Part of
Morphological Metatheory
Edited by Daniel Siddiqi and Heidi Harley
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 229] 2016
► pp. 513536
References (35)
References
Allen, Margaret. 1978. Morphological Investigations. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Aronoff, Mark & Fuhrhop, Nana. 2002. Restricting suffix combinations in German and English: Closing suffixes and the Monosuffix Constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 451–490. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Morphology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie, Lieber, Rochelle & Plag, Ingo. 2013. The Oxford Reference Guide to English Morphology. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie & Renouf, Antoinette. 2001. A corpus-based study of compounding in English. Journal of English Linguistics 29: 101–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2013. Taking Form. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Botha, Rudolph. 1984. Morphological Mechanisms. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Mchombo, Samuel. 1995. The Lexical Integrity Principle: Evidence from Bantu. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13: 181–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990-present. <[URL]>
DiSciullo, Anna-Maria & Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the Definition of Word. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, Patrick. 2013. Lexical Analysis. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2009. Compounding in Distributed Morphology. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 129–144. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1985. On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547–594.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2009. Compounding in the parallel architecture and in conceptual semantics. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 105–128. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. Lexical phonology and morphology. In Linguistics in the Morning Calm, Linguistic Society of Korea (eds), 3–91. Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Lapointe, Stephen. 1980. The Theory of Grammatical Agreement. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Lees, Robert. 1960. The Grammar of English Nominalizations. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press & The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Levi, Judith. 1978. The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle. 1983. Argument linking and compounds in English. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 251–285.Google Scholar
. 1992. Deconstructing Morphology. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Morphology and Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. The category of roots and the roots of categories: What we learn from selection in derivation. Morphology 16: 247–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. A lexical semantic approach to compounding. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 78–104. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2010. On the lexical semantics of compounds: Non-affixal (de)verbal compounds. In Cross-Disciplinary Issues in Compounding [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 311], Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds), 127–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. Forthcoming. Compounding in a lexical semantic framework. In The Semantics of Compounding, Pius ten Hacken (ed). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logo
Melloni, Chiara. 2007. Polysemy in Word Formation: The Case of Deverbal Nominals. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Verona.
. 2011. Event and Result Nominals. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas & Siegel, Muffy. 1978. A lexical transformation for verbal compounds. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 199–260.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas. 1988. Compound syntax and head movement. In Yearbook of Morphology, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 187–228. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio. 1984. Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Scalise, Sergio & Bisetto, Antonietta. 2009. The classification of compounds. In The Oxford Handbook of Compounding, Rochelle Lieber & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 34–53. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1982. The Syntax of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, Dorothy. 1974. Topics in English Morphology. Ph.D. dissertation. MIT.
Williams, Edwin. 1981. On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 245–74.Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Mattiello, Elisa & Wolfgang U. Dressler
2022. Dualism and superposition in the analysis of English synthetic compounds ending in-er. Linguistics 60:2  pp. 395 ff. DOI logo
Popova, Gergana
2022. Chapter 12. English participles in the derivational paradigm. In Paradigms in Word Formation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 225],  pp. 319 ff. DOI logo
Dressler, Wolfgang U., Sabine Sommer-Lolei, Katharina Korecky-Kröll, Reili Argus, Ineta Dabašinskienė, Laura Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė, Johanna Johansen Ijäs, Victoria V. Kazakovskaya, Klaus Laalo & Evangelia Thomadaki
2019. First-language acquisition of synthetic compounds in Estonian, Finnish, German, Greek, Lithuanian, Russian and Saami. Morphology 29:3  pp. 409 ff. DOI logo
Lieber, Rochelle
2015. The semantics of transposition. Morphology 25:4  pp. 353 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.