References
Arregi, Karlos & Nevins, Andrew. 2012. Morphotactics: Basque Auxiliaries and the Structure of Spellout. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aronoff, Mark. 2012. Morphological stems: What William of Ockham really said. Word Structure 5(1): 28–51. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, Harald R. 1992. Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1991, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 109–150. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, Harald R. 1993. On frequency, transparency, and productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1992, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 181–208. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, Harald R. 1994. Productivity in language production. Language and Cognitive Processes 9: 447–469. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. Harald & Lieber, Rochelle. 1991. Productivity and English derivation: A corpus based study. Linguistics 29: 801–843. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baayen, R. Harald & Renouf, Antoinette. 1996. Chronicling the Times: Productive innovations in an English newspaper. Language 29: 801–843. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Alan, 2011. Simplicity. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2011 edn, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). <[URL]>![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2013. The Spanish lexicon stores stems with theme vowels, not roots with inflectional class features. Probus 25(1): 3–103.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2000. The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. In University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 10, Kleanthes Grohmann & Caro Struijke (eds), 35–71. College Park MD: University of Maryland, Department of Linguistics.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2012. Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonet, Eulalia. 2013. Agreement in two steps (at least). In Distributed Morphology Today, Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bye, Patrik & Svenonius, Peter. 2012. Non-concatenative morphology as epiphenomenon. In The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence, Jochen Trommer (ed.), 427–495. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Caha, Pavel. 2009. The Nanosyntax of Case. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Chomsky, Noam. 1970. Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 184–221. Waltham MA: Ginn.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chung, Inkie. 2007. Suppletive negation in Korean and Distributed Morphology. Lingua 117: 95–148. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dakin, Karen & Wichmann, Søren. 2000. Cacao and chocolate: A Uto-Aztecan perspective. Ancient Mesoamerica 11: 55–75. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, David. 2007a. Blocking effects and analytic/synthetic alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(1): 1–37. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, David. 2007b. Linearization and local dislocation: Derivational mechanics and interactions. Linguistic Analysis 33(3–4): 303–336.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, David. 2010a. Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, David. 2012. On the targets of phonological realization. Talk given to the MSPI Workshop at Stanford University, 13 October 2012.
Embick, David. 2013. Morphemes and morphophonological loci. In Distributed Morphology Today, Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, David & Halle, Morris. 2005. On the status of stems in morphological theory. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 270], Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken & Haike Jacobs (eds), 37–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, David & Marantz, Alec. 2008. Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1): 1–53. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Embick, David & Noyer, Rolf. 2007. Distributed morphology and the syntax-morphology interface. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 289–324. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grimshaw, Jane. 2000. Locality and extended projection. In Lexical Specification and Insertion [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 197], Peter Coopmans, Martin Everaert & Jane Grimshaw (eds), 115–133. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halle, Morris. 1997. Distributed Morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In Papers at the Interface [MIT Working Papers in Linguistcs 30], Benjamin Bruening, Yoonyung Kang & Martha McGinnis (eds), 425–450. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1994. Some key features of Distributed Morphology. In Papers on Phonology and Morphology [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21], Andrew Carnie & Heidi Harley, 275–288. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harley, Heidi. 2009. A morphosyntactic account of the ‘Latinate’ ban on dative shiftin English. Ms, University of Arizona.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harley, Heidi. 2014. On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40(3–4): 225–276. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harley, Heidi & Tubino Blanco, Mercedes. 2013. Cycles, vocabulary items, and stem forms in Hiaki. In Distributed Morphology Today: Morphemes for Morris Halle, Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds), 117–134. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harley, Heidi & Noyer, Rolf. 1999. State-of-the-Article: Distributed Morphology. Glot International 4: 3–9.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haugen, Jason D. 2009. Borrowed borrowings: Nahuatl loanwords in English. Lexis 3: 63–106.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haugen, Jason D. 2011. Reduplication in Distributed Morphology. In Proceedings of the 4th Arizona Linguistics Circle Conference (ALC 4). Coyote Papers, Vol. 18. Tucson, AZ: Department of Linguistics, University of Arizona. <[URL]>
Haugen, Jason D. & Everdell, Michael. 2015. ‘To kill’ and ‘to die’ (and other suppletive verbs) in Uto-Aztecan. Language Dynamics and Change 5: 227–281. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haugen, Jason D. & Siddiqi, Daniel. 2013a. Roots and the derivation. Linguistic Inquiry 44(3): 493–517. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haugen, Jason D. & Siddiqi, Daniel. 2013b. On double marking and containment in Realization Theory. Ms. <[URL]>
