The costs of zero-derived causativity in English
Evidence from reading times and MEG
This paper investigates the processing of lexical causative verbs in English as a means to provide insight into long-standing debates in this domain and to explore methods for comparison of words which are phonologicallyidentical but vary at other levels of representation. Verbs such as melt can be used in both transitive and intransitive contexts, which have been argued to vary not only in the number of thematic arguments, but also in semantic, morphological, and syntactic representation. Hypothesizing that the transitive variants contain additional causativity, we predicted that they would induce greater processing cost that could be attributed to greater lexical semantic complexity. In order to test this prediction, we included in each study pairs of activity verbs which alternate in transitivity but not causativity. Two self-paced reading studies confirmed our prediction, demonstrating an interaction such that transitive verbs in the causative condition took significantly longer to process than intransitive verbs, a pattern that was not reflected in the activity condition. A further magnetoencephalography study tested for neural activity associated with different levels of linguistic processing and provides insight into the nature of the behavioral delay. The behavioral findings suggest that the transitive variants in the lexical causative alternation are more complex than the intransitives at some level of representation, despite their phonological identity. The MEG study provides a profile which is suggestive of a link with lexical or morphological complexity.
References (94)
References
Adachi, Y., Shimogawara, M., Higuchi, M., Haruta, Y. & Ochiai, M. 2001. Reduction of non-periodic environmental magnetic noise in MEG measurement by continuously adjusted least squares method. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 11: 669–672.
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian. 2006. The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 187–212. Berlin: Mouton.
Baayen, R. Harald. 2007. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics. Cambridge: CUP.
Baayen, R. Harald, Davidson, Douglas J. & Bates, Douglas M. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59: 390–412.
Baggio, Giosuè, Choma, Travis, van Lambalgen, Michiel & Hagoort, Peter. 2010. Coercion and compositionality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22: 2131–40.
Bates, Douglas & Maechler, Martin. 2009. lme4: Linear Mixed-effects Models Using S4 Classes. R package, version 0.999375–31.
Bedny, Marina, Hulbert, Justin C. & Thompson-Schill, Sharon L. 2007. Understanding words in context: The role of Broca’s area in word comprehension. Brain Research 1146: 101–14.
Bemis, Douglas K. & Pylkkänen, Liina. 2011. Simple composition: A magnetoencephalography investigation into the comprehension of minimal linguistic phrases. The Journal of Neuroscience 31: 2801–2814.
Ben-Shachar, Michal, Palti, Dafna & Grodzinsky, Yosef. 2004. Neural correlates of syntactic movement: Converging evidence from two fMRI experiments. NeuroImage 21: 1320–1336.
Bhatt, Rajesh & Embick, David. 2003. Causative derivations in Hindi. Ms, University of Texas and University of Pennsylvania.
Bittner, Maria. 1999. Concealed causatives. Natural Language Semantics 7: 1–78.
Bookheimer, S. 2002. Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience 25: 151–188.
Bornkessel, Ina & Schlesewsky, Matthias. 2006. The extended argument dependency model: A neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. Psychological Review 113: 787–821.
Bornkessel, Ina, Zysset, Stefan, Friederici, Angela D., von Cramon, D. Yves & Matthias Schlesewsky. 2005. Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension. NeuroImage 26: 221–233.
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina & Schlesewsky, Matthias. 2009. The role of prominence information in the real-time comprehension of transitive constructions: A cross-linguistic approach. Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 19–58.
Bozic, Mirjana, Marslen-Wilson, William D., Stamatakis, Emmanuel A., Davis, Matthew H. & Tyler, Lorraine K. 2007. Differentiating morphology, form, and meaning: Neural correlates of morphological complexity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19: 1464–1475.
Brennan, Jonathan, Nir, Yuval, Hasson, Uri, Malach, Rafael, Heeger, David J. & Pylkkänen, Liina. 2012. Syntactic structure building in the anterior temporal lobe during natural story listening. Brain and Language 120: 163–173.
Brennan, Jonathan & Pylkkänen, Liina. 2010. Processing psych verbs: Behavioral and MEG measures of two different types of semantic complexity. Language and Cognitive Processes 25: 777–807.
Brennan, Jonathan & Pylkkänen, Liina. 2012. The time-course and spatial distribution of brain activity associated with sentence processing. NeuroImage 60: 1139–1148.
Brennan, Jonathan & Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Processing events: Behavioral and neuromagnetic correlates of aspectual coercion. Brain and Language 106: 132–143.
Carter, Cameron S., Braver, Todd S., Barch, Deanna M., Botvinick, Matthew M., Noll, Douglas & Cohen, Jonathan D. 1998. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 280: 747–749.
Chiarelli, Valentina, El Yagoubi, Radouane, Mondini, Sara, Bisiacchi, Patrizia & Semenza, Carlo. 2011. The syntactic and semantic processing of mass and count nouns: An ERP study. PLoS ONE 6(10): e25885.
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1989. A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. Ms, Cornell University.
Cohen, Jonathan D., MacWhinney, Brian, Flatt, Matthew & Provost, Jefferson. 1993. PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 25: 257–271.
Crain, Stephen & Fodor, Jerry D. 1985. How can grammars help parsers? In Natural Language Parsing, David Dowty, Liina Kartunnen & Arnold Zwicky (eds). Cambridge: CUP.
Dale, Anders M., Liu, Arthur K., Fischl, Bruce R., Buckner, Randy L., Belliveau, John W., Lewine, Jeffrey D. & Halgren, Eric. 2000. Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: Combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 26: 55–67.
Dale, Anders M. & Sereno, Martin I. 1993. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: A linear approach. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5: 162–176.
Desikan, Rahul S., Ségonne, Florent, Fischl, Bruce, Quinn, Brian T., Dickerson, Bradford C., Blacker, Deborah, Buckner, Randy L., Dale, Anders M., Maguire, R. Paul, Hyman, Bradley T., Albert, Marilyn S. & Killiany, Ronald J. 2006. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage 31: 968–980.
Devlin, Joseph T., Jamison, Helen L., Matthews, Paul M. & Gonnerman, Laura M. 2004. Morphology and the internal structure of words. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101: 14984–14988.
Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Ferreira, Fernanda. 1994. Choice of passive voice is affected by verb type and animacy. Journal of Memory and Language 33(6): 715–736.
Ferstl, Evelyn C., Neumann, Jane, Bogler, Carsten & von Cramon, D. Yves. 2008. The extended language network: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human Brain Mapping 29: 581–593.
Fiorentino, Robert & Poeppel, David. 2007. Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 22(7): 953–1000.
Friederici, Angela D., Meyer, Martin & von Cramon, D. Yves. 2000. Auditory language comprehension: An event-related fMRI study on the processing of syntactic and lexical information. Brain and Language 74: 289–300.
Gennari, Silvia & Poeppel, David. 2003. Processing correlates of lexical semantic complexity. Cognition 89: B27–B41.
Gold, Brian T. & Rastle, Kathleen. 2007. Neural correlates of morphological decomposition during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19: 1983–1993.
Grewe, Tanja, Bornkessel, Ina, Zysset, Stefan, Wiese, Richard, von Cramon, D. Yves & Schlesewsky, Matthias. 2005. The emergence of the unmarked: A new perspective on the language-specific function of Broca’s area. Human Brain Mapping 26: 178–90.
Grewe, Tanja, Bornkessel, Ina, Zysset, Stefan, Wiese, Richard, von Cramon, D. Yves & Schlesewsky, Matthias. 2006. Linguistic prominence and Broca’s area: The influence of animacy as a linearization principle. NeuroImage 32: 1395–402.
Grodzinsky, Yosef & Friederici, Angela D. 2006. Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 16: 240–246.
Hagoort, Peter, Hald, Lea, Bastiaansen, Marcel & Petersson, Karl Magnus. 2004. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science 304: 438–441.
Hämäläinen, Matti S. & Sarvas, Jukka. 1989. Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 36: 165–71.
Hämäläinen, Matti & Ilmoniemi, Risto J. 1984. Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: Estimates of current distributions. Technical Report TKK-F-A559, Helsinki University, Helsinki.
Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subject, Events, and Licensing. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. Inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hickok, Gregory & Poeppel, David. 2007. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8: 393–402.
Humphries, Colin, Binder, Jeffrey R., Medler, David A. & Liebenthal, Einat. 2006. Syntactic and semantic modulation of neural activity during auditory sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18: 665–679.
Husband, E. Matthew, Kelly, Lisa A. & Zhu, David C. 2011. Using complement coercion to understand the neural basis of semantic composition: Evidence from an fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23: 3254–3266.
Kuperberg, Gina R., Choi, Arim, Cohn, Neil, Paczynski, Martin & Jackendoff, Ray. 2010. Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22: 2685–2701.
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1965. Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Lakoff, George. 1965. On the Nature of Syntactic Regularity. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.
Lau, Ellen F., Phillips, Colin & Poeppel, David. 2008. A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9: 920–933.
Lehtonen, Minna, Vorobyev, Victor A., Hugdahl, Kenneth, Tuokkola, Terhi & Laine, Matti. 2006. Neural correlates of morphological decomposition in a morphologically rich language: An fMRI study. Brain and Language 98: 182–193.
Lehtonen, Minna, Monahan, Philip J. & Poeppel, David. 2011. Evidence for early morphological decomposition: Combining masked priming with magnetoencephalography. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(11): 3366–3379.
Leminen, Alina, Leminen, Miika, Lehtonen, Minna, Nevalainen, Päivi, Ylinen, Sari, Kimppa, Lilli, Sannemann, Christian, Mäkelä, Jyrki P. & Kujala, Teija. 2011. Spatiotemporal dynamics of the processing of spoken inflected and derived words: A combined EEG and MEG study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5: 66.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Levin, Beth & Rappaport-Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Levinson, Lisa. 2012. The morphosemantics of (anti-)causative alternations. Talk presented at the
2012 Linguistic Society of American Annual Meeting
, January.
MacDonald, Maryellen C., Pearlmutter, Neal J. & Seidenberg, Mark S. 1994. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101: 676–703.
Malaia, Evguenia, Wilbur, Ronnie B. & Weber-Fox, Christine. 2009. ERP evidence for telicity effects on syntactic processing in garden-path sentences. Brain and Language 108: 145–158.
Mazoyer, Bernard M., Tzourio, Nathalie, Frak, Victor, Syrota, André, Murayama, N., Levrier, Olivier, Salamon, George, Dehaene, Stanislas, Cohen, Laurent & Mehler, Jacques. 1993. The cortical representation of speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5: 467–479.
McCandliss, Bruce D., Cohen, Laurent & Dehaene, Stanislas. 2003. The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Science 7: 293–299.
McCawley, James D. 1968. Lexical insertion in a grammar without deep structure. In Papers from the Fourth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Bill J. Darden, Charles-James N. Bailey & Alice Davidson (eds), 71–80. Chicago IL: CLS.
McKoon, Gail & MacFarland, Talke. 2000. Externally and internally caused change of state verbs. Language 76: 833–858.
McKoon, Gail & MacFarland, Talke. 2002. Event templates in the lexical representation of verbs. Cognitive Psychology 45: 1–44.
Oldfield, R.C. 1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97–113.
Pallier, Christophe, Devauchelle, Anne-Dominique & Dehaene, Stanislas. 2011. Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 2522–2527.
Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Piñón, Christopher. 2001. Modelling the causative-inchoative alternation. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 76: 273–293.
