Part of
Weak Referentiality
Edited by Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 219] 2014
► pp. 365388
Abbott, B
2004Definiteness and indefiniteness. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, L. Horn & G. Ward (eds), 122–149. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Aguilar-Guevara, A
2014Weak Definites. Semantics, Lexicon and Pragmatics. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
Aguilar-Guevara, A. & Schulpen, M
2011Understanding the meaning enrichment of weak definites. In Proceedings of the 2011 ESSLLI student session .
Aguilar-Guevara A. & M. Schulpen
2014Modified weak definites. In Weak Referentiality, A. Aguilar-Guevara, B. Le Bruyn & J. Zwarts (eds), 237–264. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aguilar-Guevara, A. & J. Zwarts
2010Weak definites and reference to kinds. In Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 20, N. Li & D. Lutz (eds), 179–196. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Almor, A
1999Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review 106(4): 748–765. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J.E. & Holcomb, P.J
2005An electrophysiological investigation of the effects of coreference on word repetition and synonymy. Brain and Language 94(2): 200–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ašić T. & F. Corblin
2014Telic definites and their prepositions: French and Serbian. In Weak Referentiality, A. Aguilar-Guevara, B. Le Bruyn & J. Zwarts (eds), 183–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Asher, N
1993Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 50]. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baggio, G., Choma, T., van Lambalgen, M. & Hagoort, P
2010Coercion and compositionality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22(9): 2131–2240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Birner, B. & Ward, G
1994Uniqueness, familiarity, and the definite article in English. Berkeley Linguistics Society 20: 93–102.Google Scholar
Burkhardt, P
2006Inferential bridging relations reveal distinct neural mechanisms: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain & Language 98(2): 159–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007The P600 reflects cost of new information in discourse memory. Neuroreport 18(17): 1851–1854. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Two types of definites: Evidence for presupposition cost. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 12, A. Grøn (ed.), 66–80. Oslo: ILOS.Google Scholar
Carlson, G
1977Reference to Kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Carlson, G. & Sussman, R
2005Seemingly indefinite definites. In Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives, S. Kepser & M. Reis (eds), 71–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carlson, G., Sussman, R., Klein, N. & Tanenhaus, M
2006Weak definite noun phrases. In Proceedings of NELS 36, C. Davis, A.R. Eal & Y. Zabbal (eds), 179–196. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Clark, H.H
1975Bridging. In Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, B. Nash-Webber & R. Schank (eds), 188–193. New Haven CT: Yale University Mathematical Society Sciences Board.Google Scholar
Consten, M., Knees, M. & Schwarz-Friesel, M
2007The function of complex anaphors in texts. In Anaphors in Text [Studies in Language Companion Series 86], M. Schwarz-Friesel, M. Consten & M. Knees (eds), 81–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S. & Van Petten, C
2002Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study. Memory and Cognition 30(6): 958–968. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D
1967The logical form of action sentences. In The Logic of Decision and Action, N. Rescher (ed.), 81–95. Pittsburg PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
De Villiers, P.A
1974Imagery and theme in recall of connected discourse. Journal of Experimental Psychology 103(2): 263–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Epstein, R
2000Roles and non-unique definites. Berkeley Linguistics Society 25: 122–133.Google Scholar
Garrod, S. & Sanford, A
1977Interpreting anaphoric relations: The integration of semantic information while reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 16(1): 77–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gernsbacher, M.A. & Robertson, R.R.W
2002The definite article the as a cue to map thematic information. In Thematics: Interdisciplinary Studies [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research], W. van Peer & M.M. Louwerse (eds), 119–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosz, B.J., Joshi, A.K. & Weinstein, S
1995Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 21(2): 203–225.Google Scholar
Gundel, J.K., Hedberg, N. & Zacharski, R
1993Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2): 274–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, D
1980Über Verschmelzungen von Präposition und bestimmten Artikel. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 47(2): 160–183.Google Scholar
Haviland, S.E. & Clark, H.H
1974What’s new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13(5): 512–521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J.A
1978Definiteness and Indefiniteness. Atlantic Highland NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Heim, I
1982The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
Hirotani, M. & Schumacher, P.B
2011Context and topic marking affect distinct processes during discourse comprehension in Japanese. Journal of Neurolinguistics 24(3): 276–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hung, Y.-C. & Schumacher, P.B
2012Topicality matters: Position-specific demands on Chinese discourse processing. Neuroscience Letters 511(2): 59–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huynh, H. & Feldt, L.S
1970Conditions under which mean square ratios repeated measurements designs have exact F distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Assocation 65(332): 1582–1589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jasper, H.H
1958The ten twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 10(2): 371–375.Google Scholar
Kaan, E., Dallas, A.C. & Barkley, C.M
2007Processing bare quantifiers in discourse. Brain Research 1146: 199–209. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
King, J.W. & Kutas, M
1995Who did what and when? Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 7: 376–395. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keppel, G
1991Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Klein, N
2011Convention and Cognition: Weak Definite Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Rochester.
Kutas, M. & Federmeier, K.D
2011Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology 62: 621–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M., van Petten, C. & Kluender, R
2006Psycholinguistics electrified II: 1994-2005. In Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2nd edn, M. Traxler & M.A. Gernsbacher (eds), 659–724. New York NY: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D
1979Scorekeeping in a language game. In Semantics from Different Points of View, R. Bauerle, U. Egli & A. von Stechow (eds), 172–187. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Löbner, S
1985Definites. Journal of Semantics 4: 279–326. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maienborn, C
2003Die logische Form von Kopulasätzen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McKoon, G. & Ratcliff, R
1986Inferences about predictable events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 12(1): 82–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, G
1995Transfers of meaning. Journal of Semantics 12: 109–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, L. & McElree, B
2006The syntax-semantics interface: On-line composition of sentence meaning. In Handbook of Psycholinguistics, 2nd edn, M. Traxler & M.A. Gernsbacher (eds), 537–577. New York NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T
1981Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27(1): 53–94.Google Scholar
Rips, L.J., Shoben, E.J. & Smith, E.E
1973Semantic distance and verification of semantic relations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 12(1): 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rugg, M.D
1985The effects of semantic priming and word repetition on event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 22(6): 642–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scholten, J. & Aguilar-Guevara, A
2010Assessing the discourse referential properties of weak definites. Linguistics in the Netherlands 27: 115–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, P.B. & Baumann, S
2010Pitch accent type affects the N400 during referential processing. Neuroreport 21(9): 618–622. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, P.B., Consten, M. & Knees, M
2010Constraints on ontology changing complexation processes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes 25(6): 840–865. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, P.B. & Hung, Y.C
(2012) Positional influences on information packaging: Insights from topological fields in German. Journal of Memory and Language 67(2): 295–310. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, P.B
2009Definiteness marking shows late effects during discourse processing: Evidence from ERPs. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 5847: 91–106.Google Scholar
2011 The hepatitis called...: Electrophysiological evidence for enriched composition. In Experimental Pragmatics/Semantics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 175], J. Meibauer & M. Steinbach (eds), 199–219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, F
2009Two Types of Definites in Natural Language. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
2014Functional frames in the interpretation of weak nominals. In Weak Referentiality, A. Aguilar-Guevara, B. Le Bruyn & J. Zwarts (eds), 213–235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, P.B
2013When combinatorial processing results in reconceptualization: Towards a new approach of compositionality. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 677. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streb, J., Rösler, F. & Hennighausen, E
1999Event-related responses to pronoun and proper name anaphors in parallel and nonparallel discourse structures. Brain and Language 70(2): 273–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Berkum, J.J.A., Brown, C.M. & Hagoort, P
1999Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language 41(2): 147–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vogel, S
2011Weak Definites and Generics. BA thesis, Universität Osnabrück.
von Heusinger, K
1997Salienz und Referenz. Der Epsilonoperator in der Semantik der Nominalphrase und anaphorischer Pronomen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
2006Salience and anaphoric definite noun phrases. Acta Lingvistica Hafniensia 38: 33–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weisbrod, M., Kiefer, M., Winkler, S., Maier, S., Hill, H., Roesch-Ely, D. & Spitzer, M
1999Electrophysiological correlates of direct versus indirect semantic priming in normal volunteers. Cognitive Brain Research 8(3): 289–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwarts, J
2014Functional frames in the interpretation of weak nominals. In Weak Referentiality, A. Aguilar-Guevara, B. Le Bruyn & J. Zwarts (eds), 265–286. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar