Article published in:
Morphological Metatheory
Edited by Daniel Siddiqi and Heidi Harley
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 229] 2016
► pp. 343386
References

References

Arregi, Karlos & Nevins, Andrew
2012Morphotactics: Basque Auxiliaries and the Structure of Spellout. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1976Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2012Morphological stems: What William of Ockham really said. Word Structure 5(1): 28–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, Harald R.
1992Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1991, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 109–150. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993On frequency, transparency, and productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1992, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 181–208. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Productivity in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 447–469. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald & Lieber, Rochelle
1991Productivity and English derivation: A corpus based study. Linguistics 29: 801–843. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald & Renouf, Antoinette
1996Chronicling the Times: Productive innovations in an English newspaper. Language 29: 801–843. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Alan
2011Simplicity. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2011 edn, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). http://​plato​.stanford​.edu​/archives​/sum2011​/entries​/simplicity/Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo
2013The Spanish lexicon stores stems with theme vowels, not roots with inflectional class features. Probus 25(1): 3–103.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David
2000The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. In University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 10, Kleanthes Grohmann & Caro Struijke (eds), 35–71. College Park MD: University of Maryland, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
2012Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bonet, Eulalia
2013Agreement in two steps (at least). In Distributed Morphology Today, Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
1985Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bye, Patrik & Svenonius, Peter
2012Non-concatenative morphology as epiphenomenon. In The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence, Jochen Trommer (ed.), 427–495. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caha, Pavel
2009The Nanosyntax of Case. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Chomsky, Noam
1970Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 184–221. Waltham MA: Ginn.Google Scholar
Chung, Inkie
2007Suppletive negation in Korean and Distributed Morphology. Lingua 117: 95–148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dakin, Karen & Wichmann, Søren
2000Cacao and chocolate: A Uto-Aztecan perspective. Ancient Mesoamerica 11: 55–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Williams, Edwin
1987On the Definition of Word. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Embick, David
2007aBlocking effects and analytic/synthetic alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(1): 1–37. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007bLinearization and local dislocation: Derivational mechanics and interactions. Linguistic Analysis 33(3–4): 303–336.Google Scholar
2010aLocalism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012On the targets of phonological realization. Talk given to the MSPI Workshop at Stanford University, 13 October 2012.
2013Morphemes and morphophonological loci. In Distributed Morphology Today, Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David & Halle, Morris
2005On the status of stems in morphological theory. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 270], Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken & Haike Jacobs (eds), 37–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David & Marantz, Alec
2008Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1): 1–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David & Noyer, Rolf
2007Distributed morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 289–324. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane
2000Locality and extended projection. In Lexical Specification and Insertion [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 197], Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert & Jane Grimshaw (eds), 115–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris
1997Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In Papers at the Interface [MIT Working Papers in Linguistcs 30], Benjamin Bruening, Yoonyung Kang & Martha McGinnis (eds), 425–450. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1994Some key features of Distributed Morphology. In Papers on Phonology and Morphology [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21], Andrew Carnie & Heidi Harley, 275–288. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
2009A morphosyntactic account of the ‘Latinate’ ban on dative shiftin English. Ms, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
2014On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40(3–4): 225–276. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Tubino Blanco, Mercedes
2013Cycles, vocabulary items, and stem forms in Hiaki. In Distributed Morphology Today: Morphemes for Morris Halle, Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds), 117–134. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Noyer, Rolf
1999State-of-the-Article: Distributed Morphology. Glot International 4: 3–9.Google Scholar
Haugen, Jason D.
2008Morphology at the Interfaces: Reduplication and Noun Incorporation in Uto-Aztecan [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 117]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Borrowed borrowings: Nahuatl loanwords in English. Lexis 3: 63–106.Google Scholar
2011Reduplication in Distributed Morphology. In Proceedings of the 4th Arizona Linguistics Circle Conference (ALC 4). Coyote Papers, Vol. 18. Tucson, AZ: Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona. http://​arizona​.openrepository​.com​/arizona​/handle​/10150​/138590
Haugen, Jason D. & Everdell, Michael
2015‘To kill’ and ‘to die’ (and other suppletive verbs) in Uto-Aztecan. Language Dynamics and Change 5: 227–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Jason D. & Siddiqi, Daniel
2013aRoots and the derivation. Linguistic Inquiry 44(3): 493–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013bOn double marking and containment in Realization Theory. Ms. <ling​.auf​.net​/lingbuzz
Hay, Jennifer & Baayen, R. Harald
2002Parsing and productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 2001, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 203–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Phonotactics, parsing, and productivity. Rivista di Linguistica 15(1): 99–130.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Plag, Ingo
2004What constrains possible suffix combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 565–596. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1954Two models of grammatical description. Word 10: 210–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopi Dictionary Project
1998Hopi Dictionary/Hopìikwa Lavàytutuveni: A Hopi-English Dictionary of the Third Mesa Dialect. Tucson AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Izvorski, Roumi
2002Some observations about the form and meaning of the perfect. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Armin von Stechow (eds), 153–204. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1983Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1990Semantic Structures. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1992Languages of the Mind: Essays on Mental Representation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. Douglas
1972Formal Aspects of Phonological Description. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kandybowicz, Jason
2007On fusion and multiple copy spellout. In The Copy Theory of Movement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 107], Norbert Corver & Jairo Nunes (eds), 119–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Ronald
1987Three seductions of computational psycholinguistics. In Linguistic Theory and Computer Applications, Peter J. Whitelock, Mary McGee Wood, Harold L. Somers, Rod Johnson & Paul Bennett (eds), 149–188. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1997The English complementizer of. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1: 43–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1982Lexical morphology and phonology. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm: Selected Papers from SICOL 1981, Linguistic Society of Korea (eds), 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.
