Cover not available
Part of
Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Languages
Edited by Kristin Bech and Kristine Gunn Eide
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 213] 2014
► pp. 81–110

Quantifying information structure change in English

| Radboud University Nijmegen
| Radboud University Nijmegen
| Radboud University Nijmegen
ORCID logo | University of Edinburgh
The verb-second constraint in Old and Middle English made available a special clause-initial position that could host more than just the subject. Los (2009) suggests that this position served a discourse-linking function, expressed by, for instance, an adverbial. This allowed the subject to be reserved for human “protagonists”. It stands to reason that the loss of verb-second in the fifteenth century entailed a decrease in the prevalence of discourse-linking clause-initial adverbials. The subject took over the discourse-linking function, thus extending its functional load. This article tests four hypotheses concerning the changing functional load of the English subject. Our corpus consists of syntactically-parsed texts that have been enriched with referential information, allowing us to quantify the changes affecting the subject.
Published online: 7 May 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.213.04kom
References (35)
References
Bech, Kristin. 2001. Word Order Patterns in Old and Middle English: A Syntactic and Pragmatic Study. PhD dissertation, University of Bergen. [URL]
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English . Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Carroll, Mary & Lambert, Monique. 2005. Reorganizing principles of information structure in advanced L2s. In Educating for Advanced Foreign Language Capacities: Constructs, Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment , Heidi Byrnes, Heather Weger-Guntharp & Katherine Sprang (eds), 54–73. Georgetown DC: University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Mary, Rossdeutscher, Antje, Lambert, Monique & von Stutterheim, Christiane. 2008. Subordination in narratives and macrostructural planning: a comparative point of view. In ‘Subordination’ versus ‘Coordination’ in Sentence and Text: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 98], Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds), 161–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Mary, von Stutterheim, Christiane & Nuese, Ralph. 2004. The language and thought debate: A psycholinguistic approach. In Multidisciplinary Approaches to Language Production , Thomas Pechmann & Christopher Habel (eds), 183–218. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Downing, Angela & Locke, Philip. 2002. A University Course in English Grammar . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga, van Kemenade, Ans, Koopman, Willem & van der Wurff, Wim. 2000. The Syntax of Early English . Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fleischman, Susan. 1990. Tense and Narrativity: From Medieval Performance to Modern Fiction . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Garnham, Alan. 2001. Mental Models and the Interpretation of Anaphora . Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar . London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Haug, Dag T.T., Jøhndal, Marius L., Eckhoff, Hanne M., Welo, Eirik, Hertzenberg, Mari J.B. & Müth, Angelika. 2009. Computational and linguistic issues in designing a syntactically annotated parallel corpus of Indo-European languages. TAL 50(2): 17–45. [URL]
Hinterhölzl, Ronald & van Kemenade, Ans. 2012. The interaction between syntax, information structure and prosody in word order change. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English , Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Terttu Nevalainen (eds), 803–821. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Ronald & Petrova, Svetlana. 2010. From V1 to V2 in West Germanic. Lingua 120(2): 315–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irmer, Matthias. 2011. Bridging Inferences Constraining and Resolving Underspecification in Discourse Interpretation . Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1983. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness . Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans. 1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English . Dordrecht: Foris.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Rethinking the loss of V2. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English , Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Terttu Nevalainen (eds), 822–834. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Milicev, Tanja. 2012. Syntax and discourse in Old English and Middle English word order. In Grammatical Change: Origins, Nature, Outcomes . Dianne Jonas, Andrew Garrett & John Whitman (eds), 239–254. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans, Milicev, Tanja & Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. The balance between syntax and discourse in Old English. In English Historical Linguistics 2006, vol. I : Syntax and Morphology , Maurizio Gotti, Martina Dossena & Richard Dury (eds), 3–22. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Westergaard, Marit. 2012. Syntax and information structure: verb second variation in Middle English. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English , Bettelou Los, María José López-Couso & Anneli Meurman-Solin (eds), 87–118. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Komen, Erwin R. 2011. Cesax: Coreference Editor for Syntactically Annotated XML Corpora . Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen, [URL] > (7 November 2011).
. 2012. Coreferenced corpora for information structure research. In Outposts of Historical Corpus Linguistics: From the Helsinki Corpus to a Proliferation of Resources [Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 10], Jukka Tyrkkö, Matti Kilpiö, Terttu Nevalainen & Matti Rissanen (eds). Helsinki: Research Unit for Variation, Contacts, and Change in English, [URL] (24 November 2012).
. 2013. Finding Focus: A Study of the Historical Development of Focus in English. PhD dissertation, Radboud University NijmegenGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2007. Basic notions of information structure. In Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure 06, Caroline Féry, Gisbert Fanselow & Manfred Krifka (eds), 1–50.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony. 1989. Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Diertani, Ariel. 2004. Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English . [URL]
. 2010. Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English . [URL].
Kroch, Anthony & Taylor, Ann. 2000. Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English , 2nd edn. [URL]
Los, Bettelou. 2009. The consequences of the loss of verb-second in English: information structure and syntax in interaction. English Language and Linguistics 13(1): 97–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The loss of verb-second and the switch from bounded to unbounded systems. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English , Anneli Meurman-Solin, María José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 21–46. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Los, Bettelou & Dreschler, Gea. 2012. The loss of local anchoring: from adverbial local anchors to permissive subjects. In Rethinking Approaches to the History of English , Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 859–872. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Radical Pragmatics , Peter Cole (ed), 223–255. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann, Warner, Athony, Pintzuk, Susan & Beths, Frank. 2003. The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose . [URL]
Ward, Gregory, Birner, Betty & Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. Information packaging. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language , Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 1363–1448. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwaan, Rolf A. & Radvansky, Gabriel A. 1998. Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin 123(2): 162–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

LOS, BETTELOU, GEA DRESCHLER, ANS VAN KEMENADE, ERWIN KOMEN & STEFANO CORETTA
2023. The decline of local anchoring: a quantitative investigation. English Language and Linguistics 27:2 ► pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
Los, Bettelou
2018. Chapter 1. “Permissive” subjects and the decline of adverbial linking in the history of English. In Explorations in English Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 198], ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
Dreschler, Gea
2017. Chapter 6. The information status of late subjects in passive main clauses in Old English. In Word Order Change in Acquisition and Language Contact [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 243], ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Bech, Kristin & George Walkden
2016. English is (still) a West Germanic language. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39:1 ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.