Cover not available
Part of
The Lexicon–Syntax Interface: Perspectives from South Asian languages
Edited by Pritha Chandra and Richa Srishti
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 209] 2014
► pp. 217–244

Agreement and verb types in Kutchi Gujarati

 | Universität Tübingen
 | Universität Tübingen
This paper explores the φ-agreement system in Kutchi Gujarati, focusing on canonical transitive cases and on non-canonical cases involving psych predicates and modal auxiliaries. Based on the agreement pattern in the future perfect, we argue that φ-agreement in Kutchi Gujarati involves two agreement probes, a higher (number/person) probe in T, and a lower (gender/number) probe in the v/Asp area. After showing how such a system derives the split-ergative agreement pattern in canonical transitive constructions (Section 2), we extend our analysis to other types of verbs, specifically to psych predicates (such as gam ‘like’) and to constructions that involve modal auxiliaries (such as par ‘have to’), both of which require a dative-marked subject (Section 3).
Keywords: future perfect, Gujarati, Marwari, modals, psych predicates, split-ergativity
Published online: 25 March 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.209.10gro
References (44)
Baker, Mark. 2008. The Syntax of Agreement and Concord . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2005. Long distance agreement in Hindi-Urdu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 757–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Walkow, Martin. 2013. Locating agreement in grammar: An argument from agreement in conjunctions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31: 951–1013. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bjorkman, Bronwyn. 2011. BE-ing Default: the Morphosyntax of Auxiliaries. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan. 1993. On ergativity and ergative unergatives. In Papers on Case and Agreement II. MITWPL volume 19, Colin Phillips (ed.), 45–88. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
. 2008. Where’s Phi? agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In Phi-Theory: Phi Features across Interfaces and Modules , Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds), 295–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan & Wurmbrand, Susanne. 2003. Long distance object agreement, restructuring and anti-reconstruction. In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society Annual Meeting 33 (NELS 33) , Makoto Kadowaki & Shigeto Kawahara (eds), 67–86. Amherst: University of Massachusetts, GLSA.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam & Ahmed, Tafseer. 2011. The redevelopment of Indo-Aryan case systems from a lexical semantic perspective. Morphology 21: 545–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butt, Miriam. 2012. From spatial to subject marker. Handout for Workshop on Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects .
. 1995. The Structure of Complex Predicates in Urdu . Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Cardona, George. 1965. A Gujarati Reference Grammar . Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Chandra, Pritha. 2007. (Dis)Agree: Movement and Agreement Reconsidered. PhD Dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures . The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language , Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures , Adriana Belletti (ed.), 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. “Restructuring” and functional structure. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures , Adriana Belletti (ed.), 132–191. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coon, Jessica & Preminger, Omer. 2011. Towards a unified account of person splits. In Proceedings of 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 29) , 310–318. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Coon, Jessica. 2013. TAM split ergativity, Part I. Language and Linguistics Compass 7: 171–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta. 2011. Agreement, Ergativity, and the Parameterization of Probes. Ms. Leiden University.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen & Velupillai, Viveka. 2011. The past tense. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online , Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, Chapter 66, [URL] ([URL]).Google Scholar
Desai, Usha & Ramsay-Brijball, Malini. 2004. Tracing Gujarati language development philologically and sociolinguistically. Alternation 11: 308–324.Google Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. 1994. Ergativity . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Patrick & Patel-Grosz, Pritty. 2013. Structural Asymmetries. The View from Kutchi Gujarati and Marwari. Handout for GLOW 36 , Lund University.Google Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Izvorski, Roumyana. 2003. Observations about the form and meaning of the Perfect. In Perfect Explorations , Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 153–204. Berlin: de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna. 2006. Hindi . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laka, Itziar. 1993. Unergatives that assign ergative, unaccusatives that assign accusative. In Papers on Case and Agreement I. MITWPL volume 18, Jonathan Bobaljik & Colin Phillips (eds), 149–172. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
. 2000. Thetablind case: Burzio’s generalisation and its image in the mirror. In Arguments and Case: Explaning Burzio’s Generalisation , Eric Reuland (ed.), 103–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magier, David S. 1983a. Topics in the Grammar of Marwari. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
. 1983b. Components of Ergativity in Marwari. CLS 19. Papers from the 19th Regional Meeting , 244–255. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Mistry, P. J. 1997. Objecthood and specificity in Gujarati. In The Life of Language: Papers in Linguistics in Honor of William Bright , J. Hill, P. J. Mistry & L. Campbell (eds), 425–442. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2004. Subjecthood of non-nominatives in Gujarati. In Non-nominative Subjects , vol. 2, Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 1–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1991. Zero Syntax: Vol. 2: Infinitives. Ms., MIT.Google Scholar
. 1996. Zero Syntax . Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian. 2008a. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008b. Lexical Items in Complex Predications: Selection as Underassociation. Nordlyd, Tromsø Working Papers in Linguistics .Google Scholar
. 2012. Indexical vs. Anaphoric Modals. Ms. University of Tromsø/CASTL.Google Scholar
Rezac, Milan. 2003. The fine structure of cyclic agree. Syntax 6: 156–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008a. Phi-agree and theta-related case. In Phi Theory: Phi-Features across Modules and Interfaces , Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Bejar (eds), 83–129. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2008b. The syntax of eccentric agreement: The person case constraint and absolutive displacement in Basque. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 61–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tessitori, Luigi. 1913. On the origin of the dative and genitive postpositions in Gujarati and Marwari. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland 45: 553–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1914–16. Notes on the grammar of the Old Western Rajasthani with special reference to Apabhramsa and to Gujarati and Marwari. The Indian Antiquary volumes 43–45.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen. 2006. Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 111–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2001. Infinitives: Restructuring and Clause Structure . Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2004. Two types of restructuring – lexical vs. functional. Lingua 114: 991–1014. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (24)

