Article published in:
Morphological Metatheory
Edited by Daniel Siddiqi and Heidi Harley
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 229] 2016
► pp. 387430
References

References

Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad
2004Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word Formation. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arad, Maya
2003Locality constraints on the interpretation of roots: The case of Hebrew denominal verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(4): 737–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1994Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 22]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Arregi, Karlos & Nevins, Andrew
2012Morphotactics: Basque Auxiliaries and the Structure of Spellout [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 86]. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, Harald, Dijkstra, Ton & Schreuder, Robert
1997Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language 37(1): 94–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beard, Robert
1991Decompositional composition: The semantics of scope ambiguities in “bracketing paradoxes”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9: 195–229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo
2006Morphological structure and phonological domains in Spanish denominal derivation. In Optimality-Theoretic Studies in Spanish Phonology [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 99], Fernando Martínez-Gil & Sonia Colina (eds), 278–311. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Stratal Optimality Theory: An overview. http://​www​.bermudez​-otero​.com​/Stratal​_Optimality​_Theory​.htm (1 September 2015).
2012The architecture of grammar and the division of labour in exponence. In The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence [Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 41], Jochen Trommer (ed.), 8–83. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013aThe Spanish lexicon stores stems with theme vowels, not roots with inflectional class features. Probus 25(1): 3–103.Google Scholar
2013bThe stem-level syndrome. Paper presented at the Speaker Series of the University of Pennsylvania Linguistics Department, Philadelphia, 11 April 2013. http://​www​.bermudez​-otero​.com​/stemlevel​.pdf.
2015Amphichronic explanation and the life cycle of phonological processes. In The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology, Patrick Honeybone & Joseph C. Salmons (eds), 374–99. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. In defence of underlying representations: French adjectival liaison and Romanian morphological palatalization. Probus.
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo & Luís, Ana R.
Forthcoming. A view of the morphome debate. In The Morphome Debate, Ana R. Luís & Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero (eds) Oxford OUP
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo & Trousdale, Graeme
2012Cycles and continua: On unidirectionality and gradualness in language change. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 691–720. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bloch, Bernard
1947English verb inflection. Language 23: 399–418. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David
2012Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David & Wurmbrand, Susi
2013Suspension across domains. In Distributed Morphology Today: Morphemes for Morris Halle, Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds), 185–98. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boyé, Gilles & Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia
2004Étude de la distribution des suffixes -er/-ir dans les infinitifs de l’espagnol à partir d’un corpus exhaustif. Corpus 3: 237–60. http://​corpus​.revues​.org​/document227​.htmls.Google Scholar
Bye, Patrik
2015The nature of allomorphy and exceptionality: Evidence from Burukashi plurals. In Understanding Allomorphy: Perspectives from Optimality Theory [Advances in Optimality Theory], Eulàlia Bonet, Maria-Rosa Lloret & Joan Mascaró (eds), 107–76. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Bye, Patrik & Svenonius, Peter
2012Non-concatenative morphology as epiphenomenon. In The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence [Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 41], Jochen Trommer (ed.), 427–95. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cabré, Teresa & Ohannesian, Maria
2007The role of morpheme boundaries in Spanish glide formation. Cuadernos de Lingüística 14: 1–14.Google Scholar
Cabré, Teresa & Prieto, Pilar
2006Exceptional hiatuses in Spanish. In Optimality-Theoretic Studies in Spanish Phonology [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 99], Fernando Martínez-Gil & Sonia Colina (eds), 205–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caha, Pavel
2009The Nanosyntax of Case. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Chomsky, Noam
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris
1968The Sound Pattern of English. New York NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
COCA
2017The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 400+ million words, 1990-present. Created by Mark Davies, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT (2008-) <http://​www​.americancorpus​.org/.
Collie, Sarah
2008English stress preservation: The case for “fake cyclicity”. English Language and Linguistics 12(3): 505–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dabouis, Quentin
2015When stress preservation leads to clash. Ms, Laboratoire Ligérien de Linguistique, Université de Tours.Google Scholar
Embick, David
2010Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology [Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 60]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Contextual conditions on stem alternations: illustrations from the Spanish conjugation. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2010. Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’, Leiden, 2010. [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 4], Irene Franco, Sara Lusini & Andrés Saab (eds), 21–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Phase cycles, φ-cycles, and phonological (in)activity. In The Form of Structure, the Structure of Forms: Essays in Honor of Jean Lowenstamm [Language Faculty and Beyond 12], Sabrina Bendjaballah, Noam Faust, Mohamed Lahrouchi & Nicola Lampitelli (eds), 271–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. On the targets of phonological realization. In The Morphosyntax-Phonology Connection: Locality and Directionality, Vera Gribanova & Stephanie S. Shih (eds) Oxford OUP
Embick, David & Halle, Morris
2005On the status of stems in morphological theory. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003. Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’ 2003, Nijmegen, 20–22 November [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 270], Twan Geerts, Ivo van Ginneken & Haike Jacobs (eds), 37–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Embick, David & Marantz, Alec
2008Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1): 1–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert & Féry, Caroline
2002Ineffability in grammar. In Resolving Conflicts in Grammars: Optimality Theory in Syntax, Morphology, and Phonology [Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 11], Gisbert Fanselow & Caroline Féry (eds), 263–3075. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–76. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1994Some key features of Distributed Morphology. In Papers on Phonology and Morphology [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21], Andrew Carnie & Heidi Harley (eds), 275–88. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Harris, James W.
1969Spanish Phonology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995Projection and edge marking in the computation of stress in Spanish. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, John A. Goldsmith (ed.), 867–87. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer
2001Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative? Linguistics 39(6): 1041–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Causes and Consequences of Word Structure. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce
2000Gradient well-formedness in Optimality Theory. In Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax, and Acquisition, Joost Dekkers, Frank van der Leeuw & Jeroen van de Weijer (eds), 88–120. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1987Refurbishing our Found ations: Elementary Linguistics from an Advanced Point of View [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 56]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hualde, José Ignacio
1997Spanish /i/ and related sounds: An exercise in phonemic analysis. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 27(2): 61–79.Google Scholar
1999Patterns in the lexicon: Hiatus with unstressed high vowels in Spanish. In Advances in Hispanic Linguistics: Papers from the 2nd Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Vol. 1, Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach & Fernando Martínez-Gil (eds), 182–97. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Hualde, José Ignacio & Prieto, Mónica
2002On the diphthong/hiatus contrast in Spanish: Some experimental results. Linguistics 40(2): 217–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1975Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon. Language 51(3): 639–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1994Allomorphy or morphophonology? In Trubetzkoy’s Orphan. Proceedings of the Montréal Roundtable “Morphonology: Contemporary Responses” (Montréal, September 30 – October 2, 1994) [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 144], Rajendra Singh & Richard Desrochers (eds), 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref
2000Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review 17(2–4): 351–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005aBlocking and periphrasis in inflectional paradigms. In Yearbook of Morphology 2004, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 113–35. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005bParadigm uniformity constraints. Ms, Stanford University. www​.stanford​.edu​/~kiparsky​/Papers​/LexConservatism​.pdf.
2006The Amphichronic Program vs. Evolutionary Phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 32(2): 217–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. The morphology of the Basque auxiliary: Thoughts on Arregi & Nevins 2012. In The Morphosyntax-Phonology Connection: Locality and Directionality, Vera Gribanova & Stephanie S. Shih (eds) Oxford OUP
Kraska-Szlenk, Iwona
2007Analogy: The Relation between Lexicon and Grammar [Lincom Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 38]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Labov, William
2007Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2): 344–387. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Larson, Richard K.
