Article published in:
Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Languages
Edited by Kristin Bech and Kristine Gunn Eide
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 213] 2014
► pp. 1752


Asher, Nicholas & Lascarides, Alex
1998 Bridging. Journal of Semantics 15(1): 83–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, Leila
2005Genericity from a cross-linguistic perspective. Linguistics 43(2): 275–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Gillian & Yule, George
1983 Discourse Analysis [Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
1998Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6: 339–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Herbert H.
1975 Bridging. In Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, R.C. Schank & B.L. Nash-Webber (eds). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Eckho, Hanne M.
2011 Old Russian Possessive Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fretheim, Thorstein & Borthen, Kaja
2007Resolving the reference of zero and pronominal possessives in Norwegian discourse. Working Paper ISK 4:43–71.Google Scholar
Guéron, Jacqueline
2006Generic sentences and bare plurals. In Non-definiteness and Plurality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 95], Svetlana Vogeleer & Liliane Tasmowski (eds), 219–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette, Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron
1993Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69: 274–307. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haug, Dag & Jøhndal, Marius L.
2008Creating a parallel treebank of the old indoeuropean bible translations. In Language Resources and Evaluation , Marrakech, Morocco.Google Scholar
Haug, Dag, Jøhndal, Marius L., Eckhoff, Hanne, Welo, Eirik, Hertzenberg, Mari & Müth, Angelika
2009Computational and linguistic issues in designing a syntactically annotated parallel corpus of indo-european languages. Traitement Automatique des Langues 50: 17–45.Google Scholar
Haviland, Susan & Clark, Herbert
1974What’s new? Aquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13: 512–521. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heim, Irene
1982On the Semantics of Defnite and Indefnite Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Hertzenberg, Mari
2012Third Person Reference in the Itinerarum Egeriae: With a Particular View to Demonstratives, Null Pronouns and Bare NPs. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
von Heusinger, Klaus
2011Specifcity. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning , Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds), 1024–1057 Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans
1981A theory of truth and semantic representation. In Formal Methods in the Study of Language , Part 1, Vol. 135, Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo Janssen & Martin Stokhof (eds), 277–322. Amsterdam: Mathematical Centre. Reprinted in Jeroen Groenendijk, Theo Janssen & Martin Stokhof (eds) 1984  Truth, Interpretation, and Information; Selected Papers from the Third Amsterdam Colloquium , 1–41. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans & Reyle, Uwe
1993 From Discourse to Logic . Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Karttunen, Lauri
1976Discourse referents. In Syntax and Semantics, 2: Notes From the Linguistic Underground , James McCawley (ed.), 363–385. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
, Pelletier, Francis Jeffry, Carlson, Gregory N., ter Meulen, Alice, Chierchia, Gennaro & Link, Godehard 1995Genericity: An introduction. In The Generic Book , Gregory N. Carlson & Francis Jeffry Pelletier (eds), 1–124. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Rebecka
2013Defniteness in Old Church Slavonic. MA thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Lyons, Christopher
1999 Defniteness . Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Napoli, Maria
2009Aspects of defniteness in Greek. Studies in Language 33(3): 569–611. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nissim, Malvina, Dingare, Shipra, Carletta, Jean & Steedman, Mark
2004An annotation scheme for information status in dialogue. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation , Granada, Spain.Google Scholar
Riester, Arndt, Lorenz, David & Seemann, Nina
2010A recursive annotation scheme for referential information status. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation , 717–722, Valletta, Malta.Google Scholar
Ritz, Julia, Dipper, Stefanie & Michael Götze
2008Annotation of information structure: An evaluation across different types of texts. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008, 26 May - 1 June 2008 . Marrakech: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
Roberts, Craige
1989Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 12(6): 683–721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie
2006Mark-up barking up the wrong tree. Comput. Linguist . 32(4): 577–580. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Dreschler, Gea
2017.  In Word Order Change in Acquisition and Language Contact [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 243],  pp. 103 ff. Crossref logo
Haug, Dag T.
2015.  In Perspectives on Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 169],  pp. 185 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.