Cited by 24 other publications

Baker, Mark C.
2022. Agree without agreement in object clitic doubling constructions. In Angles of Object Agreement, ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Bhattacharya, Tanmoy & Jyoti Sharma
2022. A morphosyntactic account of agreement in Mara. In Angles of Object Agreement, ► pp. 84 ff. DOI logo
Carstens, Vicki
2022. Addressee agreement and clitic raising in Kiunguja Swahili. In Angles of Object Agreement, ► pp. 56 ff. DOI logo
De Cia, Simone
2022. Topicality and object–past participle agreement in Friulian. In Angles of Object Agreement, ► pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
Devos, Maud & Rozenn Guérois
2022. Micro-variation in object marking in North Mozambican Bantu languages. In Angles of Object Agreement, ► pp. 164 ff. DOI logo
Gračanin-Yuksek, Martina
2022. Agreement in Turkish relative clauses. In Angles of Object Agreement, ► pp. 340 ff. DOI logo
Irimia, Monica Alexandrina & Eva-Maria Roessler
2022. DOM and other object-marking strategies. In Angles of Object Agreement, ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Milković, Marina & Ronnie Wilbur
2022. Agreement marking in Croatian Sign Language. In Angles of Object Agreement, ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Murugesan, Gurujegan
2022. Deriving the anaphor–agreement effect and the violations of it. Syntax 25:1 ► pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Andrew Nevins, Anita Peti-Stantic, Mark de Vos & Jana Willer-Gold
2022. Angles of Object Agreement, DOI logo
Overfelt, Jason
2022. Asymmetric symmetry in Tigrinya object marking. In Angles of Object Agreement, ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Riedel, Kristina
2022. Object marking in Bantu. In Angles of Object Agreement, ► pp. 110 ff. DOI logo
Sonnenhauser, Barbara & Paul Widmer
2022. Object clause indexing in Albanian. In Angles of Object Agreement, ► pp. 327 ff. DOI logo
Steinbach, Markus
2022. Differential object marking in sign languages?. In Angles of Object Agreement, ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Willer-Gold, Jana
2022. Introduction. In Angles of Object Agreement, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Willer-Gold, Jana & Anita Peti-Stantić
2022. A multiple-agreement approach to auxiliary clitic drop in Croatian. In Angles of Object Agreement, ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo
Irimia, Monica Alexandrina
2021. Oblique differential object marking and types of nominals. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 66:4 ► pp. 486 ff. DOI logo
Rudnev, Pavel
2020. Agreeing Adpositions in Avar and The Directionality-of-Valuation Debate. Linguistic Inquiry 51:4 ► pp. 829 ff. DOI logo
Manzini, M. Rita & Ludovico Franco
2019. ‘Agreement of structural obliques’parameter. Lingvisticae Investigationes 42:1 ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Norris, Mark
2017. Description and analyses of nominal concord (Pt II). Language and Linguistics Compass 11:11 DOI logo
Keine, Stefan, Trupti Nisar & Rajesh Bhatt
2014. Complete and defective agreement in Kutchi. Linguistic Variation 14:2 ► pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. General preface. In Angles of Object Agreement, ► pp. vii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. List of abbreviations. In Angles of Object Agreement, ► pp. viii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Copyright Page. In Angles of Object Agreement, ► pp. iv ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.