Article published in:
Bavarian Syntax: Contributions to the theory of syntax
Edited by Günther Grewendorf and Helmut Weiß
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 220] 2014
► pp. 145182
References

References

Altmann, Hans
1981Formen der “Herausstellung” im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Josef
2001Asymmetry in emphatic topicalization. In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow, Caroline Féry & Wolfgang Sternefeld (eds), 15–47. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
2006A note on targets of A′ -movement in the left periphery of German sentences. In Form, Structure, and Grammar. A Festschrift to Günther Grewendorf on Occasion of His 60th Birthday, Patrick Brandt & Erich Fuss (eds), 119–128. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paolo & Poletto, Cecilia
2004Topic, focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 52–75. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan
1977Variables in the theory of transformations. In Formal Syntax, Peter William Culicover, Tom Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds), 157–196. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1982Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1986Barriers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero & Maria-Luisa Zubizaretta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard
1977Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 425–504.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1990Types of A′ -dependencies. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
2001The lower operator position with parasitic gaps. In Features and Interfaces in Romance [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 222], Julia Herschensohn, Enrique Mallén & Karen Zagona (eds), 85–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabet
1983Parasitic gaps. Linguistics and Philosophy 6: 5–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Felix, Sascha
1985Parasitic gaps in German. In Erklärende Syntax des Deutschen, Werner Abraham (ed.), 173–200. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
von Fintel, Kai
1994Restrictions on Quantifier Domains. PhD dissertation, University of Amherst.
Fuß, Eric & Grewendorf, Günther
2014Freie Relativsätze mit d-Pronomen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft (in press).Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther
2013Double fronting in Bavarian left periphery, Ms, forthcoming in Beyond Functional Sequence, Ur Shlonsky (ed.). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Grewendorf, Günther & Groat, Erich
2013Licensing null heads in free relatives. Ms, University of Frankfurt.
Grohmann, Kleanthes
2003Prolific Domains. On the Anti-Locality of Movement Dependencies [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 66]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Günthner, Susanne
1999 Wenn-Sätze im Vor-Vorfeld: Ihre Formen und Funktionen in der gesprochenen Sprache. InLiSt 11: 1–33.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1997Verb second, the split CP and null subjects in early Dutch finite clauses. Geneva Generative Papers (GenGenP) 4: 133–175.Google Scholar
2002Anchoring to speaker, adverbial clauses and the structure of CP. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2: 117–180.Google Scholar
2004The syntax of adverbial clauses and its consequences for topicalization. Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 107: 61–90.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard Stanley
1983Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & van der Auwera, Johan
1988Clause integration in German and Dutch conditionals, concessive conditionals and concessives. In Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse [Typological Studies in Language 18], John Haiman & Sandra Annear Thompson (eds), 101–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, Ulrich
1993Zur Extraktion aus Adjunktsätzen im Deutschen. In Extraktion im Deutschen I [Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungs-bereichs 340, Nr. 34], Franz Josef d’Avis, Sigrid Beck, Ulrich Lutz, Jürgen Pafel & Susanne Trissler (eds), 133–189. Universität Tübingen.Google Scholar
Müller, Stefan
1999An HPSG-analysis for free relative clauses in German. Grammars 2(1): 53–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nissenbaum, Jonathan
2000Investigations of Covert Phrase Movement [MITWPL]. Cambridge MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.Google Scholar
Pittner, Karin
1995The case of German relatives. Linguistic Review 12: 197–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1983Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Richards, Marc
2012No phase is an island (?): An attempt to constrain internal ‘Free Merge’ via the edge feature. Ms, University of Frankfurt.
Roberts, Ian
2004The C-system in Brythonic Celtic languages, V2, and the EPP. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 297–328. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ross, John Robert
1967Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
von Stechow, Arnim & Sternefeld, Wolfgang
1988Bausteine syntaktischen Wissens. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trutkowski, Ewa
2011Topic drop at the syntax-semantics-pragmatics interface. Ms, University of Potsdam.
Weiß, Helmut
1998Syntax des Bairischen. Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar