Article published in:

Advances in the Syntax of DPs: Structure, agreement, and case
Edited by Anna Bondaruk, Gréte Dalmi and Alexander Grosu
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 217] 2014
► pp. 95–116

Syntactic (dis)agreement is not semantic agreement

Gabi Danon

This chapter looks at two cases where subject agreement in Hebrew does not follow the morphosyntactic (phi) features of the subject: singular agreement with plural subjects, and plural agreement with singular group-denoting subjects. The paper argues that there are important differences between these two cases; in particular, it is argued that the former is not agreement but lack of agreement, whereas the latter involves (syntactic) agreement. Lack of agreement is tied to constraints on thematic role assignment. Neither case poses a real problem to current syntactic models of agreement.

Published online: 14 October 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.217.04dan

References

Bobaljik, Jonathan D.

2008 Where's phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In Phi-theory: Phi Features Across Interfaces and Modules, Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds), 295–328. Oxford: OUP.

Bock, Kathryn, Cutler, Anne, Eberhard, Kathleen M., Buttefield, Sally, Cutting, J. Cooper & Humphreys, Karin R.

2006 Number agreement in British and American English: Disagreeing to agree collectively. Language 82(1): 64–113.

Chomsky, Noam

1986 Knowledge of Language. New York NY: Praeger.

2000 Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays in Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.

Corbett, Greville G.

1979 The agreement hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics 15: 203–224.

Danon, Gabi

2011 Agreement and DP-internal feature distribution. Syntax 14(4): 297–317.

2012 Nothing to agree on: Non-agreeing subjects of copular clauses in Hebrew. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 59(1–2): 85–108.

2013 Agreement alternations with quantified nominals in Modern Hebrew. Journal of Linguistics 49(1): 55–92.

. In press. ma ze ze? nituax taxbiri šel ha-oged "ze" ba-ivrit ha-modernit (What's ze? A syntactic analysis of the copula "ze" in Modern Hebrew). To appear in Hebrew Linguistics.

Davies, Mark

2013 Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 billion words from speakers in 20 countries. <http://corpus2.byu.edu/glowbe/>

den Dikken, Marcel

2001 ‘Pluringulars’, pronouns and quirky agreement. The Linguistic Review 18: 19–41.

Doron, Edit

1983 Verbless Predicates in Hebrew. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.

Dowty, David & Jacobson, Pauline

1988 Agreement as a semantic phenomenon. In Proceedings of ESCOL , Joyce Powers & Kenneth de Jong (eds), 95–108. Columbus OH: Ohio State University, Department of Linguistics.

Elbourne, Paul

1999 Some correlations between semantic plurality and quantifier scope. In NELS 29: Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society , Pius Tamanji, Masako Hirotani & Nancy Hall (eds), 81–92. Amherst MA: GLSA.

Geist, Ljudmila

2007 Predication and equation in copular sentences: Russian vs. English. In Existence: Semantics and Syntax, Ileana Comorovski & Klaus Heusinger (eds), 79–105. Dordrecht: Springer.

Greenberg, Yael

2008 Predication and equation in Hebrew (nonpseudocleft) copular sentences. In Current Issues in Generative Hebrew Linguistics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 134], Sharon Armon-Lotem, Gabi Danon & Susan Rothstein (eds), 161–196. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Hellan, Lars

1986 The headedness of NPs in Norwegian. In Features and Projections, Pieter Muysken & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 89–122. Dordrecht: Foris.

Heller, Daphna

2002 On the relation of connectivity and specificational pseudoclefts. Natural Language Semantics 10: 243–284.

Josefsson, Gunlög

2009 Peas and pancakes: On apparent disagreement and (null) light verbs in Swedish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 32(1): 35–72.

Kathol, Andreas

1999 Agreement and the syntax-morphology interface in HPSG. In Studies in Contemporary Phrase Structure Grammar, Robert D. Levine & Georgia M. Green (eds), 223–274. Cambridge: CUP.

Kim, Jong-Bok

2004 Hybrid agreement in English. Linguistics 42(6): 1105–1128.

Landau, Idan

2013 Agreement at PF: An argument from partial control. Ms, Ben-Gurion University. <http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/001813>

Levin, Magnus

2001 Agreement With Collective Nouns in English. Lund: Lund University Press.

Markman, Vita G.

2008 Pronominal copula constructions are what? Reduced specificational pseudo-clefts. In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 366–374. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.

Partee, Barbara & Borschev, Vladimir

2008 Existential sentences, BE and GEN NEG in Russian. In Existence: Semantics and Syntax, Ileana Comorowski & Klaus von Heusinger (eds), 147–191. New York NY: Springer.

Pollard, Carl & Sag, Ivan A.

1994 Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.

Reeve, Matthew

2010 Clefts. PhD dissertation, University College London.

Reid, Wallis

1991 Verb and Noun Number in English: A Functional Explanation. London: Longman.

2011 The communicative function of English verb number. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29(4): 1087–1146.

Sauerland, Uli

2004 A team definitely. Snippets 9: 11–12.

Smith, Peter W.

2013 Collective (dis)agreement: On a 3/4 pattern of British English collective NPs. In Proceedings of ConSOLE XX , Enrico Boone, Martin Kohlberger & Maartje Schulpen (eds), 229–253. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden.

Wechsler, Stephen & Zlatić, Larisa

2000 A theory of agreement and its application to Serbo-Croatian. Language 76(4): 799–832.

2003 The Many Faces of Agreement. Stanford CA: CSLI.

Wechsler, Stephen

2011 The structure of Swedish pancakes. Paper presented at CSSP 2011, Université Paris 8.