Part of
Morphological Metatheory
Edited by Daniel Siddiqi and Heidi Harley
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 229] 2016
► pp. 163200
References (94)
References
Adachi, Y., Shimogawara, M., Higuchi, M., Haruta, Y. & Ochiai, M. 2001. Reduction of non-periodic environmental magnetic noise in MEG measurement by continuously adjusted least squares method. IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity 11: 669–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Schäfer, Florian. 2006. The properties of anticausatives crosslinguistically. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 187–212. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald. 2007. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Davidson, Douglas J. & Bates, Douglas M. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59: 390–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baggio, Giosuè, Choma, Travis, van Lambalgen, Michiel & Hagoort, Peter. 2010. Coercion and compositionality. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22: 2131–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas & Maechler, Martin. 2009. lme4: Linear Mixed-effects Models Using S4 Classes. R package, version 0.999375–31.Google Scholar
Bedny, Marina, Hulbert, Justin C. & Thompson-Schill, Sharon L. 2007. Understanding words in context: The role of Broca’s area in word comprehension. Brain Research 1146: 101–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bemis, Douglas K. & Pylkkänen, Liina. 2011. Simple composition: A magnetoencephalography investigation into the comprehension of minimal linguistic phrases. The Journal of Neuroscience 31: 2801–2814. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ben-Shachar, Michal, Palti, Dafna & Grodzinsky, Yosef. 2004. Neural correlates of syntactic movement: Converging evidence from two fMRI experiments. NeuroImage 21: 1320–1336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Embick, David. 2003. Causative derivations in Hindi. Ms, University of Texas and University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Bittner, Maria. 1999. Concealed causatives. Natural Language Semantics 7: 1–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bookheimer, S. 2002. Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience 25: 151–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bornkessel, Ina & Schlesewsky, Matthias. 2006. The extended argument dependency model: A neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. Psychological Review 113: 787–821. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bornkessel, Ina, Zysset, Stefan, Friederici, Angela D., von Cramon, D. Yves & Matthias Schlesewsky. 2005. Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension. NeuroImage 26: 221–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, Ina & Schlesewsky, Matthias. 2009. The role of prominence information in the real-time comprehension of transitive constructions: A cross-linguistic approach. Language and Linguistics Compass 3: 19–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bozic, Mirjana, Marslen-Wilson, William D., Stamatakis, Emmanuel A., Davis, Matthew H. & Tyler, Lorraine K. 2007. Differentiating morphology, form, and meaning: Neural correlates of morphological complexity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19: 1464–1475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Jonathan, Nir, Yuval, Hasson, Uri, Malach, Rafael, Heeger, David J. & Pylkkänen, Liina. 2012. Syntactic structure building in the anterior temporal lobe during natural story listening. Brain and Language 120: 163–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Jonathan & Pylkkänen, Liina. 2010. Processing psych verbs: Behavioral and MEG measures of two different types of semantic complexity. Language and Cognitive Processes 25: 777–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The time-course and spatial distribution of brain activity associated with sentence processing. NeuroImage 60: 1139–1148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Processing events: Behavioral and neuromagnetic correlates of aspectual coercion. Brain and Language 106: 132–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carter, Cameron S., Braver, Todd S., Barch, Deanna M., Botvinick, Matthew M., Noll, Douglas & Cohen, Jonathan D. 1998. Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 280: 747–749. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chiarelli, Valentina, El Yagoubi, Radouane, Mondini, Sara, Bisiacchi, Patrizia & Semenza, Carlo. 2011. The syntactic and semantic processing of mass and count nouns: An ERP study. PLoS ONE 6(10): e25885. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1989. A semantics for unaccusatives and its syntactic consequences. Ms, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Cohen, Jonathan D., MacWhinney, Brian, Flatt, Matthew & Provost, Jefferson. 1993. PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 25: 257–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crain, Stephen & Fodor, Jerry D. 1985. How can grammars help parsers? In Natural Language Parsing, David Dowty, Liina Kartunnen & Arnold Zwicky (eds). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dale, Anders M., Liu, Arthur K., Fischl, Bruce R., Buckner, Randy L., Belliveau, John W., Lewine, Jeffrey D. & Halgren, Eric. 2000. Dynamic statistical parametric mapping: Combining fMRI and MEG for high-resolution imaging of cortical activity. Neuron 26: 55–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dale, Anders M. & Sereno, Martin I. 1993. Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: A linear approach. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5: 162–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Desikan, Rahul S., Ségonne, Florent, Fischl, Bruce, Quinn, Brian T., Dickerson, Bradford C., Blacker, Deborah, Buckner, Randy L., Dale, Anders M., Maguire, R. Paul, Hyman, Bradley T., Albert, Marilyn S. & Killiany, Ronald J. 2006. An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interest. NeuroImage 31: 968–980. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devlin, Joseph T., Jamison, Helen L., Matthews, Paul M. & Gonnerman, Laura M. 2004. Morphology and the internal structure of words. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101: 14984–14988. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, Fernanda. 1994. Choice of passive voice is affected by verb type and animacy. Journal of Memory and Language 33(6): 715–736. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferstl, Evelyn C., Neumann, Jane, Bogler, Carsten & von Cramon, D. Yves. 2008. The extended language network: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human Brain Mapping 29: 581–593. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiorentino, Robert & Poeppel, David. 2007. Compound words and structure in the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 22(7): 953–1000. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Friederici, Angela D., Meyer, Martin & von Cramon, D. Yves. 2000. Auditory language comprehension: An event-related fMRI study on the processing of syntactic and lexical information. Brain and Language 74: 289–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gennari, Silvia & Poeppel, David. 2003. Processing correlates of lexical semantic complexity. Cognition 89: B27–B41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gold, Brian T. & Rastle, Kathleen. 2007. Neural correlates of morphological decomposition during visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19: 1983–1993. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grewe, Tanja, Bornkessel, Ina, Zysset, Stefan, Wiese, Richard, von Cramon, D. Yves & Schlesewsky, Matthias. 2005. The emergence of the unmarked: A new perspective on the language-specific function of Broca’s area. Human Brain Mapping 26: 178–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Linguistic prominence and Broca’s area: The influence of animacy as a linearization principle. NeuroImage 32: 1395–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, Yosef & Friederici, Angela D. 2006. Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 16: 240–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagoort, Peter, Hald, Lea, Bastiaansen, Marcel & Petersson, Karl Magnus. 2004. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science 304: 438–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hämäläinen, Matti S. & Sarvas, Jukka. 1989. Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 36: 165–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hämäläinen, Matti & Ilmoniemi, Risto J. 1984. Interpreting measured magnetic fields of the brain: Estimates of current distributions. Technical Report TKK-F-A559, Helsinki University, Helsinki.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subject, Events, and Licensing. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. Inchoative/causative verb alternations. In Causatives and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 23], Bernard Comrie & Maria Polinsky (eds), Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickok, Gregory & Poeppel, David. 2007. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8: 393–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Humphries, Colin, Binder, Jeffrey R., Medler, David A. & Liebenthal, Einat. 2006. Syntactic and semantic modulation of neural activity during auditory sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18: 665–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Husband, E. Matthew, Kelly, Lisa A. & Zhu, David C. 2011. Using complement coercion to understand the neural basis of semantic composition: Evidence from an fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23: 3254–3266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuperberg, Gina R., Choi, Arim, Cohn, Neil, Paczynski, Martin & Jackendoff, Ray. 2010. Electrophysiological correlates of complement coercion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22: 2685–2701. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1965. Generative grammatical studies in the Japanese language. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Lakoff, George. 1965. On the Nature of Syntactic Regularity. Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.
Lau, Ellen F., Phillips, Colin & Poeppel, David. 2008. A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9: 920–933. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehtonen, Minna, Vorobyev, Victor A., Hugdahl, Kenneth, Tuokkola, Terhi & Laine, Matti. 2006. Neural correlates of morphological decomposition in a morphologically rich language: An fMRI study. Brain and Language 98: 182–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehtonen, Minna, Monahan, Philip J. & Poeppel, David. 2011. Evidence for early morphological decomposition: Combining masked priming with magnetoencephalography. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(11): 3366–3379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leminen, Alina, Leminen, Miika, Lehtonen, Minna, Nevalainen, Päivi, Ylinen, Sari, Kimppa, Lilli, Sannemann, Christian, Mäkelä, Jyrki P. & Kujala, Teija. 2011. Spatiotemporal dynamics of the processing of spoken inflected and derived words: A combined EEG and MEG study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5: 66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport-Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levinson, Lisa. 2012. The morphosemantics of (anti-)causative alternations. Talk presented at the 2012 Linguistic Society of American Annual Meeting , January.
MacDonald, Maryellen C., Pearlmutter, Neal J. & Seidenberg, Mark S. 1994. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101: 676–703. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malaia, Evguenia, Wilbur, Ronnie B. & Weber-Fox, Christine. 2009. ERP evidence for telicity effects on syntactic processing in garden-path sentences. Brain and Language 108: 145–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mazoyer, Bernard M., Tzourio, Nathalie, Frak, Victor, Syrota, André, Murayama, N., Levrier, Olivier, Salamon, George, Dehaene, Stanislas, Cohen, Laurent & Mehler, Jacques. 1993. The cortical representation of speech. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5: 467–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCandliss, Bruce D., Cohen, Laurent & Dehaene, Stanislas. 2003. The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Science 7: 293–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1968. Lexical insertion in a grammar without deep structure. In Papers from the Fourth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Bill J. Darden, Charles-James N. Bailey & Alice Davidson (eds), 71–80. Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
McKoon, Gail & MacFarland, Talke. 2000. Externally and internally caused change of state verbs. Language 76: 833–858. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Event templates in the lexical representation of verbs. Cognitive Psychology 45: 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oldfield, R.C. 1971. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9: 97–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pallier, Christophe, Devauchelle, Anne-Dominique & Dehaene, Stanislas. 2011. Cortical representation of the constituent structure of sentences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 2522–2527. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Piñón, Christopher. 2001. Modelling the causative-inchoative alternation. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 76: 273–293.Google Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina, Brennan, Jonathan & Bemis. Douglas K. 2011. Grounding the cognitive neuroscience of semantics in linguistic theory. Language and Cognitive Processes 26: 1317–1337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina & Marantz, Alec. 2003. Tracking the time course of word recognition in MEG. Trends in Cognitive Science 7: 187–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina, Martin, Andrea E., McElree, Brian & Smart, Andrew. 2008. The anterior midline field: Coercion or decision making? Brain and Language 108: 184–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina & McElree, Brian. 2007. An MEG study of silent meaning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19: 1905–1921. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2002. Introducing Arguments. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
R Development Core Team. 2006. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth. 2012. Lexicon uniformity and the causative alternation. In The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface, Martin Everaert, Marijana Marelj & Tal Siloni (eds). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 2002. The theta system – an overview. Theoretical Linguistics 28: 229–290.Google Scholar
Rogalsky, Corianne & Hickok, Gregory. 2010. The role of Broca’s Area in sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23: 1–17.Google Scholar
Sahin, Ned T., Pinker, Steven, Cash, Sydney S., Schomer, Donald & Halgren, Eric. 2009. Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical, and phonological information with in Broca’s area. Science 326: 445–449. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santi, Andrea & Grodzinsky, Yosef. 2007. Working memory and syntax interact in Broca’s area. NeuroImage 37: 8–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. fMRI adaptation dissociates syntactic complexity dimensions. NeuroImage 51: 1285–1293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Lewis P., Zurif, Edgar & Grimshaw, Jane. 1987. Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs. Cognition 27: 219–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shetreet, Einat & Friedmann, Naama. 2012. Stretched, jumped, and fell: An fMRI investigation of reflexive verbs and other intransitives. NeuroImage 60: 1800–1806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shetreet, Einat, Friedmann, Naama & Hadar, Uri. 2009a. Cortical representation of verbs with optional complements: The theoretical contribution of fMRI. Human Brain Mapping 31: 770–785. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. The neural correlates of linguistic distinctions: Unaccusative and unergative verbs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19: 1753–1767.Google Scholar
Shetreet, Einat, Palti, Dafna, Friedmann, Naama & Hadar, Uri. 2007. Cortical representation of verb processing in sentence comprehension: Number of complements, subcategorization, and thematic frames. Cerebral Cortex 17: 1958–1969. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1976. The grammar of causative constructions: A conspectus. In The Grammar of Causative Constructions [Syntax and Semantics 6], Masayoshi Shibatani (ed.), 1–40. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Steinhauer, Karsten, Pancheva, Roumyana, Newman, Aaron J., Gennari, Silvia & Ullman, Michael T. 2001. How the mass counts: An electrophysiological approach to the processing of lexical features. NeuroReport 12: 999–1005. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stowe, Laurie A., Broere, Cees A.J., Paans, Anne M.J., Wijers, Albertus A., Mulder, Gijsbertus, Vaalburg, Wim & Zwarts, Frans. 1998. Localizing components of a complex task: Sentence processing and working memory. Neuroreport 9: 2995–2999. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stowe, Laurie A. 1986. Parsing wh-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes 2: 227–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stowe, Laurie A., Haverkort, Marco & Zwarts, Frans. 2005. Rethinking the neurological basis of language. Lingua 115: 997–1042. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandenberghe, Rik, Nobre, Anna Christina & Price, Charis J. 2002. The response of left temporal cortex to sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14: 550–560. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vartiainen, Johanna, Aggujaro, Silvia, Lehtonen, Minna, Hultén, Laine, Annika M. & Salmelin, Riita. 2009. Neural dynamics of reading morphologically complex words. NeuroImage 47: 2064–2072. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zweig, Eytan & Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. A visual M170 effect of morphological complexity. Language and Cognitive Processes 24: 412–439. DOI logoGoogle Scholar