This paper examines the data on which theoretical treatments of synthetic compounding in English have typically been based against data culled from the Corpus of Contemporary American English and argues that many claims made in the literature are inaccurate. Claims about the unacceptability of external arguments as the first elements of synthetic compounds, the obligatory transitive interpretation of compounds like tomato growing, the absence of achievement verbs in -ing synthetic compounds, the inability of -ing synthetics to be pluralized, the absence of eventive readings in synthetics, among others are falsified. The paper then proposes a set of generalizations more consistent with the corpus data and shows that the lexical semantic framework of Lieber (2004) is capable of accounting for the facts.
1978Morphological Investigations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Aronoff, Mark & Fuhrhop, Nana
2002Restricting suffix combinations in German and English: Closing suffixes and the Monosuffix Constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 451–490.
Aronoff, Mark
1976Word Formation in Generative Morphology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo
2013The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP.
Bauer, Laurie & Renouf, Antoinette
2001A corpus-based study of compounding in English. Journal of English Linguistics 29: 101–123.
Borer, Hagit
2013Taking Form. Oxford: OUP.
Botha, Rudolph
1984Morphological Mechanisms. Oxford: Pergamon.
Bresnan, Joan & Mchombo, Samuel
1995The Lexical Integrity Principle: Evidence from Bantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13: 181–254.
Davies, Mark
2008The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. [URL]
DiSciullo, Anna-Maria & Williams, Edwin
1987On the Definition of Word. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Hanks, Patrick
2013Lexical Analysis. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Harley, Heidi
2009Compounding in Distributed Morphology. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 129–144. Oxford: OUP.
Higginbotham, James
1985On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547–594.
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Jackendoff, Ray
2009Compounding in the parallel architecture and in conceptual semantics. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 105–128. Oxford: OUP.
Kiparsky, Paul
1982Lexical phonology and morphology. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Linguistic Society of Korea (eds), 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.
Lapointe, Stephen
1980The Theory of Grammatical Agreement. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Lees, Robert
1960The Grammar of English Nominalizations. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press & The Hague: Mouton.
Levi, Judith
1978The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lieber, Rochelle
1983Argument linking and compounds in English. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 251–285.
Lieber, Rochelle
1992Deconstructing Morphology. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lieber, Rochelle
2004Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.
Lieber, Rochelle
2006The category of roots and the roots of categories: What we learn from selection in derivation. Morphology 16: 247–272.
Lieber, Rochelle
2009A lexical semantic approach to compounding. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 78–104. Oxford: OUP.
Forthcoming. Compounding in a lexical semantic framework. In The Semantics of Compounding, Pius ten Hacken (ed) Cambridge CUP
Melloni, Chiara
2007Polysemy in Word Formation: The Case of Deverbal Nominals. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Verona.
Melloni, Chiara
2011Event and Result Nominals. Bern: Peter Lang.
Roeper, Thomas & Siegel, Muffy
1978A lexical transformation for verbal compounds. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 199–260.
Roeper, Thomas
1988Compound syntax and head movement. In Yearbook of Morphology, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 187–228. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Scalise, Sergio
1984Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.
Scalise, Sergio & Bisetto, Antonietta
2009The classification of compounds. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 34–53. Oxford: OUP.
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1982The Syntax of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Siegel, Dorothy
1974Topics in English Morphology. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT.
Williams, Edwin
1981On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 245–74.
Cited by
Cited by 4 other publications
Dressler, Wolfgang U., Sabine Sommer-Lolei, Katharina Korecky-Kröll, Reili Argus, Ineta Dabašinskienė, Laura Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė, Johanna Johansen Ijäs, Victoria V. Kazakovskaya, Klaus Laalo & Evangelia Thomadaki
2019. First-language acquisition of synthetic compounds in Estonian, Finnish, German, Greek, Lithuanian, Russian and Saami. Morphology 29:3 ► pp. 409 ff.
Lieber, Rochelle
2015. The semantics of transposition. Morphology 25:4 ► pp. 353 ff.
Mattiello, Elisa & Wolfgang U. Dressler
2022. Dualism and superposition in the analysis of English synthetic compounds ending in-er. Linguistics 60:2 ► pp. 395 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.