Subject intervention in free relatives
Subject intervention in wh-questions has been reported for several Romance varieties. The case we focus on here is free relatives. In Italian/French an object free relative introduced by chi/qui is degraded if a preverbal subject intervenes, much like the corresponding wh-question. However, pronominal relatives introduced by ciò che/ce que do not show a subject intervention effect. Moreover, in other languages, including English, free relatives display no subject intervention effect whatsoever. In this paper we address the following questions: (i) Why do subject intervention effects emerge in direct questions and in free relatives in Italian, French (and other Romance varieties)? (ii) Why don’t they arise in pronominal relatives? (iii) Why don’t they arise in languages like English?To answer these questions, we capitalize on the concept of Gross Minimality (Cecchetto & Donati, 2015) and on the observation that English free relatives are modeled after indirect questions.
References
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena
1998 Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP-checking.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491–539.
Âmbar, Manuela
1988 Para uma sintaxe da inversão sujeito verbo en portugês. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Lisbon.
Barbosa, Pilar
1995 Null Subjects. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Barbosa, Pilar
2001 On inversion in wh-questions in Romance. In
Romance Inversion,
Aafke Hulk &
Jean Yves Pollock (eds), 20–59. Oxford: OUP.
Belletti, Adriana & Contemori, Carla
2010.
Intervention and attraction. On the production of subject and object relatives by Italian (young) children and adults. In
Proceedings of GALA 2009,
João Costa,
Ana Castro,
Maria Lobo &
Fernanda Pratas (eds), 39–52. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
2010 Ways of avoiding intervention: Object relatives, passive and control. In
Rich Grammar from a Poor Input,
Robert Berwick &
Massimo Piattelli Palmarini (eds), 115–126. Oxford: OUP.
Belletti, Adriana & Chesi, Cristiano
2011 Relative clauses from the input: Syntactic considerations on a corpus-based analysis of Italian. Studies in Linguistics.
CISCL Working Papers 4: 5–24.
Belletti, Adriana, Friedmann, Naama, Brunato, Dominique & Rizzi, Luigi
2012 Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian.
Lingua 122(10): 1053–1069.
Bhatt, Rajesh
2002 The raising analysis of relative clauses: Evidence from adjectival modification.
Natural Language Semantics 10: 43–90.
Bianchi, Valentina
1999 Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Caponigro, Ivano
2003 Free not to Ask: On the Semantics of Free Relatives and Wh-words Crosslinguistically. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Caponigro Ivano, Pearl Lisa, Brooks Neon & David Barner
2012 Acquiring the meaning of free relative clauses and plural definite descriptions.
Journal of Semantics 29(2): 262–293.
Cecchetto, Carlo & Donati Caterina
2010 On labeling: Principle C and head movement.
Syntax 13: 241–278.
Cecchetto, Carlo & Donati, Caterina
2012 “Perché” Rizzi is right. In
ENJOY LINGUISTICS! Papers Offered to Luigi Rizzi on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday,
Valentina Bianchi &
Cristiano Chesi (eds), 54–62. Siena: CISCL Press.
Cecchetto, Carlo & Donati, Caterina
2015 (Re)labeling. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam
2008 On phases. In
Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud,
Robert Freidin,
Carlos Otero &
Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds),
133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Contemori, Carla & Belletti, Adriana
2014 Relatives and passive object relatives in Italian-speaking children and adults: Intervention in production and comprehension.
Applied Psycholinguistics 35(6): 1021–1053.
Costa, João, Grillo, Nino & Lobo, Maria
2012 Minimality beyond lexical restrictions: Processing and acquisition of free wh-dependencies in European Portuguese.
Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 57(2): 143–160.
Donati, Caterina & Cecchetto, Carlo
2011 Relabeling heads: A unified account for relativization structures.
Linguistic Inquiry 42: 519–560.
Friedmann, Naama, Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
2009 Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies.
Lingua 119: 67–88.
Greco, Ciro
2013 Arguments and Subjects in A¢-syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Milan-Bicocca
Grillo, Nino
2008 Generalized Minimality. Ph.D. dissertation. Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, OTS.
Hirschbühler, Paul & Bouchard, Denis
1985 French ‘quoi’ and its clitic allomorph ‘que’. In
Studies in Romance Languages,
Carol Neidle &
Rafael Nunez Cedeno (eds), 39–60. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kayne, Richard
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Kayne, Richard
2010 Why isn’t ‘this’ a complementizer? In
Comparisons and Contrasts,
Richard Kayne (ed.), 190–227. Oxford: OUP.
Manzini, Maria Rita & Savoia, Leonardo
2003 The nature of complementizers.
Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 28: 87–110.
Obenauer, Hans Georg
1994 Aspects de la syntaxe A barre. Effects d’intervention et mouvements des quantifieurs. Thèse d’Etat, Université de Paris 8.
Patterson, Gary & Caponigro, Ivano
2014 The puzzling degraded status of who free relative clauses in English. Ms, UCSD.
Rizzi, Luigi
1990 Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Rizzi, Luigi
1996 Residual verb second and the Wh-criterion. In
Parameters and Functional Heads,
Belletti, Adriana &
Rizzi, Luigi (eds), 63–90. Oxford: OUP.
Rizzi, Luigi
2010 On some properties of Criterial Freezing. In
The Complementizer Phase: Subjects and Operators,
Phoevos Panagiotidis (ed.), 17–32. Oxford: OUP.
Rizzi, Luigi
To appear.
Cartography, criteria and labeling. In
Beyond Functional Sequence,
Ur Shlonsky (ed.) Oxford OUP
Van der Lely, Heather & Battell, Jackie
2003 Wh-movement in children with grammatical SLI: A test of the RDDR hypothesis.
Language 79: 153–181.
Vergnaud, Jean-Roger
1974 French Relative Clauses. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Rugna, Giuseppe
2023.
The Case and Finiteness Restrictions of Italian Relativeche.
Probus 35:1
► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.