Article published in:
Bavarian Syntax: Contributions to the theory of syntax
Edited by Günther Grewendorf and Helmut Weiß
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 220] 2014
► pp. 223246
References

References

Demirdache, Hamida & Uribe-Etxebarria, Myriam
2000The primitives of temporal relations. In Step by step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka, 157–186. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2007The syntax of time arguments. Lingua 117: 330–366. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
2003On the syntax of locative and directional adpositional phrases. Ms, City University of New York.
Enç¸. Mürvet
1987Anchoring conditions for tense. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 633–657.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert
1993Die Rückkehr der Basisgenerierer. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 36:1–74.Google Scholar
Gehrke, Berit
2008Ps in Motion. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
Grimm, Jacob & Grimm, Wilhelm
1854Deutsches Wörterbuch von jacob und wilhelm grimm. Verlag von S. Hirzel. 16 Bde. in 32 Teilbänden. Leipzig 1854-1961. Quellenverzeichnis Leipzig 1971. <http://​woerterbuchnetz​.de​/DWB​/> DOI: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert
1982Dependenzen und Konfigurationen: Zur deutschen VProjektion. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 21: 1–60.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth
1986Notes on world view and semantic categories: Some Warlpiri examples. In Features and Projections [Studies in Generative Grammar Series 25], Pieter Muysken & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 233–254. Berlin: Foris.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S.
1983Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Postal, Paul M.
1964An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Description. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
2005A short note on where vs. place. Ms, New York University.
Koopman, Hilda
1993The structure of Dutch PPs. Ms, University of California,Los Angeles.
1997Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions and particles: The structure of Dutch PPs. Ms, University of California, Los Angeles.
2010Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions and particles: The structure of Dutch PPs. In The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol.6, Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lötscher, Andreas
1985Syntaktische Bedingungen der Topikalisierung. Deutsche Sprache 13: 207–229.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Andrew
2001German Double Particles as Preverbs. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
Müller, Stefan
2003Mehrfache vorfeldbesetzung. Deutsche Sprache 31: 29–62.Google Scholar
Noonan, Máire
2005Spotlight on spatial PPs: Evidence from German shadows. Ms, McGill University.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk
1990Functional prepositions. In Unity in Diversity: Papers Presented to Simon C. Dik on his 50th Birthday, Harm Pinkster & Inge Genee (eds), 229–241. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk & Huybregts, Riny
2002Location and locality. In Progress in Grammar: Articles at the 20th Anniversary of the Comparison of Grammatical Models Group in Tilburg, Marc van Oostendorp & Elena Anagnostopoulou (eds), 1–23. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth & Wiltschko, Martina
2009Varieties of INFL: TENSE, LOCATION, and PERSON. In Alternatives to Cartography, Hans Broekhuis, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 153–202. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stowell, Tim
2007The syntactic expression of tense. Lingua 117: 437–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2010Spatial P in English. In The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol.6, Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 127–160. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1975aFigure and ground in complex sentences. In Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society , 419–430. Berkeley CA: BLS.
1975bSemantics and syntax of motion. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol.4, John P. Kimball (ed.), 181–238. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter
1984Zur Syntax der Präpositionalphrase im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 3: 65–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zeller, Jochen
2001Lexical particles, semi-lexical postpositions. In Semi-lexical Categories, Norbert Corver & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 505–549. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar