Article published in:
Theoretical Approaches to Linguistic Variation
Edited by Ermenegildo Bidese, Federica Cognola and Manuela Caterina Moroni
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 234] 2016
► pp. 53–88

The use of gerunds and infinitives in perceptive constructions

The effects of a threefold parametric variation in some Romance varieties

| University of Trento
In this article I compare the use of gerunds with perceptive verbs in Spanish and in Gardenese, a Rhaeto-Romance variety spoken in Northern Italy: perceptive gerunds are used as secondary predicates in Spanish but as defective TP-complements in Gardenese. Following Rizzi’s (2014) account of parametric variation, I propose that the differences are due to the interplay of three parameters: (i) a [+progressive] feature on Gardenese perception verbs, (ii) the pure lexical status of perception verbs in Gardenese, and (iii) a [+Agreement] feature on Spanish gerunds. The discussion of the parameters involved leads to more general considerations, such as a new proposal for the structure of perceptive ECMs in Romance, the confirmation of Folli and Harley’s (2007) analysis of Romance causative constructions, and the necessity of both the [+Agreement] and the [+Tense] feature in order to allow nominative non-finite subjects. The comparison with other Romance varieties confirms the role played by this parametric variation in perceptive constructions.
Keywords: ECM constructions, overt non-finite subjects, secondary predication
Published online: 01 December 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.234.03cas
References

References

Basilico, David
2003 The topic of small clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 34(1): 1-35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
1990 Generalized Verb Movement. Aspects of Verb Syntax. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Bello, Andrés
1847[1981]. Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos, edn. crítica de R. Trujillo. Tenerife: Aula de Cultura de Tenerife.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola
1994 L’interferenza sintattica: Di un aspetto della sintassi ladina considerato di origine tedesca. In La variazione sintattica, Paola Benincà, 89–103. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina
2000 On finiteness and nominative case licensing. Quaderni del Laboratorio di Linguistica 1: 145-167.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Holmberg, Anders, Roberts, Ian & Sheehan, Michelle
2014 Complexity in comparative syntax: The view from modern parametric theory. In Measuring Linguistic Complexity, Frederick Newmeyer & Laurel B. Preston (eds), 103-127. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1984 Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
1986 Italian Syntax. A Government-binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Guasti, Maria Teresa
1995 Small Clauses. Syntax and Semantics. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Casalicchio, Jan
2011 L'uso del gerundio con i verbi di percezione gardenesi. Ladinia 35: 321-352.Google Scholar
2013 Pseudorelative, gerundi e infiniti nelle varietà romanze. Affinità (solo) superficiali e corrispondenze strutturali. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2015 Predicative gerunds in Spanish and Catalan. Quaderni di lavoro ASIt 18: 103-126.Google Scholar
2016 Pseudo-relative clauses and their left periphery: A unified account. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory. Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’ 28, Lisbon, Ernestina Carrilho, Alexandra Fiéis, Maria Lobo & Sandra Pereira (eds), 23-42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Casalicchio, Jan & Cognola, Federica
2015 On the left periphery of relaxed V2 languages: A comparison between Rhaetoromance and Mòcheno. Ms, University of Trento.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000 Minimalist inquiries. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalism in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 83-155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed), 1-54. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1992 The pseudo-relative and acc-ing constructions after verbs of perception. Working Papers in Linguistics – University of Venice 2: 1-31.Google Scholar
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2006 Restructuring and Functional Heads. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ciutescu, Elena
2013 Remarks on the infinitival subject of perception verb complements: Evidence for two syntactic configurations. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 58(3): 292-312.Google Scholar
Cuneo, Marco
1997 L'uso dell'infinito nei dialetti liguri: Infinito con soggetto espresso e infinito flesso nel dialetto di Cicagna (GE). Rivista Italiana di Dialettologia 21: 99-132.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
2006 Relators and Linkers. The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion, and Copulas. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Di Tullio, Ángela L.
1998 Complementos no flexivos de verbos de percepción física en español. Verba 25: 197-221.Google Scholar
Fernández Lagunilla, Marina
1987. Los infinitivos con sujetos léxicos en español. In Sintaxis de las lenguas románicas, Violeta Demonte & Marina Fernández Lagunilla (eds), 125-147. Madrid: Arquero.Google Scholar
1999 Las construcciones de gerundio. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Vol. II, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 3443-3500. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
2011 Aspecto, predicación secundaria y complementos verbales no finitos en español. In Contribuciones al estudio del español [Colección Estudios lingüísticos 4], Rosa Maria Ortiz Ciscomani (ed.), 15-50. Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar
Fernández Lagunilla, Marina & de Dios López, Francisco
1991 Dos análisis gramaticales de ciertas construcciones completivas de infinitivo en español: a propósito de los verbos causativos y de percepción. Revista española de Lingüística 21(2): 216-232.Google Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi
2007 Causation, obligation and argument structure: On the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry 38(2): 197-238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Ángel
2009 Defective C-T in Romance. Probus 21: 163-216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gili Gaya, Samuel
1951 Curso superior de sintaxis española. Barcelona: Vox.Google Scholar
Graffi, Giorgio
1997 Frasi "complete" e frasi "ridotte". Lingua e stile 32(2): 273-291.Google Scholar
Granville-Hatcher, Anna
1944 Je le vois sourire; Je le vois qui sourit; Je le vois souriant. Modern Language Quarterly 5: 275-301; 387-405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grillo, Nino & Moulton, Keir
2015 Pseudo-relatives: Big and direct. In Proceedings of the Forty-fifth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Thuy Bui & Deniz Özyıldız (eds), 193-202. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa
1992 Pseudorelatives and prepositional infinitives. A unified account. Geneva Generative Papers 1: 53-65.Google Scholar
1993 Causative and Perception Verbs: A Comparative Study. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Araus, María Luz
1992 Sobre el gerundio en función adjetival. In Homenaje a Humberto López Morales, María T. Vaquero de Ramírez, Amparo Morales & Humberto López Morales (eds), 205-220. Madrid: Arco/Libros.Google Scholar
Haiman, John & Benincà, Paola
1992 The Rhaeto-Romance Languages. London: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Halmøy, Odile
2003 Le gérondif en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Hernanz, María Luïsa
1999 El infinitivo. In Grámatica descriptiva de la lengua Española, Vol. II, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 2197-2356. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Georg
2002 Die Verb-Zweit-Stellung im Rätoromanischen. Ein typologischer Vergleich. Ladinia 26-27: 313-334.Google Scholar
Kany, Charles E.
1970 Sintaxis hispanoamericana. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1975 French Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki
1972 The categorical judgement and the thetic judgement. Foundations of Language 9: 153-185.Google Scholar
Labelle, Marie
1996 Remarques sur les verbes de perception et la sous-categorisation. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 25: 83–106.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan
2004 The scale of finiteness and the calculus of control. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 22: 811-877. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
1998 Variation in the Romance infinitive: The case of the Southern Calabrian inflected infinitive. Transactions of the Philological Society 96: 1-61. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 A Comparative Syntax of the Dialects of Southern Italy. A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lepschy, Giulio
1976 Italian causative and perception predicates followed by an infinitive: Competence and performance. In Studies in Greek, Italic, and Indo-European Linguistics Offered to Leonard R. Palmer, Anna Morpurgo Davies & Wolfgang Meid (eds), 153-161. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Lonzi, Lidia
1988 Tipi di gerundio. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 13: 59-80.Google Scholar
LRL = Holtus, Günter, Metzeltin, Michael & Schmitt, Christian (eds) 1988/2005 Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik, 8 Vols. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Mensching, Guido
2000 Infinitive Constructions with Specified Subjects: A Syntactic Analysis of the Romance Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Moro, Andrea
1995 Small clauses with predicative nominals. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 28: Small Clauses, Anna Cardinaletti & Maria Teresa Guasti (eds), 109-126. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Picallo, M. Carme
(ed.) 2014 Linguistic Variation in the Minimalist Framework. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2002 The left periphery of a V2-Rhaetoromance dialect: A new perspective on V2 and V3. In Syntactic Microvariation. Proceedings of the Workshop on Syntactic Microvariation, Amsterdam, August 2000, Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips & Susanne van der Kleij (eds), 214-242. Amsterdam: Meertens Institute.Google Scholar
Radford, Andrew
1977 Italian Syntax. Transformational and Relational Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rafel, Joan
2000 Complex Small Clauses. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
2002 A case of disjunction in the syntax-semantics interface: The bare infinitive in perception and causative sentences. In Current Issues in Generative Grammar, Manuel Leonetti, Olga Fernández-Soriano & Victoria Escandell-Vidal (eds), 217-236. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá de Henares.Google Scholar
Raposo, Eduardo
1989 Prepositional infinitival constructions in European Portuguese. In The Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth J. Safir (eds), 277-305. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rigau, Gemma
1995 Propiedades de FLEX en las construcciones temporales de infinitivo: La legitimación del sujeto. In De grammatica generativa, Patxi Goenaga (ed.), 173-184. Universidad del País Vasco-Euskal Herriko Unibersitatea: Anejos del Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca Julio de Urquijo.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1982 Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992 Direct perception, government and thematic sharing. Geneva Generative Papers 1: 39-52.Google Scholar
2014 On the elements of syntactic variation. In Linguistic Variation in the Minimalist Framework, Maria Carme Picallo (ed.), 13-35. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sáenz, Hilario S.
1953 Disquisiciones participiogerundiales. Hispania 36: 291-299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Safir, Ken
1983 On small clauses as constituents. Linguistic Inquiry 14(4): 730-735.Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo
2000 Il ladino. Schizzo linguistico. Verbum 2(1): 151-169.Google Scholar
2016 Ladin. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds), 154-168. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo & Skytte, Gunver
1991 Frasi subordinate all'infinito. In Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, II, Lorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi & Anna Cardinaletti (eds), 483-567. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle
2016 Complex predicates. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds), 981-994. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Siller-Runggaldier, Heidi
1997 "Perzeptionsverb+Verb im Gerundium", ein im Romanischen funktional einheitliches Konstruktionsmuster? In Ladinia et Romania. Festschrift für Guntram Plangg zum 65. Geburtstag, Maria Iliescu, Werner Marxgut, Erich Mayr, Heidi Siller-Runggaldier & Lotte Zörner (eds), 309-320. Vich/Vigo di Fassa: Istitut Cultural Ladin "Majon di fascegn".Google Scholar
Sitaridou, Ioanna
2002 The Synchrony and Diachrony of Romance Infinitives with Nominative Subjects. PhD dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Škerlj, Stanko
1926 Syntaxe du participe présent et du gérondif en vieil italien. Avec une introduction sur l'emploi du participe présent et de l'ablatif du gérondif en latin. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Torrego, Esther
1998 The Dependencies of Objects. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Videsott, Paul
2011 Rätoromanische Bibliographie/Bibliografia retoromanza 1729-2010. Bozen/Bolzano: Bozen-Bolzano University Press.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel
1998 On the grammar of inflected non-finite forms (with special reference to Old Neapolitan). Copenhagen Studies in Language 22: 135-58.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1980 Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11(1): 203-238.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Cinque, Guglielmo
2020.  In The Syntax of Relative Clauses, Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.