Article published in:
Biolinguistic Investigations on the Language Faculty
Edited by Anna Maria Di Sciullo
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 235] 2016
► pp. 79–100

Electroencephalographic evidence of vowels computation and representation in human auditory cortex

| Centro di Ricerca Interdisciplinare sul Linguaggio (CRIL) x University of Salento, Lecce, ItalyDepartment of Human Movement, Social and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Rome, ItalyIRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome Italy
| Centro di Ricerca Interdisciplinare sul Linguaggio (CRIL) x University of Salento, Lecce, ItalyDepartment of Human Movement, Social and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Rome, ItalyIRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome Italy
| Centro di Ricerca Interdisciplinare sul Linguaggio (CRIL) x University of Salento, Lecce, ItalyDepartment of Human Movement, Social and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico”, Rome, ItalyIRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome Italy
By exploiting the N1 component of the auditory event related potentials we aimed to measure and localize the processing involving the spectro-temporal and the abstract featural representation. We investigated the electroencephalography patterns of 11 Salento Italian speakers discriminating their native five stressed vowels [i, ε, a, ɔ, u]. Findings showed two distinct N1 sub-components: the N1a peaking at 125–135 ms, localized in the bilateral primary auditory cortex (BA41), and the N1b peaking at 145–155 ms, localized in the superior temporal gyrus (BA22) with a strong leftward lateralization. Crucially, while high vowels elicited higher amplitudes than non-high vowels both in the N1a and N1b, back vowels generated later responses than non-back vowels in the N1b only. Overall, these findings suggest a hierarchical processing where from the N1a to the N1b the acoustic analysis shift progressively toward the computation and representation of phonological features.
Published online: 24 November 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.235.04gri
References

References

Biermann, S. & Heil, P.
2000 Parallels between timing of onset responses of single neurons in cat and of evoked magnetic fields in human auditory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 84(5): 2426-2439.Google Scholar
Böcker, K.B.E, Brunia, C.H.M. & van den Berg-Lenssen, M.M.C.
1994 A spatiotemporal dipole model of the stimulus preceding negativity prior to feedback stimuli. Brain Topography 7(1): 71-88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D.
2010 Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program], Version 5.2. http://​www​.praat​.org/Google Scholar
Calabrese, A.
2011 Metaphony in Romance. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Vol. 5, M. van Oostendorp, C.J. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice (eds), 2631-2661. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chang, E.F., Rieger, J.W, Johnson, K., Berger, M.S., Barbaro, N.M., Knight, R.T.
2010 Categorical Speech Representation in Human Superior Temporal Gyrus. Nature 13(11): 1428–1432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diesch, E., Eulitz, C., Hampson, S. & Ross, B.
1996 The neurotopography of vowels as mirrored by evoked magnetic field measurements. Brain Language 53: 143-168. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diesch, E. & Luce, T.
1997 Magnetic fields elicited by tones and vowel formants reveal tonotopy and nonlinear summation of cortical activation. Psychophysiology 34: 501-510. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 Topographic and temporal indices of vowel spectral envelope extraction in the human auditory cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12: 878–893. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eulitz, C., Diesch, E., Pantev, C., Hampson, S. & Elbert, T.
1995 Magnetic and electric brain activity evoked by the processing of tone and vowel stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience 15: 2748-2755.Google Scholar
Eulitz, C., Eulitz, H. & Elbert, T.
1997 Differential outcomes from magneto-and electroencephalography for the analysis of human cognition. Neuroscience Letters 227(3): 185-188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eulitz, C., Obleser, J. & Lahiri, A.
2004 Intra-subject replication of brain magnetic activity during the processing of speech sounds. Cognitive brain research 19(1): 82-91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ferrero, F.E., Magno-Caldognetto, E., Vagges, K. & Lavagnoli, C.
1978 Some acoustic characteristics of the Italian vowels. Journal of Italian Linguistics 3(1): 87-96.Google Scholar
Gage, N., Poeppel, D., Roberts, T.P.L. & Hickok, G.
1998 Auditory evoked M100 reflects onset acoustics of speech sounds. Brain Research 814(1): 236-239. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gage, N., Roberts, T.P.L & Hickok, G.
2006 Temporal resolution properties of human auditory cortex: Reflections in the neuromagnetic auditory evoked M100 component. Brain Research 1069(1): 166-171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grimaldi, M.
2003 Nuove ricerche sul vocalismo tonico del Salento meridionale. Analisi acustica e trattamento fonologico dei dati. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
2009 Acoustic correlates of phonological microvariations. The case of unsuspected highly diversified metaphonetic processes in a small area of Southern Salento (Apulia). In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2006. Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’, Amsterdam 7-9 December 2006 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 303], D. Torck & W.L. Wetzels (eds), 89-109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M.
2002 From Memory to Speech and Back: Papers on Phonetics and Phonology 1954–2002. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D.
2004 Dorsal and ventral streams: A framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 92(1): 67-99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8(5): 393-402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Inui, K., Okamoto, H., Miki, K., Gunji, A. & Kakigi, R.
2006 Serial and parallel processing in the human auditory cortex: A magnetoencephalographic study. Cerebral Cortex 16(1): 18-30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaas, J.H. & Hackett, T.A.
2000 Subdivisions of auditory cortex and processing streams in primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 97(22): 11793-11799. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kodera, K., Hink, R.F., Yamada, O. & Suzuki, J.-I.
1979 Effects of rise time on simultaneously recorded auditory-evoked potentials from the early, middle and late ranges. International Journal of Audiology 18: 395-402. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, I. & Precoda, K.
1990 Updating upsid. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 74: 104-111.Google Scholar
Manca, A.D.
., Di Russo, F., Sigona, F. & Grimaldi, M. Submitted. Electrical brain responses mirror tonochrony, phonemotopic and hierarchical organization of auditory cortex.
Manca A.D., Di Russo F. & Grimaldi M.
. In press. Orderly organization of vowels in the auditory brain: The neuronal correlates of the Italian vowels. In Proceedings of the XI Convegno Nazionale Associazione Italiana Scienze della Voce, AISV . Il farsi e il disfarsi del linguaggio. Bologna.
Malmivuo, J., Suihko, V. & Eskola, H.
1997 Sensitivity distributions of EEG and MEG measurements. IEEE Transactions of Biomedical Engineering 44: 196-208. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mäkelä, A.M., Alku, P. & Tiitinen, H.
2003 The auditory N1m reveals the left-hemispheric representation of vowel identity in humans. Neuroscience Letters 353: 111-114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
May, P.J.C. & Tiitinen, H.
2010 Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance‐elicited auditory deflection, explained. Psychophysiology 47(1): 66–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mcdonald, J.J., Teder-Sälejärvi, W.A., Di Russo, F. & Hillyard, S.A.
2003 Neural substrates of perceptual enhancement by crossmodal spatial attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15(1): 10-19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Näätänen, R. & Picton, T.
1987 The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: A review and analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24: 375-425. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Näätänen, R.
1990 The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by the event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function‖. Behavioural Brain Science 13: 201–288. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Obleser, J., Elbert, T., Lahiri, A. & Eulitz, C.
2003a Cortical representation of vowels reflects acoustic dissimilarity determined by formant frequencies. Cognitive Brain Research 15(3): 207-213. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Obleser, J., Lahiri, A. & Eulitz, C.
2003b Auditory-evoked magnetic field codes place of articulation in timing and topography around 100 milliseconds post syllable onset. Neuroimage 20(3): 1839-1847. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004a Intra-subject replication of brain activity during the processing of speech sounds. Cognitive Brain Research 19: 82-91. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004b Magnetic brain response mirrors extraction of phonological features from spoken vowels. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(8): 31-39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Obleser, J., Scott, S.K. & Eulitz, C.
2006 Now you hear it, now you don’t: Transient traces of consonants and their nonspeech analogues in the human brain. Cerebral Cortex 16(8): 1069-1076. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Obleser, J. & Eisner, F.
2009 Pre-lexical abstraction of speech in the auditory cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13(1): 14-19. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohl, F.W. & Scheich, H.
1997 Orderly cortical representation of vowels based on formant interaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A . 94: 9440-9444.
Pantev, C., Bertrand, O., Eulitz, C., Verkindt, C., Hampson, S., Schuierer, G. & Elbert, T.
1995 Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 94(1): 26-40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Picton, T.W., Woods, D.L. & Proulx, G.B.
1978 Human auditory sustained potentials, I: The nature of the response. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 45(2): 186-197. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D., Phillips, C., Yellin, E., Rowley, H.A., Roberts, T.P.L & Marantz, A.
1997 Processing of vowels in supratemporal auditory cortex. Neuroscience Letters 221: 145-148. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Poeppel, D., Idsardi, W.J. & van Wassenhove, V.
2009 Speech perception at the interface of neurobiology and linguistics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363(1493): 1071-1086. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rauschecker, J.P. & Scott, S.K.
2009 Maps and streams in the auditory cortex: Nonhuman primates illuminate human speech processing. Nature Neuroscience 12(6): 718-724. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, T.P.L. & Poeppel, D.
1996 Latency of auditory evoked M100 as a function of tone frequency. NeuroReport 7: 1138-1140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, T.P.L., Ferrari, P. & Poeppel, D.
1998 Latency of evoked neuromagnetic M100 reflects perceptual and acoustic stimulus attributes. NeuroReport 9: 3265-3269. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, T.P.L., Ferrari, P., Stufflebeam, S.M. & Poeppel, D.
2000 Latency of the auditory evoked neuromagnetic field components: Stimulus dependence and insights toward perception. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 17: 114-129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, T.P.L., Flagg, E.J. & Gage, N.M.
2004 Vowel categorization induces departure of M100 latency from acoustic prediction. NeuroReport 15: 1679-1682. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romani, G.L., Williamson, S.J. & Kaufman, L.
1982 Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex. Science 216: 1339-1340. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saenz, M. & Langers, D.R.M.
2014 Tonotopic mapping of human auditory cortex. Hearing Research 307: 42-52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scharinger, M., Idsardi, W.J. & Poe, S.
2011 A comprehensive three-dimensional cortical map of vowel space. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(12): 3972-3982. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, S.K. & Johnsrude, I.S.
2003 The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception. Trends in Neurosciences 26(2): 100-107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, S.K. & McGettigan, C.
2013 Do temporal processes underlie left hemisphere dominance in speech perception? Brain & Language 127: 36-45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shestakova, A., Brattico, E., Soloviev, A., Klucharev, V. & Huotilainen, M.
2004 Orderly cortical representation of vowel categories presented by multiple exemplars. Cognitive Brain Research 21: 342-350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, K.N.
2002 Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 111(4): 1872-1891. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talavage, T.M., Sereno, M.I., Melcher, J.R., Ledden, P.J., Rosen, B.R. & Dale, A.M.
2004 Tonotopic organization in human auditory cortex revealed by progressions of frequency sensitivity. Journal of neurophysiology 91(3): 1282-1296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teder-Sälejärvi, W.A., McDonald, J.J., Di Russo, F. & Hillyard, S.A.
2003 An analysis of audio-visual crossmodal integration by means of event related potential (ERP) recordings. Cognitive Brain Research 14(1): 106-114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teder-Sälejärvi, W., Di Russo, F., McDonald, J.J. & Hillyard, S.A.
2005 Effects of spatial congruity on audio-visual multimodal integration. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17(9): 1396-1409. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vihla, M. & Eulitz, C.
2003 Topography of the auditory evoked potential in humans reflects differences between vowels embedded in pseudo-words. Neuroscience Letters 338(3): 189-192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Virtanen, J., Ahveninen, J., Ilmoniemi, R.J., Näätänen, R. & Pekkonen, E.
1998 Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 108: 291-298. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wolpaw, J.R. & Kiffin Penry, J.
1975 A temporal component of the auditory evoked response. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 39: 609-620. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wood, C.C. & Wolpaw, J.R.
1982 Scalp distribution of human auditory evoked potentials. II. Evidence for overlapping sources and involvement of auditory cortex. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 54(1): 25-38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Woods, D.L.
1995 The component structure of the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology-Supplements Only 44: 102-109.Google Scholar
Woods, D.L., Herron, T., Kang, X., Cate, A.D. & William Yund, E.
2011 Phonological processing in human auditory cortical fields. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5(00042): 1-15. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Whitten, Allison, Alexandra P. Key, Antje S. Mefferd & James W. Bodfish
2020. Auditory event-related potentials index faster processing of natural speech but not synthetic speech over nonspeech analogs in children. Brain and Language 207 ► pp. 104825 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.