Pylkkänen, Liina, Brennan, Jonathan & Bemis. Douglas K. 2011. Grounding the cognitive neuroscience of semantics in linguistic theory. Language and Cognitive Processes 26: 1317–1337.
Pylkkänen, Liina & Marantz, Alec. 2003. Tracking the time course of word recognition in MEG. Trends in Cognitive Science 7: 187–189.
Pylkkänen, Liina, Martin, Andrea E., McElree, Brian & Smart, Andrew. 2008. The anterior midline field: Coercion or decision making? Brain and Language 108: 184–190.
Pylkkänen, Liina & McElree, Brian. 2007. An MEG study of silent meaning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19: 1905–1921.
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing Arguments. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
R Development Core Team. 2006. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth. 2012. Lexicon uniformity and the causative alternation. In The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, Martin Everaert, Marijana Marelj & Tal Siloni (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. The theta system – an overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229–290.
Rogalsky, Corianne & Hickok, Gregory. 2010. The role of Broca’s Area in sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23: 1–17.
Sahin, Ned T., Pinker, Steven, Cash, Sydney S., Schomer, Donald & Halgren, Eric. 2009. Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical, and phonological information with in Broca’s area. Science 326: 445–449.
Santi, Andrea & Grodzinsky, Yosef. 2007. Working memory and syntax interact in Broca’s area. NeuroImage 37: 8–17.
Santi, Andrea & Grodzinsky, Yosef. 2010. fMRI adaptation dissociates syntactic complexity dimensions. NeuroImage 51: 1285–1293.
Shapiro, Lewis P., Zurif, Edgar & Grimshaw, Jane. 1987. Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs. Cognition 27: 219–246.
Shetreet, Einat & Friedmann, Naama. 2012. Stretched, jumped, and fell: An fMRI investigation of reflexive verbs and other intransitives. NeuroImage 60: 1800–1806.
Shetreet, Einat, Friedmann, Naama & Hadar, Uri. 2009a. Cortical representation of verbs with optional complements: The theoretical contribution of fMRI. Human Brain Mapping 31: 770–785.
Shetreet, Einat, Friedmann, Naama & Hadar, Uri. 2009b. The neural correlates of linguistic distinctions: Unaccusative and unergative verbs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19: 1753–1767.
Shetreet, Einat, Palti, Dafna, Friedmann, Naama & Hadar, Uri. 2007. Cortical representation of verb processing in sentence comprehension: Number of complements, subcategorization, and thematic frames. Cerebral Cortex 17: 1958–1969.
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1976. The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In The Grammar of Causative Constructions [Syntax and Semantics 6], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 1–40. New York NY: Academic Press.
Steinhauer, Karsten, Pancheva, Roumyana, Newman, Aaron J., Gennari, Silvia & Ullman, Michael T. 2001. How the mass counts: An electrophysiological approach to the processing of lexical features. NeuroReport 12: 999–1005.
Stowe, Laurie A., Broere, Cees A.J., Paans, Anne M.J., Wijers, Albertus A., Mulder, Gijsbertus, Vaalburg, Wim & Zwarts, Frans. 1998. Localizing components of a complex task: Sentence processing and working memory. Neuroreport 9: 2995–2999.
Stowe, Laurie A. 1986. Parsing wh-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes 2: 227–246.
Stowe, Laurie A., Haverkort, Marco & Zwarts, Frans. 2005. Rethinking the neurological basis of language. Lingua 115: 997–1042.
Vandenberghe, Rik, Nobre, Anna Christina & Price, Charis J. 2002. The response of left temporal cortex to sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14: 550–560.
Vartiainen, Johanna, Aggujaro, Silvia, Lehtonen, Minna, Hultén, Laine, Annika M. & Salmelin, Riita. 2009. Neural dynamics of reading morphologically complex words. NeuroImage 47: 2064–2072.
Zweig, Eytan & Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. A visual M170 effect of morphological complexity. Language and Cognitive Processes 24: 412–439.