References
Abbott, B. 2004. Definiteness and indefiniteness. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, L. Horn & G. Ward (eds), 122–149. Oxford: Blackwell.
Aguilar-Guevara, A. 2014. Weak Definites. Semantics, Lexicon and Pragmatics. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
Aguilar-Guevara, A. & Schulpen, M. 2011. Understanding the meaning enrichment of weak definites. In
Proceedings of the 2011 ESSLLI student session
.
Aguilar-Guevara A. & M. Schulpen. 2014. Modified weak definites. In Weak Referentiality, A. Aguilar-Guevara, B. Le Bruyn & J. Zwarts (eds), 237–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Aguilar-Guevara, A. & J. Zwarts. 2010. Weak definites and reference to kinds. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 20, N. Li & D. Lutz (eds), 179–196. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.
Almor, A. 1999. Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review 106(4): 748–765. 

Anderson, J.E. & Holcomb, P.J. 2005. An electrophysiological investigation of the effects of coreference on word repetition and synonymy. Brain and Language 94(2): 200–216. 

Asher, N. 1993. Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 50]. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 

Baggio, G., Choma, T., van Lambalgen, M. & Hagoort, P. 2010. Coercion and compositionality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(9): 2131–2240. 

Birner, B. & Ward, G. 1994. Uniqueness, familiarity, and the definite article in English. Berkeley Linguistics Society 20: 93–102.
Burkhardt, P. 2006. Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain & Language 98(2): 159–168. 

Burkhardt, P. 2007. The P600 reflects cost of new information in discourse memory. Neuroreport 18(17): 1851–1854. 

Burkhardt, P. 2008. Two types of definites: Evidence for presupposition cost. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12, A. Grøn (ed.), 66–80. Oslo: ILOS.
Carlson, G. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Carlson, G. & Sussman, R. 2005. Seemingly indefinite definites. In Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives, S. Kepser & M. Reis (eds), 71–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 

Carlson, G., Sussman, R., Klein, N. & Tanenhaus, M. 2006. Weak definite noun phrases. In Proceedings of NELS 36, C. Davis, A.R. Eal & Y. Zabbal (eds), 179–196. Amherst MA: GLSA.
Clark, H.H. 1975. Bridging. In Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, B. Nash-Webber & R. Schank (eds), 188–193. New Haven CT: Yale University Mathematical Society Sciences Board.
Consten, M., Knees, M. & Schwarz-Friesel, M. 2007. The function of complex anaphors in texts. In Anaphors in Text [Studies in Language Companion Series 86], M. Schwarz-Friesel, M. Consten & M. Knees (eds), 81–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 

Coulson, S. & Van Petten, C. 2002. Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study. Memory and Cognition 30(6): 958–968. 

Davidson, D. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In The Logic of Decision and Action, N. Rescher (ed.), 81–95. Pittsburg PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
De Villiers, P.A. 1974. Imagery and theme in recall of connected discourse. Journal of Experimental Psychology 103(2): 263–268. 

Epstein, R. 2000. Roles and non-unique definites. Berkeley Linguistics Society 25: 122–133.
Garrod, S. & Sanford, A. 1977. Interpreting anaphoric relations: The integration of semantic information while reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16(1): 77–90. 

Grosz, B.J., Joshi, A.K. & Weinstein, S. 1995. Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 21(2): 203–225.
Gundel, J.K., Hedberg, N. & Zacharski, R. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2): 274–307. 

Hartmann, D. 1980. Über Verschmelzungen von Präposition und bestimmten Artikel. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 47(2): 160–183.
Haviland, S.E. & Clark, H.H. 1974. What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13(5): 512–521. 

Hawkins, J.A. 1978. Definiteness and Indefiniteness. Atlantic Highland NJ: Humanities Press.
Heim, I. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Hirotani, M. & Schumacher, P.B. 2011. Context and topic marking affect distinct processes during discourse comprehension in Japanese. Journal of Neurolinguistics 24(3): 276–292. 

Hung, Y.-C. & Schumacher, P.B. 2012. Topicality matters: Position-specific demands on Chinese discourse processing. Neuroscience Letters 511(2): 59–64. 

Huynh, H. & Feldt, L.S. 1970. Conditions under which mean square ratios repeated measurements designs have exact F distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Assocation 65(332): 1582–1589. 

Jasper, H.H. 1958. The ten twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 10(2): 371–375.
Kaan, E., Dallas, A.C. & Barkley, C.M. 2007. Processing bare quantifiers in discourse. Brain Research 1146: 199–209. 

King, J.W. & Kutas, M. 1995. Who did what and when? Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 7: 376–395. 

Keppel, G. 1991. Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Klein, N. 2011. Convention and Cognition: Weak Definite Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Rochester.
Kutas, M. & Federmeier, K.D. 2011. Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology 62: 621–647. 

Kutas, M., van Petten, C. & Kluender, R. 2006. Psycholinguistics electrified II: 1994-2005. In Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2nd edn, M. Traxler & M.A. Gernsbacher (eds), 659–724. New York NY: Elsevier. 

Lewis, D. 1979. Scorekeeping in a language game. In Semantics from Different Points of View, R. Bauerle, U. Egli & A. von Stechow (eds), 172–187. Berlin: Springer. 

Löbner, S. 1985. Definites. Journal of Semantics 4: 279–326. 

Maienborn, C. 2003. Die logische Form von Kopulasätzen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. 

McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R. 1986. Inferences about predictable events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 12(1): 82–91. 

Nunberg, G. 1995. Transfers of meaning. Journal of Semantics 12: 109–133. 

Pylkkänen, L. & McElree, B. 2006. The syntax-semantics interface: On-line composition of sentence meaning. In Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2nd edn, M. Traxler & M.A. Gernsbacher (eds), 537–577. New York NY: Elsevier.
Reinhart, T. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27(1): 53–94.
Rips, L.J., Shoben, E.J. & Smith, E.E. 1973. Semantic distance and verification of semantic relations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12(1): 1–20. 

Rugg, M.D. 1985. The effects of semantic priming and word repetition on event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 22(6): 642–647. 

Schumacher, P.B. & Baumann, S. 2010. Pitch accent type affects the N400 during referential processing. Neuroreport 21(9): 618–622. 

Schumacher, P.B., Consten, M. & Knees, M. 2010. Constraints on ontology changing complexation processes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes 25(6): 840–865. 

Schumacher, P.B. & Hung, Y.C. (2012). Positional influences on information packaging: Insights from topological fields in German. Journal of Memory and Language 67(2): 295–310. 

Schumacher, P.B. 2009. Definiteness marking shows late effects during discourse processing: Evidence from ERPs. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 5847: 91–106.
Schwarz, F. 2009. Two Types of Definites in Natural Language. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Schumacher, P.B. 2013. When combinatorial processing results in reconceptualization: Towards a new approach of compositionality. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 677. 

Streb, J., Rösler, F. & Hennighausen, E. 1999. Event-related responses to pronoun and proper name anaphors in parallel and nonparallel discourse structures. Brain and Language 70(2): 273–286. 

van Berkum, J.J.A., Brown, C.M. & Hagoort, P. 1999. Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language 41(2): 147–182. 

Vogel, S. 2011. Weak Definites and Generics. BA thesis, Universität Osnabrück.
von Heusinger, K. 1997. Salienz und Referenz. Der Epsilonoperator in der Semantik der Nominalphrase und anaphorischer Pronomen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
von Heusinger, K. 2006. Salience and anaphoric definite noun phrases. Acta Lingvistica Hafniensia 38: 33–53. 

Weisbrod, M., Kiefer, M., Winkler, S., Maier, S., Hill, H., Roesch-Ely, D. & Spitzer, M. 1999. Electrophysiological correlates of direct versus indirect semantic priming in normal volunteers. Cognitive Brain Research 8(3): 289–298. 
