Article published in:
The Lexicon–Syntax Interface: Perspectives from South Asian languages
Edited by Pritha Chandra and Richa Srishti
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 209] 2014
► pp. 197–216

Not so high

The case of causee in South Asian Languages (Hindi, Kashmiri, Punjabi & Manipuri)

| Central Institute of Indian Languages Mysore
The status of the causee argument in Hindi and other South Asian Languages has been contentious in recent literature as it takes instrumental/ablatice Case marker and hence, seems comparable to an instrumental/ablative adjunct (-se in Hindi, athi in Kashmiri, tõ: in Punjabi, and -n∂ in Manipuri). The question is whether the instrumental/ablative Case marker appearing on the causee and on an instrumental adjunct should only receive an analysis of accidental homophony or a more principled analysis between the two is possible? The paper here argues that such an analysis is certainly possible. The instrumental/ablative is an adjunct and in causatives, the causee argument is merged to the Voice head as its specifier (the position involving -se/athi/tõ:/n∂ being valued as a structural, rather than a lexical, Case). It is further argued that though, this position is υP-external, i.e. ‘high’ but not ‘high’ enough to count as the subject.
Keywords: ?P-external, Argument/Adjunct, Causative alternation, Voice
Published online: 25 March 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.209.09sri
References
Ahmed, Tafseer
2009 Spatial Expressions and Case in South Asian Languages. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
Balachandran, Lakshmi Bai
1970 A Case Grammar of Hindi with Special Reference to Causative Sentences. Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Embick, David
2004 Causative Derivations in Hindi. Ms. University of Texas & University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris
2005 A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8(2): 81–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davison, Alice
1982 On the form and meaning of Hindi passive sentences. Lingua 58(1–2): 149–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1989a Verb agreement in Proto-Tibeto-Burman verb. Bulletin of the School of Oriental & African Studies 52(2): 315–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David
1991 Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67(3): 547–619.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David
1997 Voice and the Interfaces of Syntax. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Hook, Peter
1979 Hindi structures: Intermediate level. Michigan Papers on South and South East Asia 16, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna
1980  Aspects of Hindi Syntax . Manohar Publications: Delhi.Google Scholar
Khokholova, Ludmila
V. 1997. Infringement of morphological and syntactic operations’ pairing in “Second causative” formation. Paper presented at the XVIII South Asian Language Analysis Round Table , JNU, New Delhi.
Kidwai, Ayesha
1995 Binding and Free Word Order Phenomenon in Hindi-Urdu. PhD thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru University.Google Scholar
2000  XP-Adjunction in Universal Grammar: Scrambling and Binding in Hindi-Urdu . New York: OUP.Google Scholar
Mahajan, Anoop
1990  On the A/A-Bar Distinction and Movement Thoery . PhD Thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Manning, Christopher
1994  Argument Structure as a Locus for Binding Theory . Ms. University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin P
1991  The Indo-Aryan Languages . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mohanan, Tara
1994  Argument Structure in Hindi . Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Nikolaeva, Irina & Tolskaya, Maria
2001  A Grammar of Udihe . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pandharipande, Rajeshwari
1981 Transitivity in Hindi. 11(2): 161–179. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2002 Introducing Arguments. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2008  Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Licensing of instrumental case in Hindi/Urdu in Causatives. Working Papers on Language & Linguistics 38. Tromsø University: Septentrio Acdemic Publishing.Google Scholar
Richa
2003 Possessive Reflexives and Pronominals in Hindi-Urdu and Indian sign Language: A Minimalist Analysis. M.Phil. Dissertation, Jawaharlal Nehru University.Google Scholar
2008 Unaccusativity, Unergativity and the Causative Alternation in Hindi: A Minimalist Analysis. Doctoral Dissertation, J.N.U. Delhi.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2008 Smuggling, Affectness and Argument Structure Alternation. Ms. University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rosen, Carol & Wali, Kashi
1989 Twin passives, inversion, and multistratalism in Marathi. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7(1): 1–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saksena, Anuradha
1982  Topics in the Analysis of Causatives with an Account of Hindi Paradigms . Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Yeon, Jaehoon
2003  Korean Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning . London: Saffron Books.Google Scholar
Whorf, Benjamin Lee
1945 Grammatical categories. Language 21(1): 1–11. Linguistic Society of America. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Arkadiev, Peter M. & Jurgis Pakerys
2015.  In Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic, 2], ► pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.