Cover not available
Part of
Cross-linguistic Investigations of Nominalization Patterns
Edited by Ileana Paul
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 210] 2014
► pp. 189–214

Patterns of nominalization in Blackfoot

 | UBC
Patterns of nominalization in Blackfoot are surveyed. It is demonstrated that two of these patterns behave like nouns while two others only partially behave like nouns. Degrees of nominality are analyzed within the assumption that there is a universal syntactic spine, a hierarchically organized set of categories, which are not intrinsically specified for nominality or verbality. They are category-neutral. Different nominalization patterns (and degrees of nominality) reduce to different ways of introducing the nominalizer: it may be introduced by a dedicated morphological marker (nominalization via m-marking), it may be introduced as a head (nominalization via complementation), or it may be introduced as part of the higher head (nominalization via selection). Category-neutral functional projections as well as functors are independently attested.
Published online: 18 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.210.08wil
References (36)
References
Abney, Steven. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Armoskaite, Solveiga. 2011. The Destiny of Roots in Blackfoot and Lithuanian. PhD dissertation, UBC.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borsley, Robert D. & Kornfilt, Jaklin. 2000. Mixed extended projections. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 32: The Nature and Function of Syntactic Categories, Robert D. Borsley (ed.), 101-131. New York NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cook, Claire. 2008. The Syntax and Semantics of Clause-typing in Plains Cree. PhD dissertation, UBC.Google Scholar
Davis, Henry & Matthewson, Lisa. 1999. On the functional determination of lexical categories. Revue Québécoise de Linguistique 27: 30-69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Wiltschko, Martina. In press. Micro-variation in agreement, clause-typing and finiteness: Comparative evidence from Plains Cree & Blackfoot. In Proceedings of Algonquian Conference .
. 2010. Interface syntax. Ms, UBC.Google Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida & Matthewson, Lisa. 1995. On the Universality of syntactic categories. In Proceedings of NELS 25, 79-94.Google Scholar
Frantz, Donald & Russell, Lena. 1995. Blackfoot Dictionary of Stems, Roots and Affixes. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Frantz, Donald. 1991. Blackfoot Grammar. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
. 2009. Blackfoot Grammar, 2nd edn. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Goddard, Ives 2007. Reconstruction and history of the independent indicative. In Papers of the Thirty-Eighth Algonquian Conference , H. Christophe Wolfart (ed.), 207-271. Winnepeg: University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane. 1991/2005. Extended projection. In Words and Structure, Jane Grimshaw (ed.) 1-73. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 2000. Locality and extended projection. In Lexical Specification and Insertion [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 197], Coopmans, Peter, Martin Everart & Jane Grimshaw (eds) 115-133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jelinek, Eloise & Demers, Richard. 1994. Predicates and pronominal arguments in Straits Salish. Language 70: 697-737 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johansson, Sara. 2011. Relative clauses, or clause-sized nominalizations? A consideration of Blackfoot. Talk presented at the relative clause workshop, University of Victoria.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Daniel. 2009. Austronesian nominalism and its consequences: A Tagalog case study. Theoretical Linguistics 35(1): 1–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kinkade, M. Dale. 1983. Salish evidence against the universality of "noun" and "verb". Lingua 60: 25-40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin & Whitman, John. 2011. Afterword: Nominalizations in syntactic theory. Lingua 121: 1297-1313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire. 1998. Multifunctionality and variation among grammars: The case of the determiner in Haitian and in Fongbe. Journal of Pidgins and Creole Languages 13: 93-150. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium [University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2)], Alexis Dimitriadis, Laura Siegel, Clarissa Surek- Clark & Alexander Williams (eds), 201-225. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Marvin, Tatjana. 2002. Topics in the Stress and Syntax of Words. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Morgan, Lawrence. 1991. A Description of the Kutenai Language. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Oxford, Will. 2012 Theoretical implications of Proto-Algonquian verb inflection. Talk presented at the 44th annual Algonquian Conference. University of Chicago, October.
Panagiotidis, Phoevos & Grohmann, Kleanthes. 2009. Mixed projections: Categorial switches and prolific domains. Linguistic Analysis 35(1–4): 141–161.Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2010. Functional heads, Agree, and labels. Ms, University of Cyprus.Google Scholar
. 2011. Categorial features and categorizers. Linguistic Review 28: 325-346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pentland, D. 1999. The morphology of the Algonquian Independent Order. In Papers of the 34th Algonquian Conference , David H. Pentland (ed.), 222-266. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1990. Functional prepositions. In Unity in Diversity, Harm Pinkster & Inge Genee (eds), 229-242. Dordrecht: Foris.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth & Rosen, Sara 2010. Possessors as arguments: Evidence from Blackfoot paper presented at the 42nd Algonquian Conference, MUN, October 2010 and LSA, Pittsburgh, January 2011. [URL]
Schueler, David. 2005. Extended projection, categorization, and the English morpheme -ing. Proceedings of WECOL 2004, 342-356.Google Scholar
Thompson, James. 2012. Syntactic Nominalization in Halkomelem Salish. PhD dissertation, UBC.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina 2006. ‘C-selection is unique.’ In Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 2006), Donald Baumer, David Montero & Michael Scanlon (eds), 444-452. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
. In preparation. The Structure of Universal Categories. Towards a Formal Typology. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logo