Part of
Theoretical Approaches to Linguistic Variation
Edited by Ermenegildo Bidese, Federica Cognola and Manuela Caterina Moroni
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 234] 2016
► pp. 205236
Anttila, Arto & Young-mee Yu Cho
1998Variation and Change in Optimality Theory. Lingua 104: 31-56. Special issue on Optimality Theory. Partially reprinted in John J. McCarthy (ed.). 2003. Optimality Theory in Phonology: A Reader. Blackwell, Oxford, U.K. and Malden, Massachusetts, with an introductory note by the editor. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo
2006Phonological change in Optimality Theory. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edn, Vol. 9, Keith Brown (ed.), 497-505. Oxford: Elsevier. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Diachronic phonology. In The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, Paul de Lacy (ed.), 497-517. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014Amphichronic explanation and the life cycle of phonological processes. In The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology, Patrick Honeybone & Joseph C. Salmons (eds), 374-399. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Stratal Optimality Theory. Oxford: OUP.
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo & Hogg, Richard M
2003The actuation problem in Optimality Theory: Phonologization, rule inversion and rule loss. In Optimality Theory and Language Change, D. Eric Holt (ed.), 91-119. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broselow, Ellen, Chen, Su-I & Wang, Chilin
1998The emergence of the unmarked in second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 261-280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea
1993Palatalization processes in the history of Romance languages: A theoretical study. In Linguistic Perspectives on the Romance Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 103], William J. Ashby, Marianne Mithun & Giorgio Perissinotto (eds), 65-83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clements, George N
1990The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In Papers in Laboratory Phonology, I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, John Kingston & Mary Beckman (eds), 283-333. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collins, Joe & Krämer, Martin
2016Crazy rules and grounded constraints. In Proceedings of CLS 51.
Downing, Laura
1998On the Prosodic Misalignment of Onsetless Syllables. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16: 1–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giavazzi, Maria
2008On the application of velar palatalization in Italian. In Proceedings of WCCFL 27, UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics , 20-29.
2012Stress-conditioned Palatalization in Italian. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
Holt, D. Eric
(ed.) 2003Optimality Theory and Language Change. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ito, Junko
1988Syllable Theory in Prosodic Phonology. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin
1999The structure of the phonological lexicon. In The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, Natsuko Tsujimura (ed.), 62-100. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2001Covert generalizations in Optimality Theory: The role of stratal faithfulness constraints. In Proceedings of the 2001 International Conference on Phonology and Morphology, The Phonology-Morphology Circle of Korea (ed.), 3-33. Seoul: The Phonology-Morphology Circle of Korea.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1973Phonological representations. In Three Dimensions of Linguistic Theory, Osamu Fujimura (ed.), 3-136. Tokyo: TEC.Google Scholar
2006The amphichronic program vs. evolutionary phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 32: 217-36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015New perspectives in historical linguistics. In Handbook of Historical Linguistics, Claire Bowern & Bethwyn Evans (eds). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert
1996Synchronic chain shifts in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 341-350.Google Scholar
Kochetov, A
2016Palatalization and glide strengthening as competing repair strategies: Evidence from Kirundi. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 1(1), 14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krämer, Martin
2009aThe Phonology of Italian. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2009bCrypto-variation in Italian velar palatalisation. In Romance Linguistics: Structures, Interfaces, and Microparametric Variation [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 304], Pascual J. Masullo, Erin O'Rourke & Chia-Hui Huang (eds), 193-208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009cMain stress in Italian nonce nouns. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2006, [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 303], Danièle Torck & W. Leo Wetzels (eds), 127-141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Underlying Representations. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016Mataphonic chain shifts, vowel height, and markedness. In Approaches to metaphony in the Languages of Italy, Francesc Torres-Tamarit, Kathrin Linke & Marc van Oostendorp (eds), 277-299. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Łubowicz, Anna
2002Derived environment effects in Optimality Theory. Lingua 112: 243-280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Counter-feeding opacity as a chain shift effect. Proceedings of WCCFL 22: 315-327.
2011Chain shifts. In Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Beth Hume & Keren Rice (eds). Hoboken NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John
2005Taking a free ride in morphophonemic learning. In ‘Morphology in Phonology’, Maria-Rosa Lloret & Jesus Jiménez (eds). Thematic issue of Catalan Journal of Linguistics 4: 19-55.Google Scholar
2007Hidden Generalizations. Phonological Opacity in Optimality Theory. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John & Alan Prince
1994The Emergence of the Unmarked: Optimality in Prosodic Morphology. In Proceedings of NELS, Mercè Gonzalez (ed.) 24: 333–379. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
McMahon, April
2000Lexical Phonology and the History of English. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John & Alan Prince
1995Faithfulness and Reduplicative Identity. In University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in LInguisticsJill Beckman, Laura Walsh-Dickey, & Suzanne Urbanczyk (eds.) 18: 249–384. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar
Pater, Joe
2000Nonuniformity in English stress: The role of ranked and lexically specific constraints. Phonology 17: 237-74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006The locus of exceptionality: Morpheme-specific phonology as constraint indexation. UMOP 32 – Papers in Optimality Theory III . Amherst MA: GLSA.
2009Morpheme-specific phonology: Constraint indexation and inconsistency resolution. In Phonological Argumentation. Essays on Evidence and Motivation, Steve Parker (ed.), 123-154. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan & Tesar, Bruce
2004Learning phonotactic distributions. In Constraints in Phonological Acquisition, René Kager, Joe Pater & Wim Zonneveld (eds), 245-291. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Smith, Neil V
1973The Acquisition of Phonology: A Case Study. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Smolensky, Paul
2006Optimality in phonology, II: Harmonic completeness, local constraint conjunction, and feature domain markedness. In The Harmonic Mind: From Neural Computation to Optimality Theoretic Grammar, Vol. 2: Linguistic and Philosophical Implications, Paul Smolensky & Géraldine Legendre (eds), 27-160. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tekavčić, Pavao
1980Grammatica storica dell’italiano in: Fonematica. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Tesar, Bruce
1997Multi-Recursive Constraint Demotion. Ms, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Tesar, Bruce & Smolensky, Paul
2000Learnability in Optimality Theory. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vincent, Nigel
1988Latin. In The Romance Languages, Martin Harris & Nigel Vincent (eds), 26-78. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar