Non-finiteness in Saamáka
In this paper we demonstrate that the creole language Saamáka does exhibit the finite vs. non-finite distinction by analysing the semantic characteristics and syntactic distribution of complementizer fu. We adopt a Klein style analysis of finiteness and argue that clauses embedded under this complementizer lack the features Assertion and Topic Time, and, hence, that these clauses are nonfinite. Based on this semantic analysis, we propose to split up the Fin-head and demonstrate that complementizer fu is base-generated in the higher Fin-position. As a result, we claim that our analysis calls for a richer lower C-domain than previously assumed in the literature.
References (36)
References
Aboh, Enoch, 2006. Complementation in Saramaccan and Gungbe: The case of C-type particles. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24: 1–55. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aboh, Enoch, Smith, Norval S.H. & Veenstra, Tonjes. 2013. Saramaccan. In Atlas of Pidgin and Creole language structure, Martin Haspelmath, Magnus Huber, Philippe Maurer & Susanne Michaelis (eds), 27-38. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bach, Emmon. 1986. The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 5–16.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Becker, Angelika. 2005. The semantic knowledge base for the acquisition of negation and the acquisition of finiteness. In The Structure of Learner Varieties, Henriëtte Henriks (ed.), 263–314. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bianchi, Valentina. 2003. On finiteness as logophoric anchoring. In Temps et point de vue, Jacqueline Gúeron & Liliane Tasmowski (eds), 213–246. Nanterre: Université Paris X.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bickerton, Derek. 1981. Roots of Language. Ann Arbor MI: Karoma Publishers.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bickerton, Derek. 1984. The Language Bioprogram Hypothesis. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7: 173–188. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Damonte, Federico. 2002. The complementizer layer in Saramaccan. In Current Issues in Generative Grammar. 10th Colloquium on Generative Grammar, Selected Papers, Manuel Leonetti, Olga Fernadez Soriano & Victoria Escandell Vidal (eds), 31–50. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad Alcalá de Henares.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Demirdache, Hamida & Uribe-Etxebarria, Myriam. 2000. The primitives of temporal relations. In Step by step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 157–186. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duffield, Nigel. 2007. Aspects of Vietnamese clausal structure: Separating tense from assertion. Linguistics 45: 765–814. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enç Mürvet. 1987. Anchoring conditions for Tense. Linguistic Inquiry 18(4): 633– 657.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enç, Mürvet. 2004. Rethinking past tense. In The Syntax of Time, Jacqueline Guéron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds), 203–215. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giorgi, Alessandra. 2006. From temporal anchoring to long distance anaphors. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24: 1009–1047. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Iatridou, Sabine. 2000. The grammatical ingredients of counterfactuality. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 231–270. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, Wolfgang. 1992. The present perfect puzzle. Language 68: 525–552. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, Wolfgang. 1998. Assertion and finiteness. In Issues in the Theory of Language Acquisition, Norbert Dittmar & Zvi Penner (eds), 225–245. Bern: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, Wolfgang. 2006. On finiteness. In Semantics in Acquisition, Veerle van Geenhoven (ed.), 245–272. Dordrecht: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, Wolfgang. 2009. Finiteness, universal grammar and the language faculty. In Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin, Jinsheng Guo, Elena Lieven, Nancy Budwig, Susan Ervin-Tripp, Keiko Nakamura & Seyda Ozcaliskan (eds), 333–344. New York NY: Psychology Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kratzer, Angelika. 1998. More structural analogies between pronouns and tenses. In
Proceedings of SALT VIII
. Cambridge MA: MIT.
Lefebvre, Claire & Loranger, Virginie. 2008. A synchronic and diachronic account of the multifunctionality of Saramaccan taá. Linguistics 46: 1167–1228. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McWhorter, John. 1997. Towards a New Model of Creole Genesis. Bern: Peter Lang.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mufwene, Salikoko & Dijkhoff, Marta. 1989. On the so-called ‘infinitive’ in Atlantic Creoles. Lingua 77: 297–330. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Partee, Barbara. 1984. Nominal and temporal anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 7: 243–286. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Price, Richard. 1983. First time. Baltimore MD: John Hopkins University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, Norval. 1987. The Genesis of the Creole Languages of Suriname. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Stowell, Tim. 1996. The phrase structure of tense. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck & Laurie Ann Zaring (eds), 277–292. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van de Vate, Marleen Susanne. 2011. Tense, Aspect and Modality in a Radical Creole: The Case of Saamáka. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
van de Vate, Marleen Susanne. 2013a. An account of the stative vs. dynamic split in Saamáka. Lingua 129: 129–149. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van de Vate, Marleen Susanne. 2013b. To bi or not to bi: A pronominal analysis for past. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 12(1): 63–82. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Veenstra, Tonjes. 1996. Serial Verbs in Saramaccan. Predication and Creole Genesis. The Hague: HAG.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Veenstra, Tonjes. 2008. Relexification and reconstitution of predicate classes: The case of sentence-embedding. Paper presented at
Syntax under Lexical Rule
. Berlin: ZAS.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.