Article published in:
The Lexicon–Syntax Interface: Perspectives from South Asian languages
Edited by Pritha Chandra and Richa Srishti
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 209] 2014
► pp. 101–126

Lexical semantics of transitivizer light verbs in Telugu

| EFL University, Hyderabad
This chapter examines the kind of meanings that are uniformly present in constructions involving a certain variety of light verbs in Telugu – transitivizer light verbs. The meanings that are inalienably constant in both the verbal and the nominal complex predicates that these light verbs form are the inceptual meanings- emphasizing inception or beginning, continuation or progression, and completion or end-point. These meanings can be directly linked, and are further evidence for the structural decomposition of the verbal domain into 3 subparts or projections (First Phase Syntax, Ramchand 2008) – initP (introduces causation), procP (specifies the process), and resP (gives the result state). The semantics of this structure is what I claim gives rise to the inceptual meanings.
Keywords: argument structure, complex predicates, Dravidian, first phase syntax, inceptual meaning
Published online: 25 March 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.209.05bal
References
Basu, D
2005 Complex predicates in Bangla: An event based analysis. MA thesis, Purdue University.Google Scholar
Basu, Debarchana & Wilbur, Ronnie
2010 Complex predicates in Bangla: An event based analysis. In Rice Working Papers in Linguistics 2.Google Scholar
Butt, M
1995 The Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu [Dissertations in Linguistics]. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam
2003 The light verb jungle. In Proceedings of the Workshop on MultiVerb Constructions , Trondheim Summer School . Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
2010 The light verb jungle: Still hacking away. In Complex Predicates in Cross-Linguistic Perspective, M. Amberber, M. Harvey & B. Baker (eds), 48–78. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam & Lahiri, Aditi
2012 Diachronic pertinacity of light verbs. Lingua. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caha, Pavel
2007 The Superset Principle. Ms, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Probal
1977 The internal grammar of compound verbs in Bangla. Indian Linguistics 38(3): 68–85.Google Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio
2007 The exhaustive lexicalisation principle. Tromsø Working Papers on Language and Linguistics: Nordlyd 34(2).Google Scholar
Hook, P.E
1974 The Compound Verb in Hindi. Ann Arbor MI: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Hook, Peter E
1993 Aspectogenesis and the compound verb in Indo-Aryan. In Complex Predicates in South Asian Languages. M. K. Verma (ed.), 97–113. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1965 A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Vol. VI: Morphology. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Karimi-Doostan, Gholamhossein
1997 Light Verb Constructions in Persian. PhD dissertation, University of Essex.Google Scholar
Krishnamurti, Bhadriraju
1992 Complex predicates in Telugu. Bulletin of The Deccan College Post Graduate and Research Institute: S.M. Katre Felicitation Volume , 314–327.
Lazard, Gilbert
1957 Grammaire du Persan contemporain. Paris: Librairie C. Klincksiek.Google Scholar
Mohanan, Tara
1994 Argument Structure in Hindi. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Pantcheva, Marina
2008 Noun preverbs in Persian complex predicates. Tromsø Working Papers on Language and Linguistics: Nordlyd 35: 19–45.Google Scholar
2010 First phase syntax of Persian complex predicates: Argument structure and telicity. Journal of South Asian Linguistics 2(1): 51–70.Google Scholar
Paul, Soma
2003 Composition of compound verbs in Bangla. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Multi-Verb Constructions , Trondheim Summer School, D. Beermann & L. Hellan (eds). Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
2004 An HPSG Account of Bangla Compound Verbs with LKB Implementation. PhD dissertation, University of Hyderabad.Google Scholar
Rajyarama, Koppaka
1998 A Study on Some Aspects Of Derivational Morphology in Telugu with Special Reference to Compounds. PhD dissertation, University of Hyderabad.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian C
2008 Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 On structural meaning vs. conceptual meaning in verb semantics. In Workshop on Complex Predicates in South Asian Languages. Hyderabad: EFLU.Google Scholar
Rao, Uma Maheshwar G
1994 On certain aspects of word formation process: A case study of Telugu. In National Seminar on Word formation in Indian Languages. Hyderabad: Osmania University.Google Scholar
Rappaport-Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
2010 Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In Syntax, Lexical Semantics, and Event Structure, ch. 2, M. Rappaport-Hovav, E. Doron & I. Sichel (eds), 21–37. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Starke, Michal
2009 Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. In Nordlyd 36(1): Special issue on Nanosyntax, P. Svenonius, G. Ramchand, M. Starke & T. Taraldsen (eds). Tromsø: Universitetet i Tromsø.Google Scholar
Starke, M
2011 Towards an Elegant Solution to Language Variation: Variation Reduces to the Size of Lexically Stored Trees. Ms. University of Tromsø. <ling​.auf​.net​/lingBuzz​/001183>Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
2007 Lexical typologies. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 3, ch. 2, T. Shopen (ed.), 66–168. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verma, Manindra K
. (ed.) 1993 Complex Predicates in South Asian Languages. New Delhi: Manohar.Google Scholar