Article published in:
Morphological Metatheory
Edited by Daniel Siddiqi and Heidi Harley
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 229] 2016
► pp. 163–200

The costs of zero-derived causativity in English

Evidence from reading times and MEG

| Oakland University
| University of Michigan

This paper investigates the processing of lexical causative verbs in English as a means to provide insight into long-standing debates in this domain and to explore methods for comparison of words which are phonologicallyidentical but vary at other levels of representation. Verbs such as melt can be used in both transitive and intransitive contexts, which have been argued to vary not only in the number of thematic arguments, but also in semantic, morphological, and syntactic representation. Hypothesizing that the transitive variants contain additional causativity, we predicted that they would induce greater processing cost that could be attributed to greater lexical semantic complexity. In order to test this prediction, we included in each study pairs of activity verbs which alternate in transitivity but not causativity. Two self-paced reading studies confirmed our prediction, demonstrating an interaction such that transitive verbs in the causative condition took significantly longer to process than intransitive verbs, a pattern that was not reflected in the activity condition. A further magnetoencephalography study tested for neural activity associated with different levels of linguistic processing and provides insight into the nature of the behavioral delay. The behavioral findings suggest that the transitive variants in the lexical causative alternation are more complex than the intransitives at some level of representation, despite their phonological identity. The MEG study provides a profile which is suggestive of a link with lexical or morphological complexity.

