Pejoration
Editors
| Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
| Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
| University of Potsdam
Though “pejoration” is an important notion for linguistic analysis and theory, there is still a lack of theoretical understanding and sound descriptive analysis. In this timely collection, the phenomenon of pejoration is studied from a number of angles. It contains studies from phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics and pragmatics, and deals with diverse languages and their variants. The collection will appeal to all those linguists with a genuine interest in locating pejoration at the grammar-pragmatics interface.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 228] 2016. vii, 357 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
Table of Contents
|
Preface
|
vii–viii
|
|
1–18
|
|
|
Pejoration in different linguistic domains
|
|
|
21–40
|
|
|
41–74
|
|
|
75–102
|
|
|
103–118
|
|
|
119–142
|
|
|
Pejoration, slurring and sarcasm
|
|
|
145–166
|
|
|
167–186
|
|
|
187–218
|
|
|
219–240
|
|
|
Pejoration in different linguistic contexts
|
|
|
243–268
|
|
|
269–300
|
|
|
301–324
|
|
|
325–354
|
|
|
Index
|
355–358
|
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Bonacchi, Silvia
2018.
In Handbuch Pragmatik,
► pp. 439 ff. 
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.
In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization,
Magni, Elisabetta
2018. Collective suffixes and ad hoc categories: from Latin -ālia to Italian -aglia
.
Folia Linguistica 52:s39-s1 ► pp. 201 ff.
Meibauer, Jörg
2016. Aspects of a theory of bullshit.
Pragmatics & Cognition 23:1 ► pp. 68 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects & Metadata
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General