Subject intervention in free relatives
Subject intervention in wh-questions has been reported for several Romance varieties. The case we focus on here is free relatives. In Italian/French an object free relative introduced by chi/qui is degraded if a preverbal subject intervenes, much like the corresponding wh-question. However, pronominal relatives introduced by ciò che/ce que do not show a subject intervention effect. Moreover, in other languages, including English, free relatives display no subject intervention effect whatsoever. In this paper we address the following questions: (i) Why do subject intervention effects emerge in direct questions and in free relatives in Italian, French (and other Romance varieties)? (ii) Why don’t they arise in pronominal relatives? (iii) Why don’t they arise in languages like English?To answer these questions, we capitalize on the concept of Gross Minimality (Cecchetto & Donati, 2015) and on the observation that English free relatives are modeled after indirect questions.
References (34)
References
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 1998. Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP-checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 16: 491–539. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Âmbar, Manuela. 1988. Para uma sintaxe da inversão sujeito verbo en portugês. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Lisbon.
Barbosa, Pilar. 1995. Null Subjects. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Barbosa, Pilar. 2001. On inversion in wh-questions in Romance. In Romance Inversion, Aafke Hulk & Jean Yves Pollock (eds), 20–59. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, Adriana & Contemori, Carla. 2010. Intervention and attraction. On the production of subject and object relatives by Italian (young) children and adults. In Proceedings of GALA 2009, João Costa, Ana Castro, Maria Lobo & Fernanda Pratas (eds), 39–52. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 2010. Ways of avoiding intervention: Object relatives, passive and control. In Rich Grammar from a Poor Input, Robert Berwick & Massimo Piattelli Palmarini (eds), 115–126. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, Adriana & Chesi, Cristiano. 2011. Relative clauses from the input: Syntactic considerations on a corpus-based analysis of Italian. Studies in Linguistics. CISCL Working Papers 4: 5–24.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, Adriana, Friedmann, Naama, Brunato, Dominique & Rizzi, Luigi. 2012. Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua 122(10): 1053–1069. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2002. The raising analysis of relative clauses: Evidence from adjectival modification. Natural Language Semantics 10: 43–90. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bianchi, Valentina. 1999. Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caponigro, Ivano. 2003. Free not to Ask: On the Semantics of Free Relatives and Wh-words Crosslinguistically. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
Caponigro Ivano, Pearl Lisa, Brooks Neon & David Barner. 2012. Acquiring the meaning of free relative clauses and plural definite descriptions. Journal of Semantics 29(2): 262–293. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cecchetto, Carlo & Donati Caterina. 2010. On labeling: Principle C and head movement. Syntax 13: 241–278. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cecchetto, Carlo & Donati, Caterina. 2012. “Perché” Rizzi is right. In ENJOY LINGUISTICS! Papers Offered to Luigi Rizzi on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Valentina Bianchi & Cristiano Chesi (eds), 54–62. Siena: CISCL Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cecchetto, Carlo & Donati, Caterina. 2015. (Re)labeling. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Contemori, Carla & Belletti, Adriana. 2014. Relatives and passive object relatives in Italian-speaking children and adults: Intervention in production and comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics 35(6): 1021–1053. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Costa, João, Grillo, Nino & Lobo, Maria. 2012. Minimality beyond lexical restrictions: Processing and acquisition of free wh-dependencies in European Portuguese. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 57(2): 143–160.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Donati, Caterina & Cecchetto, Carlo. 2011. Relabeling heads: A unified account for relativization structures. Linguistic Inquiry 42: 519–560. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Friedmann, Naama, Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 2009. Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119: 67–88. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Greco, Ciro. 2013. Arguments and Subjects in A¢-syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Milan-Bicocca
Grillo, Nino. 2008. Generalized Minimality. Ph.D. dissertation. Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, OTS.
Hirschbühler, Paul & Bouchard, Denis. 1985. French ‘quoi’ and its clitic allomorph ‘que’. In Studies in Romance Languages, Carol Neidle & Rafael Nunez Cedeno (eds), 39–60. Dordrecht: Foris. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kayne, Richard. 2010. Why isn’t ‘this’ a complementizer? In Comparisons and Contrasts, Richard Kayne (ed.), 190–227. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzini, Maria Rita & Savoia, Leonardo. 2003. The nature of complementizers. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 28: 87–110.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Obenauer, Hans Georg. 1994. Aspects de la syntaxe A barre. Effects d’intervention et mouvements des quantifieurs. Thèse d’Etat, Université de Paris 8.
Patterson, Gary & Caponigro, Ivano 2014. The puzzling degraded status of who free relative clauses in English. Ms, UCSD.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 1996. Residual verb second and the Wh-criterion. In Parameters and Functional Heads, Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi (eds), 63–90. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi 2010. On some properties of Criterial Freezing. In The Complementizer Phase: Subjects and Operators, Phoevos Panagiotidis (ed.), 17–32. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. To appear. Cartography, criteria and labeling. In Beyond Functional Sequence, Ur Shlonsky (ed.). Oxford: OUP.
Van der Lely, Heather & Battell, Jackie. 2003. Wh-movement in children with grammatical SLI: A test of the RDDR hypothesis. Language 79: 153–181. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1974. French Relative Clauses. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Rugna, Giuseppe
2023.
The Case and Finiteness Restrictions of Italian Relativeche.
Probus 35:1
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.