The past decade has witnessed a productive convergence of a number of historically separate research strands. One strand explores the implicational models that grew out of classical WP approaches to inflection (e.g., Wurzel 1984; Maiden 2005; Blevins 2006; Ackerman et al. 2009). A second strand extends the information-theoretic perspectives on ‘morphological information’ developed originally in the processing models of Kostić et al. (2003), Moscoso del Prado Martín et al. (2004), and Milin et al. (2009a, b). A third strand investigates a ‘complex systems’ approach to grammatical organization (Ackerman & Blevins 2008; Ackerman et al. 2008; Beckner et al. 2009). The fourth strand develops a cohesive discriminative perspective on language learning and use (Ramscar & Yarlett 2007; Ramscar & Dye 2010; Ramscar et al. 2010, 2013; Ramscar 2013; Arnon & Ramscar 2012; Baayen et al. 2011). This chapter considers how the interaction of these distinct components has produced a general conception of the structure and function of morphological systems which opens significant points of contact with research in other domains.
2008Syntax: The state of the art. In Unity and Diversity of Languages, Piet van Sterkenberg (ed.), 215–229. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ackerman, Farrell, Blevins, James P. & Malouf, Robert
2009Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition, James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds), 54–81. Oxford: OUP.
2012Systemic polyfunctionality and morphology-syntax interdependencies. Defaults in Morphological Theory, Lexington KY.
Ackerman, Farrell & Malouf, Robert
2013Morphological organization: The Low Conditional Entropy Conjecture. Language 89: 429–464.
Ackerman, Farrell, Malouf, Robert & Blevins, James P
2008Inflectional morphology as a complex adaptive system. Paper presented at the First Annual Complex Systems and Language Workshop, University of Arizona, Tucson.
Ackerman, Farrell & Stump, Gregory T
2004Paradigms and periphrasis: A study in realization-based lexicalism. In Projecting Morphology, Louisa Sadler & Andrew Spencer (eds), 111–157. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Ackerman, Farrell & Webelhuth, Gert
1998A Theory of Predicates. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Anderson, Philip W
1972More is different. Science 177(4047): 393–396.
Anderson, Stephen R
1992A-Morphous Morphology. Cambridge: CUP.
Anderson, Stephen R
2015The morpheme: Its nature and use. In The Oxford Handbook of Inflection, Matthew Baerman (ed.), 11–33. Oxford: OUP.
Arnon, Inbal & Ramscar, Michael
2012Granularity and the acquisition of grammatical gender: How order-of-acquisition affects what gets learned. Cognition 122: 292–305.
Aronoff, Mark
1994Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Baayen, R. Harald, McQueen, James M., Dijkstra, Ton & Schreuder, Robert
2003Frequency effects in regular inflectional morphology: Revisiting Dutch plurals. In Morphological Structure in Language Processing, R. Harald Baayen & Robert Schreuder (eds), 355–370. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Baayen, R. Harald, Milin, Petar, Filipović Ðurđević, Dusica, Hendrix, Peter & Marelli, Marco
2011An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review 118: 438–481.
Baerman, Matthew, Brown, Dunstan & Corbett, Greville G
(eds)2015Understanding and Measuring Morphological Complexity. Oxford: OUP.
Bateson, Patrick & Gluckman, Peter
2011Plasticity, Robustness, Development and Evolution. Cambridge: CUP.
Beard, Robert & Volpe, Mark
2005Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology. In Handbook of English Word-Formation, Pavel Štekauer & Rochelle Lieber (eds), 189–205. Dordrecht: Springer.
Beckner, Clay, Blythe, Richard, Bybee, Joan L., Chrisiansen, Morton H., Croft, William, Ellis, Nick C., Holland, John, Ke, Jinyun, Larsen-Freeman, Diane & Schoenemann, Thomas
2009Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning 59: 1–26.
Blazej, Laura J. & Cohen-Goldberg, Ariel M
2015Can we hear morphological complexity before words are complex?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 41(1): 50–68.
Blevins, James P
2006Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42: 531–573.
Blevins, James P
2008Declension classes in Estonian. Linguistica Uralica 44(4): 241–267.
2013bWord-based morphology from Aristotle to modern WP. In Oxford Handbook of the History of Linguistics, Ch. 16, Keith Allan (ed.), 396–417. Oxford: OUP.
Blevins, James P
2016Word and Paradigm Morphology. Oxford: OUP.
Blevins, James P., Milin, Petar & Ramscar, Michael
2016The Zipfian Paradigm Cell Filling Problem. In Morphological paradigms and functions, Ferenc Kiefer, James P. Blevins & Huba Bartos (eds), in press. Leiden: Brill.
Bloch, Bernard
1947English verb inflection. Language 23: 399–418. Reprinted in Joos 1957, 243–254.
1926A set of postulates for the science of language. Language 2: 153–164. Reprinted in Joos 1957, 26–37.
Bloomfield, Leonard
1929Review of Konkordanz Panini-Candra by Bruno Liebich.Language 5: 267–276. Reprinted in Hockett 1970, 219–226.
Bloomfield, Leonard
1933Language. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Bochner, Harry
1993Simplicity in Generative Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Boeckx, Cedric, Leivada, Evelina & Tiago Martins, Pedro
2013Language and complexity considerations: A biolinguistic perspective. Llengua, Societat i Comunicació 11: 20–26.
Bonami, Olivier
2015Periphrasis as collocation. Morphology 25: 63–110.
Bonami, Olivier & Henri, Fabiola
2010Assessing empirically the inflectional complexity of Mauritian Creole. Paper presented at workshop on Formal Aspects of Creole Studies, Berlin. [URL]
Bonami, Olivier & Samvelian, Pollet
2015The diversity of inflectional periphrasis in Persian. Journal of Linguistics 51(2): 327–382.
Börjars, Kersti, Vincent, Nigel & Chapman, Carol
1997Paradigms, periphrases, and pronominal inflection: A featurebased account. In Yearbook of Morphology 1996, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 155–180. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Davis, Matthew H., Marslen-Wilson, William D. & Gaskell, M Gareth
2002Leading up the lexical garden-path: Segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 28: 218–244.
Elman, Jeffrey L., Bates, Elizabeth A., Johnson, Mark H., Karmiloff-Smith, Annette, Parisi, Domenico & Plunkett, Kim
1996Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
1997Synthesizing Nature-nurture: The Prenatal Roots of Instinctive Behavior. Hove: Psychology Press.
Gukhman, M.M
1955Glagolnye analaticheskie konstruksii kak osobyj sochetanij chastichnogo i polnogo slova (na materiale istorii nemetskogo iazyka). In Voprosy grammatischeskogo stoia, V.V. Vonogradov (ed.). Moscow: Academic Sciences.
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Silvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Harris, Zelig S
1942Morpheme alternants in linguistic analysis. Language 18: 169–180. Reprinted in Joos 1957, 109–115.
Hay, Jennifer B. & Baayen, R. Harald
2005Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Science 9(73): 342–348.
Hockett, Charles F
1947Problems of morphemic analysis. Language 23: 321–343. Reprinted in Joos 1957, 229–242.
Hockett, Charles F
1954Two models of grammatical description. Word 10: 210–231. Reprinted in Joos 1957, 386–399.
Hockett, Charles F
(ed.)1970A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
2014Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking. New York NY: Basic Books.
Jablonka, Eva & Lamb, Marion J
2006Four Dimensions of Evolution: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Jackendoff, Ray
1997The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Joos, Martin
(ed.)1957Readings in Linguistics I. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Kaplan, Ronald M. & Bresnan, Joan
1982Lexical-functional grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, Joan Bresnan (ed.). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Karttunen, Lauri
2003Computing with realizational morphology. In Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing [Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 2588], Alexander Gelbukh (ed.), 205–216. Heidelberg: Springer.
Karttunen, Lauri & Beesley, Kenneth R
2003Finite State Morphology. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Kemps, Rachèl, Ernestus, Mirjam, Schreuder, Robert & Baayen, R. Harald
2005Prosodic cues for morphological complexity: The case of Dutch plural nouns. Memory & Cognition 33(3): 430–446.
Koskenniemi, Kimmo Matti
1983Two-level morphology: A general computational model for word-form recognition and production. Technical Report 11, Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki.
Kostić, Aleksandar, Marković, Tania & Baucal, Aleksandar
2003Inflectional morphology and word meaning: Orthogonal or coimplicative domains? In Morphological Structure in Language Processing, R. Harald Baayen & Robert Schreuder (eds), 1–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langendoen, D. Terence
1981The generative capacity of word-formation components. Linguistic Inquiry 12(2): 320–322.
Lounsbury, Floyd
1953Oneida Verb Morphology [Yale University Publications in Anthropology 48]. New Haven CT: Yale University Press. Chapter 1 reprinted in Joos 1957, 379–385.
Maiden, Martin
2005Morphological autonomy and diachrony. In Yearbook of Morphology 2004, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 137–175. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Marantz, Alec
2013No escape from morphemes in morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 28(7): 905–916.
Matthews, Peter H
1965The inflectional component of a word-and-paradigm grammar. Journal of Linguistics 1: 139–171.
Matthews, Peter H
1970Recent developments in morphology. In New Horizon in Linguistics, John Lyons (ed.), Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Matthews, Peter H
1974Morphology. Cambridge: CUP.
Matthews, Peter H
1991Morphology. Cambridge: CUP.
Matthews, Peter H
1993Grammatical Theory in the United States: From Bloomfield to Chomsky. Cambridge: CUP.
2009aThe simultaneous effects of inflectional paradigms and classes on lexical recognition: Evidence from Serbian. Journal of Memory and Language 60: 50–64.
Milin, Petar, Kuperman, Victor, Kostić, Aleksandar & Baayen, R. Harald
2009bWords and paradigms bit by bit: An information-theoretic approach to the processing of inflection and derivation. In Analogy in Grammar: Form and Acquisition, James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds), 214–253. Oxford: OUP.
Morpurgo Davies, Anna
1978Analogy, segmentation and the early Neogrammarians. Transactions of the Philological Society 76(1): 36–60.
Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, Kostić, Aleksandar & Baayen, R. Harald
2004Putting the bits together: An information-theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition 94: 1–18.
Mürk, Harri William
1997A Handbook of Estonian: Nouns, Adjectives and Verbs [Indiana University Uralic and Altaic Series 163]. Bloomington IN: Indiana University.
Overton, Willis F
2010Life-span development: Concepts and issues. In The Handbook of Life-span Development, Vol. 1: Cognition, Biology and Methods, Richard M. Lerner & Willis F. Overton (eds), 1–29. Hoboken NJ: Wiley and Sons.
Oyama, Susan, Gray, Russell D. & Griffiths, Paul E
2001Cycles of Contingency: Developmental Systems Theory and Evolution. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Plag, Ingo
2014Phonological and phonetic variability in complex words: An uncharted territory. Italian Journal of Linguistics 26(2): 209–228.
Rácz, Péter, Pierrehumbert, Janet B., Hay, Jennifer B. & Papp, Victora
2014Morphological emergence. In The Handbook of Language Emergence, Brian MacWhinney & William O’Grady (eds). Hoboken NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ramscar, Michael, Dye, Melody & McCauley, Stewart M
2013aError and expectation in language learning: The curious absence of mouses in adult speech. Language 89(4): 760–793.
Ramscar, Michael, Hendrix, Peter, Love, Bradley & Baayen, R. Harald
2010The effects of feature-label-order and their implications for symbolic learning. Cognititive Science 34: 909–957.
Robins, Robert H
1959In defence of WP. Transactions of the Philological Society 58: 116–144. Reprinted in Transactions of the Philological Society 99(2001): 116–144.
Robins, Robert H
1997A Short History of Linguistics. London: Longman.
Sadler, Louisa & Spencer, Andrew
2001Syntax as an exponent of morphological features. In Yearbook of Morphology 2001, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 71–97. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Sampson, Geoffrey, Gil, David & Trudgill, Peter
(eds)2009Language Complexity as an Evolving Variable. Oxford: OUP.
Sapir, Edward
1921Language. San Diego CA: Harcourt Brace.
Seyfarth, Scott, Ackerman, Farrell & Malouf, Robert
2014Implicative organization facilitates morphological learning. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Herman Leung, Zachary O’Hagan, Sarah Bakst, Auburn Lutzross, Jonathan Manker, Nicholas Rolle & Katie Sardinha (eds). Berkeley CA: BLS.
Sims, Andrea
2015Inflectional Defectiveness. Cambridge: CUP.
Spencer, Andrew J
2012Identifying stems. Word Structure 5: 88–108.
Sproat, Richard
2005Current morphological theory. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 2(2): 63–75.
Stankiewicz, Edward
(ed.)1972A Baudouin de Courtenay Anthology. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.
Stump, Gregory & Finkel, Raphael
2013Morphological Typology: From Word to Paradigm. Cambridge: CUP.
Thelen, Esther & Bates, Elizabeth
2003Connectionism and dynamic systems: Are they really different?Developmental Science 6(4): 378–391.
Tuldava, Juhan
1994Estonian Textbook [Indiana University Uralic and Altaic Series 159]. Bloomington IN: Indiana University.
Weaver, Warren
1948Science and complexity. American Scientist 36: 536–544.
Weinreich, Uriel
1967On arguing with Mr. Katz: A brief rejoinder. Foundations of Language 11(1): 284–287.
Wurzel, Wolfgang U
1984Studien zur deutschen Lautstruktur. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Wurzel, Wolfgang U
1989Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
2023. Explaining dynamic morphological patterns in acquisition using Network Analysis. Morphology 33:4 ► pp. 511 ff.
Hathout, Nabil & Fiammetta Namer
2022. ParaDis: a family and paradigm model. Morphology 32:2 ► pp. 153 ff.
Herce, Borja
2022. Stress and stem allomorphy in the Romance perfectum: emergence, typology, and motivations of a symbiotic relation. Linguistics 60:4 ► pp. 1103 ff.
Herce, Borja
2023. The Typological Diversity of Morphomes,
Kapatsinski, Vsevolod
2021. What Are Constructions, and What Else Is Out There? An Associationist Perspective. Frontiers in Communication 5
Kapatsinski, Vsevolod
2023. Learning fast while avoiding spurious excitement and overcoming cue competition requires setting unachievable goals: reasons for using the logistic activation function in learning to predict categorical outcomes. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 38:4 ► pp. 575 ff.
2018. A Construction Morphology Approach to Sign Language Analysis. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4], ► pp. 141 ff.
Schmitz, Dominic, Dinah Baer-Henney & Ingo Plag
2021. The duration of word-final /s/ differs across morphological categories in English: evidence from pseudowords. Phonetica 78:5-6 ► pp. 571 ff.
Sims, Andrea D. & Jeff Parker
2016. How inflection class systems work: On the informativity of implicative structure. Word Structure 9:2 ► pp. 215 ff.
TOMASCHEK, FABIAN, INGO PLAG, MIRJAM ERNESTUS & R. HARALD BAAYEN
2021. Phonetic effects of morphology and context: Modeling the duration of word-final S in English with naïve discriminative learning. Journal of Linguistics 57:1 ► pp. 123 ff.
Wilmoth, Sasha & John Mansfield
2021. Inflectional predictability and prosodic morphology in Pitjantjatjara and Yankunytjatjara. Morphology 31:4 ► pp. 355 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.