This paper considers the question of the nature of parameters from a diachronic perspective, focusing in particular on the case of Conditional Inversion (CI) in the history of English. The objective is to show that it is meaningful to think of parameters and their synchronic robustness and consequent diachronic stability in “size” terms. More specifically, we show that it is possible to discern a consistent, but ever more frayed parametric thread linking the availability of verb-movement operations in the history of English: while verb-movement at the earliest stages (Old and early Middle English) can be ascribed to the activation of a Verb Second grammar – conceived of as a grammar requiring verb-movement into the finite C-domain (Force or Fin) in matrix clauses (a mesoparameter) – verb-movement at the early modern stage was much more fragmented, triggered by a smaller class of finite Cs and also, as a result of the loss of V-to-T movement and the rise of a class of auxiliaries, affecting a smaller class of verbs (a microparameter); the situation in modern British and American English, where only had, should and certain uses of were trigger CI, is nanoparametric, a situation which is expected to be unstable, as various post-colonial varieties indeed show it to be. CI in the history of English, then, provides a window on parametric continuity and change.
2008The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In The Limits of Syntactic Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 132], Theresa Biberauer (ed.), 351-374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Batllori, Montserrat & Hernanz, Maria Lluïsa
2013Emphatic polarity particles in Spanish and Catalan. Lingua 128: 9-30.
Baunaz, Lena
2015On the various sizes of complementizers. Probus 27(2): 193-236.
Baunaz, Lena & Lander, Eric
2015Syncretisms with the complementizer: Verbal and nominal complementizers. Paper presented at
CGG25
, IKER, Bayonne.
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward
1994ARCHER: A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers. [URL] (25 April 2014).
Biberauer, Theresa
2008Introduction. In The Limits of Syntactic Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 132], Theresa Biberauer (ed.), 1-72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Biberauer, Theresa
2011In defence of lexico-centric parametric variation: Two 3rd factor-constrained case studies. Paper presented at the
Workshop on Formal Grammar and Syntactic Variation: Rethinking Parameters
, Madrid.
Biberauer, Theresa
2013Predicate doubling in (Germanic) contact varieties: Introducing the case of Afrikaans. Paper presented at the
27th Comparative Germanic Syntax Workshop
(Yale).
Biberauer, Theresa
2014Acquiring syntactic categories with minimal (but crucial) help from UG. Paper presented at the
Workshop on Universals, Functional Categories, and Implications for Acquisition
, Cambridge.
Biberauer, Theresa
2015aMacro- and microvariation: An emergentist perspective. Paper presented at the
Formal Approaches to Variation conference
, Vitoria.
Biberauer, Theresa
2015bPreserving “Germanic” syntax via “exotic” means: V2 in modern Afrikaans. Paper presented at the
Linguistics Association of Great Britain Annual Meeting
, UCL.
Biberauer, T
2016Syntactic variation, stability and change: an emergentist parametric perspective. Paper presented at the
Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences ‘Language variation in action’ Colloquium
(Amsterdam).
Biberauer, Theresa
In press. Optional V2 in modern Afrikaans: Probing a Germanic peculiarity. In Verb-Second Languages: Essays in honour of Ans van Kemenade, Bettelou Los & Pieter de Haan (eds) Amsterdam John Benjamins
Biberauer, Theresa, Holmberg, Anders, Roberts, Ian & Sheehan, Michelle
2014Complexity in comparative syntax: The view from modern parametric theory. In Measuring Linguistic Complexity, Frederick Newmeyer & Laurel B. Preston (eds), 103-127. Oxford: OUP.
Biberauer, Theresa & van Kemenade, Ans
2011Subject positions and information-structural diversification in the history of English. Catalan Papers in Linguistics 10: 17-69.
2010Subjects, tense and verb-movement. In Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds), 263-303. Cambridge: CUP.
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian
2012aTowards a parameter hierarchy for auxiliaries: Diachronic considerations. In Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 6, James N. Chancharu, Xuhui Freddy Hu & Moreno Mitrović (eds), 209-236.
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian
2012bOn the significance of what hasn’t happened. Paper presented at the
14th Diachronic Generative Syntax Conference
, Lisbon.
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian
2015aClausal hierarchies. In Beyond Functional Sequence, Ur Shlonsky (ed.), 295-313. Oxford: OUP.
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian
2015bRethinking formal hierarchies: A proposed unification. In Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 7, James N. Chancharu, Xuhui Freddy Hu & Moreno Mitrović (eds), 1-31.
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian
In press. Parameter setting. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds) Cambridge CUP
Biberauer, Theresa, Roberts, Ian & Sheehan, Michelle
2014No-choice parameters and the limits of syntactic variation. In Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 31), Robet E. Santana-LaBarge (ed.), 46-55. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Bjorkman, Bronwyn M. & Halpert, Claire
2012In an imperfect world: Deriving the typology of counterfactual marking. In Modality across Syntactic Categories, Ana Arregui, María Luisa Rivero & Andrés Pablo Salanova (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Bour, Anthony
2014Description of Multiple Modality in Contemporary Scotland: Double and Triple Modals in the Scottish Borders. PhD dissertation, Freiburg University.
Branigan, Phil
2012Macroparameter learnability: an Algonquian case study. Ms, Memorial University. [URL] (21 December 2015).
Breitbarth, Anne
2014The development of conditional should in English. In Language Change at the Syntax-Semantics Interface, Chiara Gianollo, Agnes Jäger & Doris Penka (eds), 293-332. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Butler, Jonny
2004Phase Structure, Phrase Structure and Quantification. PhD dissertation, York University.
Butler, Jonny
2005A minimalist treatment of modality. Lingua 113: 967-996.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-shen
2007Verb copying in Mandarin Chinese. In The Copy Theory of Movement on the PF Side [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 107], Norbert Corver & Jairo Nunes (eds), 151-174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.
Cinque, Guglielmo
2006Restructuring and Functional Heads. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford: OUP.
Cognola, Federica
2013The mixed OV/VO syntax of Mòcheno main clauses: On the interaction between high and low left periphery. In Theoretical Approaches to Disharmonic Orders, Theresa Biberauer & Michelle Sheehan (eds), 106-135. Oxford: OUP.
De Belder, Marijke & van Craenenbroek, Jeroen
2015How to merge a root. To appear in Linguistic Inquiry 46(4): 625-655.
Denison, David
1985The origins of periphrastic DO. In Papers from the 4th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 41], Roger Eaton, Olga Fischer, Willem F. Koopman & Frederike van der Leek (eds), 45-60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Denison, David
1993Some recent changes in the English verb. In English Diachronic Syntax, Mauricio Gotti (ed.), 15-33. Milan: Guerini.
Denison, David
1998Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Suzanne Romaine (ed.), 92-329. Cambridge: CUP.
Duffield, Nigel
2007Aspects of Vietnamese clause structure: Separating tense from assertion. Linguistics 45: 765-814.
Duffield, Nigel
2013On polarity emphasis, assertion and mood in Vietnamese and English. Lingua 137: 248-270.
Fischer, Olga, van Kemenade, Ans, Koopman, Willem F. & van der Wurff, Wim
2000The Syntax of Early English. Cambridge: CUP.
Giannakidou, Anastasia
2000Negative … Concord?Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 457-523.
1994The Step-tongue: Children's English in Singapore. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Grimshaw, Jane
1979Complement selection and the lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry 10(2): 279-326.
Haeberli, Eric
1999Features, Categories and the Syntax of A-Positions. Synchronic and Diachronic Variation in the Germanic Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.
Haeberli, Eric
2000Adjuncts and the syntax of subjects in Old and Middle English. In Diachronic Syntax: Models and Mechanisms, Susan Pintzuk, George Tsoulas & Anthony Warner (eds), 109-131. Oxford: OUP.
Haeberli, Eric
2002Features, Categories and the Syntax of A-Positions. Cross-Linguistic Variation in the Germanic Languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Haeberli, Eric & Ihsane, Tabea
2016Revisiting the loss of verb movement in the history of English: Evidence from adverb placement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34(2): 497–542.
Han, Chun-Hye & Kroch, Anthony
2000The rise of do-support in English: implications for clause structure. In NELS 30: Proceedings of the
30th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistics Society, Rutgers University 2000
, Masako Hirotami (ed.), 311-325. Amherst MA: GLSA.
Harwood, Will
2013Being Progressive is Just a Phase: Dividing the Functional Hierarchy. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Gent.
Harwood, Will
2015Being progressive is just a phase: Celebrating the uniqueness of progressive aspect under a phase-based analysis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33(2): 523-573.
Heim, Johannes
& Wiltschko, Martina2015The syntax of confirmationals. A neo-performative analysis. Ms, UBC. [URL] (29 April 2016).
Henry, Alison
1995Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect Variation and Parameter Setting. Oxford: OUP.
Heycock, Caroline
2006Embedded root phenomena. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 174-220. Oxford: Blackwell.
Holmberg, Anders
2013The syntax of answers to polar questions in English and Swedish. Lingua 128: 31-50.
Holmberg, Anders
2015Verb Second. In Syntax – Theory and Analysis, Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 135-175. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Holmberg, Anders
2016The Syntax of Yes and No. Oxford: OUP.
Holmberg, Anders & Platzack, Christer
1995The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford: OUP.
Hornstein, Norbert
1999Movement and Control. Linguistic Inquiry 30(1): 69-96.
Hu, Xuhui
2015A Comparative Study of Chinese and English Resultatives. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Huang, C.T.-James
2015Syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. In Chinese Syntax in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson & Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai (eds), 1-48. Oxford: OUP.
Huddleston, Rodney
2002Content clauses and reported speech. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 947-1030. Cambridge: CUP.
Iatridou, Sabine & Zeijlstra, Hedde
2013Negation, polarity and deontic modals. Linguistic Inquiry 44: 529-568.
IJbema, Aniek
2001Grammaticalization and Infinitival Complements in Dutch. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Jespersen, Otto
1909-1949A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
Jimenez-Fernandez, Ángel L. & Miyagawa, Shigeru
2014A feature-inheritance approach to root phenomena and parametric variation. Lingua 145: 275-302.
Kandybowicz, Jason
2013Ways of emphatic scope-taking: from emphatic assertion in Nupe to the grammar of emphasis. Lingua 128: 51-71.
Kayne, Richard S
(2005) Remarks on Comparative Syntax, with special reference to English and French. In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne (eds), 3-69. Oxford: OUP.
van Kemenade, Ans
1987Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris.
1989bReflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1(3): 199-244.
Krug, Manfred
2000Emerging English Modals. A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kuwabara, Kazuki
2013Peripheral effects in Japanese questions and the fine structure of CP. Lingua 126: 91-119.
Ledgeway, Adam
2015From Latin to Romance syntax: The Great Leap. To appear in The Oxford Handbook of Diachronic and Historical Linguistics, Paola Crisma & Giuseppe Longobardi (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas
2009Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP.
Lightfoot, David
1979Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.
Marcus, Gary P., Pinker, Steven, Ullman, Michael, Hollander, Michelle, Rosen, T. John & Xu, Fei
1992Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57(4): 1-182.
McCloskey, James
2006Questions and questioning in a local English. In Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense, and Clausal Architecture, Raffaella Zanuttini, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul Portner (eds), 87-126. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
McCready, Eric
2008What man does. Linguistics and Philosophy 31(6): 671-724.
Meisel, Jürgen
2010Bilingual language acquisition and theories of diachronic change: bilingualism as cause and effect of grammatical change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14(2): 121-145.
Meisel, Jürgen, Elsig, Martin & Bonessen, Matthias
Mittwoch, Anita, Huddleston, Rodney & Collins, Peter
2002The clause: adjuncts. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 663-784. Cambridge: CUP.
Munaro, Nicola
2010Toward a hierarchy of clause types. In Mapping the Left Periphery. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds), 125-162. Oxford: OUP.
Pesetsky, David
1989The Earliness Principle. Ms, MIT.[URL] (25 April 2014).
Pintzuk, Susan
1991Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Poletto, Cecilia
2012Word Order in Old Italian. Oxford: OUP.
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989Verb movement, Universal Grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365-424.
Ramchand, Gillian & Svenonius, Peter
2014Deriving the functional hierarchy. Language Sciences 46: 152-174.
Richards, Marc D
2011Deriving the edge: What's in a phase?Syntax 14(1): 74-95.
Rissanen, Matti
1999Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. III: Early Modern English 1476-1776, Roger Lass (ed.), 187-331. Cambridge: CUP.
Ritter, Elizabeth & Wiltschko, Martina
2009Varieties of INFL: TENSE, LOCATION and PERSON. In Alternatives to Cartography, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed.), 153-201. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ritter, Elizabeth & Wiltschko, Martina
2014The composition of INFL. An exploration of tense, tenseless languages, and tenseless constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32: 1331–1386.
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar. A Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed), 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rizzi, Luigi
2001On the position Int(errogative) in the Left Periphery of the clause. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 267-296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Rizzi, Luigi & Roberts, Ian
1989Complex inversion in French. Probus 1: 1-30.
Roberts, Ian
1985Agreement parameters and the development of English modal auxiliaries. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 21-58.
Roberts, Ian
1993Verbs and Diachronic Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Roberts, Ian
1996Remarks on the Old English C-system and the diachrony of V2. In Language Change and Generative Grammar [Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 7], Ellen Brandner & Gisella Ferraresi (eds), 154-164. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Roberts, Ian
1999Verb movement and markedness. In Language Creation and Language Change, Michel DeGraff (ed.), 287-328. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Roberts, Ian
2010Agreement and Head Movement. Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Roberts, Ian
2012On the nature of syntactic parameters: A programme for research. In Parameter Theory and Linguistic Change, Charlotte Galves, Sonia Cyrino, Ruth Lopez, Filomena Sandalo & Juanito Avelar (eds), 319-334. Oxford: OUP.
Roberts, Ian. & Roussou, Anna
2003Syntactic Change. A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalisation. Cambridge: CUP.
Saito, Mamoru
2012Sentence Types and the Japanese Right Periphery. In Discourse and Grammar: From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories, Günther Grewendorf & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds), 147-175. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sheehan, Michelle
2014Towards a parameter hierarchy for alignment. In Proceedings of 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Robert E. Santana-Labarge (ed.), 399-408. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Sheehan, M
In press. Parameterising ergativity: An inherent case approach. In The Oxford Handbook of Ergativity, Jessica Coon, Diane Massam & Lisa Travis (eds) Oxford OUP
2005Immobile complex verbs in Germanic. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 8(1-2): 83-115.
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus
1963-1973An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Vols 1-3. Leiden: Brill.
Walkden, George
2014Syntactic Reconstruction and Proto-Germanic. Oxford: OUP.
Warner, Anthony
1983Review of Lighfoot (1979). Journal of Linguistics 19: 187-209.
Warner, Anthony
1997The structure of parametric change, and V-movement in the history of English. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 380-393. Cambridge: CUP.
2019. Inter- vs. Intra-Speaker Variation in Mixed Heritage Syntax: A Statistical Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 10
Karen De Clercq, Liliane Haegeman, Terje Lohndal & Christine Meklenborg
2023. Adverbial Resumption in Verb Second Languages,
Ladoukakis, Emmanuel D., Dimitris Michelioudakis & Elena Anagnostopoulou
2022. Toward an evolutionary framework for language variation and change. BioEssays 44:3
Ledgeway, Adam & Norma Schifano
2023. Negation and Verb-Movement in Romance: New Perspectives on Jespersen’s Cycle. Probus 35:1 ► pp. 151 ff.
Sauerland, Uli & Artemis Alexiadou
2020. Generative Grammar: A Meaning First Approach. Frontiers in Psychology 11
van der Wal, Jenneke
2022. A Featural Typology of Bantu Agreement,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.