Article published in:
Theoretical Approaches to Linguistic Variation
Edited by Ermenegildo Bidese, Federica Cognola and Manuela Caterina Moroni
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 234] 2016
► pp. 259–292

Parameter typology from a diachronic perspective

The case of Conditional Inversion

| University of Cambridge
| University of Cambridge
This paper considers the question of the nature of parameters from a diachronic perspective, focusing in particular on the case of Conditional Inversion (CI) in the history of English. The objective is to show that it is meaningful to think of parameters and their synchronic robustness and consequent diachronic stability in “size” terms. More specifically, we show that it is possible to discern a consistent, but ever more frayed parametric thread linking the availability of verb-movement operations in the history of English: while verb-movement at the earliest stages (Old and early Middle English) can be ascribed to the activation of a Verb Second grammar – conceived of as a grammar requiring verb-movement into the finite C-domain (Force or Fin) in matrix clauses (a mesoparameter) – verb-movement at the early modern stage was much more fragmented, triggered by a smaller class of finite Cs and also, as a result of the loss of V-to-T movement and the rise of a class of auxiliaries, affecting a smaller class of verbs (a microparameter); the situation in modern British and American English, where only had, should and certain uses of were trigger CI, is nanoparametric, a situation which is expected to be unstable, as various post-colonial varieties indeed show it to be. CI in the history of English, then, provides a window on parametric continuity and change.
Keywords: diachrony of English, emergent parameters, parameter hierarchies, V2 constraint
Published online: 01 December 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.234.10bib
References

References

Alcázar, Asier & Saltarelli, Mario
2014 The Syntax of Imperatives. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
2008 The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In The Limits of Syntactic Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 132], Theresa Biberauer (ed.), 351-374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Batllori, Montserrat & Hernanz, Maria Lluïsa
2013 Emphatic polarity particles in Spanish and Catalan. Lingua 128: 9-30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baunaz, Lena
2015 On the various sizes of complementizers. Probus 27(2): 193-236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baunaz, Lena & Lander, Eric
2015 Syncretisms with the complementizer: Verbal and nominal complementizers. Paper presented at CGG25 , IKER, Bayonne.
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward
1994 ARCHER: A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers. http://​www​.alc​.manchester​.ac​.uk​/subjects​/lel​/research​/projects​/archer/ (25 April 2014).
Biberauer, Theresa
2008 Introduction. In The Limits of Syntactic Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 132], Theresa Biberauer (ed.), 1-72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 In defence of lexico-centric parametric variation: Two 3rd factor-constrained case studies. Paper presented at the Workshop on Formal Grammar and Syntactic Variation: Rethinking Parameters , Madrid.
2013 Predicate doubling in (Germanic) contact varieties: Introducing the case of Afrikaans. Paper presented at the 27th Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop (Yale).
2014 Acquiring syntactic categories with minimal (but crucial) help from UG. Paper presented at the Workshop on Universals, Functional Categories, and Implications for Acquisition , Cambridge.
2015a Macro- and microvariation: An emergentist perspective. Paper presented at the Formal Approaches to Variation conference , Vitoria.
2015b Preserving “Germanic” syntax via “exotic” means: V2 in modern Afrikaans. Paper presented at the Linguistics Association of Great Britain Annual Meeting , UCL.
Biberauer, T.
2016 Syntactic variation, stability and change: an emergentist parametric perspective. Paper presented at the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences ‘Language variation in action’ Colloquium (Amsterdam).
