Part of
Formal Studies in Slovenian Syntax: In honor of Janez Orešnik
Edited by Franc Lanko Marušič and Rok Žaucer
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 236] 2016
► pp. 6990
Aissen, Judith L. & Perlmutter, David M
1976Clause reduction in Spanish. In Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Liguistic Society [BLS 2], Henry Thompson, Kenneth Whistler, Vicky Edge, Jeri Jaeger, Ronya Javkin, Miriam Petruck, Christopher Smeall & Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (eds), 1–30. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1983Clause reduction in Spanish. In David M. Perlmutter (ed.), Studies in Relational Grammar 1, 360–403. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Emmon
1986The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 5–16.Google Scholar
Barker, Chris & Jacobson, Pauline
2007Direct Compositionality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Barwise, Jon
1989The Situation in Logic. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Barwise, Jon & Perry, John
1983Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge MA: Bradford Books, The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Michael Ruisdael
1976A variation and extension of a Montague fragment of English. In Montague Grammar, Barbara H. Partee (ed.), 119-164. New York NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, Hans C. & Sag, Ivan A
2012Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
2006Restructuring and Functional Heads [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 4]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cooper, Robin
1982Binding in wholewheat* syntax (*unenriched with inaudibilia). In The Nature of Syntactic Representation [Synthese Language Library 15], Pauline Jacobson & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds). Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005aAustinian truth, attitudes and type theory. Research on Language and Computation 3(2): 333–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005bRecords and record types in semantic theory. Journal of Logic and Computation 15(2): 99–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Type theory and semantics in flux. In Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 14: Philosophy of Linguistics, Ruth Kempson, Nicholas Asher & Tim Fernando (eds), 271–323. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2014Phrase structure rules as dialogue update rules. In Proceedings of The 18th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, Edinburgh, September 1-3, Verena Rieser & Philippe Muller (eds), 26–34.Google Scholar
In preparation. Type theory and language: from perception to linguistic communication. https://​sites​.google​.com​/site​/typetheorywithrecords​/drafts
Cooper, Robin & Ginzburg, Jonathan
2015Type theory with records for natural language semantics. In The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, 2nd edn., Shalom Lappin & Chris Fox (eds), 375-407. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DiSciullo, Anna Maria & Williams, Edwin
1987On the Definition of Word. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dobnik, Simon
2003Restructuring in Slovene as First-Phase Syntax. Draft of an article. http://​dobnik​.net​/simon​/documents​/dobnik​_restructuring​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Dowty, David, Wall, Robert & Peters, Stanley
1981Introduction to Montague Semantics. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Evers, Arnold
1975aThe Guillotine principle. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 1972-1973, Albert Kraak (ed.), 147. Amsterdam: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
(1975b) The Transfromational Cycle of Dutch and German. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Fernando, Tim
2004A finite-state approach to events in natural language semantics. Journal of Logic and Computation 14(1): 79–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Situations as strings. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 165: 23–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Finite-state descriptions for temporal semantics. In Computing Meaning [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 83], Vol. 3, Harry Bunt & Reinhard Muskens (eds), 347–368. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Situations in LTL as strings. Information and Computation 207(10): 980–999. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Constructing situations and time. Journal of Philosophical Logic 40: 371–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015The semantics of tense and aspect: A finite-state perspective. In The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, 2nd edn., Shalom Lappin & Chris Fox (eds), 203-236. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard S
1989Null subjects and clitic climbing. In The Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo Jaeggli & Ken Safir (eds), 239–261, Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991Romance clitics, verb movement, and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 647–686.Google Scholar
Martin-Löf, Per
1984Intuitionistic Type Theory. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Montague, Richard
1973The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In Approaches to Natural Language: Proceedings of the 1970 Stanford Workshop on Grammar and Semantics, Jaakko Hintikka, Patrick Suppes & Julius Moravcsik (eds), 247–270. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1974Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, with an introduction by Richmond H. Thomason (ed.). New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo
1981Semantic interpretation vs. lexical governance: Clitic climbing in Italian. Language 57(4): 841–887. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nordström, Bengt, Petersson, Kent & Smith, Jan M
1990Programming in Martin-Löf’s Type Theory [International Series of Monographs on Computer Science 7]. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pulman, Stephen G
2005Lexical decomposition: For and against. In Charting a New Course: Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval [The Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval 16], John I. Tait (ed.), 155–173, Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
2008Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First-phase Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ranta, Aarne
1994Type-Theoretical Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1976Ristrutturazione. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 1:1–54.Google Scholar
1978A restructuring rule in Italian syntax. In Recent Transformational Studies in European Languages, Samuel Jay Keyser (ed.), 113–158. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1982Issues in Italian Syntax. Chapter: A restructuring rule, 1–48. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Ian
1994Two types of head movement in Romance. In Verb movement, David Lightfoot & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 207–242, Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997Restructuring, head movement, and locality. Linguistic Inquiry 28: 423–460.Google Scholar
Rosen, Sara Thomas
1990Restructuring verbs are light verbs. In Proceedings of the 9th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics [WCCFL9], Aaron L. Halpern (ed.), 477–491, Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan A., Wasow, Thomas & Bender, Emily M
2003Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction, 2nd edn. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand
1916Cours de linguistique générale, edited by Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S
1991The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Richmond H
1976Some extensions of Montague Grammar. In Montague Grammar, Barbara H. Partee (ed.), 77-118. New York NY: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wackernagel, Jacob
1892Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung. Indogermanische Forschungen 1: 333–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susanne
2001Infinitives: Restructuring and Clause Structure [Studies in Generative Grammar 55]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar