Abraham, Werner & Leisiö, Larisa
(eds) 2006 Passivization and Typology. Form and Function [Typological Studies in Languages 68]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aissen, Judith
1999Markedness and subject choice in optimality theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17: 673–711. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Amritavalli, Raghavachari
2003Syntactic categories and lexical argument structure. Language in India 3(5 May).Google Scholar
Bach, Emond
1982Purpose clauses and control. In The Nature of Syntactic Representation , P. Jacobson & G. K. Pullum (eds), 35–57. Reidel: Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C
1988 Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. C
1996On the structural position of themes and goals. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon , J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (eds), 7–34. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C
2003 Lexical Categories: Verbs, Nouns, and Adjectives . [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 102]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark C., Johnson, Kyle & Roberts, Ian
1989Passive arguments raised. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 219–251.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh
2003Topics in the syntax of the modern indo-aryan languages. Causativization. [URL]
Bhatt, Rajesh & Embick, David
2003Causative derivations in Hindi. [URL] (2003)
Bodding, Paul O
1929/1952 A Santal Grammar for the Beginners . Benagaria: Santal Mission of the Northern Churches.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005 Structuring Sense II: The Normal Course of Events . Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Greg N
1984Thematic roles and their role in semantic interpretation. Linguistics 22(3): 259–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax . Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1982 Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding . Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995 The Minimalist Program . Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics . Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud , R. Freidin, C. P. Otero & M. L. Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge: MIT Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, Eve V. & Clark, Herbert H
1979When nouns surface as verbs. Language 55: 767–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chris
2005A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8(2): 81–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deeney, John. J
1975 Ho Grammar and Vocabulary . Chaibasa: Xavier Ho Publications.Google Scholar
Deo, Ashwini & Sharma, Devyani
2007Typological variation in the ergative morphology of Indo-Aryan Languages. Linguistic Typology 10(3): 369–418.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna M. & Williams, Edwin
1987 On the Definition of Word . Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E
1991Subcategorization and syntax-based theta-role assignment. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 369–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane
1979Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10: 279–326.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel J
1993On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The View from Building, 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger , K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds), 53–109. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building, 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger , K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1994Some key features of distributed morphology. In Papers on Phonology and Morphology [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21], A. Carnie, H. Harley & T. Bures (eds), 275–288. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
1995 Sase bizarre: The structure of Japanese causatives. In Proceedings of the Canadian Linguistic Society Meeting , P. Koskinen (ed.), 221–232. Toronto: Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
2009Compounding in distributive morphology. In Oxford Handbook of Compounding . Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Stekauer (eds), 129–144. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2011A minimalist approach to argument structure. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism , C. Boeckx (ed.), 427–448. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James
1999Accomplishments. In Proceedings of the Nanzan GLOW, the Second GLOW Meeting in Asia , Mamoru Saito et al.. (eds), 131–139. Nagoya, Japan: Nanzan University.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika
1998 Semantics in Generative Grammar . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Johann
1903 Mundari Grammar . Calcutta: Bengal Secretariat Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1972 Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jaeggli, Osvaldo. A
1986Passives. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 587–622.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna
1980 Aspects of Hindi-grammar . New Delhi: Manohar Publications.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward
1976Towards a universal definition of subject. In Subject and topic , C. N. Li (ed.), 303–333. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1996Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon , Johann Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds), 109–137. Kluwer Dordrecht: Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladusaw, William. A. & Dowty, David. R
1988Towards a nongrammatical account of thematic role. Syntax and Semantics 21: 61–73. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993 English Verb Classes and Alternations . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995 Unaccusativity at the Syntax-Semantics Interface . Cambridge. Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mahajan, Anoop
1994Active passives. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , R. Aronovich, W. Byrne, S. Preuss & M. Senturia (eds). Stanford University: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Manetta, Emily
2011 Peripheries in Kashmiri and Hindi-Urdu . The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1997No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium [Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 4:2], A. Dimitriadis et al.. (eds), 201–225.
Martin, Roger & Uriagereka, Juan
2000Some possible foundations of the minimalist program. In Step by Step: Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik , R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (eds), 1–29. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McGregor, R. S
1972 Outline of Hindi Grammar . Oxford: Clarendon Press, Gloucestershire Ltd.Google Scholar
Mohanan, Tara
1994 Argument Structure in Hindi . Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Neukom, Lukas
2001 Santali . München: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Nishigauchi, Taisuke
1984Control and the thematic domain. Language 60: 215–250. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, John
2007Languages without nouns and verbs? An alternative to lexical classes in Kharia. In Old and New Perspectives on South Asian Languages. Grammar and Semantics , Colin P. Masica (ed.), 274–303. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.Google Scholar
Pietroski. Paul
2011Minimal semantic instructions. In The Oxford Handbook on Linguistic Minimalism , C. Boeckx (ed.), 472–498. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2002Introducing Arguments. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
2008 Introducing Arguments . Cambridge MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2008 Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Minimalist semantics. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism , C. Boeckx (ed.), 449–471. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1996Syntactic effects of lexical operations: Reflexives and unaccusatives. UiL-OTS Working Papers . Utrecht: University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
2002The theta system – An overview. In Theoretical Linguistics 28, W. Sternfeld (ed.), 229–290. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya & Siloni, Tal
2003Thematic arity operations and parametric variations. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics . University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
2005The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 389–437. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reuland, Eric J., Bhattacharya, Tanmoy & Spathas, Giorgos
2007 Argument Structure . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Hindi Verb Classes and their Argument Structure Alternations . Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Richa & Nandaraj, Amom
2011 The Status of Causee in Manipuri and Hindi . Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1987 The Representation of Implicit and Dethematized Subjects . Foris: Dordrecht. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Smuggling, Affectness and Argument Structure Alternation . University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sahoo, Anindita
2011Oriya passives with ditransitives. In Papers from Lancaster University Postgraduate Conference in Linguistics and Language Teaching 2010 , K. Kaufhold, S. McCulloch & A. Tominc (eds), 173–200. UK: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
in progress. Passives in Some South Asian languages: A Comparative Study. PhD Dissertation, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi.
Selkirk, Elizabeth O
1982 The Syntax of Words [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 7]. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Srivastava, Vishwajit N
1969A Structural Study of Hindi Phrases. PhD Dissertation, Agra University.Google Scholar
Travis, Lisa
1994Event phrase structure and a theory of functional categories. In Proceedings of the 1994 Annual Conference of Canadian Linguistics Society , P. Koskinen (ed.), 559–570.
Williams, Edwin
1981On the notions of “lexically related” and “head of a word”. Liinguistic Inquriy 12.2: 245–274.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria L
1989 Levels of Representation in the Lexicon and in the Syntax . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar