Cover not available
Part of
Advances in the Syntax of DPs: Structure, agreement, and case
Edited by Anna Bondaruk, Gréte Dalmi and Alexander Grosu
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 217] 2014
► pp. 1–12

Introduction

Published online: 14 October 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.217.01gro
References
Abney, Stephen
1987 The English Noun Phrase and Its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner
2007 Discourse binding. DP and pronouns in German, Dutch, and English. In Nominal Determination. Typology, Context Constraint, and Historical Emergence [Studies in Language Companion Series 89], Elisabeth Stark, Elisabeth Leiss & Werner Abraham (eds), 21–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Wilder, Christopher
(eds) 1998 Possessors, Predicates and Movement in the Determiner Phrase [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 22]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Law, Paul, Meinunger, André & Wilder, Christopher
2000 The Syntax of Relative Clauses [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 32]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis
2014 Multiple Determiners and the Structure of DPs [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 211]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babyonishev, Maria
1997 The possessive construction in Russian. A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 5(2): 193–234.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina
1999 Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000a The raising analysis of relative clauses: A reply to Borsley. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 123–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000b Some issues in the syntax of relative determiners. In The Syntax of Relative Clauses, edited by Artemis Alexiadou, Paul Law & Chris Wilder, 53–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borsley, Robert D
1997 Relative clauses and the theory of phrase structure. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 629–647.Google Scholar
Bouchard, Denis
2002 Adjectives, Number and Interfaces: Why Languages Vary. Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
2009 A solution to the conceptual problem of cartography. In Alternatives to Cartography, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed.), 245–274. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1988 On si constructions and the theory of Arb . Linguistic Inquiry 19(4): 521–581.Google Scholar
(ed.) 2002 Functional Structure in DP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 1. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville
1979 The agreement hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics 15: 203–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cornilescu. Alexandra
1995 Rumanian genitive constructions. In Advances in Rumanian [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 10], Guglielmo Cinque & Giuliana Giusti (eds), 1–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delsing, Lars-Olof
1993 The Internal Structure of Noun Phrases in the Scandinavian Languages. Lund: Universty of Lund.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen
2000 (In)definiteness spread: From Romanian genitives to Hebrew construct state nominals. In Comparative Studies in Romanian Syntax, Virginia Motapanyane (ed.), 177–226. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen & Giurgea, Ion
2013 A Reference Grammar of Romanian, Vol. 1: The Noun Phrase [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 207]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elbourne, Paul
1999 Some correlations between semantic plurality and quantifier scope. In NELS 29: Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society , Pius Tamanji, Masako Hirotani & Nancy Hall (eds), 81–92. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara
2007 Subjects, topics, and the interpretation of referential pro. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 691–734. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallmann, Peter
1990, Kategoriell Komplexe Wortformen: Das Zusammenwirken von Morphologie und Syntax bei der Flexion von Nomen und Adjektiv. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alssandra & Longobardi, Giuseppe
1991 The Syntax of Noun Phrases. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Giusti, Giuliana
1997 The categorical status of determiners. In New Comparative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 95–123. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
1995 Heads and modifiers among determiners: Evidence from Rumanian. In Advances in Roumanian Linguistics, edited by Gugliemo Cinque & Giuliana Giusti, 103–125. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 The functional structure of noun phrases. A bare phrase structure approach. In Functional Structure in DP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 1, Guglielmo Cinque (ed.), 54–91. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2008 Agreement and concord in nominal expressions. In The Bantu-Romance Connection. A Comparative Investigation of Verbal Agreement, DPs, and Information Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 131], 201-237, Cecil De Cat & Katherine Demuth (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosu, Alexander
1988 On the distribution of genitive phrases in Rumanian. Linguistics 26: 931-949. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Three Studies in Locality and Case. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 A unified theory of ‘standard’ and ‘transparent’ free relatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 247–331 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert
1987 Die Struktur der Deutschen NP. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 7: 32 – 59.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Ritter, Elizabeth
2002 Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3): 482–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Roger
1979 The Pseudo-cleft Construction in English. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2010a Null subject parameters. In Null Subjects and Parameters in a Minimalist Perspective, Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds), 88–125. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2010b The null generic subject pronoun in Finnish: A case of incorporation in T. In Null Subjects and Parameters in a Minimalist Perspective, Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds), 200-231. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert
2001 Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Pauline
1995 On the quantificational force of English free relatives. In Quantification in Natural Languages,Vol.2, Emmon Bach, Elinor Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara Partee (eds), 451– 486. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kajita, Masaru
1977 Towards a dynamic model of syntax. Studies in English Linguistics 5: 44–66.Google Scholar
Katzir, Roni
2011 Morphosemantic mismatches, structural economy, and licensing. Linguistic Inquiry 42: 45–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok
2004 Hybrid agreement in English. Linguistics 42(6): 1105–1128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, Idan
2003 Movement out of control. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 471– 498. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Two routes of control: Evidence from case transmission in Russian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 877–924. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mallen, Enrique
1997a A minimalist approach to concord in noun phrases. Theoretical Linguistics 23: 49–77. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997b Full feature specification and negative lexicalization in Spanish. Groninger Arbeiten zur Gerministischen Linguistik 40: 209–227.Google Scholar
2002 On the distribution of restrictive and nonrestrictive adjectives in Germanic and Romance. In New Insights in Germanic III, edited by James F. Lee, Kimberly L. Geeslin, & J. Clancy Clements, 177-210. >Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Moltmann, Friederike
2006 Generic one, arbitrary PRO, and the first person. Natural Language Semantics 14: 257–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Generalizing detached self-reference and the semantics of generic one . Mind and Language 25(4): 440–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Two kinds of first person-oriented content. Synthese 184(2): 157–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moro, Andrea
1997 The Raising of Predicates. Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nakau, Minoru
1971 The grammar of the pseudo-free relative pronoun what . English Linguistics 6: 2–47.Google Scholar
Norris, Mark, Mikkelsen, Line & Hankamer, Jorge
2013 Licensing trouble. Linguistic Inquiry 45(4).Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya
2001 On the Nature of Intra-clausal Relations. PhD dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
2007 Copular Sentences in Russian. A Theory of Intra-clausal Relations. New York NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
2012 Russian case morphology and the syntactic categories. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
Pollard, Carl & Sag, Ivan A
1994 Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reeve, Matthew
2010 Clefts. PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk
1998 Trees and scions, science and trees. Chomsky 70th Birthday Celebration Fest Webpage. [URL]Google Scholar
2000 Free relatives inside out: Transparent free relatives as grafts. In PASE Papers in Language Studies. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Polish Association for the Study of English , Bożena Rozwadowska (ed.), 223–233. Wrocław: Aksel.Google Scholar
2001 A far from simple matter: syntactic reflexes of syntax-pragmatics misalignments. In Semantics, Pragmatics and Discourse. Perspectives and Connections. A Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 90], István Kenesei & Robert M. Harnish (eds), 21–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006a Grafts follow from Merge. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 17–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006b Free relatives. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert, Henk van Riemsdijk, Rob Goedemans & Bart Hollebrandse (eds), 338–382. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Discerning default datives: Some properties of the dative case in German. In Discourse and Grammar, Günther Grewendorf & Ede T. Zimmermann, 247-287. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth
1988 A head movement approach to construct state noun phrases. Linguistics 26: 909-930. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991 Two functional categories in noun phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. In Syntax and Semantics 26. Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing, Susan Rothstein (ed.), 37-67. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 On the cartography of syntactic structures. In The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 3–17. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2006 On the form of chains. Criterial positions and chain effects. In Wh-movement: Moving on, Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97–134. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2013 Topic, focus and the cartography of clauses. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Syntax, Silvia Luraghi & Claudia Parodi (eds), 36–450. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Holmberg, Anders
2010 Introduction: Parameters in minimalist theory. In Null Subjects and Parameters in a Minimalist Perspective, Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds), 1–58. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Rutkowski, Paweł
2007 The syntactic properties and diachronic development of post-nominal adjectives in Polish. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Toronto Meeting 2006, Richard Compton, Magdalena Goledzinowska & Ulyana Savchenko (eds), 326–345. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
2009 Fraza przedimkowa w polszczyźnie. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo UW, Wydział Polonistyki.Google Scholar
2012 Is nP Part of Universal Grammar? Journal of Universal Language 13(2): 119–144.Google Scholar
Rutkowski, Paweł & Progovac, Ljiliana
2005 Classification projection in Polish and Serbian: The position and shape of classifying adjectives. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The South Carolina Meeting, Steven Franks, Frank Y. Gladney & Mila Tasseva-Kurktchieva (eds), 289–299. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Schelfhout, Carla, Peter-Arno Coppen & Nelleke Oostdijk
2004 Transparent Free Relatives. In Proceedings of ConSOLE XII 2003 , Sylvia Blaho, Luis Vicente & Mark de Vos. Patras. [URL]
Shlonsky, Ur
1988 Government and binding in Hebrew nominals. Linguistics 26(6): 951 – 976. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
2004 The syntax of person, tense and speech features. Italian Journal of Linguistics 16: 219-251. Special issue edited by Valentina Bianchi & Kenneth Safir.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór, Ármann
2009 Remarks on features. In Explorations of Phase Theory: Features and Arguments, Kleanthes Grohmann (ed.), 21–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siloni, Tal
2001 Construct states at the PF interface. Language Variation Yearbook 1: 229 – 266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Noun Phrases and Nominalizations [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory Series]. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Smith, Peter W
2013 Collective (dis)agreement: On a 3/4 pattern of British English collective NPs. In Proceedings of ConSOLE XX, Enrico Boone, Martin Kohlberger & Maartje Schulpen (eds), 229–253. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden.Google Scholar
Sternefeld, Wolfgang
2004 Feature checking, case, and agreement in German DPs. In Explorations in Nominal Inflection, Gereon Müller, Lutz Gunkel & Gisela Zifonun (eds), 269–299. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Struckmeier, Volker
2007 Attribute im Deutschen: zu ihren Eigenschaften und ihrer Position im gramatischen System. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
1994 Dependent Nexus: Subordinate Predication Structures in English and the Scandinavian Languages. PhD Diss, Santa Cruz, CA: Univeristy of California at Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
1983 The possessor that ran away. The Linguistic Review 3: 89-102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987 Functional categories in the noun phrase. In Approaches to Hungarian 2, István Kenesei, 167-189. Szeged: JATEGoogle Scholar
1994 The noun phrase. In The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian [Syntax and Semantics 27], Ferenc Kiefer & Katalin É. Kiss (eds). 1-84. New York, NY. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Trugman, Helen
2005 More puzzles about post-nominal genitives. In Possessives and Beyond: Semantics and Syntax [UMOP 29], Ji-yung Kim, Yury A. Lander & Barbara H. Partee (eds), 217-240. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
2007 Possessives within and beyond NPs. In Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics, Richard Compton, Magdalena Goledzinowska & Ulyana Savchenko (eds), 437-457. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
2008 Move versus Merge: DP-Internal Modifiers. In Elements of Slavic and Germanic Grammars: A Comparative View, Jacek Witkoś & Gisbert Fanselow (eds), 209-235. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
van de Velde, Freek
2011 Left-peripheral expansion of the English NP. English Language and Linguistics 15(2): 387-415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wechsler Stephen & Zlatić, Lara
2003 The Many Faces of Agreement. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Wilder, Christopher
1998 Transparent free relatives. ZAS Papers in Linguistics10: 191–199. Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter
2000 A head-raising analysis of relative clauses in Dutch. In The Syntax of Relative Clauses, edited by Artemis Alexiadou, Paul Law, and Chris Wilder, 349-385. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar