Finiteness and response particles in West Flemish
The empirical focus of the chapter is the morphosyntax of the morphologically marked response particles ja and neen in the Lapscheure dialect of West Flemish. Building on Krifka (2013)’s analysis of the corresponding German response particles ja/nein as TP pro-forms, we analyze morphologically marked Flemish ja/neen as TP pro-forms. First we show that the morphological marking on these particles is sui generis: it does not correspond to the marking found on verbs nor does it correspond to a clitic form of the subject pronoun. We develop a cartographic analysis of the syntax of the morphologically marked response particles in the dialect, endorsing Rizzi and Shlonsky (2006, 2007)’s proposal that a finite TP is dominated by a specialized projection for the subject, SubjP, a criterial projection. The pronominal marking on ja/neen is an instantiation of finiteness. If all finite clauses have SubjP then the finite TP pro-form realized by morphologically marked ja/neen is also dominated by (the criterial) SubjP. In the absence of an overt subject, following Rizzi and Shlonsky (2006, 2007), we assume that the Subject Criterion is satisfied by nominal φ-features generated on Fin and that morphologically marked ja/neen moves to Fin in order to license these features. Our analysis predicts that West Flemish morphologically marked ja/neen are a root phenomenon. In addition to the variant with pronominal marking, there is also a bare variant of the ja/neen pro-forms. The presence and absence of the pronominal marking on ja/neen correlates fairly closely with the distribution of finite and non-finite clauses, and we correlate the presence vs. absence of pronominal marking with a finiteness opposition.
References
Adger, David
2007 Three domains of finiteness: A minimalist perspective. In
Finiteness Theoretical and Empirical Foundations. ,
Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 23-58. Oxford: OUP.
Authier, Jean-Marc
2013 Phase-edge features and the syntax of polarity particles.
Linguistic Inquiry 44(3): 345-89.
Barbiers, Sjef, Bennis, Hans, De Vogelaer, Gunther, Devos, Magda & van der Ham, Margreet
2005 Syntactic Atlas of the Dutch Dialects, Vol. I: Commentary. Amsterdam: AUP.
Cardinaletti, Anna
1997 Subjects and clause structure. In
The New Comparative Syntax,
Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 33-63. London: Longman.
Cardinaletti, Anna
2004 Towards a cartography of subject positions. In
The Structure of CP and IP [
The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 2],
Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 115-165. Oxford: OUP.
Chomsky, Noam
1993 A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In
The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger,
Kenneth Hale &
Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 1-52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: OUP.
Cowper, Elizabeth
This volume.
Finiteness and pseudofiniteness.
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen
2010 Ellipsis in Dutch dialects. Oxford: OUP.
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Haegeman, Liliane
2007 The derivation of subject-initial V2.
Linguistic Inquiry 38(1):167-178.
Culbertson, Jennifer
2010 Convergent evidence for categorial change in French: from subject clitic to agreement marker.
Language 86(1):85-132.
De Schutter, Georges & Taeldeman, Johan
1986 Assimilatie van stem in de zuidelijke Nederlandse dialekten. In
Vruchten van z’n akker: opstellen van (oud-) medewerkers en oud-studenten voor Prof. V.F. Vanacker,
Magda Devos &
Johan Taeldeman (eds), 91–133. Ghent: Seminaire voor Nederlands Taalkunde.
De Vogelaer, Gunther
2005 Subjectsmarkering in de Nederlandse en Friese Dialecten. PhD dissertation, Ghent University.
De Vogelaer, Gunther & van der Auwera, Johan
2010 When typological rara generate rarissima: Analogical extension of verbal agreement in Dutch dialects. In
Rara & Rarissima. Collecting and Interpreting Unusual Characteristics of Human Language,
Jan Wohlgemuth &
Michael Cysouw (eds), 47-73. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Devos, Magda
1986 Het persoonlijk voornaamwoord 2e pers enk in het Westvlaams. Geografie en historiek. In
Vruchten van z’n akker: opstellen van (oud-) medewerkers en oud-studenten voor Prof. V.F. Vanacker,
Magda Devos &
Johan Taeldeman (eds), 167-189. Ghent: Seminaire voor Nederlands Taalkunde.
Devos, Magda & Vandekerckhove, Reinhild
2005 Taal in stad en land. West-vlaams. Tielt: Lannoo.
Eide, Kristin Melum
2009 Finiteness: the haves and the have-nots. In
Advances in Comparative Germanic Syntax [
Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 141],
Artemis Alexiadou,
Jorge Hankamer,
Thomas McFadden,
Justin Nuger &
Florian Schäfer (eds), 357-90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haegeman, Liliane
1990 Subject pronouns and subject clitics in West-Flemish.
The Linguistic Review 7(4): 333-364.
Haegeman, Liliane
1996 Verb second, the split CP and null subjects in early Dutch finite clauses. GenGenP.
[URL]
Haegeman, Liliane & van Koppen, Marjo
2012 Complementizer agreement and the relation between C° and T°.
Linguistic Inquiry 43(3): 441–454.
Haegeman, Liliane & Weir, Andrew
Hoeksema, Jack
2006 Hij zei van niet, maar knikte van ja: Distributie en diachronie van bijwoorden van polariteit ingeleid door van
.
Tabu 35(3-4):135-158.
Hoeksema, Jack
2008 Van + bijwoord van polariteit: Een geval van verplichte PP extrapositie? Tabu 37(1-2):69-74.
Holmberg, Anders
2001 The syntax of yes and no in Finnish.
Studia Linguistica 55(2):141-175.
Holmberg, Anders
2007 Null subjects and polarity focus.
Studia Linguistica 61(3):212-236.
Holmberg, Anders
2013 The syntax of answers to polar questions in English and Swedish.
Lingua 128: 31-50.
Kramer, Ruth & Rawlins, Kyle
2011 Polarity particles: an ellipsis account. In
Proceedings of NELS 39,
Suzi Lima,
Kevin Mullin &
Brian Smith (eds). Amherst MA: GLSA.
Krifka, Manfred
2013 Response particles as propositional anaphors. In
Proceedings of SALT 23,
Todd Snider (ed.), 1-18. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.
Landau, Idan
2004 The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22: 811-77.
Lobeck, Anne
1995 Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing and Identification. Oxford: OUP.
Mensching, Guido
2000 Infinitive Constructions with Specified Subjects: A Syntactic Analysis of the Romance Languages. Oxford: OUP.
Merchant, Jason
2001 The Syntax of Silence. Oxford: OUP.
Merchant, Jason
2004 Fragments and ellipsis.
Linguistics and Philosophy 27(6):661-738.
Muysken, Pieter
1982 Parameterizing the notion ‘head’.
Journal of Linguistic Research 2: 57-75.
Muysken, Pieter & van Riemsdijk, Henk
1986 Projecting features and featuring projections. In
Features and Projections,
Pieter Muysken &
Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 1-30. Dordrecht: Foris.
Paardekooper, Piet C
1993 Jaak/neenik enz.
Tabu 23(3):143-173.
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989 Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP.
Linguistic Inquiry 20(3): 365-424.
Rizzi, Luigi
1982 Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In
Elements of Grammar,
Liliane Haegeman (ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rizzi, Luigi
2006 On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In
Wh-movement: Moving on,
Lisa Lai-shen Cheng &
Norbert Corver (eds), 97-133. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur
2006 Satisfying the subject criterion by a non-subject: English locative inversion and heavy NP shift. In
Phases of Interpretation,
Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 341-361. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Rizzi, Luigi & Shlonsky, Ur
2007 Strategies of subject extraction. In
Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky's Minimalism and the View from Syntax-semantics,
Hans-Martin Gärtner &
Uli Sauerland (eds), 115-160. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Roberts, Craige
(
2012/1996)
Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics.
Semantics & Pragmatics 5:1-69. Originally published in
OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 49: Papers in semantics
,
Jae-Hak Yoon &
Andreas Kathol (eds). Columbus OH: The Ohio State University.
Roberts, Ian
2004 The C-system in Brythonic Celtic languages, V2, and the EPP. In
The structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2,
Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 297-328. Oxford: OUP.
Servidio, Emilio
2014 Polarity Particles in Italian: Focus, Fragments, Tags. PhD dissertation, University of Siena.
Simon, Ellen
2010 Phonological transfer of voicing and devoicing rules: Evidence from L1 Dutch and L2 English conversational speech.
Language Sciences 32(1): 63–86.
Smessaert, Hans
1995 Morfo-syntaxis van het Westvlaamse bè-jaa-k-gie
.
Tabu 25(1):45-60.
Szabolcsi, Anna
2005 Overt infinitival subjects (if that’s what they are).
Organizing Grammar: Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk,
Hans Broekhuis,
Norbert Corver,
Riny Huybregts,
Ursula Kleinhenz &
Jan Koster (eds), 618-25. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald
2001 Subject extraction, the distribution of expletives and stylistic inversion. In
Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar,
Aafke Hulk &
Jean-Yves Pollock (eds), 163-182. Oxford: OUP.
Travis, Lisa
(
1984)
Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Wurmbrand, Susi
2014 Tense and aspect in English infinitives.
Linguistic Inquiry 45: 403-447.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Karen De Clercq, Liliane Haegeman, Terje Lohndal & Christine Meklenborg
2023.
Adverbial Resumption in Verb Second Languages,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.