The biolinguistics program
Questions and hypotheses
The Biolinguistics Program is an emergent interdisciplinary field encompassing natural sciences, neurosciences and the humanities. Its core object of inquiry is human language. The overarching questions it raises are the following: what is language and what is the relation between language and biology. The central hypothesis it brings to the fore is that human language has a biological basis as well as unique traits that make language unique in the biological world. This paper details some of the specific questions and the hypotheses that have been formulated in this field, and it considers recent works on the intersection of language and biology. We start by stating the rationale for Biolinguistics. We then identify the questions and hypotheses raised by this field. Finally, we consider works that aim to bridge the explanatory gap between language and biology while preserving the unique properties of language.
References (109)
References
Avrutin, S. & Wexler, K. 1992. Development of principle B in Russian: Coindexation at LF and coreference. Language Acquisition 2: 259-306.
Baauw, S. 1999. The role of the clitic-full pronoun distinction in the acquisition of pronominal coreference. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (eds), 32-43. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Baauw S., Escobar, M. & Philip, W. 1997. A delay of principle B effect in Spanish speaking children: The role of lexical feature acquisition. In Proceedings of the GALA 97 Conference on Language Acquisition, A. Sorace, C. Heycock & R. Shillcock (eds), 16 -21. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
Bahlmann J., Schubotz R.I. & Friederici, A.D. 2008. Hierarchical artificial grammar processing engages Broca’s area. NeuroImage 42(2): 525-34.
Berwick, C.R. 2011. All you need is Merge. All you need is Merge: Biology, computation, and language from the bottom up. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, A.M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (eds), 461–491. Oxford: OUP.
Berwick, R.C., Beckers, G.J., Okanoya, K. & Bolhuis, J.J. 2012. A bird’s eye view of human language evolution. Front. Evol. Neurosci. 4(5).
Berwick C.R. & Chomsky, N. 2011. The Biolinguistic Program. The current state of its development. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, A.M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (eds), 13–45. Oxford: OUP.
Bickerton, D. 1990. Language and Species. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Boeckx, C. 2011. The emergence of the language faculty, from a biolinguistic point of view. In The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution, M. Tallerman & K. Gibson (eds), 492-201. Oxford: OUP.
Bolhuis, J.J. & Everaert, M. (eds). 2013. Birdsong, Speech, and Language: Exploring the Evolution of Mind and Brain. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Byrne, R.W. & Russon, A.E. 1998. Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 21: 667-721.
Chien, Y.C. & Wexler, K. 1990. Children’s knowledge of locality conditions in bindings as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition 1: 225–295.
Chomsky, N. 2015. Problems of projections: Extensions. In Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann & S. Matteini (eds), 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chomsky, N. 2013. Problems of projections. Lingua 130: 33–49.
Chomsky, N. 2011. Poverty of the stimulus unfinished business. Ms, MIT.
Chomsky, N. 2008b.The Biolinguistic Program: Where does it stand today? Ms, MIT.
Chomsky, N. 2008a. On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, R. Freiden, C.P. Otero & M.L. Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 2007. Of mind and language. Biolinguistics 1: 9-27.
Chomsky, N. 2005. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22.
Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, M. Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 1988. Language and Problems of Knowledge. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origins and Use. New York NY: Praeger.
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa lectures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chomsky, N. 1968. Language and Mind. New York NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 1957. Three models for the description of language. IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 2: 113–124.
Collins, C. 1997. Local Economy. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Coolidge, F.L & Wynn, T. 2005. Working memory, its executive functions, and the emergence of modern thinking. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 15(1): 5-26.
Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.
Di Sciullo, A.M. 2014. Minimalism and I-morphology. In Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the Interfaces [Linguistic Faculty and Beyond 11], P. Kosta, S. Franks & T. Radeva-Bork (eds), 267–286. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Di Sciullo, A.M. 2013. Exocentric compounds, language and proto-language. Language Information Society 20: 1–26.
Di Sciullo, A.M. 2012. Biolinguistics, minimalist grammars and the emergence of complex numerals. Presented at
Theoretical Linguistics/Biolinguistics Workshop (EVOLANG 9)
, 13 March, Kyoto.
Di Sciullo, A.M. 2011. A biolinguistic approach to variation. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty. A.M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (eds), 305-328. Oxford: OUP.
Di Sciullo, A.M. 2004. Morphological phases. In The 4th GLOW in Asia 2003. Generative Grammar in a Broader Perspective, J.-Y. Yoon (ed.), 113-137. The Korean Generative Grammar Circle and Cognitive Science, Seoul National University.