Hay, Jennifer & Baayen, R. Harald. 2002. Parsing and productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 2001, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 203–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hay, Jennifer & Baayen, R. Harald. 2003. Phonotactics, parsing, and productivity. Rivista di Linguistica 15(1): 99–130.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hay, Jennifer & Plag, Ingo. 2004. What constrains possible suffix combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 565–596. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hockett, Charles F. 1954. Two models of grammatical description. Word 10: 210–234. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hopi Dictionary Project. 1998. Hopi Dictionary/Hopìikwa Lavàytutuveni: A Hopi-English Dictionary of the Third Mesa Dialect. Tucson AZ: University of Arizona Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iatridou, Sabine, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Izvorski, Roumi. 2002. Some observations about the form and meaning of the perfect. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Armin von Stechow (eds), 153–204. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray. 1992. Languages of the Mind: Essays on Mental Representation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, C. Douglas 1972. Formal Aspects of Phonological Description. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kandybowicz, Jason. 2007. On fusion and multiple copy spellout. In The Copy Theory of Movement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 107], Norbert Corver & Jairo Nunes (eds), 119–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaplan, Ronald. 1987. Three seductions of computational psycholinguistics. In Linguistic Theory and Computer Applications, Peter J. Whitelock, Mary McGee Wood, Harold L. Somers, Rod Johnson & Paul Bennett (eds), 149–188. London: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kayne, Richard. 1997. The English complementizer of. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1: 43–54. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical morphology and phonology. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm: Selected Papers from SICOL 1981, Linguistic Society of Korea (eds), 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1983. Word formation and the lexicon. In Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference, Francis Ingemann (ed.), 3–29. Lawrence KS: University of Kansas.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. Deconstructing Morphology: Word Formation in Syntactic Theory. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marantz, Alec. 1997. Stem suppletion, or the arbitrariness of the sign. Talk given at the Universite’ de Paris VIII.
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. U.Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): 201–225.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marantz, Alec. 2013. Locality domains for contextual allomorphy across the interfaces. In Distributed Morphology Today, Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Melnar, Lynette. 2004. Caddo Verb Morphology. Lincoln NB: University of Nebraska Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merchant, Jason. 2013. How much context is enough? Two cases of span-conditioned stem allomorphy. Linguistic Inquiry 1: 77–108. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moskal, Baeta. 2013. Limits on Noun-suppletion. GLOW 36, Lund University, Sweden.
Muriungi, Peter Kinyua. 2009. The union spell-out mechanism. In Nanosyntax, Peter Svenonius, Gillian Ramchand, Michal Starke & Knut Tarald Taraldsen (eds). Special issue of Tromsø Working Papers on Language and Linguistics: Nordlyd 36(1): 191–205.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newell, Heather. 2008. Aspects of the Morphology and Phonology of Phases. Ph.D. dissertation. McGill University.
Noyer, Rolf. 1992. Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Pancheva, Roumyana. 2003. The aspectual makeup of perfect participles and the interpretation of perfect. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Armin von Stechow (eds), 277–306. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Postal, Paul M. & Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1978. Traces and the description of English complementizer contraction. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 1–29.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar [Technical Reports of the Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science, RuCCS-TR-2]. New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science. Published 2004, Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radkevich, Nina. 2010. On Location: The Structure of Case and Adpositiona. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Ramchand, Gillian. 2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raimy, Eric. 2000. The Phonology and Morphology of Reduplication [Studies in Generative Grammar 52]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schultnik, Henk. 1961. Produktiviteit als morfologisch fenomeen. Forum der Letteren 33: 110–125.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siddiqi, Daniel. 2010. Distributed Morphology. Language and Linguistics Compass. Malden MA: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Starke, Michal. 2009. Nanosyntax: A short primer on a new approach to language. In Nanosyntax, Peter Svenonius, Gillian Ramchand, Michal Starke & Knut Tarald Taraldsen (eds). Special issue of Tromsø Working Papers on Language and Linguistics: Nordlyd 36(1): 1–6.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stemberger, Joseph Paul & MacWhinney, Brian. 1986. Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory and Cognition 14: 17–26. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stemberger, Joseph Paul & MacWhinney, Brian. 1988. Are inflected forms stored in the lexicon? In Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, Michael T. Hammond & Michael T. Noonan (eds), 101–116. London: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Svenonius, Peter. 2012. Spanning. Ms, CASTL, University of Tromsø. <[URL]>
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. 2010. The nanosyntax of Nguni noun class prefixes and concords. Lingua 120: 1522–1548. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Trommer, Jochen. 1999. Morphology consuming syntax’s resources: Generation and parsing in a minimalist version of Distributed Morphology. In Proceedings of the ESSLI Workshop on Resource Logics and Minimalist Grammars.
Trommer, Jochen. 2001. Distributed Optimality. Ph.D. dissertation, Universität Potsdam.
Williams, Edwin. 2003. Representation Theory. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwicky, Arnold. 1990. Inflectional morphology as a (sub)component of grammar. In Contemporary Morphology, Wolfgang U. Dressler, Hans C. Luschützky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & John R. Rennison (eds), 217–236. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwicky, Arnold & Pullum, Geoffrey. 1986. The principle of phonology-free syntax: Introductory remarks. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 32: 63–91.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)