1983Word formation and the lexicon. In Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference, Francis Ingemann (ed.), 3–29. Lawrence KS: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle
1992Deconstructing Morphology: Word Formation in Syntactic Theory. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1997Stem suppletion, or the arbitrariness of the sign. Talk given at the Universite’ de Paris VIII.
1997No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. U.Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): 201–225.Google Scholar
2013Locality domains for contextual allomorphy across the interfaces. In Distributed Morphology Today, Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Melnar, Lynette
2004Caddo Verb Morphology. Lincoln NB: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2013How much context is enough? Two cases of span-conditioned stem allomorphy. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 77–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moskal, Baeta
2013Limits on Noun-suppletion. GLOW 36, Lund University, Sweden.
Muriungi, Peter Kinyua
2009The union spell-out mechanism. In Nanosyntax, Peter Svenonius, Gillian Ramchand, Michal Starke & Knut Tarald Taraldsen (eds). Special issue of Tromsø Working Papers on Language and Linguistics: Nordlyd 36(1): 191–205.Google Scholar
Newell, Heather
2008Aspects of the Morphology and Phonology of Phases. Ph.D. dissertation. McGill University.
Noyer, Rolf
1992Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Pancheva, Roumyana
2003The aspectual makeup of perfect participles and the interpretation of perfect. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Armin von Stechow (eds), 277–306. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul M. & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
1978Traces and the description of English complementizer contraction. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 1–29.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul
1993Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar [Technical Reports of the Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science, RuCCS-TR-2]. New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. Published 2004, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Radkevich, Nina
2010On Location: The Structure of Case and Adpositiona. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Ramchand, Gillian
2008Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Raimy, Eric
2000The Phonology and Morphology of Reduplication [Studies in Generative Grammar 52]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schultnik, Henk
1961Produktiviteit als morfologisch fenomeen. Forum der Letteren 33: 110–125.Google Scholar
Siddiqi, Daniel
2009Syntax within the Word: Economy, Allomorphy, and Argument Selection in Distributed Morphology [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 138]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Distributed Morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Starke, Michal
2009Nanosyntax: A short primer on a new approach to language. In Nanosyntax, Peter Svenonius, Gillian Ramchand, Michal Starke & Knut Tarald Taraldsen (eds). Special issue of Tromsø Working Papers on Language and Linguistics: Nordlyd 36(1): 1–6.Google Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph Paul & MacWhinney, Brian
1986Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory and Cognition 14: 17–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988Are inflected forms stored in the lexicon? In Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, Michael T. Hammond & Michael T. Noonan (eds), 101–116. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2012Spanning. Ms, CASTL, University of Tromsø. http://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingBuzz​/001501
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald
2010The nanosyntax of Nguni noun class prefixes and concords. Lingua 120: 1522–1548. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trommer, Jochen
1999Morphology consuming syntax’s resources: Generation and parsing in a minimalist version of Distributed Morphology. In Proceedings of the ESSLI Workshop on Resource Logics and Minimalist Grammars.
2001Distributed Optimality. Ph.D. dissertation, Universität Potsdam.
Williams, Edwin
2003Representation Theory. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold
1990Inflectional morphology as a (sub)component of grammar. In Contemporary Morphology, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Hans C. Luschützky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & John R. Rennison (eds), 217–236. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold & Pullum, Geoffrey
1986The principle of phonology-free syntax: Introductory remarks. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 32: 63–91.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Caha, Pavel, Karen De Clercq & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd
2019. The Fine Structure of the Comparative. Studia Linguistica 73:3  pp. 470 ff. Crossref logo
Carlson, Matthew T., Antonio Fábregas & Michael T. Putnam
2021. How Wide the Divide? – Theorizing ‘Constructions’ in Generative and Usage-Based Frameworks. Frontiers in Psychology 12 Crossref logo
Kilbourn-Ceron, Oriana, Heather Newell, Máire B. Noonan & Lisa deMena Travis
2016.  In Morphological Metatheory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 229],  pp. 121 ff. Crossref logo
Revithiadou, Anthi, Giorgos Markopoulos & Vassilios Spyropoulos
2019. Changing shape according to strength: Evidence from root allomorphy in Greek . The Linguistic Review 36:3  pp. 553 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.