Di Sciullo, A.M. 2005. Asymmetry in Morphology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Di Sciullo, A.M. & Somesfalean, S. 2015. Object pronouns in the evolution of Romanian: a biolinguistic perspective. In Formal approaches to DPs in Old Romanian, V. Hill (ed.), 269-290. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Di Sciullo, A.M., Nicolis, M. & Somesfalean, S. 2013. Evo-devo language universals. Paper presented at the
International Linguists Conference 19
, University of Geneva.
Di Sciullo, A.M. & Somesfalean, S. 2013. Variation in the Position of the Definite Determiner in Romanian: a Biolinguistic Perspective. Romance Linguistics in the Pacific: Variations in Time and Space. Special Issue of the Australian Journal of Linguistics 33(2): 121-139. Taylor&Francis.
Di Sciullo, A.M. et al. 2010. The Biological Nature of Human Language. Biolinguistics 4: 4-34.
Di Sciullo, A.M. & Isac, D. 2008. The asymmetry of Merge. Biolinguistics 2: 260–290.
Di Sciullo, A.M. & Aguero-Bautista, C. 2008. The delay of principle B effect (DPBE) and its absence in some languages. Language and Speech 51:77-100.
Embick, D. 2010. Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Fitch, W.T. 2011. “Deep homology’’ in the biology and evolution of language. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, A.M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (eds), 135–166. Oxford: OUP.
Fitch, W.T. & Hauser, M.D. 2004. Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science 303: 377-380.
Fox, D. 2000. Scope and Semantic Interpretation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Gallistel, C.R. 1990. The Organization of Learning. Cambridge MA: Bradford Books/The MIT Press.
Gopnik, M. 1990. Feature blindness: A case study. Language Acquisition 1(2): 139-164.
Grodzinsky, J. & Reinhart, T.1993. The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 69-102.
Hall, B.K. Descent with modification: The unity underlying homology and homoplasy as seen through an analysis of development and evolution. Biological Reviews 78: 409–433.
Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, T. 2002. The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve. Science 198: 1569-79.
Hauser, M.D. 2000. What do animals think about numbers? American Scientist 88(2): 144-151.
Hauser, M.D., MacNeilage, P. & Ware, M. 1996. Numerical representations in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93(4): 1514-1517.
Hauser, M.D., Yang, C., Berwick, R.C., Tattersall, I., Ryan, M.J., Watumull, J., Chomsky, N. & Lewontin, R.C. 2014. The mystery of language acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology 5.
Hornstein, N. & Uriagereka, J. 2002. Reprojections. In Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program, S. Epstein & T. Seely (eds), 106-132. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Huang, J. 1998[1982]. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. New York NY: Garland.
Hurford, J.R. 2014. Origins of Langage. A Slim Guide. Oxford: OUP.
Jackendoff, J.R. 2011. What is the human language faculty: Two views? Language 87(3): 586-624.
Jenkins, L. 2011. Biolinguistic investigations: Genetics and dynamics. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, A.M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (eds), 126–134. Oxford: OUP.
Jenkins, L. 2000. Biolinguistics: Exploring the Biology of Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Kayne, R. 2011. Why are there no directionality parameters? In Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, M. Byram Washburn, K. McKinneyBock, E. Varis, A. Sawyer & B. Tomaszewicz (eds), 1-23. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Kayne, R. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Koster, C. 1993. Errors in Anaphora Acquisition. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
Larson, R. 2011. Clauses, propositions and phases. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, A.M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (eds), 366–391. Oxford: OUP.
Lasnik, H. 2011. What kind of computing device is the human language faculty. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, A.M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (eds), 354–365. Oxford: OUP.
Lenneberg, E.H. 1967. Biological Foundations of Language. New York NY: Wiley & Sons.
Levin, M. & Palmer A.R. 2007. Left-right patterning from the inside out: Widespread evidence for intracellular control. BioEssays 29: 271-287.
Lewontin R.C. 2000. The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism and Environment. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Lewis. T. 2013. Ants ‘use math’ to find fastest route. Livescience. <[URL]>
Lewontin R. 2004. Response to ‘Selection for Asymmetry”. Science 306: 812.
Li, R. & Bowerman, B. 2010. Symmetry breaking in biology. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 2(3): A003475.
Lightfoot, D. 1991. How to Set Parameters. Arguments from Language Change. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Lightfoot, D. 1982. The Language Lottery. Toward a Biology of Grammars. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Lightfoot, D. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.
Marantz, A. 2008. Phases and words. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar, S.-H. Choe (ed.), 191–222. Seoul: Dong In.
McKee, C. 1992, A comparison of pronouns and anaphors in Italian and English acquisition. Language Acquisition 2: 21–54.
McGonigle, B., Chalmers M. & Dickinson, A. 2003. Concurrent disjoint and reciprocal classification by Cebus Apella in seriation tasks: Evidence for hierarchical organization. Animal Cognition 6:185-197.
Moro, A. 2000. Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Musso, M., Moro, A., Glauche, V., Rijntjes, M., Reichenbach, J., Büchel, C. & Weiller, C.. 2003. Broca’s area and the language instinct. Nature Neuroscience 6(7): 774‑781.
Nobrega, V.A. & Miyagawa, S. 2015. The precedence of syntax in the rapid emergence of human language in evolution as defined by the Integration Hypothesis. Frontiers Psychology 6: 271.
Palmer, R. 2009. Animal asymmetry. Current Biology 19(12): 473-477.
Palmer, A.R. 2004. Symmetry breaking and the evolution of development. Science 306: 828-833.
Palmer, A.R. 1996. From symmetry to asymmetry: Phylogenetic patterns of asymmetry variation in animals and their evolutionary significance.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA)
93: 14279-14286.
Philip, W. & Coopmans, P. 1996. The role of lexical feature acquisition in the development of pronominal anaphora. In Amsterdam Series on Child Language Development 5, W. Philip & F. Wijnen (eds). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (ed.). 1980. Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Piattelli Palmarini, M. & Uriagereka, J. 2011. A geneticist’s dream, a linguist’s nightmare: The case of FOXP2. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, A.M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (eds), 100–125. Oxford: OUP.
Piattelli-Palmarini, M. & Berwick, R.C. (eds). 2013. Rich Languages from Poor Inputs. Oxford: OUP.
Pinker, S. 1994. The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York NY: HarperCollins.
Pinker, S. & Bloom, P. 1990. Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13(4): 707-784.
Poeppel, D. & Embick, D. 2005. Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience. In Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones, A. Cutler (ed.), 103-118. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Progovac, L. 2015. Evolutionary Syntax. Oxford: OUP.
Progovac, L. 2007. Grammars within without recursion: Implications for evolutionary studies. Paper presented to
Illinois State University Conference on Recursion in Human Languages
, Normal IL.
Richards, N. 2002. Very local A’ movement in a root-first derivation. In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, S.D. Epstein & T.D. Seely, 227-245. Oxford: Blackwell.
Richards, N. 2006. Deriving the edge: What’s in a phase? Ms, University of Cambridge.
Rizzi, L. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Roberts, I. 2011. Parametric hierarchies: Some observations. Presented at the
workshop on linguistic variation and the minimalist program
, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid.
Roberts, I. 2007. Diachronic Syntax. Oxford: OUP.
Roberts, I. & Roussou, A. 2003. Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
Rugani, R., Vallortigara, G., Vallini, B. & Regolin, L. 2011. Asymmetrical number-space mapping in the avian brain. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 95: 231‑238.
Rugani, R., Fontanari, L., Simoni, E., Regolin, L. & Vallortigara, G. 2009. Arithmetic in newborn chicks. Proceedings of the
Royal Society of London B
, Biological Sciences 276: 2451–2460.
Schino, G., Tiddi, B. & di Sorrento, P. 2006. Simultaneous classification by rank and kinship in Japanese macaques. Animal Behaviour 71: 1069-1074.
Seyfarth, R.M., Cheney, D.L. & Bergman, T.J. 2005. Primate social cognition and the origins of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(6): 264‑266.
Shubin, N., Tabin, C. & Carroll, S. 1997. Fossils, genes and the evolution of animal limbs. Nature 388: 639–648.
Uriagereka, J. 2008. Syntactic Anchors. On Semantic Structuring. Cambridge: CUP.
Uriagereka, J. 2002. Derivations. London: Routledge.
Uriagereka, J. 1999. Multiple spell-out. In Working Minimalism, S.D. Epstein & N. Hornstein (eds), 251-282. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Uriagereka, J. 1998. Rime and Reason. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Wexler, K. 1998. Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua 106: 23-79.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Haspelmath, Martin
2020.
Human Linguisticality and the Building Blocks of Languages.
Frontiers in Psychology 10
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.