Cover not available
Part of
Discourse-oriented Syntax
Edited by Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl and Andreas Trotzke
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 226] 2015
► pp. 93–120

Italian adverbs and discourse particles

Between recategorization and ambiguity

| University of Florence
In Italian and its dialects, there is no evidence that lexical items functioning as discourse particle correspond to specialized functional heads, or that they have a truncated internal structure, making them into weak categories. Rather they have the syntactic distribution of adverbs, with which they coincide lexically. Therefore ‘discourse particle’ is the name of a special interpretation of adverbs, which also have a conventional temporal/aspectual/manner interpretation – to be captured by a scope(-like) mechanism at the LF interface. Temporal/aspectual/manner modifiers take events as their arguments – while discourse particles take the entire assertion (or command, question) as their argument, relating it to the store of propositional contents shared by speaker and hearer.
Published online: 16 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.226.05man
References
Arsenijević, Boban
2009 Clausal complementation as relativization. Lingua 119: 39-50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baroni, Marco, Bernardini, Silvia, Comastri, Federica, Piccioni, Lorenzo, Volpi, Alessandra, Aston, Guy & Mazzoleni, Marco
2004 Introducing the "la Repubblica" corpus: A large, annotated, TEI(XML)-compliant corpus of newspaper Italian. In Proceedings of LREC 2004 , 1771-1774. Lisbon: ELDA.
Bayer, Josef
2001 Two grammars in one: Sentential complements and complementizers in Bengali and other South Asian languages. In The Yearbook of South Asian Languages: Tokyo Symposium on South Asian Languages - Contact, Convergence and Typology, Peri Bhaskarorao & Karumuri V. Subbarao (eds), 11-36. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
1999 Final complementizers in hybrid languages. Journal of Linguistics 35: 233-271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2008 Structures and Strategies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane
2002 Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
2011 German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic Review 28: 493–531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Starke, Michal
1999 The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 145-233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa
1991 On the Typology of Wh-questions. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi
2008 The cartography of syntactic structures. Studies in Linguistics 2: 42-58 (Università di Siena).Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2008 Modal particles in Italian. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 91–129 (Università di Venezia).Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter & Jackendoff, Ray
2005 Simpler Syntax. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald
1997 [1968] On saying that. In Readings in the Philosophy of Language, Peter Ludlow (ed.), 817-832. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Wiltschko, Martina
2002 Decomposing Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409-442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles
1968 The case for case. In Universals in Linguistic Theory, Emmon Bach & Robert Harms (eds), 1-88. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia
1998 Polarity Sensitivity as (Non-)veridical Dependency [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 111-176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, James
1994 The syntax-phonology mapping in Catalan and Spanish clitics. In Papers on Phonology and Morphology [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21], Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley & Tony Bures (eds). Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1976 French relative “que”. In Current Studies in Romance Linguistics, Fritz Hensey & Marta Luján (eds), 255–299. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1984 Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2010 Comparisons and Contrasts. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Laka, Itziar
1990 Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard
1987 “Missing prepositions” and the analysis of English free relative clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 239-266.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2005 Moving through the left periphery: The dual complementiser system in the dialects of Southern Italy. Transactions of the Philological Society 103: 339-96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita
2014 Grammatical categories: Strong and weak pronouns in Romance. Lingua 150: 171-201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo
2003 The nature of complementizers. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 28: 87-110.Google Scholar
2005 I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa, Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso, 3 vols.Google Scholar
2007 A Unification of Morphology and Syntax. Studies in Romance and Albanian Varieties. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011 Grammatical Categories. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munaro, Nicola & Poletto, Cecilia
2003 Ways of clausal typing. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 27: 87–105.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara
1984 Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 243-286 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2000 The Higher Functional Field. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia & Vanelli, Laura
1995 Gli introduttori delle frasi interrogative nei dialetti italiani settentrionali. In Italia settentrionale: Crocevia di idiomi romanzi, Emanuele Banfi, Giovanni Bonfadini, Patrizia Cordin & Maria Iliescu (eds), 145-158. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul
2007 Imperatives and modals. Natural Language Semantics 15: 351–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 On the position "Int(errogative)" in the left periphery of the clause. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 287-296. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur
2007 Strategies of subject extraction. In: Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds), 115-160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna
2003 Syntactic Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
1986 Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
1978 Assertion. In Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed.), 315-332. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Starke, Michal
2009 Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd (Tromsoe University Working Papers in Language and Linguistics) 36: 1-6.Google Scholar
de Swart, Henriëtte
1993 Adverbs of Quantification. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
1984 The Possessor that ran away from home. The Linguistic Review 3: 89-102.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
2008 Discourse particles in the left periphery. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 200-231. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011 Discourse particles. In Semantics, Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds), 2011–2038. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 17 other publications

Bayer, Josef & Andreas Trotzke
2015. The derivation and interpretation of left peripheral discourse particles*. In Discourse-oriented Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 226], ► pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Cognola, Federica & Silvio Cruschina
2021. Between Time and Discourse A Syntactic Analysis of Italianpoi. Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie occidentale :55 DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Introduction. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. The expression of affect. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. A grammar for the utterance. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Conclusions. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Vocatives. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Interjections and particles. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Utterances without commitment. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. The Grammar of the Utterance, DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. The grammar of dialogue. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 251 ff. DOI logo
Corr, Alice
2022. Doing things with utterance grammar. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Modicom, Pierre-Yves
2022. Chapter 10. Modal particles in questions and wh-sensitivity. In Particles in German, English, and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series, 224], ► pp. 269 ff. DOI logo
Munaro, Nicola
2019. On the syntactic encoding of lexical interjections in Italo-Romance. In Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 251], ► pp. 185 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. List of Abbreviations. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. xi ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. General Preface. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. vii ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2022. Copyright Page. In The Grammar of the Utterance, ► pp. iv ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.