Article published in:The Lexicon–Syntax Interface: Perspectives from South Asian languages
Edited by Pritha Chandra and Richa Srishti
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 209] 2014
► pp. 197–216
Not so high
The case of causee in South Asian Languages (Hindi, Kashmiri, Punjabi & Manipuri)
The status of the causee argument in Hindi and other South Asian Languages has been contentious in recent literature as it takes instrumental/ablatice Case marker and hence, seems comparable to an instrumental/ablative adjunct (-se in Hindi, athi in Kashmiri, tõ: in Punjabi, and -n∂ in Manipuri). The question is whether the instrumental/ablative Case marker appearing on the causee and on an instrumental adjunct should only receive an analysis of accidental homophony or a more principled analysis between the two is possible? The paper here argues that such an analysis is certainly possible. The instrumental/ablative is an adjunct and in causatives, the causee argument is merged to the Voice head as its specifier (the position involving -se/athi/tõ:/n∂ being valued as a structural, rather than a lexical, Case). It is further argued that though, this position is υP-external, i.e. ‘high’ but not ‘high’ enough to count as the subject.
Keywords: ?P-external, Argument/Adjunct, Causative alternation, Voice
Published online: 25 March 2014
Balachandran, Lakshmi Bai
Bhatt, Rajesh & Embick, David
V. 1997. Infringement of morphological and syntactic operations’ pairing in “Second causative” formation. Paper presented at the XVIII South Asian Language Analysis Round Table , JNU, New Delhi.
Rosen, Carol & Wali, Kashi
Cited by 1 other publications
Arkadiev, Peter M. & Jurgis Pakerys
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.