References
Adani, Flavia. 2011. Rethinking the acquisition of relative clauses in Italian: towards a grammatically based account. Journal of Child Language 38(1): 141–165. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Adani, Flavia. 2012. Some notes on the acquisition of relative clauses: New data and open questions. In Enjoy Linguistics! Papers offered to Luigi Rizzi on the occasion of his 60th birthday, Valentina Bianchi & Cristiano Chesi (eds), 6–13. CISCL Press: University of Siena.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Adani, Flavia, Forgiarini, Matteo, Guasti, Maria Teresa & van der Lely, Heather. 2013. Number dissimilarities facilitate the comprehension of relative clauses in children with (Grammatical) specific language impairment. Journal of Child Language, 40: 1–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arosio, Fabrizio, Guasti, Maria Teresa & Stucchi, Natale. 2011. Disambiguating information and memory resources in children’s processing of Italian relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 40: 137–154. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, Adriana. 2014. Notes on passive object relatives. In Functional Structure from Top to Toe. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures vol.9, Peter Svenonius (ed), 97–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, Adriana & Chesi, Cristiano. 2011. Relative Clauses from the input: syntactic considerations on a corpus-based analysis of Italian. Studies in Linguistics (CISCL Working Papers) Vol.4, 5–24.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, Adriana & Contemori Carla. 2010. Intervention and attraction. On the production of subject and object relatives by Italian (young) children and adults. In Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2009, Joao Costa, Ana Castro, Maria Lobo & Fernanda Pratas (eds), 39–52. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, Adriana, Friedmann, Naama, Brunato, Dominique, & Rizzi, Luigi. 2012. Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua 122(10): 1053–1069. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 2012. Ways of avoiding intervention: Some Thoughts on Object relatives, Passive and Control. In Rich Languages from Poor Inputs, Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini & Robert C. Berwick (eds), 115–126. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brandt, Silke, Kidd, Evan, Lieven, Elena & Tomasello, Michael. 2009. The discourse basis of relativisation: An investigation of young German and English-speaking children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Cognitive Linguistics 20: 539–570. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cannizzaro, Courtney Leigh. 2012. Early Word Order and Animacy. Groningen: Groningen Dissertations in Linguistics, 104.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Robin & Roberts, Ian. 1993. A computational model of language learnability and language change. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 299–345.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Collins, Chris. 2005. A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8(2): 81–120. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Contemori, Carla. 2011. The Comprehension and Production of Relative Clauses in Italian across Populations and in Different Modalities. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Siena.
Correa, Leticia M. 1995. An alternative assessment of children’s comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24: 183–203. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cronel-Ohayon, Stéphany. 2004. Etude Longitudinal d’une Population d’Enfants Francophones Présentant un Trouble Specific du Developpement du Langage: Aspects Syntaxiques. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Geneva.
Delage, Hélène. 2008. Evolution de l’Hétérogénéité Linguistique chez les Enfants Sourds Moyen Lègers: Etude de la Complexité Morphosyntaxique. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tours.
Delage, Hélène, Monjauze, Cecile, Hamann, Cornelia & Tuller, Laurie. 2008. Relative clauses in atypical acquisition of French. In Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2007, Anna Gavarró & Maria J. Freitas (eds), 166–176. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diessel, Holger & Tomasello, Michael. 2005. A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language 81(4): 882–906. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fox, Barbara A. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1990. A discourse explanation of the grammar of relative clauses in English conversation. Language 66: 297–316. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frauenfelder, Ulrich, Segui, Juan & Mehler, Jacques. 1980. Monitoring around the relative clause. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 19: 328–337. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friedmann, Naama, Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 2009. Relativized relatives: types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119: 67–88. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friedmann, Naama & Gvion, Aviah. 2003. Sentence comprehension and working memory limitation: A dissociation between semantic and phonological encoding. Brain and Language 86: 23–39. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friedmann, Naama & Novogrodsky, Rama. 2004. The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: a study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language 31: 661–681. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friedmann, Naama & Szterman, Ronit. 2006. Syntactic movement in orally-trained children with hearing impairment. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 11: 56–75. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68: 1–76. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gibson, Edward. 2001. The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Image, language, brain: Papers from the first mind articulation project symposium, Alec Marantz, Yasushi Miyashita & Wayne O’Neil (eds), 95–126. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodluck, Helen. 2010. Object extraction is not subject to child relativized minimality. Lingua 120(6): 1516–1521. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goodluck, Helen & Tavakolian, Susan. 1982. Competence and processing in children’s grammar of relative clauses. Cognition 11: 1–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gordon, Peter C., Hendrick, Randall & Johnson, Marcus. 2001. Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 27(6): 1411–1423. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grillo, Antonino. 2008. Generalized Minimality: Syntactic Underspecification in Broca`s Aphasia. Utrecht: LOT dissertations.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guasti, Maria Teresa & Cardinaletti, Anna. 2003. Relative clause formation in Romance child’s production. Probus 15: 47–89. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guasti, Maria Teresa & Shlonsky, Ur. 1995. The acquisition of French relative clauses reconsidered. Language Acquisition 4(4): 257–276. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Håkansson, Gisela & Hansson, Kristina. 2000. Comprehension and production of relative clauses: a comparison between Swedish impaired and unimpaired children. Journal of Child Language 27: 313–333. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hamann, Cornelia. 2006. Speculations about Early Syntax: The production of Wh-questions by normally developing French children and French children with SLI. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 5: 143–189.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hamann, Cornelia & Abed Ibrahim, Lina. In preparation. Computational complexity and sentence repetition in German.
Hamann, Cornelia, Tuller, Laurice, Monjauze, Cécile, Delage, Hélène & Henry, Célia. Heather Caunt-Nulton2007. (Un)successful subordination in French-speaking children and adolescents with SLI.
Proceedings of BUCLD31
, , Samantha Kulatilake & I-hao Woo (eds), 286–297. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Hamann, Cornelia & Tuller, Laurice. In revision. Genuine vs. superficial relatives in French: The depth of embedding factor.
Jakubowicz, Celia. 2004. Is movement costly? The grammar and the processor in language acquisition, Paper presented at JEL 2004, University of Nantes.
Jakubowicz, Celia. 2005. The language faculty: (Ab)normal development and interface constraints, Paper presented at the GALA conference, University of Siena, September 8–10 2005.
Kidd, Evan, Brandt, Silke, Lieven, Elena, & Tomasello, Michael. 2007. Object relatives made easy: A cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children’s processing of relative clauses. Language and Cognitive Processes 22(6): 860–897. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labelle, Marie. 1990. Predication, WH-movement, and the development of relative clauses. Language Acquisition 1: 95–119. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labelle, Marie. 1996. The acquisition of relative clauses: Movement or no movement? Language Acquisition 5(2): 65–82. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mak, Willem M., Vonk, Wietske & Schriefers, Herbert. 2002. The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language 4: 50–68. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mak, Willem M., Vonk, Wietske & Schriefers, Herbert. 2006. Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush. Journal of Memory and Language 5: 466–490. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mak, Willem M., Vonk, Wietske & Schriefers, Herbert. 2008. Discourse structure and relative clause processing. Memory & Cognition 31: 170–181. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Novogrodsky, Rama & Friedmann, Naama. 2006. The production of relative clauses in SLI: a window to the nature of the impairment. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 8: 364–375. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed), 223–251.Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 2013. Locality. Lingua 130: 169–186. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Starke, Michal. 2001. Move Dissolves in to Merge. Ph.D. dissertation: University of Geneva.
Stavrakaki, Stavroula. 2001. Comprehension of reversible relative clauses in Specifically Language Impaired and Normally Developing Greek children. Brain and Language 77: 419–431. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tuller, Laurice, Henry, Célia., Sizaret, Eva & Barthez, Marie-Anne. 2012. SLI at adolescence: Avoiding complexity. Applied Psycholinguistics 33: 161–184. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van der Lely, Heather. 1998. SLI in children: Movement, Economy, and Deficits in the Compuational-syntactic System. Language Acquisition 7: 161–192. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Volpato, Francesca. 2012. The comprehension of relative clauses by hearing and hearing-impaired, cochlear-implanted children: the role of marked number features. In Selected Proceedings of the Romance Turn IV Workshop on the Acquisition of Romance Languages, Sandrine Ferré, Philippe Prévost, Laurice Tuller & Rasha Zebib (eds), 306–329. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zubin, David A. 1979. Discourse function of morphology: the focus system in German. In Syntax and Semantics. Volume 12. Discourse and Syntax, Talmy Givón (ed), 469–504. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zurif, Edgar B. & Caramazza, Alfonso. 1976. Linguistic structures in aphasia: Studies in syntax and semantics. In Studies in Neurolinguistics (Vol. 2), Haiganoosh Whitaker & Harry A. Whitaker (eds), New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)