Cover not available
Part of
Adjectives in Germanic and Romance
Edited by Petra Sleeman, Freek Van de Velde and Harry Perridon
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 212] 2014
► pp. 113–146

The resilient nature of adjectival inflection in Dutch

| Research Foundation Flanders FWO | University of Leuven
| University of Amsterdam
The rich Germanic adjectival inflection dramatically eroded in the history of Dutch as part of a general process of deflection. At present, Dutch is left with what appears to be a vestigial structure: an alternation between an inflected form in schwa and an uninflected form, the distribution of which is semantically ill-motivated. As a consequence, one might expect that the inflection is moribund and that Dutch will follow its West Germanic neighbor English in doing away with this dysfunctional piece of morphology. This is not what is happening, though. Dutch adjectival inflection is remarkably resilient. In this article it is argued that this resilience is due to refunctionalization. The inflectional schwa is turning into a transparent marker of attributive adjectives, and comes to function as a watershed between the modification and determination zone in the noun phrase. This account explains many erratic inflectional patterns in non-standard language. The whole reanalysis is a long-term process, which has not yet come to completion, but the existence of the process is supported by a detailed investigation of corpus data.
Published online: 18 February 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.212.05vel
References (76)
References
Berteloot, Amand. 2005. “… eens wisen subtiils menschen …” Over de verbuiging van het adjectief in het Middelnederlands. In Gehugdic Sis Samnungun Thinro. Liber amicorum Willy Pijnenburg, Aad Quak & Tannke Schoonheim (eds), 23–37. Groningen: Gopher Publishers.Google Scholar
Blom, Alied. 1994. Het ondoorgrondelijk bijvoeglijk naamwoord. Forum der Letteren 55: 81–94.Google Scholar
Blom, Elma, Polišenská, Daniela & Weerman, Fred. 2006. Effects of age on the acquisition of agreement inflection. Morphology 16: 313–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Articles, adjectives and age of onset: The acquisition of Dutch grammatical gender. Second Language Research 24: 297–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Boumans, Louis. 2002. Meertaligheid op de Marokkaanse elektronische prikborden. Levende Talen 3: 11–21.Google Scholar
Braunmüller, Kurt. 2008. Observations on the origins of definiteness in ancient Germanic. Sprachwissenschaft 33: 351–371.Google Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans & Keizer, Evelien. 2012. Syntax of Dutch, Vol. I: Nouns and Noun Phrases. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Coene, Martine & Yves D’hulst. 2003. Introduction: The syntax and semantics of noun phrases. In From DP to NP, Vol I: The Syntax and Semantics of Noun Phrases [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 56], Martine Coene & Yves D’hulst (eds), 1–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Schutter, Georges. 1998. The noun phrase in Dutch. Leuvense Bijdragen – Leuven Contributions in Linguistics and Philology 86: 309–356.Google Scholar
. 1999. Het achterveld in de nominale constituent in het Nederlands. Leuvense Bijdragen – Leuven Contributions in Linguistics and Philology 88: 323–354.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik. 2012. The course of actualization. Language 88(3): 601–633. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diepeveen, Janneke & Van de Velde, Freek. 2010. Adverbial morphology: How Dutch and German are moving away from English. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 22: 381–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2007. Noun phrase structure. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II: Complex Constructions, 2nd edn., Timothy Shopen (ed.), 151–205. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duinhoven, Anton M. 1988. Middelnederlandse Syntaxis, Synchroon en Diachroon, Deel 1: De Naamwoordgroep. Leiden: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Fudeman, Kirsten. 2004. Adjectival agreement vs. adverbal inflection in Balanta. Lingua 114: 105–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke & Van de Velde, Freek. 2011. A corpus-based account of the development of English such and Dutch zulk: Identification, intensification and (inter)subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 22(4): 765–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, Anna. 1998. Testing the boundaries of grammaticalization. In The Limits of Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 37], Anna Giacalone Ramat & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 227–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grondelaers, Stefan, Deygers, Katrien, Van Aken, Hilde, van den Heede, Vicky & Speelman, Dirk. 2000. Het CONDIV-corpus geschreven Nederlands. Nederlandse Taalkunde 5(4): 356–363.Google Scholar
Haeseryn, Walter, Romijn, Kirsten, Geerts, Guido, de Rooij, Jaap & van den Toorn, Maarten C. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, nd edn. Groningen: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2010. The behaviour-before-coding principle in syntactic change. In Mélanges Denis Creissels, Franck Floricic (ed.), 493–506. Paris: Presses de L’École Normale Supérieure.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 2003. On degrammaticalization. In Historical Linguistics 2001 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 237], Barry J. Blake & Kate Burridge (eds), 163–179, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K. (eds). 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Brian D. 1992. Diachronic explanation: Putting the speaker back into the picture. In Explanations in Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 84], Garry W. Davis & Gregory K. Iverson (eds), 123–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1990. How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Journal of Linguistics 26: 79–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lupyan, Gary & Dale, Rick. 2010. Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE 5(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McFadden, Thomas. 2004. How much of the Germanic strong adjective inflection is pronominal? <[URL]>
Narrog, Heiko. 2007. Exaptation, grammaticalization, and reanalysis. California Linguistic Notes 32(1). <[URL]>Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2002. The final stages of grammaticalization: Affixhood and beyond. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds), 45–65. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Old Dutch dictionary. <[URL]>
Payne, John & Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Nouns and noun phrases. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 423–523. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plevoets, Koen, Speelman, Dirk & Geeraerts, Dirk. 2009. De verspreiding van de -e(n)-uitgang in attributieve positie. Taal en Tongval Thematic issue 22: 112–143.Google Scholar
Polišenská, Daniela. 2010. Dutch Children’s Acquisition of Verbal and Adjectival Inflection. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Quak, Aad & van der Horst, Joop. 2002. Inleiding Oudnederlands. Leuven:Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph & Wrenn, Charles L. 1969 [1955]. An Old English Grammar. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Raidt, Edith H. 1968. Geskiedenis van die Byvoeglike Verbuiging in Nederlands en Afrikaans. Kaapstad: Nasou Beperk.Google Scholar
Ranheimsæter, Harald. 1945. Flektierte und unflektierte Nominativformen im Deutschen Adjektivsystem. Oslo: J.G. Tanum.Google Scholar
Royen, Gerlach. 1948. Buigingsverschijnselen in het Nederlands, Vol 2. Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgeversmaatschappij.Google Scholar
. 1953. Buigingsverschijnselen in het Nederlands, Vol. 3(2). Amsterdam: Noord-Hollandsche Uitgeversmaatschappij.Google Scholar
Ruette, Tom & Van de Velde, Freek. Forthcoming. Moroccorp: Tien miljoen woorden uit twee Marokkaans-Nederlandse chatkanalen. Lexikos. DOI logo
Scott, Gary-John. 2002. Stacked adjectival modification and the structure of nominal phrases. In Functional Structure in DP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 1, Guglielmo Cinque (ed.), 91–120. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Simon, Horst. 2010. “Exaptation” in der Sprachwandeltheorie. Eine Begriffspräzisierung. In Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung. Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung, Rüdiger Harnisch (ed.), 41–57. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Smith, John-Charles. 2006. How to do things without junk: the refunctionalization of a pronominal subsystem between Latin and Romance. In New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics, Vol. II: Phonetics, Phonology and Dialectology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 276], Jean-Pierre Y. Montreuil (ed.), 183–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Change and continuity in form-function relationships. In The Cambridge History of the Romance languages, Martin Maiden, John-Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds), 268–317. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Speelman, Dirk. 1997. Abundantia Verborum. A Corpus-tool for Carrying out Corpus Based Linguistic Case Studies. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1992. Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. I: The Beginnings to 1066, Richard M. Hogg (ed.), 168–289. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2010. Contact and sociolinguistic typology. In The Handbook of Language Contact, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 299–319. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Gorden H. 1998. The Lexicogrammar of Adjectives: A Systemic Functional Approach to Lexis. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Tummers, José. 2005. Het Naakt(e) Adjectief: Een Kwantitatief-empirisch Onderzoek naar de Buigingsvariatie bij Neutra in het Nederlands. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
é, Speelman, Dirk & Geeraerts, Dirk. 2004. Quantifying semantic effects. The impact of lexical collocations on the inflectional variation of Dutch attributive adjectives. In Le poids des mots, Gérald Purnelle, Cédrick Fairon & Anne Dister (eds), 1079–1088. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
é, Speelman, Dirk & Geeraerts, Dirk. 2005. Inflectional variation in Belgian and Netherlandic Dutch: A usage-based account of the adjectival inflection. In Perspectives on Variation. Sociolinguistic, Historical, Comparative, Nicole Delbecque, Johan van der Auwera & Dirk Geeraerts (eds), 93–110. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Bree, Cor. 1987. Historische Grammatica van het Nederlands. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Van der Lubbe, Henricus F.A. 1958. Woordvolgorde in het Nederlands: Een Synchrone Structurele Beschouwing. Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek. 2006. Herhaalde exaptatie. Een diachrone analyse van de Germaanse adjectiefflexie. In Nederlands tussen Duits en Engels, Matthias Hüning, Arie Verhagen, Ulrike Vogl & Ton van der Wouden (eds), 47–69. Leiden: Stichting Neerlandistiek Leiden.Google Scholar
. 2009. De Nominale Constituent. Structuur en Geschiedenis. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. The emergence of the determiner in the Dutch NP. Linguistics 48(2): 263–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Anaphoric adjectives becoming determiners. A corpus-based account. In The Noun Phrase in Romance and Germanic. Structure, Variation, and Change [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 171], Petra Sleeman & Harry Perridon (eds), 241–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van de Velde, Freek & van der Horst, Joop. 2013. Homoplasy in diachronic grammar. Language Sciences 36: 66–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Dijk, Johannes A. 1862. De verbuiging van enkele telwoorden. De Taalgids 4: 65–70.Google Scholar
Van Leuvenste?n, Arjan & Dekker, M.C.H. 1990. Adnominale flexie en genusmarkering in 16de-eeuws Brugs. Leuvense Bijdragen – Leuven Contributions in Linguistics and Philology 79: 257–278.Google Scholar
Van Loon, Jozef. 1988. Zwakke, sterke en pronominale adjectiefflexie in het Oudnederlands. Naamkunde 20: 37–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Marle, Jaap. 1995. On the fate of adjectival declension in overseas Dutch (with some notes on the history of Dutch). In Historical Linguistics 1993 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 124], Hennig Andersen (ed.), 283–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Roey, Jacques. 1974. A Contrastive Description of English and Dutch Noun Phrases. Brussel: AIMAV.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel. 1995. Exaptation and grammaticalization. In Historical Linguistics 1993 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 124], Hennig Andersen (ed.), 433–445. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weerman, Fred. 2003. Een mooie verhaal. Veranderingen in uitgangen. In Waar gaat het Nederlands naartoe? Panorama van een Taal, Jan Stroop (ed.), 249–260. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.Google Scholar
. 2005. Adverbia als adjectiva. In A.D. 2005. Taalkundige Artikelen voor Ad Welschen, Els Elffers & Fred Weerman (eds). Amsterdam: Faculteit der Geesteswetenschappen University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
. 2006. It’s the economy, stupid! Een vergelijkende blik op men en man. In Nederlands tussen Duits en Engels, Matthias Hüning, Arie Verhagen, Ulrike Vogl & Ton van der Wouden (eds), 19–47. Leiden: Stichting Neerlandistiek Leiden.Google Scholar
Weerman, Fred, Bisschop, Jannetje & Punt, Laura. 2006. L1 and L2 acquisition of Dutch adjectival inflexion. ACLC Working Papers 1: 5–36.Google Scholar
Willis, David 2010. Degrammaticalization and obsolescent morphology: evidence from Slavonic. In Grammaticalization: Current Views and Issues [Studies in Language Companion Series 119], Ekaterini Stathi, Elke Gehweiler & Ekkehard König (eds), 151–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wischer, Ilse. 2010. Sekretion und Exaptation als Mechanismen in der Wortbildung und Grammatik. In Prozesse sprachlicher Verstärkung. Typen formaler Resegmentierung und semantischer Remotivierung, Rüdiger Harnisch (ed.), 29–40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
WNT: Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal. 2003. ’s-Gravenhage: Sdu. Cd-rom version of: Matthias de Vries & Lammert te Winkel (1882–1998). Woordenboek der Nederlandsche Taal. ’s-Gravenhage: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Ziemann, Hendrikje, Fred Weerman & Esther Ruigendijk. 2011. Nederlands later geleerd: Gebruik van lidwoorden en flexie van bijvoeglijke naamwoorden door Duitstalige kinderen en volwassenen. Internationale Neerlandistiek 49(3): 183–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Appendix: Corpora
TwNC: Twente News Corpus, see: <[URL]>
CONDIV: see Grondelaers et al. (2000).Google Scholar
MOROCCORP: see Ruette & Van de Velde (Forthcoming).
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Lipták, Anikó & Rint Sybesma
2023. Missing and not found. Linguistic Variation DOI logo
Hummel, Martin
2018. Baseline elaboration and echo-sounding at the adjective adverb interface. Cognitive Linguistics 29:3 ► pp. 407 ff. DOI logo
Van de Velde, Freek
2018. Iterated Exaptation. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4], ► pp. 519 ff. DOI logo
Norde, Muriel & Graeme Trousdale
2016. Exaptation from the perspective of construction morphology. In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 336], ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Van de Velde, Freek & Muriel Norde
2016. Exaptation. In Exaptation and Language Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 336], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.