The biolinguistics program
Questions and hypotheses
The Biolinguistics Program is an emergent interdisciplinary field encompassing natural sciences, neurosciences and the humanities. Its core object of inquiry is human language. The overarching questions it raises are the following: what is language and what is the relation between language and biology. The central hypothesis it brings to the fore is that human language has a biological basis as well as unique traits that make language unique in the biological world. This paper details some of the specific questions and the hypotheses that have been formulated in this field, and it considers recent works on the intersection of language and biology. We start by stating the rationale for Biolinguistics. We then identify the questions and hypotheses raised by this field. Finally, we consider works that aim to bridge the explanatory gap between language and biology while preserving the unique properties of language.
References
Avrutin, S. & Wexler, K
1992 Development of principle B in Russian: Coindexation at LF and coreference.
Language Acquisition 2: 259-306.
Baauw, S
1999 The role of the clitic-full pronoun distinction in the acquisition of pronominal coreference. In
Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development,
A. Greenhill,
H. Littlefield &
C. Tano (eds), 32-43. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Baauw S., Escobar, M. & Philip, W
1997 A delay of principle B effect in Spanish speaking children: The role of lexical feature acquisition. In
Proceedings of the GALA 97 Conference on Language Acquisition,
A. Sorace,
C. Heycock &
R. Shillcock (eds), 16 -21. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
Bahlmann J., Schubotz R.I. & Friederici, A.D
2008 Hierarchical artificial grammar processing engages Broca’s area.
NeuroImage 42(2): 525-34.
Berwick, C.R
2011 All you need is Merge. All you need is Merge: Biology, computation, and language from the bottom up. In
The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty,
A.M. Di Sciullo &
C. Boeckx (eds), 461–491. Oxford: OUP.
Berwick, R.C., Beckers, G.J., Okanoya, K. & Bolhuis, J.J
2012 A bird’s eye view of human language evolution.
Front. Evol. Neurosci. 4(5).
Berwick C.R
. &
Chomsky, N 2011 The Biolinguistic Program. The current state of its development. In
The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty,
A.M. Di Sciullo &
C. Boeckx (eds), 13–45. Oxford: OUP.
Bickerton, D
1990 Language and Species. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
Boeckx, C
2011 The emergence of the language faculty, from a biolinguistic point of view. In
The Oxford Handbook of Language Evolution,
M. Tallerman &
K. Gibson (eds), 492-201. Oxford: OUP.
Bolhuis, J.J. & Everaert, M
(eds) 2013 Birdsong, Speech, and Language: Exploring the Evolution of Mind and Brain. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Byrne, R.W. & Russon, A.E
1998 Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach.
Brain and Behavioral Sciences 21: 667-721.
Chien, Y.C. & Wexler, K
1990 Children’s knowledge of locality conditions in bindings as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics.
Language Acquisition 1: 225–295.
Chomsky, N
2015 Problems of projections: Extensions. In
Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti,
E. Di Domenico,
C. Hamann &
S. Matteini (eds), 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chomsky, N
2013 Problems of projections.
Lingua 130: 33–49.
Chomsky, N
2011 Poverty of the stimulus unfinished business. Ms, MIT.
Chomsky, N
2008b.
The Biolinguistic Program: Where does it stand today? Ms, MIT.
Chomsky, N
2008a On phases. In
Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud,
R. Freiden,
C.P. Otero &
M.L. Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N
2007 Of mind and language.
Biolinguistics 1: 9-27.
Chomsky, N
2005 Three factors in language design.
Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22.
Chomsky, N
2001 Derivation by phase. In
Ken Hale: A Life in Language,
M. Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N
1988 Language and Problems of Knowledge. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N
1986 Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origins and Use. New York NY: Praeger.
Chomsky, N
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa lectures. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chomsky, N
1968 Language and Mind. New York NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Chomsky, N
1965 Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, N
1957 Three models for the description of language. IRE Trans.
Inf. Theory 2: 113–124.
Collins, C
1997 Local Economy. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Coolidge, F.L & Wynn, T
2005 Working memory, its executive functions, and the emergence of modern thinking.
Cambridge Archaeological Journal 15(1): 5-26.
Darwin, C
1871 The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.
Di Sciullo, A.M
2014 Minimalism and I-morphology. In
Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the Interfaces [
Linguistic Faculty and Beyond 11],
P. Kosta,
S. Franks &
T. Radeva-Bork (eds), 267–286. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Di Sciullo, A.M
2013 Exocentric compounds, language and proto-language.
Language Information Society 20: 1–26.
Di Sciullo, A.M
2012 Biolinguistics, minimalist grammars and the emergence of complex numerals. Presented at
Theoretical Linguistics/Biolinguistics Workshop (EVOLANG 9)
, 13 March, Kyoto.
Di Sciullo, A.M
2011 A biolinguistic approach to variation. In
The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty.
A.M. Di Sciullo &
C. Boeckx (eds), 305-328. Oxford: OUP.
Di Sciullo, A.M
2004 Morphological phases. In
The 4th GLOW in Asia 2003. Generative Grammar in a Broader Perspective,
J.-Y. Yoon (ed.), 113-137. The Korean Generative Grammar Circle and Cognitive Science, Seoul National University.
Di Sciullo, A.M
2005 Asymmetry in Morphology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Di Sciullo, A.M. & Somesfalean, S
2015 Object pronouns in the evolution of Romanian: a biolinguistic perspective. In
Formal approaches to DPs in Old Romanian,
V. Hill (ed.), 269-290. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Di Sciullo, A.M., Nicolis, M. & Somesfalean, S
2013 Evo-devo language universals. Paper presented at the
International Linguists Conference 19
, University of Geneva.
Di Sciullo, A.M. & Somesfalean, S
2013 Variation in the Position of the Definite Determiner in Romanian: a Biolinguistic Perspective.
Romance Linguistics in the Pacific: Variations in Time and Space. Special Issue of the Australian Journal of Linguistics 33(2): 121-139. Taylor&Francis.
Di Sciullo, A.M. et al.
2010 The Biological Nature of Human Language.
Biolinguistics 4: 4-34.
Di Sciullo, A.M. & Isac, D
2008 The asymmetry of Merge.
Biolinguistics 2: 260–290.
Di Sciullo, A.M. & Aguero-Bautista, C
2008 The delay of principle B effect (DPBE) and its absence in some languages.
Language and Speech 51:77-100.
Embick, D
2010 Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Fitch, W.T
2011 “Deep homology’’ in the biology and evolution of language. In
The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty,
A.M. Di Sciullo &
C. Boeckx (eds), 135–166. Oxford: OUP.
Fitch, W.T. & Hauser, M.D
2004 Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate.
Science 303: 377-380.
Fox, D
2000 Scope and Semantic Interpretation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Gallistel, C.R
1990 The Organization of Learning. Cambridge MA: Bradford Books/The MIT Press.
Gopnik, M
1990 Feature blindness: A case study.
Language Acquisition 1(2): 139-164.
Grodzinsky, J. & Reinhart, T
1993 The innateness of binding and coreference.
Linguistic Inquiry 24: 69-102.
Hall, B.K
Descent with modification: The unity underlying homology and homoplasy as seen through an analysis of development and evolution.
Biological Reviews 78: 409–433.
Hauser, M.D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, T
2002 The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve.
Science 198: 1569-79.
Hauser, M.D
2000 What do animals think about numbers? American Scientist 88(2): 144-151.
Hauser, M.D., MacNeilage, P. & Ware, M
1996 Numerical representations in primates.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93(4): 1514-1517.
Hauser, M.D., Yang, C., Berwick, R.C., Tattersall, I., Ryan, M.J., Watumull, J., Chomsky, N. & Lewontin, R.C
2014 The mystery of language acquisition.
Frontiers in Psychology 5.
Hornstein, N. & Uriagereka, J
2002 Reprojections. In
Derivation and explanation in the Minimalist Program,
S. Epstein &
T. Seely (eds), 106-132. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Huang, J
1998[1982] Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. New York NY: Garland.
Hurford, J.R
2014 Origins of Langage. A Slim Guide. Oxford: OUP.
Jackendoff, J.R
2011 What is the human language faculty: Two views? Language 87(3): 586-624.
Jenkins, L
2011 Biolinguistic investigations: Genetics and dynamics. In
The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty,
A.M. Di Sciullo &
C. Boeckx (eds), 126–134. Oxford: OUP.
Jenkins, L
2000 Biolinguistics: Exploring the Biology of Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Kayne, R
2011 Why are there no directionality parameters? In
Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics,
M. Byram Washburn,
K. McKinneyBock,
E. Varis,
A. Sawyer &
B. Tomaszewicz (eds), 1-23. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Kayne, R
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Koster, C
1993 Errors in Anaphora Acquisition. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
Larson, R
2011 Clauses, propositions and phases. In
The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty,
A.M. Di Sciullo &
C. Boeckx (eds), 366–391. Oxford: OUP.
Lasnik, H
2011 What kind of computing device is the human language faculty. In
The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty,
A.M. Di Sciullo &
C. Boeckx (eds), 354–365. Oxford: OUP.
Lenneberg, E.H
1967 Biological Foundations of Language. New York NY: Wiley & Sons.
Levin, M. & Palmer A.R
2007 Left-right patterning from the inside out: Widespread evidence for intracellular control.
BioEssays 29: 271-287.
Lewontin R.C
2000 The Triple Helix: Gene, Organism and Environment. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Lewis. T
2013 Ants ‘use math’ to find fastest route.
Livescience.
[URL]
Lewontin R
2004 Response to ‘Selection for Asymmetry”.
Science 306: 812.
Li, R. & Bowerman, B
2010 Symmetry breaking in biology.
Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 2(3): A003475.
Lightfoot, D
1991 How to Set Parameters. Arguments from Language Change. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Lightfoot, D
1982 The Language Lottery. Toward a Biology of Grammars. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Lightfoot, D
1979 Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.
Marantz, A
2008 Phases and words. In
Phases in the Theory of Grammar,
S.-H. Choe (ed.), 191–222. Seoul: Dong In.
McKee, C
1992,
A comparison of pronouns and anaphors in Italian and English acquisition.
Language Acquisition 2: 21–54.
McGonigle, B., Chalmers M. & Dickinson, A
2003 Concurrent disjoint and reciprocal classification by Cebus Apella in seriation tasks: Evidence for hierarchical organization.
Animal Cognition 6:185-197.
Moro, A
2000 Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Musso, M., Moro, A., Glauche, V., Rijntjes, M., Reichenbach, J., Büchel, C. & Weiller, C
2003 Broca’s area and the language instinct.
Nature Neuroscience 6(7): 774‑781.
Nobrega, V.A. & Miyagawa, S
2015 The precedence of syntax in the rapid emergence of human language in evolution as defined by the Integration Hypothesis.
Frontiers Psychology 6: 271.
Palmer, R
2009 Animal asymmetry.
Current Biology 19(12): 473-477.
Palmer, A.R
2004 Symmetry breaking and the evolution of development.
Science 306: 828-833.
Palmer, A.R
1996 From symmetry to asymmetry: Phylogenetic patterns of asymmetry variation in animals and their evolutionary significance.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA)
93: 14279-14286.
Philip, W. & Coopmans, P
1996 The role of lexical feature acquisition in the development of pronominal anaphora. In
Amsterdam Series on Child Language Development 5,
W. Philip &
F. Wijnen (eds). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Piattelli-Palmarini, M
(ed.) 1980 Language and Learning: The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Piattelli Palmarini, M. & Uriagereka, J
2011 A geneticist’s dream, a linguist’s nightmare: The case of FOXP2. In
The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty,
A.M. Di Sciullo &
C. Boeckx (eds), 100–125. Oxford: OUP.
Piattelli-Palmarini, M
. &
Berwick, R.C (eds) 2013 Rich Languages from Poor Inputs. Oxford: OUP.
Pinker, S
1994 The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. New York NY: HarperCollins.
Pinker, S. & Bloom, P
1990 Natural language and natural selection.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13(4): 707-784.
Poeppel, D. & Embick, D
2005 Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience. In
Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones,
A. Cutler (ed.), 103-118. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Progovac, L
2015 Evolutionary Syntax. Oxford: OUP.
Progovac, L
2007 Grammars within without recursion: Implications for evolutionary studies. Paper presented to
Illinois State University Conference on Recursion in Human Languages
, Normal IL.
Richards, N
2002 Very local A’ movement in a root-first derivation. In
Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program,
S.D. Epstein &
T.D. Seely, 227-245. Oxford: Blackwell.
Richards, N
2006 Deriving the edge: What’s in a phase? Ms, University of Cambridge.
Rizzi, L
1990 Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Roberts, I
2011 Parametric hierarchies: Some observations. Presented at the
workshop on linguistic variation and the minimalist program
, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid.
Roberts, I
2007 Diachronic Syntax. Oxford: OUP.
Roberts, I. & Roussou, A
2003 Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
Rugani, R., Vallortigara, G., Vallini, B. & Regolin, L
2011 Asymmetrical number-space mapping in the avian brain.
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 95: 231‑238.
Rugani, R., Fontanari, L., Simoni, E., Regolin, L. & Vallortigara, G
2009 Arithmetic in newborn chicks. Proceedings of the
Royal Society of London B
,
Biological Sciences 276: 2451–2460.
Schino, G., Tiddi, B. & di Sorrento, P
2006 Simultaneous classification by rank and kinship in Japanese macaques.
Animal Behaviour 71: 1069-1074.
Seyfarth, R.M., Cheney, D.L. & Bergman, T.J
2005 Primate social cognition and the origins of language.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9(6): 264‑266.
Shubin, N., Tabin, C. & Carroll, S
1997 Fossils, genes and the evolution of animal limbs.
Nature 388: 639–648.
Uriagereka, J
2008 Syntactic Anchors. On Semantic Structuring. Cambridge: CUP.
Uriagereka, J
2002 Derivations. London: Routledge.
Uriagereka, J
1999 Multiple spell-out. In
Working Minimalism,
S.D. Epstein &
N. Hornstein (eds), 251-282. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Uriagereka, J
1998 Rime and Reason. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Wexler, K
1998 Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage.
Lingua 106: 23-79.
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Haspelmath, Martin
2020.
Human Linguisticality and the Building Blocks of Languages.
Frontiers in Psychology 10
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.