Published online: 29 June 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.229.06lev
References
Adachi, Y., Shimogawara, M., Higuchi, M., Haruta, Y. & Ochiai, M
2001 Reduction of non-periodic environmental magnetic noise in MEG measurement by continuously adjusted least squares method. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 11: 669–672. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian
2006 The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 187–212. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald
2007 Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Davidson, Douglas J. & Bates, Douglas M
2008 Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59: 390–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baggio, Giosuè, Choma, Travis, van Lambalgen, Michiel & Hagoort, Peter
2010 Coercion and compositionality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22: 2131–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas & Maechler, Martin
2009 lme4: Linear Mixed-effects Models Using S4 Classes. R package, version 0.999375–31.Google Scholar
Bedny, Marina, Hulbert, Justin C. & Thompson-Schill, Sharon L
2007 Understanding words in context: The role of Broca’s area in word comprehension. Brain Research 1146: 101–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bemis, Douglas K. & Pylkkänen, Liina
2011 Simple composition: A magnetoencephalography investigation into the comprehension of minimal linguistic phrases. The Journal of Neuroscience 31: 2801–2814. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Shachar, Michal, Palti, Dafna & Grodzinsky, Yosef
2004 Neural correlates of syntactic movement: Converging evidence from two fMRI experiments. NeuroImage 21: 1320–1336. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Embick, David
2003 Causative derivations in Hindi. Ms, University of Texas and University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Bittner, Maria
1999 Concealed causatives. Natural Language Semantics 7: 1–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bookheimer, S
2002 Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience 25: 151–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bornkessel, Ina & Schlesewsky, Matthias
2006 The extended argument dependency model: A neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. Psychological Review 113: 787–821. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bornkessel, Ina, Zysset, Stefan, Friederici, Angela D., von Cramon, D. Yves & Matthias Schlesewsky
2005 Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension. NeuroImage 26: 221–233. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina & Schlesewsky, Matthias
2009 The role of prominence information in the real-time comprehension of transitive constructions: A cross-linguistic approach. Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 19–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bozic, Mirjana, Marslen-Wilson, William D., Stamatakis, Emmanuel A., Davis, Matthew H. & Tyler, Lorraine K
2007 Differentiating morphology, form, and meaning: Neural correlates of morphological complexity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19: 1464–1475. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Jonathan, Nir, Yuval, Hasson, Uri, Malach, Rafael, Heeger, David J. & Pylkkänen, Liina
2012 Syntactic structure building in the anterior temporal lobe during natural story listening. Brain and Language 120: 163–173. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Jonathan & Pylkkänen, Liina
2010 Processing psych verbs: Behavioral and MEG measures of two different types of semantic complexity. Language and Cognitive Processes 25: 777–807. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 The time-course and spatial distribution of brain activity associated with sentence processing. NeuroImage 60: 1139–1148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 Processing events: Behavioral and neuromagnetic correlates of aspectual coercion. Brain and Language 106: 132–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Cameron S., Braver, Todd S., Barch, Deanna M., Botvinick, Matthew M., Noll, Douglas & Cohen, Jonathan D
1998 Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 280: 747–749. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chiarelli, Valentina, El Yagoubi, Radouane, Mondini, Sara, Bisiacchi, Patrizia & Semenza, Carlo
2011 The syntactic and semantic processing of mass and count nouns: An ERP study. PLoS ONE 6(10): e25885. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
1989 A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. Ms, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jonathan D., MacWhinney, Brian, Flatt, Matthew & Provost, Jefferson
1993 PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 25: 257–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen & Fodor, Jerry D
1985 How can grammars help parsers? In Natural Language Parsing, David Dowty, Liina Kartunnen & Arnold Zwicky (eds). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dale, Anders M., Liu, Arthur K., Fischl, Bruce R., Buckner, Randy L., Belliveau, John W., Lewine, Jeffrey D. & Halgren, Eric
2000 Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: Combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 26: 55–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dale, Anders M. & Sereno, Martin I
1993 Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: A linear approach. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5: 162–176. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Desikan, Rahul S., Ségonne, Florent, Fischl, Bruce, Quinn, Brian T., Dickerson, Bradford C., Blacker, Deborah, Buckner, Randy L., Dale, Anders M., Maguire, R. Paul, Hyman, Bradley T., Albert, Marilyn S. & Killiany, Ronald J
2006 An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage 31: 968–980. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, Joseph T., Jamison, Helen L., Matthews, Paul M. & Gonnerman, Laura M
2004 Morphology and the internal structure of words. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101: 14984–14988. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David
1979 Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Fernanda
1994 Choice of passive voice is affected by verb type and animacy. Journal of Memory and Language 33(6): 715–736. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferstl, Evelyn C., Neumann, Jane, Bogler, Carsten & von Cramon, D. Yves
2008 The extended language network: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human Brain Mapping 29: 581–593. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fiorentino, Robert & Poeppel, David
2007 Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 22(7): 953–1000. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friederici, Angela D., Meyer, Martin & von Cramon, D. Yves
2000 Auditory language comprehension: An event-related fMRI study on the processing of syntactic and lexical information. Brain and Language 74: 289–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gennari, Silvia & Poeppel, David
2003 Processing correlates of lexical semantic complexity. Cognition 89: B27–B41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gold, Brian T. & Rastle, Kathleen
2007 Neural correlates of morphological decomposition during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19: 1983–1993. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grewe, Tanja, Bornkessel, Ina, Zysset, Stefan, Wiese, Richard, von Cramon, D. Yves & Schlesewsky, Matthias
2005 The emergence of the unmarked: A new perspective on the language-specific function of Broca’s area. Human Brain Mapping 26: 178–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Linguistic prominence and Broca’s area: The influence of animacy as a linearization principle. NeuroImage 32: 1395–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Yosef & Friederici, Angela D
2006 Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 16: 240–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hagoort, Peter, Hald, Lea, Bastiaansen, Marcel & Petersson, Karl Magnus
2004 Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science 304: 438–441. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hämäläinen, Matti S. & Sarvas, Jukka
1989 Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 36: 165–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hämäläinen, Matti & Ilmoniemi, Risto J
1984 Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: Estimates of current distributions. Technical Report TKK-F-A559, Helsinki University, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
1995 Subject, Events, and Licensing. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Haspelmath, Martin
1993 Inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hickok, Gregory & Poeppel, David
2007 The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8: 393–402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Humphries, Colin, Binder, Jeffrey R., Medler, David A. & Liebenthal, Einat
2006 Syntactic and semantic modulation of neural activity during auditory sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18: 665–679. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Husband, E. Matthew, Kelly, Lisa A. & Zhu, David C
2011 Using complement coercion to understand the neural basis of semantic composition: Evidence from an fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23: 3254–3266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuperberg, Gina R., Choi, Arim, Cohn, Neil, Paczynski, Martin & Jackendoff, Ray
2010 Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22: 2685–2701. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1965 Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Lakoff, George
1965 On the Nature of Syntactic Regularity. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.
Lau, Ellen F., Phillips, Colin & Poeppel, David
2008 A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9: 920–933. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehtonen, Minna, Vorobyev, Victor A., Hugdahl, Kenneth, Tuokkola, Terhi & Laine, Matti
2006 Neural correlates of morphological decomposition in a morphologically rich language: An fMRI study. Brain and Language 98: 182–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehtonen, Minna, Monahan, Philip J. & Poeppel, David
2011 Evidence for early morphological decomposition: Combining masked priming with magnetoencephalography. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(11): 3366–3379. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leminen, Alina, Leminen, Miika, Lehtonen, Minna, Nevalainen, Päivi, Ylinen, Sari, Kimppa, Lilli, Sannemann, Christian, Mäkelä, Jyrki P. & Kujala, Teija
2011 Spatiotemporal dynamics of the processing of spoken inflected and derived words: A combined EEG and MEG study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5: 66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993 English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport-Hovav, Malka
1995 Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Lisa
2012 The morphosemantics of (anti-)causative alternations. Talk presented at the 2012 Linguistic Society of American Annual Meeting , January.
MacDonald, Maryellen C., Pearlmutter, Neal J. & Seidenberg, Mark S
1994 The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101: 676–703. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Malaia, Evguenia, Wilbur, Ronnie B. & Weber-Fox, Christine
2009 ERP evidence for telicity effects on syntactic processing in garden-path sentences. Brain and Language 108: 145–158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mazoyer, Bernard M., Tzourio, Nathalie, Frak, Victor, Syrota, André, Murayama, N., Levrier, Olivier, Salamon, George, Dehaene, Stanislas, Cohen, Laurent & Mehler, Jacques
1993 The cortical representation of speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5: 467–479. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCandliss, Bruce D., Cohen, Laurent & Dehaene, Stanislas
2003 The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Science 7: 293–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James D
1968 Lexical insertion in a grammar without deep structure. In Papers from the Fourth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Bill J. Darden, Charles-James N. Bailey & Alice Davidson (eds), 71–80. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
McKoon, Gail & MacFarland, Talke
2000 Externally and internally caused change of state verbs. Language 76: 833–858. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002 Event templates in the lexical representation of verbs. Cognitive Psychology 45: 1–44. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, R.C
1971 The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pallier, Christophe, Devauchelle, Anne-Dominique & Dehaene, Stanislas
2011 Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 2522–2527. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Terence
1990 Events in the Semantics of English. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1995 Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Piñón, Christopher
2001 Modelling the causative-inchoative alternation. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 76: 273–293.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina, Brennan, Jonathan & Bemis. Douglas K
2011 Grounding the cognitive neuroscience of semantics in linguistic theory. Language and Cognitive Processes 26: 1317–1337. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina & Marantz, Alec
2003 Tracking the time course of word recognition in MEG. Trends in Cognitive Science 7: 187–189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina, Martin, Andrea E., McElree, Brian & Smart, Andrew
2008 The anterior midline field: Coercion or decision making? Brain and Language 108: 184–190. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina & McElree, Brian
2007 An MEG study of silent meaning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19: 1905–1921. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina
2002 Introducing Arguments. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
R Development Core Team
2006 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
2012 Lexicon uniformity and the causative alternation. In The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, Martin Everaert, Marijana Marelj & Tal Siloni (eds). Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
2002 The theta system – an overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229–290.Google Scholar
Rogalsky, Corianne & Hickok, Gregory
2010 The role of Broca’s Area in sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23: 1–17.Google Scholar
Sahin, Ned T., Pinker, Steven, Cash, Sydney S., Schomer, Donald & Halgren, Eric
2009 Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical, and phonological information with in Broca’s area. Science 326: 445–449. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Santi, Andrea & Grodzinsky, Yosef
2007 Working memory and syntax interact in Broca’s area. NeuroImage 37: 8–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 fMRI adaptation dissociates syntactic complexity dimensions. NeuroImage 51: 1285–1293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Lewis P., Zurif, Edgar & Grimshaw, Jane
1987 Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs. Cognition 27: 219–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shetreet, Einat & Friedmann, Naama
2012 Stretched, jumped, and fell: An fMRI investigation of reflexive verbs and other intransitives. NeuroImage 60: 1800–1806. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shetreet, Einat, Friedmann, Naama & Hadar, Uri
2009a Cortical representation of verbs with optional complements: The theoretical contribution of fMRI. Human Brain Mapping 31: 770–785. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009b The neural correlates of linguistic distinctions: Unaccusative and unergative verbs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19: 1753–1767.Google Scholar
Shetreet, Einat, Palti, Dafna, Friedmann, Naama & Hadar, Uri
2007 Cortical representation of verb processing in sentence comprehension: Number of complements, subcategorization, and thematic frames. Cerebral Cortex 17: 1958–1969. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1976 The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In The Grammar of Causative Constructions [Syntax and Semantics 6], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 1–40. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Steinhauer, Karsten, Pancheva, Roumyana, Newman, Aaron J., Gennari, Silvia & Ullman, Michael T
2001 How the mass counts: An electrophysiological approach to the processing of lexical features. NeuroReport 12: 999–1005. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stowe, Laurie A., Broere, Cees A.J., Paans, Anne M.J., Wijers, Albertus A., Mulder, Gijsbertus, Vaalburg, Wim & Zwarts, Frans
1998 Localizing components of a complex task: Sentence processing and working memory. Neuroreport 9: 2995–2999. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stowe, Laurie A
1986 Parsing wh-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes 2: 227–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stowe, Laurie A., Haverkort, Marco & Zwarts, Frans
2005 Rethinking the neurological basis of language. Lingua 115: 997–1042. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vandenberghe, Rik, Nobre, Anna Christina & Price, Charis J
2002 The response of left temporal cortex to sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14: 550–560. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vartiainen, Johanna, Aggujaro, Silvia, Lehtonen, Minna, Hultén, Laine, Annika M. & Salmelin, Riita
2009 Neural dynamics of reading morphologically complex words. NeuroImage 47: 2064–2072. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zweig, Eytan & Pylkkänen, Liina
2008 A visual M170 effect of morphological complexity. Language and Cognitive Processes 24: 412–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar