Bare Argument Ellipsis and Focus

| University of Tübingen
ISBN 9789027257161 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
ISBN 9789027266569 | EUR 95.00 | USD 143.00
This monograph explores the syntax and information structure of bare argument ellipsis. The study concentrates on stripping, which is identified as a subtype of bare argument ellipsis typically associated with focus sensitive particles or negation. This monograph presents a unified account of stripping located at the syntax-information structure interface and argues for a licensing mechanism which is strongly tied to the focus properties of the construction. Under this view, types of bare argument ellipsis such as stripping and pseudostripping, which have received different treatments in the literature, are shown to be subject to the same licensing mechanism. This analysis is also extended to instances of bare argument ellipsis in embedded contexts, which have received little attention in the literature so far. Integrating theoretical and experimental reasoning, this study presents a series of experiments investigating the extraction, prosody and context properties of stripping and thus arrives at a comprehensive and unified account.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 233]  2016.  xi, 182 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Index of abbreviations
Chapter 1. Introduction
Chapter 2. Types of bare argument ellipsis
Chapter 3. State of the art
Chapter 4. Licensing stripping
Chapter 5. Experimental evidence
Chapter 6. Embedded stripping
Chapter 7. Conclusion and outlook


Altmann, H.
1976Die Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Untersuchungen zu ihrer Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik (Linguistische Arbeiten 33). Tübingen: Niemeyer. Crossref link
Asher, N. and L. Vieu
2005Subordinating and coordinating discourse relations. Lingua 115, 591–610. Crossref link
Bader, M.
1998Prosodic influences on reading syntactically ambiguous sentences. In: J. Fodor and F. Ferreira (eds.), Reanalysis in Sentence Processing, 1–46. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Baker, C.L.
1991The syntax of English not: The limits of core grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 387–429.
Baltazani, M.
1999Focus in Greek. Ms.
Bard, E., D. Robertson and A. Sorace
1996Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language 72 (1), 32–68. Crossref link
Bayer, J.
1990What Bavarian negative concord reveals about the syntactic structure of German. In: J. Mascaró (ed.), Grammar in Progress, 13–23. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Crossref link
1996Directionality and Logical Form: On the Scope of Focusing Particles and Wh-in-Situ. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Bryant, D.
2006Koordinationsellipsen im Spracherwerb: Die Verarbeitung potentieller Gapping-Strukturen. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. Crossref link
Büring, D.
1994Mittelfeldreport. In: V.B. Haftka (ed.), Was determiniert Wortstellungsvariation?, 79–96. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Crossref link
1997aThe great scope inversion conspiracy. Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 175–194. Crossref link
1997bThe Meaning of Topic and Focus: The 59th Street Bridge Accent. (Routledge Studies in German Linguistics 3.) London: Routledge. Crossref link
Büring, D. and H. Hartmann
2001The syntax and semantics of focus-sensitive particles in German. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19, 229–281. Crossref link
Caplan, D. and G.S. Waters
1999Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1), 77–94. Crossref link
Carlson, K.
2001The effects of parallelism and prosody in the processing of gapping structures. Language and Speech 44, 1–26. Crossref link
2002Parallelism and Prosody in the Processing of Ellipsis Sentences. London: Routledge.
Carlson, K, M. W. Dickey and C. Kennedy
2005Structural economy in the processing and representation of gapping sentences. Syntax 8, 208–228. Crossref link
Chafe, W.L.
1976Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In: C.N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, 25–56. New York: Academic Press.
Chao, W.
1988On Ellipsis. New York: Garland.
Chomsky, N.
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
1977On wh-movement. In: P.W. Culicover, T. Wasow and A. Akmajian (eds.), Formal Syntax, 71–132. San Francisco, London: Academic Press.
1993A minimalist program for lingustic theory. In: K. Hale and S. Keyser (eds.), The View from Building 20. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
1995The Minimalist Program. (Current Studies in Linguistics 28.) Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
2001Derivation by phase. In: M. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language (Current Studies in Linguistics 36.), 1–52. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
2002An interview on minimalism. In: A. Belletti, L. Rizzi (eds.), On Nature and Language, 92–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Crossref link
Chomsky, N. and M. Halle
1968The Sound Pattern of English: New York: Harper and Row.
Chung, S., W. Ladusaw and J. McCloskey
1995Sluicing and logical form. Natural Language Semantics 3, 239–282. Crossref link
Culicover, P.W.
1991Topicalization, inversion, and complementizers in English. In: D. Delfitto, M. Evaraert, A. Evers, and F. Stuurman (eds.) Going Romance, and Beyond: Fifth Symposium on Comparative Grammar, 1–43. OTS Working Papers 91–002. Utrecht: University of Utrecht.
Culicover, P.W. and R. Jackendoff
2005Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Crossref link
Culicover, P.W. and M. Rochemont
1983Stress and focus in English. Language 59, 123–65. Crossref link
Dalrymple, M., S. Shieber and F. Pereira
1991Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 399–452. Crossref link
Depiante, M.A.
2000The Syntax of Deep and Surface Anaphora: A Study of Null Complement Anaphora and Stripping/Bare Argument Ellipsis. Ph.D. diss., University of Connecticut.
Diesing, M.
1992Indefinites. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Drubig, H.B.
1992Zur Frage der grammatischen Repräsentation thetischer und kategorischer Sätze. In: J. Jacobs (ed.), Informationsstruktur und Grammatik (Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 4), 142–195. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Crossref link
1994Island Constraints and the Nature of Focus and Association with Focus. Technical Report, Sonderforschungsbereich 340, University of Tübingen.
2003Towards a typology of focus and focus constructions. Linguistics 41 (1), 1–50. Crossref link
2007Phases and the typology of focus constructions. In: K. Schwabe, and S. Winkler (eds.), On Information Structure, Meaning and Form (Linguistik Aktuell.), 33–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
É. Kiss, K.
1998Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74, 245–273. Crossref link
Erben, J.
1972Deutsche Grammatik. Ein Abriss. 11., völlig neu bearbeitete Auflage. München: Max Hueber Verlag.
Ernst, T.
1992The phrase structure of English negation. The Linguistic Review 9, 109–144. Crossref link
Erteschik-Shir, N.
1987Right node raising. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 9, 105–113.
Fanselow, G.
1990Scrambling as NP-movement. In: G. Grewendorf and W. Sternefeld (eds.), Scrambling and Barriers, 113–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2002Quirky subjects and other specifiers. In: I. Kaufmann and B. Stiebels (eds.), More than Words, 227–250. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. Crossref link
Featherston, S.
2005Magnitude estimation and what it can do for your syntax: Some wh-constraints in German. Lingua 115, 1525–1550. Crossref link
2007Data in generative grammar: The stick and the carrot. Theoretical Linguistics 33 (3), 269–318. Crossref link
2008Thermometer judgements as linguistic evidence. In: C.M. Riehl and A. Rothe (eds.), Was ist linguistische Evidenz?, 69–89. Aachen: Shaker Verlag.
Féry, C. and M. Krifka
2008Information structure. Notional distinctions, ways of expression. In: P. van Sterkenburg (ed.), Unity and Diversity of Languages, 123–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Flämig, W.
1991Grammatik des Deutschen. Einführung in die Struktur- und Wirkungszusammenhänge. Erarbeitet auf der theoretischen Grundlage der “Grundzüge einer deutschen Grammatik“. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
Fodor, J.D.
2002aProsodic disambiguation in silent reading. In: M. Hirotani (ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 32, 113–132. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
2002bPsycholinguistics cannot escape prosody. In: B. Bel and I. Marlin (eds.), Proceedings of the Speech Prosody 2002 Conference, 83–88. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage.
Fox, D.
2000Economy and Semantic Interpretation. (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 35.) Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Frazier, L. and C. Clifton
1998Comprehension of sluiced sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes 13, 499–520. Crossref link
2001Parsing coordinates and ellipsis: Copy a. Syntax 4 (1), 1–22. Crossref link
Frazier, L. and K. Rayner
1982Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology 14 (2), 178–210. Crossref link
Frey, W.
2001About the whereabouts of indefinites. Theoretical Linguistics 27, 137–161. Crossref link
2004A medial topic position for German. Linguistische Berichte 198, 153–190.
2006Contrast and movement to the German prefield. In: V. Molnár and S. Winkler (eds.), The Architecture of Focus (Studies in Generative Grammar 82), 235–264. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
2011Peripheral adverbial clauses, their licensing and the prefield in German. In: E. Breindl, G. Ferraresi, and A. Volodina (eds.), Satzverknüpfung – Zur Interaktion von Form, Bedeutung und Diskursfunktion, 41–77. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
2012On two types of adverbial clauses allowing root-phenomena. In: L. Aelbrecht, L. Haegeman, and R. Nye (eds.), Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons, 405–429. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Gates, D.L. and O.D. Seright
1967Negative-contrastive constructions in Standard Modern English. American Speech 42 (2), 136–141. Crossref link
Geilfuß-Wolfgang, J.
1996Über gewisse Fälle von Assoziation mit Fokus. Tübingen: Niemeyer. (= Linguistische Arbeiten 358).
Gergel, R.
2005Modals and Ellipsis: Diachronic and Synchronic Evidence. Ph.D. diss., University of Tübingen.
2009Modality and Ellipsis: Diachronic and Synchronic Evidence. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Ginzburg, J. and R. Cooper
2004Clarification, ellipsis, and the nature of contextual updates in dialogue. Linguistics and Philosophy 27, 297–365. Crossref link
Goddard, C.
1986The natural semantics of too. Journal of Pragmatics 10, 635–644. Crossref link
Green, G.M.
1968On too and either, and not just on too and either, either. Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS) 4, 22–39.
1973The lexical expression of emphatic conjunction: Theoretical implications. Foundations of Language 10, 197–248.
Grewendorf, G.
2005The discourse configurationality of scrambling. In: J. Sabel and M. Saito(eds.), The Free Order Phenomenon: Its Syntactic Sources and Diversity, 75–135. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Haftka, B.
1994Wie positioniere ich meine Position? In: B. Haftka (ed.), Was determiniert Wortstellungsvariation?, 139–159. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Crossref link
Haider, H.
1993Deutsche Syntax – generativ. Tübingen: Narr.
Haider, H. and I. Rosengren
1998Scrambling. Sprache und Pragmatik 49, 1–104.
2003Scrambling – Non-triggered chain formation in OV languages. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 15, 203–267. Crossref link
Holler, A.
2008German dependent clauses from a constraint-based perspective. In: C. Fabricius-Hansen and W. Ramm (eds.), ‘Subordination’ vs. ‘Coordination’ in Sentence and Text, 187–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Halliday, M.A.K.
1967Notes on transitivity and theme in English, part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3, 199–244. Crossref link
Hankamer, J.
1973Unacceptable ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry 4, 17–68.
1979Deletion in Coordinate Structures. New York: Garland Publishing.
Hankamer, J. and I.A. Sag
1976Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7, 391–426.
Hardt, D.
1993Verb Phrase Ellipsis: Form, Meaning and Processing. Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania.
Hardt, D. and M. Romero
2004Ellipsis and the structure of discourse. Journal of Semantics 21, 375–414. Crossref link
Hartmann, J., A. Konietzko and M. Salzmann
. to appear. On the limits of non-parallelism in ATB-movement. In: S. Featherston and Y. Versley (eds.) Firm Foundations: Quantitative Approaches to Grammar and Grammatical Change. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Hartmann, K.
2000Right Node Raising and Gapping: Interface Conditions on Prosodic Deletion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Hartung, N.
2012Und-Koordination in der frühen Kindersprache: Eine korpusbasierte Untersuchung. Ph.D. diss., University of Tübingen.
Heim I. and A. Kratzer
1998Semantics in Generative Grammar. London: Blackwell.
Höhle, T.
1982Explikationen für “normale Betonung“ und “normale Wortstellung“. In: W. Abraham (ed.), Satzglieder im Deutschen. Vorschläge zur syntaktischen, semantischen und pragmatischen Fundierung, 75–153. Tübingen: Narr.
1988VERUM-Fokus. Sprache und Pragmatik 5, 2–7.
1992Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen. In: J. Jacobs (ed.), Informationsstruktur und Grammatik (Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 4), 112–141. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Crossref link
Huddleston, R.D. and G.K. Pullum
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Crossref link
Hudson, R.A.
1976Conjunction reduction, gapping and right node raising. Language 52, 535–562. Crossref link
Jackendoff, R.
1971Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2, 21–35.
1972Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Jacobs, J.
1982Syntax und Semantik der Negation im Deutschen. München: Fink.
1983Fokus und Skalen: zur Syntax und Semantik der Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Crossref link
1991Negation. In: A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik. Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenössischer Forschung, 560–596. Berlin: de Gruyter.
1997I-Topikalisierung. Linguistische Berichte 168, 91–133.
Jäger, A.
2008History of German Negation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Johnson, K.
1996/2003Gapping: In Search of the Middle Field. Ms., Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
2001What VP ellipsis can do, what it can’t, but not why. In: M. Baltin and C. Collins (eds.), The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, 439–479. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Crossref link
Kaplan, J.
1984Obligatory too in English. Language 60, 510–518. Crossref link
Keller F., M. Corley, S. Corley, L. Konieczny and A. Todirascu
1998WebExp: A Java Toolbox for Web-Based Psychological Experiments. Technical Report HCRC/TR-99, Human Communication Research Centre, University of Edinburgh.
Kennedy, C.
2003Ellipsis and syntactic representation. In: K. Schwabe and S. Winkler (eds.), The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures, 29–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Kim, J.-B. and I.A. Sag
2002Negation without head-movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20 (2), 339–412. Crossref link
Kiziak, T.
2010Extraction Asymmetries: Experimental Evidence from German. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Klein, W.
1993Ellipse. In: J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld andT. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol 1, 763–799. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Klima, E.
1964Negation in English. In: J.A. Fodor and J. Katz (eds.), The Structure of Language, 246–323. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Kolokonte, M.
2008Bare Argument Ellipsis and Information Structure. Ph.D. diss., University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
Konietzko, A. and S. Winkler
2010Contrastive ellipsis: Mapping between syntax and information structure. Lingua 120 (6), 1436–1457. Crossref link
König, E.
1991aThe Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. London: Croom Helm. Crossref link
1991bGradpartikeln. In: A. von Stechow and D. Wunderlich (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, 786–803. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
1993Focus particles. In: J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld and T. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol. 1, 978–987. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Krifka, M.
1998Scope inversion under the rise-fall contour in German. Linguistic Inquiry 29 (1), 75–112. Crossref link
1999Additive particles under stress. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 8, 111–128. Crossref link
Kuno, S.
1972Gapping: Functional sentence perspective. Linguistic Inquiry 3 (3), 269–320.
Laka, M.I.
1990Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections. Ph.D. diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Lang, E.
2004Schnittstellen bei der Konnektoren-Beschreibung. In: H. Blühdorn, E. Breindl and U.H. Waßner (eds.), Brücken schlagen: Grundlagen der Konnektorensemantik (Linguistik – Impulse und Tendenzen 5), 45–92. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Lappin, S.
1996The Interpretation of Ellipsis. In: S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, 145–175. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lasnik, H.
1981On two recent treatments of disjoint reference. Journal of Linguistic Research 1 (4), 48–58.
Lechner, W.
2001Reduced and phrasal comparatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19 (4), 683–735. Crossref link
2004Ellipsis in Comparatives. (Studies in Generative Grammar 72) Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Lenerz, J.
1977Zur Abfolge nominaler Satzglieder im Deutschen. Tübingen: Narr.
Levin, L.
1982Sluicing: A lexical interpretation procedure. In: J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, 590–654. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lobeck, A.
1995Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing and Identification. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
López, L.
1999VP-ellipsis in Spanish and English and the features of AUX. Probus 11, 263–297. Crossref link
López, L. and S. Winkler
2000Focus and topic in VP-anaphora constructions. Linguistics 38, 623–664. Crossref link
2003Variation at the syntax-semantics interface: Evidence from gapping. In: K. Schwabe and S. Winkler (eds.), The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 61), 227–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Martins, A.M.
1994Enclisis, VP-deletion and the nature of Sigma. Probus 6, 173–205. Crossref link
McCawley, J.D.
1991Contrastive negation and metalinguistic negation. In: L.M. Dobrin, L. Nichols and R.M. Rodriquez (eds.), Papers from the 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Part Two: The Parasessions on Negation, 189–206. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Merchant, J.
2001The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis. (Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 1.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2003Remarks on Stripping. Ms. University of Chicago.
2004Fragments and Ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27, 661–738. Crossref link
2006“Small structures” – A sententialist perspective. In: L. Progovac, K. Paesani, E. Casielles and E. Barton (eds.), The Syntax of Nonsententials, 73–91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2008Variable island repair under ellipsis. In: K. Johnson (ed.), Topics in Ellipsis, 132–153. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merchant, J, L. Frazier, T. Weskott and C. Clifton
2013Fragment answers to questions: A case of inaudible syntax. In: L. Goldstein (ed.) Brevity, 21–35. Oxford: OUP. Crossref link
Molnár, V.
1998Topic in focus: On the syntax, phonology, semantics and pragmatics of the so-called “contrastive topic” in Hungarian and German. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 45 (1–2), 89–166. Crossref link
2001Contrast from a contrastive perspective. In: I. Kruijff-Korbayova and Mark Steedman (eds.), Information Structure, Discourse Structure and Discourse Semantics, ESSLLI 2001 Workshop Proceedings, 99–114. Helsinki: The University of Helsinki.
2006On different kinds of contrast. In: V. Molnár and S. Winkler (eds.), The Architecture of Focus (Studies in Generative Grammar 82.), 197–233. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Molnár, V. and S. Winkler
2010Edges and gaps: Contrast at the interfaces. Lingua 120, 1392–1415. Crossref link
Morgan, J.
1973Sentence fragments and the notion ‘sentence’. In: B.J. Kachru, R.B. Lees, Y. Malkiel, A. Pitrangeli and S. Saporta (eds.), Issues in Linguistics, 719–751. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
1989Sentence fragments revisited. Chicago Linguistics Society: Papers from the Parasession on Language in Context 25, 228–241.
Müller, G. and W. Sternefeld
1994Scrambling as A-bar movement. In: N. Corver and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), Studies on Scrambling. Movement and Non-Movement Approaches to Free Word-Order Phenomena, 331–386. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Munn, A.
1993Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Coordinate Structures. Ph.D. diss., University of Maryland.
Neijt, A.
1979Gapping. Dordrecht: Foris.
Nykiel, J. and I. Sag
2011Remarks on sluicing. In: S. Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the HPSG11 Conference. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Oehrle, R.T.
1987Boolean properties in the analysis of gapping. In: G.J. Huck and A.E. Ojeda (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 20: Discontinuous Constituency, 203–240. San Diego, California: Academic Press.
Ormelius-Sandblom, E.
1997Die Modalpartikeln ja, doch und schon. Zu ihrer Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik. (= Lunder germanistische Forschungen 61). Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm.
Pollock, J.-Y.
1989Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.
Potsdam, E.
1997NegP and subjunctive complements in English. Linguistic Inquiry 28, 533–541.
Progovac, L.
2006The syntax of nonsententials: Small clauses and phrases at the root. In: L. Progovac, K. Paesani, E. Casielles and E. Barton (eds.), The Syntax of Nonsententials, 33–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Radó, J., J. Heim and S. Winkler
2012Complex Sluicing and Focus. Ms. University of Tübingen.
Reich, I.
2007Asymmetrische Koordination im Deutschen. Habilitation, University of Tübingen.
2009aAsymmetrische Koordination im Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
2009bEllipse und die Struktur von Diskursen – Anaphora und Gapping. Talk, 15.01.2009, University of Tübingen.
2011Ellipsis. In: C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger and P. Portner (eds.), Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. (= Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science). 1849–1874. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Reich, I. and M. Reis
2013Koordination und Subordination. In: J. Meibauer, M. Steinbach, and H. Altmann (eds.), Satztypen des Deutschen, 536–569. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Reinhart, T.
1981Definite NP anaphora and C-command domains. Linguistic Inquiry 12 (4), 605–635.
1982Pragmatics and Linguistics: An Analysis of Sentence Topics. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
1991Elliptical conjunctions: Non-quantificational LF. In: A. Kasher (ed.), The Chomskyan Turn, 360–384. Oxford: Blackwell.
1995Interface Strategies. (OTS Working Papers.) Utrecht: Research Institute of Language and Speech.
Reis, M.
1997Zum syntaktischen Status unselbstständiger Verbzweit-Sätze. In: C. Dürscheid and Karl-Heinz Ramers (eds.), Sprache im Fokus: Festschrift für Heinz Vater zum 65. Geburtstag, 121–144. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
2005On the syntax of so-called focus particles in German – A reply to Büring and Hartmann 2001. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23, 459–483. Crossref link
Reis, M. and I. Rosengren
1992What do wh-imperatives tell us about wh-movement? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10, 79–118. Crossref link
1997A modular approach to the grammar of additive particles: The case of German auch. Journal of Semantics 14, 237–309. Crossref link
Repp, S.
2005Interpreting Ellipsis: The Changeable Presence of the Negation in Gapping. Ph.D. diss., Humboldt-University Berlin.
2008When the negative goes missing: The role of the information structure in gapping coordinations with but. In: A. Steube (ed.), The Discourse Potential of Underspecified Structures: Event Structure and Information Structure, 359–388. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
2009Negation in Gapping. Oxford: OUP. Crossref link
Rochemont, M.
1986Focus in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: JohnBenjamins. Crossref link
Rooth, M.
1985Association with Focus, Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts.
1992aA theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1, 75–116. Crossref link
1992bEllipsis redundancy and reduction redundancy. In: S. Berman and A. Hestvik (eds.), Proceedings of the Stuttgart Ellipsis Workshop 1992, (Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340 ‘Sprach-theoretische Grundlagen für die Computerlinguistik’ 29.) Universität Stuttgart/Universität Tübingen.
Rosengren, I.
1997The thetic/categorical distinction revisited once more. Linguistics 35, 439–479. Crossref link
Ross, J.R.
1967Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Ph.D. diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
1969Guess who? In: R. Binnick, A. Davison, G. Green and J. Morgan (eds.), Papers from the 5th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 252–286. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Sag, I.
1976Deletion and Logical Form. Ph.D. diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Sasse, H.- J.
1987The thetic/categorical distinction revisited. Linguistics 25, 511–580. Crossref link
Schmeh, K., P.W. Culicover, J. Hartmann and S. Winkler
2015Discourse function ambiguity of fragments: A linguistic puzzle. In: S. Winkler (ed.), Ambiguity: Language and Communication, 199–216. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Crossref link
Schwabe, K. and S. Winkler
(eds.) 2003The Interfaces: Deriving and Interpreting Omitted Structures (Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 61). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Selkirk, E.O.
1984Phonology and Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Shopen, T.
1972A Generative Theory of Ellipsis. Ph.D. diss., University of California, Los Angeles.
Siegel, M.E.A.
1984Gapping and interpretation. Linguistic Inquiry 15 (3), 523–530.
Stainton, R.J.
1995Non-sentential assertions and semantic ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 281–296. Crossref link
1997Utterance meaning and syntactic ellipsis. Pragmatics and Cognition 5, 51–78. Crossref link
2004In defense of non-sentential assertion. In: Z. Szabe (ed.), Semantics vs. Pragmatics, 383–457. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2006Neither fragments nor ellipsis. In: L. Progovac, K. Paesani, E. Casielles and E. Barton (eds.), The Syntax of Nonsententials, 93–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Steiner, I.
2005On the syntax of DP coordination. Combining evidence from reading-time studies and agrammatic comprehension. In: S. Kepser and M. Reis (eds.), Linguistic Evidence. Empirical, Theoretical and Compu-tational Perspectives (Studies in Generative Grammar: Vol. 85.)., 507–527. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
2009Zur Verarbeitung koordinierter Strukturen. Ph.D. diss., University of Tübingen.
Stolterfoht, B.
2005Processing Word Order Variations and Ellipses: The Interplay of Syntax and Information Structure during Sentence Comprehension (Max-Planck-Series in Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences 55). Leipzig: Max-Planck-Institut für Kognitions- und Neurowissenschaften.
Taglicht, J.
1993Focus and background. In: J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld and T. Vennemann (eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, 998–1006. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
te Velde, J.R.
2006Deriving Coordinate Symmetries: A Phase-Based Approach Integrating Select, Merge, Copy and Match. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Crossref link
Wasow, T.
1972Anaphoric Relations in English. Ph.D. diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
1979Anaphora in Generative Grammar. Ghent: E. Story-Scientia. Crossref link
Webelhuth, G.
1989Syntactic Saturation Phenomena and the Modern Germanic Languages. Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts.
Weiß, H.
2002A quantifier approach to negation in natural languages. Or why negative concord is necessary. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 25 (2), 125–153. Crossref link
Wilder, C.
1994Coordination, ATB and ellipsis. In: C.J.W. Zwart (ed.), Minimalism and Kayne‘s Asymmetry Hypothesis (Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 37.), 291–329. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
1997Some properties of ellipsis in coordination. In: A. Alexiadou and T. Hall (eds.), Studies in Universal Grammar and Typological Variation, 59–107. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Crossref link
Williams, E.
1977Discourse and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 8, 692–696. Crossref link
1978Across the board rule application. Linguistic Inquiry 9 (1), 31–43.
Winkler, S.
2000Silent copy and polarity focus in VP ellipsis. In: K. Schwabe and N. Zhang (eds.), Ellipsis in Coordination, 221–247. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Crossref link
2005Ellipsis and Focus in Generative Grammar. (Studies in Generative Grammar 81.) Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
2012aChapter 2: English. In: M. Krifka and R. Musan (eds), The Expression of Information Structure, 71–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2012bFocus in reduced weil-clauses in German. In: J. Brandtler, et al. (eds.), Discourse & Grammar: A Festschrift in Honor of Valéria Molnár, 487–500. Lund: Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University.
2016Current issues of information structure Chapter 20: Ellipsis. In: C. Féry and S. Ishihara (eds), The (Oxford) Handbook of Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zifonun, G., L. Hoffmann and B. Strecker
1997Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. Band 1–3. (Schriften des Instituts für deutsche Sprache; Band 7.1). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Al-Horais, Nasser
2017. On Negation and Focus in Standard Arabic: Interface-based Approach. Journal of Universal Language 18:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Reich, Ingo
2018.  In Handbuch Pragmatik,  pp. 240 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 may 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009060 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Syntax
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2016027569