Article published in:
Biolinguistic Investigations on the Language Faculty
Edited by Anna Maria Di Sciullo
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 235] 2016
► pp. 340
References

References

Avrutin, S. & Wexler, K.
1992Development of principle B in Russian: Coindexation at LF and coreference. Language Acquisition 2: 259-306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baauw, S.
1999The role of the clitic-full pronoun distinction in the acquisition of pronominal coreference. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (eds), 32-43. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Baauw S., Escobar, M. & Philip, W.
1997A delay of principle B effect in Spanish speaking children: The role of lexical feature acquisition. In Proceedings of the GALA 97 Conference on Language Acquisition, A. Sorace, C. Heycock & R. Shillcock (eds), 16 -21. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Bahlmann J., Schubotz R.I. & Friederici, A.D.
2008Hierarchical artificial grammar processing engages Broca’s area. NeuroImage 42(2): 525-34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berwick, C.R.
2011All you need is Merge. All you need is Merge: Biology, computation, and language from the bottom up. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, A.M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (eds), 461–491. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Berwick, R.C., Beckers, G.J., Okanoya, K. & Bolhuis, J.J.
2012A bird’s eye view of human language evolution. Front. Evol. Neurosci. 4(5). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berwick C.R.
. & Chomsky, N 2011The Biolinguistic Program. The current state of its development. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, A.M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (eds), 13–45. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D.
1990Language and Species. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boeckx, C.
2011The emergence of the language faculty, from a biolinguistic point of view. In The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution, M. Tallerman & K. Gibson (eds), 492-201. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bolhuis, J.J. & Everaert, M.
(eds) 2013Birdsong, Speech, and Language: Exploring the Evolution of Mind and Brain. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, R.W. & Russon, A.E.
1998Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach. Brain and Behavioral Sciences 21: 667-721. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chien, Y.C. & Wexler, K.
1990Children’s knowledge of locality conditions in bindings as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics. Language Acquisition 1: 225–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
2015Problems of projections: Extensions. In Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti, E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann & S. Matteini (eds), 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Problems of projections. Lingua 130: 33–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Poverty of the stimulus unfinished business. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
2008b.The Biolinguistic Program: Where does it stand today? Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
2008aOn phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, R. Freiden, C.P. Otero & M.L. Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Of mind and language. Biolinguistics 1: 9-27.Google Scholar
2005Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, M. Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1988Language and Problems of Knowledge. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1986Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origins and Use. New York NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
1981Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa lectures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
1968Language and Mind. New York NY: Harcourt, Brace & World. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1957Three models for the description of language. IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 2: 113–124. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C.
1997Local Economy. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coolidge, F.L & Wynn, T.
2005Working memory, its executive functions, and the emergence of modern thinking. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 15(1): 5-26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C.
1871The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Sciullo, A.M.
2014Minimalism and I-morphology. In Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the Interfaces [Linguistic Faculty and Beyond 11], P. Kosta, S. Franks & T. Radeva-Bork (eds), 267–286. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Exocentric compounds, language and proto-language. Language Information Society 20: 1–26.Google Scholar
2012Biolinguistics, minimalist grammars and the emergence of complex numerals. Presented at Theoretical Linguistics/Biolinguistics Workshop (EVOLANG 9) , 13 March, Kyoto.
2011A biolinguistic approach to variation. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty. A.M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (eds), 305-328. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004Morphological phases. In The 4th GLOW in Asia 2003. Generative Grammar in a Broader Perspective, J.-Y. Yoon (ed.), 113-137. The Korean Generative Grammar Circle and Cognitive Science, Seoul National University.Google Scholar
2005Asymmetry in Morphology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, A.M. & Somesfalean, S.
2015Object pronouns in the evolution of Romanian: a biolinguistic perspective. In Formal approaches to DPs in Old Romanian, V. Hill (ed.), 269-290. Leiden/Boston: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Di Sciullo, A.M., Nicolis, M. & Somesfalean, S.
2013Evo-devo language universals. Paper presented at the International Linguists Conference 19 , University of Geneva.
Di Sciullo, A.M. & Somesfalean, S.
2013Variation in the Position of the Definite Determiner in Romanian: a Biolinguistic Perspective. Romance Linguistics in the Pacific: Variations in Time and Space. Special Issue of the Australian Journal of Linguistics 33(2): 121-139. Taylor&Francis.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, A.M.. et al.
2010The Biological Nature of Human Language. Biolinguistics 4: 4-34.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, A.M. & Isac, D.
2008The asymmetry of Merge. Biolinguistics 2: 260–290.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, A.M. & Aguero-Bautista, C.
2008The delay of principle B effect (DPBE) and its absence in some languages. Language and Speech 51:77-100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Embick, D.
2010Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fitch, W.T.
2011“Deep homology’’ in the biology and evolution of language. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, A.M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (eds), 135–166. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fitch, W.T. & Hauser, M.D.
2004Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science 303: 377-380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, D.
2000Scope and Semantic Interpretation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gallistel, C.R.
1990The Organization of Learning. Cambridge MA: Bradford Books/The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gopnik, M.
1990Feature blindness: A case study. Language Acquisition 1(2): 139-164. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grodzinsky, J. & Reinhart, T.
1993The innateness of binding and coreference. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 69-102.Google Scholar
Hall, B.K.
. Descent with modification: The unity underlying homology and homoplasy as seen through an analysis of development and evolution. Biological Reviews 78: 409–433. Crossref
Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, T.
2002The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve. Science 198: 1569-79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M.D.
2000What do animals think about numbers? American Scientist 88(2): 144-151. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M.D., MacNeilage, P. & Ware, M.
1996Numerical representations in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93(4): 1514-1517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, M.D., Yang, C., Berwick, R.C., Tattersall, I., Ryan, M.J., Watumull, J., Chomsky, N. & Lewontin, R.C.
2014The mystery of language acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology 5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, N. & Uriagereka, J.
2002Reprojections. In Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program, S. Epstein & T. Seely (eds), 106-132. Malden MA: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, J.
1998[1982]Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Hurford, J.R.
2014Origins of Langage. A Slim Guide. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, J.R.
2011What is the human language faculty: Two views? Language 87(3): 586-624. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, L.
2011Biolinguistic investigations: Genetics and dynamics. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, A.M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (eds), 126–134. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2000Biolinguistics: Exploring the Biology of Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R.
2011Why are there no directionality parameters? In Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, M. Byram Washburn, K. McKinneyBock, E. Varis, A. Sawyer & B. Tomaszewicz (eds), 1-23. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Koster, C.
1993Errors in Anaphora Acquisition. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Larson, R.
2011Clauses, propositions and phases. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, A.M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (eds), 366–391. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lasnik, H.
2011What kind of computing device is the human language faculty. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, A.M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (eds), 354–365. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E.H.
1967Biological Foundations of Language. New York NY: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Levin, M. & Palmer A.R.
2007Left-right patterning from the inside out: Widespread evidence for intracellular control. BioEssays 29: 271-287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin R.C.
2000The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism and Environment. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis. T.
Lewontin R.
2004Response to ‘Selection for Asymmetry”. Science 306: 812. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, R. & Bowerman, B.
2010Symmetry breaking in biology. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 2(3): A003475. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D.
1991How to Set Parameters. Arguments from Language Change. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1982The Language Lottery. Toward a Biology of Grammars. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1979Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Marantz, A.
2008Phases and words. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar, S.-H. Choe (ed.), 191–222. Seoul: Dong In.Google Scholar
McKee, C.
1992, A comparison of pronouns and anaphors in Italian and English acquisition. Language Acquisition 2: 21–54. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McGonigle, B., Chalmers M. & Dickinson, A.
2003Concurrent disjoint and reciprocal classification by Cebus Apella in seriation tasks: Evidence for hierarchical organization. Animal Cognition 6:185-197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moro, A.
2000Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Musso, M., Moro, A., Glauche, V., Rijntjes, M., Reichenbach, J., Büchel, C. & Weiller, C.
2003Broca’s area and the language instinct. Nature Neuroscience 6(7): 774‑781. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nobrega, V.A. & Miyagawa, S.
2015The precedence of syntax in the rapid emergence of human language in evolution as defined by the Integration Hypothesis. Frontiers Psychology 6: 271.Google Scholar
Palmer, R.
2009Animal asymmetry. Current Biology 19(12): 473-477. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A.R.
2004Symmetry breaking and the evolution of development. Science 306: 828-833. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996From symmetry to asymmetry: Phylogenetic patterns of asymmetry variation in animals and their evolutionary significance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 93: 14279-14286.
Philip, W. & Coopmans, P.
1996The role of lexical feature acquisition in the development of pronominal anaphora. In Amsterdam Series on Child Language Development 5, W. Philip & F. Wijnen (eds). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, M.
(ed.) 1980Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Piattelli Palmarini, M. & Uriagereka, J.
2011A geneticist’s dream, a linguist’s nightmare: The case of FOXP2. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, A.M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (eds), 100–125. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Piattelli-Palmarini, M.
. & Berwick, R.C (eds) 2013Rich Languages from Poor Inputs. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Pinker, S.
1994The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York NY: HarperCollins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinker, S. & Bloom, P.
1990Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13(4): 707-784. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D. & Embick, D.
2005Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience. In Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones, A. Cutler (ed.), 103-118. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Progovac, L.
2015Evolutionary Syntax. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Grammars within without recursion: Implications for evolutionary studies. Paper presented to Illinois State University Conference on Recursion in Human Languages , Normal IL.
2006The syntax of nonsententials: Small clauses and phrases at the root. In The Syntax of Nonsententials [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 93], L. Progovac, K. Paesani, E. Casielles & E. Barton (eds), 33–71. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richards, N.
2002Very local A’ movement in a root-first derivation. In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, S.D. Epstein & T.D. Seely, 227-245. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Deriving the edge: What’s in a phase? Ms, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L.
1990Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, I.
2011Parametric hierarchies: Some observations. Presented at the workshop on linguistic variation and the minimalist program , Universidad Autonoma de Madrid.
2007Diachronic Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Roberts, I. & Roussou, A.
2003Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rugani, R., Vallortigara, G., Vallini, B. & Regolin, L.
2011Asymmetrical number-space mapping in the avian brain. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 95: 231‑238. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rugani, R., Fontanari, L., Simoni, E., Regolin, L. & Vallortigara, G.
2009Arithmetic in newborn chicks. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B , Biological Sciences 276: 2451–2460. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schino, G., Tiddi, B. & di Sorrento, P.
2006Simultaneous classification by rank and kinship in Japanese macaques. Animal Behaviour 71: 1069-1074. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seyfarth, R.M., Cheney, D.L. & Bergman, T.J.
2005Primate social cognition and the origins of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(6): 264‑266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shubin, N., Tabin, C. & Carroll, S.
1997Fossils, genes and the evolution of animal limbs. Nature 388: 639–648. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, J.
2008Syntactic Anchors. On Semantic Structuring. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Derivations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1999Multiple spell-out. In Working Minimalism, S.D. Epstein & N. Hornstein (eds), 251-282. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1998Rime and Reason. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wexler, K.
1998Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua 106: 23-79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Haspelmath, Martin
2020. Human Linguisticality and the Building Blocks of Languages. Frontiers in Psychology 10 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 august 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.