Article published in:
Weak Referentiality
Edited by Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 219] 2014
► pp. 237264
References

References

Aguilar-Guevara, A.
2014. Weak Definites: Semantics, Lexicon and Pragmatics. Utrecht: Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalkunde Dissertation Series.Google Scholar
Aguilar-Guevara, A. & Zwarts, J.
2010Weak definites and reference to kinds. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 20, N. Li & D. Lutz (eds), 179–196. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Arsenijević, B., Boleda Torrent, G., Gehrke, B. & McNally, L.
2010Ethnic adjectives are proper adjectives. In Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society 46, T. Grinsell, A. Baker, J. Thomas, R. Baglini & J. Keane (eds),1–15. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
Baayen, R.H.
2011languageR: Data sets and functions with “Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics”. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Bally, C.
1944Linguistique générale et linguistique française. Bern: A. Francke.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M. & Bolker, B.
2012. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. <http://​CRAN​.R​-project​.org​/package​=lme4>
Bolinger, D.
1967Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication. Lingua 18: 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borik, O. & Espinal, M.
2012On definite kinds. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 41: 123–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, G.
1977Reference to Kinds in English. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Carlson, G. & Sussman, R.
2005Seemingly indefinite definites. In Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical, and Computational Perspectives, S. Kepsar & M. Reis (eds), 71–85. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G.
2010The Syntax of Adjectives. A Comparative Study. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dayal, V.
2004Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(4): 393–450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Swart, H. & Zwarts, J.
2009Less form-more meaning: Why bare singular nouns are special. Lingua 119(2): 280–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, A.
2007The internal syntactic structure of relational adjectives. Probus 19(1): 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Farkas, D. & de Swart, H.
2007Stability and variation in article choice: Generic and episodic contexts. Lingua 117(9): 1657–1676. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fradin, B. & Kerleroux, F.
2003Troubles with lexemes. In Proceedings of the Third Mediterranean Morphology Meeting, G. Booij, J. de Cesaris, S. Scalie & A. Rallis (eds), 177–196, Barcelona: Institut Universitari de Lingüística Aplicada, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Horn, L.
1984Toward a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q-based and R-based implicature. Meaning, Form, and Use in Context 42: 11–42.Google Scholar
Kamp, H.
1975Two theories about adjectives. In Formal Semantics of Natural Language, E. Keenan (ed.), 123–155. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamp, H. & Partee, B.
1995Prototype theory and compositionality. Cognition 57(2): 129–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krifka, M.
2004Bare NPs: Kind–referring, indefinites, both, or neither? In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics, Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds), 111–132. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Krifka, M., Pelletier, F.J., Carlson, G., ter Meulen, A., Chierchia, G. & Link, G.
1995Genericity: An introduction. In The Generic Book, G. Carlson & F.J. Pelletier (eds), 1–124. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Larson, R.
1998Events and modification in nominals. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 8: 145–168.Google Scholar
Levi, J.
1978The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
McNally, L. & Boleda, G.
2004Relational adjectives as properties of kinds. Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics 5: 179–196.Google Scholar
Partee, B.
1986Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers [Groningen–Amsterdam Studies in Semantics 8], J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh & M. Stokhof (eds.), 115–143. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
2003Are there privative adjectives? Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Conference on the philosophy of Terry Parsons.
2010Privative adjectives: Subsective plus coercion. In Presuppositions and Discourse: Essays Offered to Hans Kamp, R. Bäuerle, U. Reyle & T.E. Zimmermann (eds.), 273–285. Bingley: Emerald. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team
2008R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Schulpen, M.
2011Weak Definites: Modification, Non-unique Reference and Enriched Meanings. MA thesis, Utrecht University.
Schwarz, F.
2014Functional frames in the interpretation of weak nominals. In Weak Referentiality, A. Aguilar-Guevara, B. Le Bruyn & J. Zwarts (eds), 213–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, J.
2014Functional frames in the interpretation of weak nominals. In Weak Referentiality, A. Aguilar-Guevara, B. Le Bruyn & J. Zwarts (eds), 265–286. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Klein, Natalie M., Whitney M. Gegg-Harrison, Greg N. Carlson & Michael K. Tanenhaus
2013. Experimental investigations of weak definite and weak indefinite noun phrases. Cognition 128:2  pp. 187 ff. Crossref logo
Schumacher, Petra B. & Hanna Weiland
2014.  In Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 219],  pp. 365 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.