Article published in:
Morphological Metatheory
Edited by Daniel Siddiqi and Heidi Harley
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 229] 2016
► pp. 237270
References

References

Akinlabi, Akinbiyi
1985Tonal Underspecification and Yorùbá Tone. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Ibadan.
Allen, Margaret
1978The morphology of negative prefixes in English. In Papers from Annual Meeting, North Eastern Linguistics Society, 1–11. Amherst MA: GSLA.Google Scholar
Archangeli, Diana, Mielke, Jeff & Pulleyblank, Douglas
2012aFrom sequence frequencies to conditions in Bantu vowel harmony: Building a grammar from the ground up. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics 22(1).Google Scholar
2012bGreater than noise: Frequency effects in Bantu height harmony. In Phonological Explorations: Empirical, Theoretical and Diachronic Issues, Bert Botma & Roland Noske (eds), 191–222. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Archangeli, Diana & Pulleyblank, Douglas
2012Emergent phonology: Evidence from English. In Issues in English Linguistics, Ik-Hwan Lee, Young-Se Kang, Kyoung-Ae Kim, Kee-Ho Kim, Il-Kon Kim, Seong-Ha Rhee, Jin-Hyuang Kim, Hyo-Young Kim, Ki-Jeang Lee, Hye-Kyung Kang, & Sung-Ho Ahn (eds), 1–26. Seoul: Hankookmunhwasa.Google Scholar
2013Esimbi prefix selection. Ms, University of Arizona and University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
2015Tonal allomorphy in Kinande. In Capturing Phonological Shades, Lian Hee Wee & Yuchau Hsiao (eds), 76–100. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
To appear. Phonology as an emergent system. In The Routledge Handbook of Phonological Theory, Anna Bosch & S.J. Hannahs (eds) London Routledge
Under review. Emergence and allomorphy: Kinande recent past tone patterns. In Challenges and New Prospects on Prosody in West Africa, Firmin Ahoua (ed.)
Awobuluyi, Oladele
1978Essentials of Yoruba Grammar. Ibadan: OUP.Google Scholar
Bamgbose, Ayo
1966aThe assimilated low tone in Yoruba. Lingua 16: 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1966bA Grammar of Yoruba. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia
2004Morph insertion and allomorphy in Optimality Theory. International Journal of English Studies 4: 73–104.Google Scholar
Chen, Matthew Y.
1987The syntax of Xiamen tone sandhi. Phonology 4: 109–149. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris
1965Some controversial questions in phonological theory. Journal of Linguistics 1: 97–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1968The Sound Pattern of English. New York NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Deacon, Terrence
1997The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. New York NY: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Eimas, Peter, Siqueland, Einar, Jusczyk, Peter & Vigorito, James
1971Speech perception in infants. Science 171: 303–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gambarage, Joash Johannes & Pulleyblank, Douglas
In press. Tongue root harmony in Nata: An allomorphy-based account. In Africa’s Endangered Languages: Documentary and Theoretical Approaches, Jason Kandybowicz & Harold Torrence (eds) Oxford OUP
Gerken, LouAnn & Bollt, Alex
2008Three exemplars allow at least some linguistic generalizations: Implications for generalization mechanisms and constraints. Language Learning and Development 4: 228–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Kathleen Currie, Allen, Blake, Fry, Michael, Mackie, Scott & McAuliffe, Michael
2015Phonological CorpusTools. Version 1.1.1 http://​phonologicalcorpustools​.github​.io​/CorpusTools/Google Scholar
Halle, Morris
1997Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30: Papers at the Interface, B. Bruening, Y. Kang & M. McGinnis (eds), 425–449. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20.Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1994. Some key features of Distributed Morphology. In Papers on Phonology and Morphology [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21], Andrew Carnie & Heidi Harley (eds), 275–288. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Noyer, Rolf
1999Distributed Morphology. Glot International 4: 3–9.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig S.
1942Morpheme alternants in linguistic analysis. Language 18: 169–180. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Higgins, Holly Ann
2011Ikoma Vowel Harmony: Phonetics and Phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, Trinity Western University.
Hockett, Charles F.
1947Problems of morphemic analysis. Language 23: 321–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1958A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York NY: Macmillan Publishing.Google Scholar
1961Linguistic elements and their relations. Language 37: 29–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoijer, Harry
1933Tonkawa: An Indian language of Texas. In Handbook of American Indian Languages, Vol. III. New York NY: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
1949An Analytical Dictionary of the Tonkawa Language [University of California Publications in Linguistics 5]. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. & Valinande, Nzama
1985Globality in the Kinande tone system. In African Linguistics: Essays in Memory of M.W.K. Semikenke, Didier Goyvaerts (ed.), 239–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Itô, Junko, Mester, R. Armin & Padgett, Jaye
1995Licensing and underspecification in optimality theory. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 571–613.Google Scholar
Jusczyk, Peter & Luce, Paul
1994Infants’ sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language 33: 630–645. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kager, René
1996On affix allomorphy and syllable counting. In Interfaces in Phonology, Ursula Kleinhenz (ed.), 155–171. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Kuhl, Patricia, Williams, Karen & Lacerda, Francisco
1987Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Cell 49: 606–608.Google Scholar
Mascaró, Joan
2007External allomorphy and lexical representation. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 715–735. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maye, Jessica, Werker, Janet & Gerken, LouAnn
2002Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition 82: 101–111. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John & Prince, Alan
1995Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics [UMOP], 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, Jill Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey & Suzanne Urbancyzk (eds), 249–384. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Mutaka, Ngessimo
1990The Lexical Tonology of Kinande. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern California. Published by Lincom, Munich, 1994.
Myers, James & Tsay, Jane
2008Neutralization in Taiwan Southern Min tone sandhi. In Interfaces in Chinese Phonology: Festschrift in Honor of Matthew Y. Chen on his 70th Birthday, Yuchau E. Hsiao, Hui-chuan Hsu, Lian-Hee Wee & Dah-an Ho (eds), 47–78. Taiwan: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Newport, Elissa & Aslin, Richard
2004Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology 48: 127–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pfau, Roland
2000Features and Categories in Language Production. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Frankfurt.
2009Grammar as Processor: A Distributed Morphology Account of Spontaneous Speech Errors [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 137]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pitt, Mark A., Dilley, Laura, Johnson, Keith, Kiesling, Scott, Raymond, William D., Hume, Elizabeth & Fosler-Lussier, Eric
2007Buckeye Corpus of Conversational Speech, 2nd release. Columbus OH: Department of Psychology, Ohio State University (Distributor). www​.buckeyecorpus​.osu​.eduGoogle Scholar
Polka, Linda & Werker, Janet
1994Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance 20: 421–435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul
1993Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Technical Report RuCCS-TR-2. New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Douglas
1986Tone in Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saffran, Jenny, Aslin, Richard & Newport, Elissa
1996Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science 274: 1926–1928. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1933[1944] The psychological reality of phonemes. In Selected Writings of Edward Sapir, 46–60. Berkeley CA: University of California.Google Scholar
Seidl, Amanda & Buckley, Eugene
2005On the learning of arbitrary phonological rules. Language Learning and Development 1: 289–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Dorothy
1974Topics in English Morphology. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. (Garland 1979).
Stonham, John
1999Aspects of Tsishaath Nootka Phonetics & Phonology [Lincom Studies in Native American Linguistics]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Tranel, Bernard
1996French liaison and elision revisited: A unified account within Optimality Theory. In Aspects of Romance Linguistics, Claudia Parodi, Carlos Quicoli, Mario Saltarelli & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 433–455. Washington DC: Georgetown Universitiy Press.Google Scholar
Tsay, Jane & Myers, James
1996Taiwanese tone sandhi as allomorph selection. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 22, 394–405. Berkeley CA: BLS. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Ida C.
1952An Introduction to the Yoruba Language. Cambridge:W. Heffer and Sons.Google Scholar
Werker, Janet & Lalonde, Chris
1988Cross-language speech perception: Initial capabilities and developmental change. Developmental Psychology 24: 672–683. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yip, Moira
1980The Tonal Phonology of Chinese. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Sande, Hannah
2018. Cross-word morphologically conditioned scalar tone shift in Guébie. Morphology 28:3  pp. 253 ff. Crossref logo
Sande, Hannah
2020. Morphologically conditioned phonology with two triggers. Phonology 37:3  pp. 453 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.