Testing the theory
Information structure in Old English
Various information structure (IS) distinctions have been proposed in the literature to account for differences in word order in languages both modern and historic. We use the schemes adopted by several ongoing IS annotation projects and examine their effect on object position (pre-/post-verbal) in Old English. While most of the schemes make the same major distinctions, some apparently small differences (e.g. elaborating vs. bridging inferables) have relatively large effects. Although these distinctions are frequently difficult to make, the effort to operationalise them is useful, since failing to include them in the annotation can produce misleading results. Other distinctions (e.g. different types of ‘old’ information) show virtually no effect, supporting the wide-spread view that they constitute a single category.
References
Arnold, Jennifer E., Losongco, Anthony, Wasow, Thomas & Ginstrom, Ryan
2000 Heaviness vs. newness: The effects of structural complexity and discourse status on constituent ordering.
Language
76(1): 28–55.


Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian
Bies, Ann Elizabeth
1996 Syntax and Discourse Factors in Early New High German: Evidence for Verb-Final Word Order. MA dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

Birner, Betty J
2006 Inferential relations and noncanonical word order. In
Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning. Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn
[Studies in Language Companion Series 80],
Betty J. Birner &
Gregory Ward (eds), 31–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.


Calhoun, Sasha, Nissim, Malvina, Steedman, Mark & Brenier, Jason
2005 A framework for annotating information structure in discourse. In
Proceedings of the Workshop on Frontiers in Corpus Annotation II: Pie in the Sky
, 45–52. Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Computational Linguistics.


Du Bois, John W
1980 Beyond definiteness: the trace of identity in discourse. In
The Pear Stories. Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production
,
Wallace L. Chafe (ed.), 203–274. Norwood NJ: Ablex.

Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron
1993 Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse.
Language
69(2): 274–307.


Haug, Dag T.T
2011 Guidelines for annotation of givenness: The PROIEL project.
[URL]
Haviland, Susan E. & Clark, Herbert H
1974 What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
13: 512–521.
[URL]
Karttunen, Lauri
1976 Discourse referents. In
Syntax and Semantics 7. Notes from the Linguistic Underground
,
James D. McCawley (ed.), 363–385. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Lambrecht, Knud
1996
Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents
. Cambridge: CUP.

Los, Bettelou & Komen, Erwin R
2012 The Pentaset: Annotating information state primitives. Ms, Radboud University Nijmegen.

Nissim, Malvina, Dingare, Shipra, Carletta, Jean & Steedman, Mark
2004 An annotation scheme for information status in dialogue. In
Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC)
, 1023–1026, Lisbon, Portugal.

Pintzuk, Susan
1996 Cliticization in Old English. In
Approaching Second. Second Position Clitics and Related Phenomena
,
Aaron L. Halpern &
Arnold M. Zwicky (eds), 366–400. Stanford, CA: CSLI.

Pintzuk, Susan
1999
Phrase Structures in Competition. Variation and Change in Old English Word Order
. New York, NY: Garland.

Pintzuk, Susan & Taylor, Ann
2006 The loss of OV order in the history of English. In
The Handbook of the History of English,
Ans van Kemenade &
Bettelou Los (eds), 249–278. Oxford: Blackwell.


Prince, Ellen F
1981 Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In
Radical Pragmatics
,
Peter Cole (ed.), 223–255. New York, NY: Academic Press.

Riester, Arndt, Lorenz, David & Seemann, Nina
2010 A recursive annotation scheme for referential information status. In
Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC)
, 717–722, Valetta, Malta.

Taylor, Ann & Pintzuk, Susan
2011 The interaction of syntactic change and information status effects in the change from OV to VO in English.
Catalan Journal of Linguistics
10: 71–94.

Taylor, Ann & Pintzuk, Susan
2012a The effect of information structure on object position in Old English: A pilot study. In
Information Structure and Syntactic Change,
María José López Couso,
Bettelou Los &
Anneli Meurman-Solin (eds), 71–94. Oxford: OUP.


Taylor, Ann & Pintzuk, Susan
2012b Rethinking the OV/VO alternation in Old English: The effect of complexity, grammatical weight and information structure. In
The Oxford Handbook of the History of English,
Terttu Nevalainen &
Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 835–845. Oxford: OUP.


Taylor, Ann & van der Wurff, Wim
(eds)
2005 Special issue on aspects of OV and VO order in the history of English.
English Language and Linguistics
9(1): 1–4.


Wallenberg, Joel C
2009 Antisymmetry and the Conservation of C-Command: Scrambling and Phrase Structure in Synchronic and Diachronic Perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

Wasow, Thomas
1997 Remarks on grammatical weight.
Language Variation and Change
9: 81–105.


Cited by
Cited by 8 other publications
Chrambach, Susanne
Dreschler, Gea
STRUIK, TARA & GERT-JAN SCHOENMAKERS
2022.
When information structure exploits syntax: The relation between the loss of VO and scrambling in Dutch.
Journal of Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff.

Struik, Tara & Ans van Kemenade
2022.
Information structure and OV word order in Old and Middle English: a phase-based approach.
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 25:1
► pp. 79 ff.

Taylor, Ann & Susan Pintzuk
Tiemann, Juliane
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.