1998Events and modification in nominals. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) VIII, Devon Strolovitch & Aaron Lawson (eds), 145–68. Ithaca IL: Cornell Linguistics Circle Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linares, Rafael Enrique, Rodriguez-Fornells, Antoni & Clahsen, Harald
2006Stem allomorphy in the Spanish mental lexicon: evidence from behavioral and ERP experiments. Brain and Language 97(1): 110–20. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
2007Phases and words. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar, Sook-Hee Choe (ed.), 191–222. Seoul: Dong In.Google Scholar
2013Locality domains for contextual allomorphy across the interfaces. In Distributed Morphology Today: Morphemes for Morris Halle, Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds), 95–115. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marvin, Tatjana
2002Topics in the Stress and Syntax of Words. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Merchant, Jason
2015How much context is enough? Two cases of span-conditioned stem allomorphy. Linguistic Inquiry 46(2): 273–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Myler, Neil
2015Stem storage? Not proven: A reply to Bermúdez-Otero 2013. Linguistic Inquiry 46(1): 173–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Navarro Tomás, Tomás
1918Manual de pronunciación española [Publicaciones de la Revista de Filología Española]. Madrid: Junta para Ampliación de Estudios e Investigaciones Científicas, Centro de Estudios Históricos.Google Scholar
Nida, Eugene
1948The identification of morphemes. Language 24: 414–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Orgun, Cemil Orhan & Inkelas, Sharon
2002Reconsidering bracket erasure. In Yearbook of Morphology 2001, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 115–46. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paster, Mary
2015Phonologically conditioned suppletive allomorphy: Cross-linguistic results and theoretical consequences. In Understanding Allomorphy: Perspectives from Optimality Theory [Advances in Optimality Theory], Eulàlia Bonet, Maria-Rosa Lloret & Joan Mascaró (eds), 218–53. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Pater, Joe
2009Morpheme-specific phonology: Constraint indexation and inconsistency resolution. In Phonological Argumentation: Essays on Evidence and Motivation [Advances in Optimality Theory], Steve Parker (ed.), 123–54. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey K. & Zwicky, Arnold M.
1991A misconceived approach to morphology. In WCCFL 10: The Proceedings of the Tenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Dawn Bates (ed.), 387–98. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Radkevich, Nina
2010On Location: the Structure of Case and Adpositions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Roca, Iggy
2010Theme vowel allomorphy in Spanish verb inflection: An autosegmental optimality account. Lingua 120(2): 408–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siddiqi, Daniel
2009Syntax within the Word: Economy, Allomorphy, and Argument Selection in Distributed Morphology [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 138]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sproat, Richard
1985On Deriving the Lexicon. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/1721​.1​/15167.
Staroverov, Petr
2014Splitting Theory and Consonant Epenthesis. Ph.D. dissertation, Rutgers University.
Steriade, Donca
2009The phonology of perceptibility effects: The P-map and its consequences for constraint organization. In The Nature of the Word: Studies in Honor of Paul Kiparsky, Kristin Hanson & Sharon Inkelas (eds), 151–79. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, Thomas & Stump, Gregory T.
2007Paradigm function morphology and the morphology- syntax interface. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 383–421. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory T.
2001Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2012Spanning. Ms, University of Tromsø. http://​ling​.auf​.net​/lingbuzz​/001501
Trommer, Jochen
2001Distributed Optimality. Ph.D. dissertation, Universität Potsdam. http://​opus​.kobv​.de​/ubp​/volltexte​/2005​/101​/pdf​/trommer​.pdf.
Wescoat, Michael T.
2002On Lexical Sharing. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
Wunderlich, Dieter
1996Minimalist morphology: The role of paradigms. In Yearbook of Morphology 1995, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 93–114. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zuraw, Kie
2010A model of lexical variation and the grammar with application to Tagalog nasal substitution. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 417–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Iosad, Pavel V.
2020. Stratal phonology and Russian morphophonology. Rhema :1, 2020  pp. 36 ff. Crossref logo
Revithiadou, Anthi, Giorgos Markopoulos & Vassilios Spyropoulos
2019. Changing shape according to strength: Evidence from root allomorphy in Greek . The Linguistic Review 36:3  pp. 553 ff. Crossref logo
Scheer, Tobias
2016. Melody-free syntax and phonologically conditioned allomorphy. Morphology 26:3-4  pp. 341 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.