Biberauer, Theresa
In press. Optional V2 in modern Afrikaans: Probing a Germanic peculiarity. In Verb-Second Languages: Essays in honour of Ans van Kemenade, Bettelou Los & Pieter de Haan (eds) Amsterdam John Benjamins
Biberauer, Theresa, Holmberg, Anders, Roberts, Ian & Sheehan, Michelle
2014 Complexity in comparative syntax: The view from modern parametric theory. In Measuring Linguistic Complexity, Frederick Newmeyer & Laurel B. Preston (eds), 103-127. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & van Kemenade, Ans
2011 Subject positions and information-structural diversification in the history of English. Catalan Papers in Linguistics 10: 17-69.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian
2008 Cascading parameter changes: internally driven change in Middle and Early Modern English. In Grammatical Change and Linguistic Theory: The Rosendal Papers [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 113] Thórhallur Eythorsson (ed.), 79-113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Subjects, tense and verb-movement. In Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds), 263-303. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2012a Towards a parameter hierarchy for auxiliaries: Diachronic considerations. In Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 6, James N. Chancharu, Xuhui Freddy Hu & Moreno Mitrović (eds), 209-236.Google Scholar
2012b On the significance of what hasn’t happened. Paper presented at the 14th Diachronic Generative Syntax Conference , Lisbon.
2015a Clausal hierarchies. In Beyond Functional Sequence, Ur Shlonsky (ed.), 295-313. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015b Rethinking formal hierarchies: A proposed unification. In Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 7, James N. Chancharu, Xuhui Freddy Hu & Moreno Mitrović (eds), 1-31.Google Scholar
In press. Parameter setting. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds) Cambridge CUP
Biberauer, Theresa, Roberts, Ian & Sheehan, Michelle
2014 No-choice parameters and the limits of syntactic variation. In Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 31), Robet E. Santana-LaBarge (ed.), 46-55. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Bjorkman, Bronwyn M. & Halpert, Claire
2012 In an imperfect world: Deriving the typology of counterfactual marking. In Modality across Syntactic Categories, Ana Arregui, María Luisa Rivero & Andrés Pablo Salanova (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bour, Anthony
2014 Description of Multiple Modality in Contemporary Scotland: Double and Triple Modals in the Scottish Borders. PhD dissertation, Freiburg University.Google Scholar
Branigan, Phil
2012 Macroparameter learnability: an Algonquian case study. Ms, Memorial University. http://​www​.ucs​.mun​.ca​/%7Ebranigan​/branigan​-amp​.pdf (21 December 2015).
Breitbarth, Anne
2014 The development of conditional should in English. In Language Change at the Syntax-Semantics Interface, Chiara Gianollo, Agnes Jäger & Doris Penka (eds), 293-332. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Butler, Jonny
2004 Phase Structure, Phrase Structure and Quantification. PhD dissertation, York University.Google Scholar
2005 A minimalist treatment of modality. Lingua 113: 967-996. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-shen
2007 Verb copying in Mandarin Chinese. In The Copy Theory of Movement on the PF Side [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 107], Norbert Corver & Jairo Nunes (eds), 151-174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2006 Restructuring and Functional Heads. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cognola, Federica
2013 The mixed OV/VO syntax of Mòcheno main clauses: On the interaction between high and low left periphery. In Theoretical Approaches to Disharmonic Orders, Theresa Biberauer & Michelle Sheehan (eds), 106-135. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Belder, Marijke & van Craenenbroek, Jeroen
2015 How to merge a root. To appear in Linguistic Inquiry 46(4): 625-655. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Denison, David
1985 The origins of periphrastic DO. In Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 41], Roger Eaton, Olga Fischer, Willem F. Koopman & Frederike van der Leek (eds), 45-60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993 Some recent changes in the English verb. In English Diachronic Syntax, Mauricio Gotti (ed.), 15-33. Milan: Guerini.Google Scholar
1998 Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Suzanne Romaine (ed.), 92-329. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Duffield, Nigel
2007 Aspects of Vietnamese clause structure: Separating tense from assertion. Linguistics 45: 765-814. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 On polarity emphasis, assertion and mood in Vietnamese and English. Lingua 137: 248-270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Olga, van Kemenade, Ans, Koopman, Willem F. & van der Wurff, Wim
2000 The Syntax of Early English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia
2000 Negative … Concord? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 457-523. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grosz, Patrick Georg
2012 On the Grammar of Optative Constructions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 193]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, Anthea Fraser
1994 The Step-tongue: Children's English in Singapore. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jane
1979 Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10(2): 279-326.Google Scholar
Haeberli, Eric
1999 Features, Categories and the Syntax of A-Positions. Synchronic and Diachronic Variation in the Germanic Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
2000 Adjuncts and the syntax of subjects in Old and Middle English. In Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms, Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds), 109-131. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2002 Features, Categories and the Syntax of A-Positions. Cross-Linguistic Variation in the Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haeberli, Eric & Ihsane, Tabea
2016 Revisiting the loss of verb movement in the history of English: Evidence from adverb placement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34(2): 497–542. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Han, Chun-Hye & Kroch, Anthony
2000 The rise of do-support in English: implications for clause structure. In NELS 30: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society, Rutgers University 2000 , Masako Hirotami (ed.), 311-325. Amherst MA: GLSA.
Harwood, Will
2013 Being Progressive is Just a Phase: Dividing the Functional Hierarchy. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Gent.Google Scholar
2015 Being progressive is just a phase: Celebrating the uniqueness of progressive aspect under a phase-based analysis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33(2): 523-573. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heim, Johannes
& Wiltschko, Martina 2015 The syntax of confirmationals. A neo-performative analysis. Ms, UBC. http://​syntaxofspeechacts​.linguistics​.ubc​.ca​/wp​-content​/uploads​/2014​/02​/WiltschkoHeim​_the​-syntax​-of​-confirmationals​_resubmitted​.pdf (29 April 2016).
Henry, Alison
1995 Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter Setting. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline
2006 Embedded root phenomena. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 174-220. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2013 The syntax of answers to polar questions in English and Swedish. Lingua 128: 31-50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 Verb Second. In Syntax – Theory and Analysis, Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 135-175. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2016 The Syntax of Yes and No. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders & Platzack, Christer
1995 The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert
1999 Movement and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 30(1): 69-96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Xuhui
2015 A Comparative Study of Chinese and English Resultatives. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Huang, C.T.-James
2015 Syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. In Chinese Syntax in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson & Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai (eds), 1-48. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney
2002 Content clauses and reported speech. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 947-1030. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine & Zeijlstra, Hedde
2013 Negation, polarity and deontic modals. Linguistic Inquiry 44: 529-568. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
IJbema, Aniek
2001 Grammaticalization and Infinitival Complements in Dutch. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1909-1949 A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Jimenez-Fernandez, Ángel L. & Miyagawa, Shigeru
2014 A feature-inheritance approach to root phenomena and parametric variation. Lingua 145: 275-302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kandybowicz, Jason
2013 Ways of emphatic scope-taking: from emphatic assertion in Nupe to the grammar of emphasis. Lingua 128: 51-71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S.
(2005) Remarks on Comparative Syntax, with special reference to English and French. In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne (eds), 3-69. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans
1987 Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krishnamurtu, Bhadiraju
2006 Dravidian Languages. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony S.
1989a Function and grammar in the history of English periphrastic do . In Language Variation and Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 52], Ralph W. Fasold & Deborah Schiffrin (eds), 132-172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1989b Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1(3): 199-244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Krug, Manfred
2000 Emerging English Modals. A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuwabara, Kazuki
2013 Peripheral effects in Japanese questions and the fine structure of CP. Lingua 126: 91-119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2015 From Latin to Romance syntax: The Great Leap. To appear in The Oxford Handbook of Diachronic and Historical Linguistics, Paola Crisma & Giuseppe Longobardi (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas
2009 Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1979 Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Marcus, Gary P., Pinker, Steven, Ullman, Michael, Hollander, Michelle, Rosen, T. John & Xu, Fei
1992 Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57(4): 1-182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, James
2006 Questions and questioning in a local English. In Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense, and Clausal Architecture, Raffaella Zanuttini, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul Portner (eds), 87-126. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
McCready, Eric
2008 What man does. Linguistics and Philosophy 31(6): 671-724. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen
2010 Bilingual language acquisition and theories of diachronic change: bilingualism as cause and effect of grammatical change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(2): 121-145. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen, Elsig, Martin & Bonessen, Matthias
2011 Delayed grammatical acquisition in first language development: Subject-verb inversion and subject clitics in French interrogatives. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1(4): 347-390. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mittwoch, Anita, Huddleston, Rodney & Collins, Peter
2002 The clause: adjuncts. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 663-784. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Munaro, Nicola
2010 Toward a hierarchy of clause types. In Mapping the Left Periphery. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds), 125-162. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1989 The Earliness Principle. Ms, MIT.http://​web​.mit​.edu​/linguistics​/people​/faculty​/pesetsky​/earliness​.pdf (25 April 2014).
Pintzuk, Susan
1991 Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2012 Word Order in Old Italian. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989 Verb movement, Universal Grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365-424.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian & Svenonius, Peter
2014 Deriving the functional hierarchy. Language Sciences 46: 152-174. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Marc D.
2011 Deriving the edge: What's in a phase? Syntax 14(1): 74-95. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rissanen, Matti
1999 Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. III: Early Modern English 1476-1776, Roger Lass (ed.), 187-331. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth & Wiltschko, Martina
2009 Varieties of INFL: TENSE, LOCATION and PERSON. In Alternatives to Cartography, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed.), 153-201. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 The composition of INFL. An exploration of tense, tenseless languages, and tenseless constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32: 1331–1386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar. A Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed), 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
2001 On the position Int(errogative) in the Left Periphery of the clause. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 267-296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Roberts, Ian
1989 Complex inversion in French. Probus 1: 1-30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1985 Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 21-58.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1993 Verbs and Diachronic Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
1996 Remarks on the Old English C-system and the diachrony of V2. In Language Change and Generative Grammar [Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 7], Ellen Brandner & Gisella Ferraresi (eds), 154-164. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999 Verb movement and markedness. In Language Creation and Language Change, Michel DeGraff (ed.), 287-328. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2010 Agreement and Head Movement. Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 On the nature of syntactic parameters: A programme for research. In Parameter Theory and Linguistic Change, Charlotte Galves, Sonia Cyrino, Ruth Lopez, Filomena Sandalo & Juanito Avelar (eds), 319-334. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. & Roussou, Anna
2003 Syntactic Change. A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalisation. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saito, Mamoru
2012 Sentence Types and the Japanese Right Periphery. In Discourse and Grammar: From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories, Günther Grewendorf & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds), 147-175. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle
2014 Towards a parameter hierarchy for alignment. In Proceedings of 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Robert E. Santana-Labarge (ed.), 399-408. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Sheehan, M.
In press. Parameterising ergativity: An inherent case approach. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Travis (eds) Oxford OUP
Speas, Peggy & Tenny, Carol L.
2003 Configurational properties of Point of View roles. In Asymmetry in Grammar, Vol. 1 [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 57], Anna Maria DiSciullo (ed.), 315-343. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi
2014 Early, late or very late? Timing acquisition and bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 4(3): 283-313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten
2005 Immobile complex verbs in Germanic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8(1-2): 83-115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus
1963-1973 An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Vols 1-3. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Walkden, George
2014 Syntactic Reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Anthony
1983 Review of Lighfoot (1979). Journal of Linguistics 19: 187-209. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 The structure of parametric change, and V-movement in the history of English. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 380-393. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Westergaard, Marit
2009 The Acquisition of Word Order: Micro-cues, Information Structure, and Economy [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 145]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina
2014 The Universal Structure of Categories. Towards a Formal Typology. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, Samuel
(2015) Word order in Medieval Romance: a comparative study. Ph.D. dissertation: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Portner, Paul
2000 The characterization of exclamative clauses in Paduan. Language 71(1): 123-132. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79(1): 39-81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Cognola, Federica, Ivano Baronchelli & Evelina Molinari
2019. Inter- vs. Intra-Speaker Variation in Mixed Heritage Syntax: A Statistical Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo
Sauerland, Uli & Artemis Alexiadou
2020. Generative Grammar: A Meaning First Approach. Frontiers in Psychology 11 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 04 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.