Cover not available
Part of
Bavarian Syntax: Contributions to the theory of syntax
Edited by Günther Grewendorf and Helmut Weiß
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 220] 2014
► pp. 113–144

Structures of ‘emphatic topicalization’ in Bavarian

| University of Stuttgart

Bavarian emphatic topicalization as in its most simple form Dees wann-e wissert! (‘If I only knew that!’) differs markedly from topicalization in Standard German which does not allow for topicalization to the left of a lexical complementizer in V-final clauses. The paper reviews some basic properties of the various forms of Bavarian emphatic topicalization and discusses two recent approaches to its structural analysis and differences to its counterparts in Standard German.

Published online: 26 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.220.05lut
References
Altmann, Hans
1981 Formen der ‘Herausstellung’ im Deutschen: Rechtsversetzung, Linksversetzung, freies Thema. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef
1983 Den wenne trief daschloche. Squib, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
1984 COMP in Bavarian Syntax. The Linguistic Review 3: 209–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Asymmetry in emphatic topicalization. In Audiatur vox sapientiae, Caroline Féry & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds), 15–47. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
2006 A note on targets of A’-movement in the left periphery of German sentences. In Form, Structure, and Grammar. A Festschrift Presented to Günther Grewendorf on Occasion of his 60th birthday, Patrick Brandt & Eric Fuß (eds), 11–128. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef & Brandner, Ellen
2008 On wh-head-movement and the doubly-filled-Comp filter. In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 87–95. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef
This volume. Syntactic and phonological properties of wh-operators and wh-movement in Bavarian. 23–51.
Bayer, Josef & Dasgupta, Probal
To appear. Emphatic topicalization and the structure of the left periphery: Evidence from German and Bangla. To appear in Syntax.
Brandt, Margareta, Reis, Marga, Rosengren, Inger & Zimmermann, Ilse
1992 Satztyp, Satzmodus und Illokution. In Satz und Illokution, Bd. 1, Inger Rosengren (ed.), 1–90. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabeth
1983 Parasitic gaps. Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 5–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Versatile parasitic gaps. In Parasitic Gaps, Peter Culicover & Paul Postal (eds), 127–145. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert
1991 Minimale Syntax [Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 32]. Groningen: University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Felix, Sascha W
1985 Parasitic gaps in German. In Erklärende Syntax des Deutschen, Werner Abraham (ed.), 173–200. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Frey, Werner
2010 A’-movement and conventional implicatures: About the grammatical encoding of emphasis in German. Lingua 120: 1416–1435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther
1988 Aspekte der deutschen Syntax. Eine Rektions- und Bindungsanalyse. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
2002 Minimalistische Syntax. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
2012 Bavarian extraction and topic drop. Handout, Workshop ‘Syntax des Bairischen’, 29.–30. Juni 2012, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt.
2013. The internal structure of wh-elements and the diversity of wh-movement. Ms, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt. (To appear in Representing Structure in Phonology and Syntax, Henk van Riemsdijk & Marc van Oostendorp(eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.)
Lutz, Uli
1997 Parasitic gaps und Vorfeldstruktur. In Zur Satzstruktur des Deutschen [Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 349, Nr. 90], Franz-Josef D’Avis & Uli Lutz (eds), 55–80. Tübingen: University of Tübingen.Google Scholar
2004 ET, parasitic gaps, and German clause structure. In The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds), 265–312. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Merkle, Ludwig
1975 Bairische Grammatik. München: Heimeran.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga
1992 Zur Grammatik und Pragmatik von Echo-w-Fragen. In Satz und Illokution, Bd. 1, Inger Rosengren (ed.), 213–261. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaer, Benjamin & Frey, Werner
2004 Integrated and non-integrated left-peripheral elements in German and English. In ZAS Papers in Linguistics 35. Proceedings of the Workshop on dislocated elements, Benjamin Shaer, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 465–502.Google Scholar
von Stechow, Arnim & Sternefeld, Wolfgang
1988 Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weiß, Helmut
1998 Syntax des Bairischen. Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

De Clercq, Karen & Liliane Haegeman
2021. Chapter 4. Invariant die and adverbial resumption in the Ghent dialect. In Current Issues in Syntactic Cartography [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 267], ► pp. 54 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.