Cover not available
Part of
Morphological Metatheory
Edited by Daniel Siddiqi and Heidi Harley
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 229] 2016
► pp. 479–512

Affix ordering in Optimal Construction Morphology

| University of California, Berkeley
This paper sketches an integrated approach to affix ordering within Optimal Construction Morphology, a bottom-up, competition based model of word production in which each step of affixation is the optimal choice among competing possibilities (Caballero & Inkelas 2013). Optimalitytheoretic models are natural fits for affix ordering, a complex phenomenon governed by a mix of conflicting universal and language-specific factors which interact differently in every language. This study covers familiar, global cross-linguistic principles such as semantic relevance (e.g., Bybee 1985) and scope (e.g., Baker 1988; Rice 2000), integrating them with local lexical selectional restrictions (e.g., Fabb 1988); it also incorporates usage-based factors such as Complexity-Based Ordering (e.g., Hay & Plag 2004). The study innovates in adding affix informativity to the mix.
Published online: 29 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.229.16ink
References (80)
References
Ackerman, Farrell & Malouf, Rob. 2013. Morphological organization: The low conditional entropy conjecture. Language 89(3): 429–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alsina, Alex. 1999. Where’s the Mirror Principle? The Linguistic Review 16(1): 1–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by Itself: Stems and Inflectional Classes. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark & Xu, Zheng. 2010. A realization Optimality-Theoretic approach to affix order. Morphology 20(2): 381–411. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago ILI: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Balling, Laura Winther. & Baayen, R. Harald. 2012. Probability and surprisal in auditory comprehension of morphologically complex words. Cognition 125(1). 80–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beesley, Kenneth & Karttunen, Lauri. 2003. Finite State Morphology. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bell, Melanie & Plag, Ingo. 2012. Informativeness is a determinant of compound stress in English. Journal of Linguistics 48: 485–520. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blevins, James. 2003. Stems and paradigms. Language 79(4): 737–767. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. The information-theoretic turn. Psihologija 46(3): 355–375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caballero, Gabriela & Inkelas, Sharon. 2013. Word construction: Tracing an optimal path through the lexicon. Special issue New theoretical tools in the modeling of morphological exponence. Morphology 23: 103–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cohen Priva, Uriel. 2012. Sign and Signal: Deriving Linguistic Generalizations from Information Utility. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
Eyigöz, Elif, Gildea, Daniel & Oflazer, Kemal. 2013. Simultaneous word-morpheme alignment for statistical machine translation. Proceedings of the 2013 meeting of the North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL-13).
Fabb, Nigel. 1988. English suffixation is constrained only by selectional restrictions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6(4): 527–539. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fulmer, S. Lee. 1991. Dual-position affixes in Afar: an argument for phonologically-driven morphology. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Meeting of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Aaron Halpern (ed.), 189–203. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Gahl, Susanne & Garnsey, Susan. 2004. Knowledge of grammar, knowledge of usage: syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation. Language 80(4): 748–775. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge. 1986. Finite state morphology and left to right phonology. In Proceedings of the Fifth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Mary Dalrymple, Jeffrey Goldberg, Kristin Hanson, Michael Inman, Chris Piñon & Stephen Wechsler (eds), Stanford CA: Stanford Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Hargus, Sharon. 1993. Metathesis and Domain Membership in Sekani. Berkeley CA: Department of Linguistics, UC Berkeley.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer. 1999. Distributed Morphology. GLOT International 4(4): 3–9.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice. 2000. Where in the word is the Udi clitic? Language 76(3): 593–616. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & Wilson, Colin. 2008. A maximum entropy model of phonotactics and phonotactic learning. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 379–440. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer. 2002. From speech perception to morphology: Affix ordering revisited. Language 78(3): 527–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Baayen, R. Harald. 2002. Parsing and productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 2001, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 203–235. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Harald Baayen. 2005. Shifting paradigms: Gradient structure in morphology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(7): 342–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Plag, Ingo. 2004. What constrains possible suffix combinations? On the interaction of grammatical and processing restrictions in derivational morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22(3): 565–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirschberg, Julia & Pan, Shimei. 2000. Modeling local context for speech accent prediction. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
Hyman, Larry M. 2003. Suffix ordering in Bantu: A morphocentric approach. In Yearbook of Morphology 2002, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 245–281. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon. 1989. Prosodic Constituency in the Lexicon. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University.
. 1993. Nimboran position class morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11: 559–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon & Orgun, Cemil Orhan. 1998. Level (non)ordering in recursive morphology: Evidence from Turkish. In Morphology and its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, Steven Lapointe, Diane Brentari & Patrick Farrell (eds). Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon & Orgun, Jem. 2015. Informativity and affix ordering: A pilot study of Turkish. Portland OR. <[URL]>
Itô, Junko, Mester, Armin & Padgett, Jaye. 1995. Licensing and underspecification in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 26(4): 571–614.Google Scholar
Kim, Yuni. 2008. Topics in the Phonology and Morphology of San Francisco del Mar Huave. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982a. Lexical morphology and phonology. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Linguistic Society of Korea (eds), 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
. 1982b. Word-formation and the lexicon. In 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference Papers, Frances Ingemann (ed.), 3–32. Lawrence KS: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Kuperman, Victor, Pluymaekers, Mark, Ernestus, Mirjam & Baayen, R. Harald. 2007. Morphological predictability and acoustic duration of interfixes in Dutch compounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 12(4): 2261–2271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Legendre, Geraldine, Miyata, Yoshiro & Smolensky, Paul. 1990. Harmonic Grammar: A Formal Multi-level Connectionist Theory of Linguistic Well-formedness. Theoretical Foundations. Boulder CO: Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Levy, Roger. 2008. Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition 106: 1126–1177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 1980. On the Organization of the Lexicon. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Luutonen, Jorma. 1997. The Variation of Morpheme Order in Mari Declension. Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2005. Morphological autonomy and diachrony. In Yearbook of Morphology 2004, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 137–75. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manova, Stella & Aronoff, Mark. 2010. Modeling affix order. Morphology 20: 109–131. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Marle, Jaap. 1998. Review of Jorma Luutonen, The Variation of Morpheme Order in Mari Declension. In Yearbook of Morphology 1997, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 307–308. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John. 2002. A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 2010. An introduction to harmonic serialism. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(10): 1001–1018. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John & Prince, Alan. 1993. Generalized alignment. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 79–153. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory, Jill Beckman, Laura Dickey & Suzanne Urbanczyk (eds), 249–384. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas. 2004. The Position of Morphological Case in the Derivation: A Study on the Syntax-morphology Interface. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Mohanan, Karuvannur P. 1986. Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
. 1995. The organization of the grammar. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, John Goldsmith (ed.). Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Moscoso del Prado Martín, Fermín, Kostic, Aleksandar & Baayen, R. Harald. 2004. Putting the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological processing. Cognition 94: 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noyer, Rolf. 1993. Optimal Words: Towards a declarative theory of word formation. Rutgers University. <[URL]>
. 1994. Mobile affixes in Huave: Optimality and morphological wellformedness. In Proceedings of the TwelfthWest Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Erin Duncan, Donka Farkas & Philip Spaelti (eds), 67–82. Stanford CA: Stanford Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
Oflazer, Kemal. 1994. Two-level description of Turkish morphology. Literary and Linguistic Computing 9(2): 137–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parker, Jeff & Sims, Andrea. 2012. Affix ordering constraints and processing in Russian: A look at Complexity-Based ordering. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Paster, Mary. 2005. Pulaar verbal extensions and phonologically driven affix order. In Yearbook of Morphology, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 155–199. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Phonological Conditions on Affixation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Plag, Ingo. 2002. The role of selectional restrictions, phonotactics and parsing in constraining suffix ordering in English. In Yearbook of Morphology 2001, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 285–314. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Plag, Ingo & Baayen, R. Harald. 2009. Suffix ordering and morphological processing. Language 85(1): 109–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Alan & Smolensky, Paul. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University.Google Scholar
. 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, Keren. 2000. Morpheme Order and Semantic Scope: Word Formation in the Athapaskan Verb. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Principles of affix ordering: An overview. Word Structure 4: 169–200. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Kevin. 2010. Variable affix order: Grammar and learning. Language 86: 758–791.Google Scholar
Saarinen, Pauliina & Hay, Jennifer. 2014. Affix ordering in derivation. In Oxford Handbook of Derivational Morphology, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Stekauer (eds), 370–383. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sak, Haşim, Güngör, Tunga & Saraçlar, Murat. 2008. Turkish language resources: Morphological parser, morphological disambiguator and web corpus. Proceedings of GoTAL 2008 , 417–427. DOI logo
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1982. The Syntax of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Seyfarth, Scott, Ackerman, Farrell & Malouf, Robert. 2014. Implicative organization facilitates morphological learning. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Herman Leung, Zachary O’Hagan, Sarah Bakst, Auburn Lutzross, Jonathan Manker, Nicholas Rolle & Katie Sardinha (eds), 480–494. Berkeley CA: BLS. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shannon, Claude. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379–423, 623–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Jane & Withgott, Margaret. 1986. Pronominal clitic clusters and templates. In Syntax and Semantics, 19: The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, Hagit Borer (ed.). New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 2003. Putting some order into morphology; Reflections on Rice (2000) and Stump (2001). Journal of Linguistics 39: 621–646. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Lexical Relatedness: A Paradigm-Based Model. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steriopolo, Olga. 2013. Diminutive affixes in the number domain: A syntactic variation. Questions and Answers in Linguistics 1(2): 33–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stump, Gregory. 2001. Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wolf, Matthew. 2008. Optimal Interleaving: Serial Phonology-Morphology Interaction in a Constraint-based Model. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Xu, Zheng & Aronoff, Mark. 2011. A realization Optimality-Theoretic approach to extended morphological exponence. Journal of Linguistics 47(3): 673–707. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, Alan C.-L. 2007. A Natural History of Infixation. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Manova, Stela
2023. Ordering Restrictions between Affixes. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Hahn, Michael, Rebecca Mathew & Judith Degen
2022. Morpheme Ordering Across Languages Reflects Optimization for Processing Efficiency. Open Mind 5 ► pp. 208 ff. DOI logo
Lai, Yunfan
2021. Betrayal through obedience: on the history of the unusual inflectional chain in Siyuewu Khroskyabs. Linguistic Typology 25:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Caballero, Gabriela & Sharon Inkelas
2018. A Construction-Based Approach to Multiple Exponence. In The Construction of Words [Studies in Morphology, 4], ► pp. 111 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.