Cover not available
Part of
Information Structure and Syntactic Change in Germanic and Romance Languages
Edited by Kristin Bech and Kristine Gunn Eide
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 213] 2014
► pp. 203–232

Word order variation in late Middle English

The effect of information structure and audience design

 | Eötvös Loránd University
ORCID logo | UiT The Arctic University of Norway
This paper discusses the considerable word order variation that existed at the end of the Middle English period, by studying four prose texts written by the same author, John Capgrave. The data are investigated in terms of information structure, and we identify the effect of three different grammars, a local East Anglian variety with syntactically motivated V2 (CP-V2) due to Scandinavian influence, a new leveled standard variety without verb movement (Non-V2), as well as the mixed grammar from Old English where word order is based on information structure (IS-V2). The texts display variation that to some extent mirrors the diachronic development, and we show that the intended readership plays a significant role for the grammars chosen across the four texts.
Published online: 7 May 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.213.08eit
References (38)
References
Baugh, Albert C. & Cable, Thomas. 1993. A History of the English Language . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bech, Kristin. 2001. Word Order Patterns in Old and Middle English: A Syntactic and Pragmatic Study. PhD dissertation, University of Bergen. <[URL]>
. 2008. Verb types and word order in Old and Middle English. In English Historical Linguistics 2006, Vol. I: Syntax and Morphology [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 295], Maurizio Gotti, Marina Dossena & Richard Dury (eds), 49–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans. 1977. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. Ms, University of Amsterdam. Published 1981 in Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 20: 1–78; republished 1983 in Werner Abraham (ed.), On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania, 47–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins; republished 1989 in Hans den Besten, Studies in Germanic Syntax, 14–100. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Birner, Betty. 2006. Inferential relations and non-canonical word order. In Drawing the Boundaries of Meaning: Neo-Gricean Studies in Pragmatics and Semantics in Honor of Laurence R. Horn, Betty J. Birner & Gregory L. Ward (eds), 31–52. Amsterdam: Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Subject and Topic , Charles N. Li (ed.), 27–55. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Eitler, Tamás. 2005. Some sociolectal and communicative aspects of word order variation and change in Late Middle English. In Historical Linguistics: Selected Papers from the 16th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Copenhagen, 11–15 August, 2003 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 257], Michael Fortescue, Eva Skafte Jensen, Jens Erik Mogensen & Lene Schøsler (eds), 87–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2006a. Audience rules: Interspeaker accommodation and intraspeaker syntactic variation in Late Middle English. In Medieval English and its Heritage: Structure, Meaning and Mechanisms of Change , Nikolaus Ritt, Herbert Schendl, Christiane Dalton-Puffer & Dieter Kastovsky (eds), 221–236. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. 2006b. Some Sociolectal, Dialectal and Communicative Aspects of Word Order Variation in Late Middle English. PhD dissertation, Eötvös Loránd University.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph & Faarlund, Jan Terje (forthcoming). English as North Germanic: Modern English is Modern Norse.
Galves, Charlotte. 2002. Syntax and style: clitic-placement in Padre António Vieira. Santa Barbara Portuguese Studies 6: 387–403.Google Scholar
Ganuza, Natalia. 2008. Syntactic Variation in the Swedish of Subject-verb Order in Declaratives, Questions and Subordinate Clauses. PhD dissertation, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
. 2010. Subject-Verb order variation in the Swedish of young people. In Multilingual Urban Scandinavia: New Linguistic Practices, Pia Quist & Bente A. Svendsen (eds), 31–48. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Haeberli, Eric. 2002a. Inflectional morphology and the loss of verb-second in English. In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, David Lightfoot (ed.), 88–106. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002b. Observations on the loss of verb second in the history of English. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 53], C. Jan-Wouter Zwart & Werner Abraham (eds), 245–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helsinki Corpus/The Helsinki Corpus of English Texts . (1991). Department of Modern Languages, University of Helsinki. Compiled by Matti Rissanen (project leader), Merja Kytö (project secretary); Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, Matti Kilpiö (Old English); Saara Nevanlinna, Irma Taavitsainen (Middle English); Terttu Nevalainen, Helena Raumolin-Brunberg (Early Modern English).
van Kemenade, Ans. 1987. Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English . Dordrecht: Foris.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. V2 and embedded topicalisation in Old and Middle English. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change , Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 326–352. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2009. Discourse relations and word order change. In Information Structure and Language Change , Roland Hinterhölzl & Svetlana Petrova (eds), 191–20. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Los, Bettelou. 2006. Discourse adverbs and clausal syntax in Old and Middle English. In The Handbook of the History of English, Ans van Kemenade & Bettelou Los (eds), 224–248. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Westergaard, Marit. 2012. Syntax and information structure: verb-second variation in Middle English. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English, Anneli Meurman Solin, María José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 87–118. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Taylor, Ann. 1997. Verb movement in Old and Middle English: dialect variation and language contact. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 297–325. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2000. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English 2. Philadelphia PA: Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1992. Phonology and morphology. In The Cambridge History of the English Language , Vol. 2, Norman Blake (ed.), 23–155. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David. 1999. The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change and Evolution . Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lucas, Peter J. (ed). 1983. John Capgrave’s Abbreuiacion of Cronicles [Early English Text Society Original Series 285]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Munro, John J. (ed.). 2001. John Capgrave’s Lives of St Augustine and St Gilbert of Sempringham, and a Sermon [Early English Text Society Original Series 140]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Opsahl, Toril & Nistov, Ingvild. 2010. On some structural aspects of Norwegian spoken among adolescents in multilingual settings in Oslo. In Multilingual Urban Scandinavia: New Linguistic Practices, Pia Quist & Bente A. Svendsen (eds), 49–64. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan. 1999. Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order . New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Radical Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 223–255. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1992. The ZPG Letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. In Discourse Description: Diverse Analyses of a Fund-Raising Text [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16], William C. Mann & Sandra Thompson (eds), 195–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages . /Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Warner, Anthony. 2007. Parameters of variation between verb-subject and subject-verb order in late Middle English. English Language and Linguistics 11(1): 81–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, Marit R. 2005. Optional word order in wh-questions in two Norwegian dialects: a diachronic analysis of synchronic variation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28(2): 269–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Westergaard, Marit. 2008. Acquisition and change: On the robustness of the triggering experience for word order cues. Lingua 118(12): 1841–1863. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. Microvariation as diachrony: A view from acquisition. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 12(1): 49–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009c. The Acquisition of Word Order: Micro-cues, Information Structure and Economy [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 145]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Heggelund, Øystein Imerslund
2020. Intertextual Variation in Old and Middle English. English Studies 101:3 ► pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
Taylor, Ann
2020. Treebanks in Historical Syntax. Annual Review of Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Westergaard, Marit
2017. Chapter 3. Word order and verb movement in Norwegian wh-questions. In Word Order Change in Acquisition and Language Contact [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 243], ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Roeper, Tom W.
2016. Multiple Grammars and the Logic of Learnability in Second Language Acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology 7 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.