Cover not available
Part of
Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti
Edited by Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann and Simona Matteini
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 223] 2015
► pp. 321–342

Intervention effects in the spontaneous production of relative clauses in (a)typical language development of French children and adolescents

The present study investigates spontaneous production of 4 groups of typically developing French speaking children (TD6, TD8, TD11, TD14) and a group of French children with specific language impairment (SLI) with focus on the production of types of relative clauses and the occurrence of intervening elements and avoidance strategies. We provide data complementing much of Adriana Belletti’s recent work in that intervention is avoided in the choice of the relative subject, frequently a pronoun and animate, and because we do not find subject relatives with passive. We argue that investigation of spontaneous speech naturally controls for discourse effects and allows to uncover patterns in the feature specifications of relative heads and subjects that are relevant for theoretical descriptions of intervention.

Keywords: avoidance strategies., intervening elements, relative clauses, spontaneous production, typical and atypical development
Published online: 27 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.223.15ham
References
Adani, Flavia
2011 Rethinking the acquisition of relative clauses in Italian: towards a grammatically based account. Journal of Child Language 38(1): 141–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Some notes on the acquisition of relative clauses: New data and open questions. In Enjoy Linguistics! Papers offered to Luigi Rizzi on the occasion of his 60th birthday, Valentina Bianchi & Cristiano Chesi (eds), 6–13. CISCL Press: University of Siena.Google Scholar
Adani, Flavia, Forgiarini, Matteo, Guasti, Maria Teresa & van der Lely, Heather
2013 Number dissimilarities facilitate the comprehension of relative clauses in children with (Grammatical) specific language impairment. Journal of Child Language, 40: 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arosio, Fabrizio, Guasti, Maria Teresa & Stucchi, Natale
2011 Disambiguating information and memory resources in children’s processing of Italian relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 40: 137–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2014 Notes on passive object relatives. In Functional Structure from Top to Toe. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures vol.9, Peter Svenonius (ed), 97–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Chesi, Cristiano
2011 Relative Clauses from the input: syntactic considerations on a corpus-based analysis of Italian. Studies in Linguistics (CISCL Working Papers) Vol.4, 5–24.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Contemori Carla
2010 Intervention and attraction. On the production of subject and object relatives by Italian (young) children and adults. In Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2009, Joao Costa, Ana Castro, Maria Lobo & Fernanda Pratas (eds), 39–52. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana, Friedmann, Naama, Brunato, Dominique, & Rizzi, Luigi
2012 Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua 122(10): 1053–1069. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
2012 Ways of avoiding intervention: Some Thoughts on Object relatives, Passive and Control. In Rich Languages from Poor Inputs, Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini & Robert C. Berwick (eds), 115–126. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandt, Silke, Kidd, Evan, Lieven, Elena & Tomasello, Michael
2009 The discourse basis of relativisation: An investigation of young German and English-speaking children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Cognitive Linguistics 20: 539–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cannizzaro, Courtney Leigh
2012 Early Word Order and Animacy. Groningen: Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics, 104.Google Scholar
Clark, Robin & Roberts, Ian
1993 A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 299–345.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris
2005 A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8(2): 81–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Contemori, Carla
2011 The Comprehension and Production of Relative Clauses in Italian across Populations and in Different Modalities. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Siena.
Correa, Leticia M
1995 An alternative assessment of children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24: 183–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cronel-Ohayon, Stéphany
2004 Etude Longitudinal d’une Population d’Enfants Francophones Présentant un Trouble Specific du Developpement du Langage: Aspects Syntaxiques. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Geneva.
Delage, Hélène
2008 Evolution de l’Hétérogénéité Linguistique chez les Enfants Sourds Moyen Lègers: Etude de la Complexité Morphosyntaxique. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tours.
Delage, Hélène, Monjauze, Cecile, Hamann, Cornelia & Tuller, Laurie
2008 Relative clauses in atypical acquisition of French. In Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2007, Anna Gavarró & Maria J. Freitas (eds), 166–176. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger & Tomasello, Michael
2005 A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language 81(4): 882–906. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. & Thompson, Sandra A
1990 A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language 66: 297–316. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frauenfelder, Ulrich, Segui, Juan & Mehler, Jacques
1980 Monitoring around the relative clause. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 19: 328–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Naama, Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
2009 Relativized relatives: types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119: 67–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Naama & Gvion, Aviah
2003 Sentence comprehension and working memory limitation: A dissociation between semantic and phonological encoding. Brain and Language 86: 23–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Naama & Novogrodsky, Rama
2004 The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: a study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language 31: 661–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Naama & Szterman, Ronit
2006 Syntactic movement in orally-trained children with hearing impairment. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 11: 56–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Edward
1998 Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68: 1–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Image, language, brain: Papers from the first mind articulation project symposium, Alec Marantz, Yasushi Miyashita & Wayne O’Neil (eds), 95–126. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goodluck, Helen
2005 D(iscourse)-linking and question formation: comprehension effects in children and Broca’s aphasics. In UG and external systems: Language, brain and computation, Anna Maria Di Scullio (ed). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Object extraction is not subject to child relativized minimality. Lingua 120(6): 1516–1521. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodluck, Helen & Tavakolian, Susan
1982 Competence and processing in children’s grammar of relative clauses. Cognition 11: 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall & Johnson, Marcus
2001 Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 27(6): 1411–1423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grillo, Antonino
2008 Generalized Minimality: Syntactic Underspecification in Broca`s Aphasia. Utrecht: LOT dissertations.Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa & Cardinaletti, Anna
2003 Relative clause formation in Romance child’s production. Probus 15: 47–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa & Shlonsky, Ur
1995 The acquisition of French relative clauses reconsidered. Language Acquisition 4(4): 257–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, Gisela & Hansson, Kristina
2000 Comprehension and production of relative clauses: a comparison between Swedish impaired and unimpaired children. Journal of Child Language 27: 313–333. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamann, Cornelia
2006 Speculations about Early Syntax: The production of Wh-questions by normally developing French children and French children with SLI. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 5: 143–189.Google Scholar
Hamann, Cornelia & Abed Ibrahim, Lina
In preparation. Computational complexity and sentence repetition in German.
Hamann, Cornelia, Tuller, Laurice, Monjauze, Cécile, Delage, Hélène & Henry, Célia. Heather Caunt-Nulton
2007 (Un)successful subordination in French-speaking children and adolescents with SLI. Proceedings of BUCLD31 , , Samantha Kulatilake & I-hao Woo (eds), 286–297. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Hamann, Cornelia & Tuller, Laurice
In revision. Genuine vs. superficial relatives in French: The depth of embedding factor.
Jakubowicz, Celia
2004 Is movement costly? The grammar and the processor in language acquisition, Paper presented at JEL 2004, University of Nantes.
2005 The language faculty: (Ab)normal development and interface constraints, Paper presented at the GALA conference, University of Siena, September 8–10 2005.
Kidd, Evan, Brandt, Silke, Lieven, Elena, & Tomasello, Michael
2007 Object relatives made easy: A cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children’s processing of relative clauses. Language and Cognitive Processes 22(6): 860–897. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labelle, Marie
1990 Predication, WH-movement, and the development of relative clauses. Language Acquisition 1: 95–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 The acquisition of relative clauses: Movement or no movement? Language Acquisition 5(2): 65–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mak, Willem M., Vonk, Wietske & Schriefers, Herbert
2002 The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language 4: 50–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush. Journal of Memory and Language 5: 466–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Discourse structure and relative clause processing. Memory & Cognition 31: 170–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Novogrodsky, Rama & Friedmann, Naama
2006 The production of relative clauses in SLI: a window to the nature of the impairment. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 8: 364–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
2004 Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed), 223–251.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2013 Locality. Lingua 130: 169–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starke, Michal
2001 Move Dissolves in to Merge. Ph.D. dissertation: University of Geneva.
Stavrakaki, Stavroula
2001 Comprehension of reversible relative clauses in Specifically Language Impaired and Normally Developing Greek children. Brain and Language 77: 419–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuller, Laurice, Henry, Célia., Sizaret, Eva & Barthez, Marie-Anne
2012 SLI at adolescence: Avoiding complexity. Applied Psycholinguistics 33: 161–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van der Lely, Heather
1998 SLI in children: Movement, Economy, and Deficits in the Compuational-syntactic System. Language Acquisition 7: 161–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Volpato, Francesca
2012 The comprehension of relative clauses by hearing and hearing-impaired, cochlear-implanted children: the role of marked number features. In Selected Proceedings of the Romance Turn IV Workshop on the Acquisition of Romance Languages, Sandrine Ferré, Philippe Prévost, Laurice Tuller & Rasha Zebib (eds), 306–329. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Zubin, David A
1979 Discourse function of morphology: the focus system in German. In Syntax and Semantics. Volume 12. Discourse and Syntax, Talmy Givón (ed), 469–504. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zurif, Edgar B. & Caramazza, Alfonso
1976 Linguistic structures in aphasia: Studies in syntax and semantics. In Studies in Neurolinguistics (Vol. 2), Haiganoosh Whitaker & Harry A. Whitaker (eds), New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Delage, Hélène & Ulrich Hans Frauenfelder
2019. Syntax and working memory in typically-developing children. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 10:2 ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Karssenberg, Lena, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. ‘Il n’y a que Superman qui porte le slip par-dessus le pantalon’ – les clivées enil n’y a que x qui. SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 02009 ff. DOI logo
Sukenik, Nufar & Naama Friedmann
2018. ASD Is Not DLI: Individuals With Autism and Individuals With Syntactic DLI Show Similar Performance Level in Syntactic Tasks, but Different Error Patterns. Frontiers in Psychology 9 DOI logo
Sukenik, Nufar, Eléonore Morin, Naama Friedmann, Philippe Prevost & Laurice Tuller
2021. Coconuts and curtain cakes: The production of wh-questions in ASD. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments 6 ► pp. 239694152098295 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.