Word order and finiteness in acquisition
A study of Norwegian and English Wh-questions
Children acquiring languages such as English, German or Dutch typically go through a phase where they produce non-finite root clauses, often referred to as the Optional Infinitive (OI) stage. But there is a difference between English on the one hand and the other Germanic languages on the other with respect to the occurrence of non-finite wh-questions: while there is a high number of OIs in English in this context, non-finite wh-questions are virtually non-existent in child data of e.g. German or Swedish. This is often argued to be due to the early setting of the V2 parameter. Comparing Norwegian and English child data on wh-questions, this paper argues that there is no such parameter and that children instead are sensitive to fine syntactic distinctions in the input called micro-cues. On this view, both English and Norwegian have restricted V2 in wh-questions. The paper also shows that there is no causal correlation between finiteness morphology and word order in this context. Children’s non-finite root clauses are argued to generally be caused by a problem realizing auxiliaries, in both languages, and the difference between English and Norwegian is due to the type of verb required in wh-questions (auxiliaries vs. lexical verbs).
References (72)
References
Anderssen, Merete. 2006. The Acquisition of Compositional Definiteness in Norwegian. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Atkinson, Martin. 1998. Now, hang on a minute: Some reflections on emerging orthodoxies. In Clahsen (ed.), 451-499.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Behrens, Heike. 1993. Temporal Reference in German Child Language: Form and Function of Early Verb Use. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Bentzen, Kristine. 2003. V-to-I Movement in the absence of morphological cues: evidence from Northern Norwegian. In Proceedings from the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Peter Svenonius, Anne Dahl & Marit R. Westergaard (eds).
Nordlyd
31(3): 573-588.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bentzen, Kristine. 2005. What’s the better move? On verb placement in Standard and Northern Norwegian. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28(2): 153-188. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bentzen, Kristine. 2007. The degree of verb movement in embedded clauses in three varieties of Norwegian. In Scandinavian Dialect Syntax 2005, Kristine Bentzen & Øystein A. Vangsnes (eds).
Nordlyd
34: 127-146.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berk, Stephanie. 2003. Why ‘why’ is different? In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Barbara Beachley, Amanda Brown & Frances Conlin (eds),127-137. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blom, Elma. 2007. Modality, infinitives, and finite bare verbs in Dutch and English child language. Language Acquisition 14(1): 75-113. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2002. Realizing Germanic inflection: Why morphology does not drive syntax. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6: 129-167. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bobaljik, Jonathan David & Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1998. Two heads aren't always better than one. Syntax 1(1): 37-71. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bohnacker, Ute. 1999. Icelandic plus English: Language Differentiation and Functional Categories in a Successively Bilingual Child. PhD dissertation, University of Durham.
Boser, Katharina, Lust, Barbara C., Santelmann, Lynn & Whitman, John. 1992. The syntax of V2 in early child German grammar: The Strong Continuity Hypothesis. Proceedings of the Northeastern Linguistic Society 22: 51-66.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, Roger. 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clahsen, Harald. 1986. Verb inflections in German child language: Acquisition of agreement markings and the functions they encode. Linguistics 24: 79-121. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clahsen, Harald. 1988. Parameterized grammatical theory and language acquisition: A study of the acquisition of verb placement and inflection by children and adults. In Linguistic Theory in Second Language Acquisition, Suzanne Flynn & Wayne O’Neil (eds), 47-75. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clahsen, Harald & Muysken, Pieter. 1986. The availability of Universal Grammar to adult and child learners – A study of the acquisition of German word order. Second Language Research 2(2): 93-119. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clahsen, Harald & Muysken, Pieter. 1989. The UG paradox in L2 acquisition. Second Language Research 5(1): 1-29. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clahsen, Harald & Penke, Martina. 1992. The acquisition of agreement morphology and its syntactic consequences: New evidence on German child language from the Simone-corpus. In The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition, Jürgen M. Meisel (ed.), 181-223. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Haan, Germen. 1987. A theory-bound approach to the acquisition of verb placement in Dutch. In Germen de Haan & Wim Zonneveld (eds.), Formal Parameters of Generative Grammar, 15-30. Dordrecht: ICG.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Endresen, Rolf Theil & Simonsen, Hanne Gram. 2001. The Norwegian verb. In A Cognitive Approach to the Verb: Morphological and Constructional Perspectives, Hanne Gram Simonsen & Rolf Theil Endresen (eds), 73-94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eide, Kristin Melum. 2009. Finiteness: The haves and the have-nots. In Advances in Comparative Germanic Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 141], Artemis Alexiadou, Jorge Hankamer, Thomas McFadden, Justin Nuger & Florian Schäfer (eds), 357-390 Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guasti, Maria Teresa. 1996. Acquisition of Italian interrogatives. In Clahsen (ed.), 241-270.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guasti, Maria Teresa. 2000. An excursion into interrogatives in Early English and Italian. In The Acquisition of Syntax: Studies in Comparative Developmental Linguistics, Marc-Ariel Friedemann & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 105-128, Harlow: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guasti, Maria Teresa, Thornton, Rosalind & Wexler, Ken. 1995. Negation in children’s questions: The case of English. In BUCLD 19: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Dawn MacLaughlin & Susan McEwen (eds), 228-240. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, Tony & Wexler, Ken. 1996. The optional-infinitive stage in child English: Evidence from negation. In Clahsen (ed.), 1-42.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoekstra, Teun & Hyams, Nina. 1998. Aspects of root infinitives. Lingua 106: 81-112. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ingram, David & Thompson, William. 1996. Early syntactic acquisition in German: Evidence for the Modal Hypothesis. Language 72(1): 97-120. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jordens, Peter. 1990. The acquisition of verb placement in Dutch and German. Linguistics28: 1407-1448. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Josefsson, Gunlög. 1999. Non-finite root clauses in Swedish child language. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 63: 105-150.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klima, Edward S. & Bellugi[-Klima], Ursula. 1966. Syntactic regularities in the speech of children. In Psycholinguistic Papers, John Lyons & Roger J. Wales (eds), 183-208. Edinburgh: EUP. Also published in Lust, Barbara C. & Foley, Claire (eds). 2004. First Language Acquisition: The Essential Readings, 344-366. Malden MA: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Labov, William & Labov, Teresa. 1978. Learning the syntax of questions. In Recent Advances in the Psychology of Language: Formal and Experimental Approaches, Robin N. Campbell & Philip T. Smith (eds). New York NY: Plenum. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lardiere, Donna. 2000. Mapping features to forms in second language acquisition. In Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, John Archibald (ed.), 102-129. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasser, Ingeborg. 1997. Finiteness in Adult and Child Language. PhD dissertation, City University of New York.
Lightfoot, David. 2002. Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacWhinney, Brian. 2000. The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, Vol. 2: The Database, 3rd edn. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Phillips, Colin. 1995. Syntax at age two: Cross-linguistic differences. In Papers on Language Processing and Acquisition [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 26], Carson T. Schütze, Jennifer B. Ganger & Kevin Broihier (eds), 325-382. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plunkett, Kim & Strömqvist, Sven. 1990. The Acquisition of Scandinavian Languages. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 59.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poeppel, David & Wexler, Ken. 1993. The Full Competence Hypothesis of clause structure in early German. Language 69: 1-33. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20(3): 365–425.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radford, Andrew. 1992. The acquisition of the morphosyntax of finite verbs in English. In The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition, Jürgen M. Meisel (ed.), 23-62. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radford, Andrew 1994. The syntax of questions in child English. Journal of Child Language 21: 211-236. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 1993/94. Some notes on linguistic theory and language development: The case of root infinitives. Language Acquisition 3(4): 371-393. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 1996. Residual verb second and the wh-criterion. In Parameters and Functional Heads, Adriana Belletti & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 63-90. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 2000. Remarks on early null subjects. In The Acquisition of Syntax: Studies in Comparative Developmental Linguistics, Marc-Ariel Friedemann & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 269-292. Harlow: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roeper, Tom. 1999. Universal Bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 2(3), 169-186. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rowland, Caroline F. & Pine, Julian M. 2000. Subject-auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: ‘What children do know?’ Journal of Child Language 27: 157-181. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rowland, Caroline F. & Pine, Julian M. 2003. The development of inversion in wh-questions: A reply to Van Valin. Journal of Child Language 30: 197-212. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Santelmann, Lynn. 1995. The Acquisition of Verb Second Grammar in Child Swedish: Continuity of Universal Grammar in WH-questions, Topicalizations and Verb Raising. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.
Santelmann, Lynn. 2004. The acquisition of Swedish wh-questions. In Gunlög Josefsson, Christer Platzack and Gisela Håkansson (eds.), The Acquisition of Swedish Grammar, 261-307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Snyder, William. 2007. Child Language: The Parametric Approach. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stromswold, Karin. 1990. Learnability and the Acquisition of Auxiliaries. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Theakston, Anna L., Lieven, Elena V.M., Pine, Julian M. & Rowland, Caroline F. 2001. The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: An alternative account. Journal of Child Language 28: 127-152. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thornton, Rosalind. 2008. Why continuity? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26: 107-146. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Valin, Robert D. 2002. The development of subject-auxiliary inversion in English wh-questions: An alternative analysis. Journal of Child Language 29: 161-175. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verrips, Maaike & Weissenborn, Jürgen. 1992. Routes to verb placement in early German and French: The independence of finiteness and agreement. In The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition, Jürgen Meisel (ed.), 283-331. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Waldmann, Christian. 2008.
Input och output: Ordföljd i svenska barns huvudsatser och bisatser
(Input and Output: Word Order in Swedish Children’s Main and Embedded Clauses). PhD dissertation, University of Lund.
Westergaard, Marit R. 2003. Word order in wh-questions in a North Norwegian dialect: Some evidence from an acquisition study. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26(1): 81-109. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westergaard, Marit. 2008. Acquisition and change: On the robustness of the triggering experience for word order cues. Lingua 118(12): 1841-1863. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westergaard, Marit. 2009b. Microvariation as diachrony: A view from acquisition. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 12(1): 49-79. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westergaard, Marit. 2009c. Usage-based vs. rule-based learning: The acquisition of word order in wh-questions in English and Norwegian. Journal of Child Language 36(5): 1023-1051. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Westergaard, Marit & Bentzen, Kristine. 2010. Word order and finiteness in the acquisition of English and Norwegian wh-questions. In BUCLD 34: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Vol 2, Katie Franich, Kate M. Iserman & Lauren L. Keil (eds), 457-467. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wexler, Kenneth. 1994. Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivation. In Verb Movement, David Lightfoot & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 305-350. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wexler, Kenneth. 1999. Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: a new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. In Language Acquisition: Knowledge Representation and Processing, Antonella Sorace, Caroline Heycock & Richard Shillock (eds). Special issue of Lingua
, 23-79.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wijnen, Frank, Kempen, Masja & Gillis, Steven. 2001. Root infinitives in Dutch early child language: An effect of input? Journal of Child Language 28(3): 629-660. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn, Bentzen, Kristine & Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg. 2007. Rethinking Scandinavian verb movement. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 10(3): 203-233. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.