Exploring the domain of ditransitive constructions
Ditransitive splits and ditransitive alternations across languages
Following up on (Malchukov, Haspelmath & Comrie 2010), the paper provides a description of the lexical variation in the domain of ditransitive constructions. It has been shown that the variation is not random, but there are cross-linguistically valid preferences of certain verb meanings (verb classes) for certain alignments, which can be captured in the forms of hierarchies and semantic maps. The ditransitive semantic map has been shown to be able to capture extensions of ditransitive constructions across a wide range of languages, and to be applicable to languages of different structural profiles (making use of either flagging or indexing), as well as to different kinds of alternations, which are represented as areas of overlap in a universal semantic space.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Basic alignment types
- 3.Alignment variation and lexical splits in ditransitive constructions
- 4.Lexical splits in the ditransitive domain: Introducing partial hierarchies
- 4.1Ditransitive-Allative Hierarchy
- 4.2Ditransitive-Benefactive Hierarchy
- 4.3Ditransitive-Instrumental Hierarchy
- 4.4Combining subhierarchies
- 5.Towards a semantic map for ditransitive constructions
- 5.1Ditransitive domain: A semantic map perspective
- 5.2Ditransitive constructions in Mandarin
- 5.3Ditransitive constructions in CAY Eskimo
- 5.4Ditransitive constructions in Thai
- 5.5Ditransitive constructions in Yorùbá
- 5.6Some more maps and alignments splits
- 6.Further application of the map
- 6.1Constraining indexing: Mian
- 6.2Applicative split: Ainu
- 7.Problematic patterns
- 7.1Interference of structural factors
- 7.2Verb polysemy and pattern inheritance
- 8.Conclusions
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References
Asher, Ronald E. & Kumari, T.C.
1997 Malayalam. London: Routledge
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Atoyebi, Joseph, Haspelmath, Martin & Malchukov, Andrej
2010 Ditransitive constructions in Yorùbá. In
Malchukov et al. (eds), 145–166.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Kristoffersen, Kristian E. & Sveen, Andreas
2011 West Scandinavian ditransitives as a family of constructions: With a special attention to the Norwegian V-refl-NP construction.
Linguistics 49(1): 53–104.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Blansitt, Edward L. Jr.
1984 Dechticaetiative and dative. In
Objects: Towards a Theory of Grammatical Relations,
Frans Plank (ed.), 127–150. London: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borg, Albert & Comrie, Bernard
1984 Object diffuseness in Maltese. In
Plank (ed.), 9–126.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bresnan, Joan & Nikitina, Tatiana
2009 The gradience of the dative alternation. In
Reality Exploration and Discovery: Pattern Interaction in Language and Life,
Linda Uyechi &
Lian-Hee Wee (eds), 161–184. Stanford CA: CSLI.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bugaeva, Anna
2011 Ditransitive constructions in Ainu.
Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 64(3): 237–255.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bugaeva, Anna
2015 Valency classes in Ainu. In
Malchukov &
Comrie (eds), 807–855.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard
1982 Grammatical relations in Huichol. In
Studies in Transitivity [
Syntax and Semantics 15],
Paul J. Hopper &
Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 95–115. New York NY: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Conti, Carmen
2008 Receptores y beneficiarios: estudio tipológico de la ditransitividad. Munich: Lincom.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William, Barddal, Johanna, Hollmann, Willem, Nielsen, Maike, Sotirova, Violeta & Taoka, Chiaki
2001 Discriminating verb meanings: The case of transfer verbs. Handout, LAGB Autumn Meeting, Reading.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William
2001 Radical Construction Grammar. Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William
2003 Typology and Universals. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cysouw, Michael, Haspelmath, Martin & Malchukov, Andrej
(eds) 2010 Semantic maps: Theory and applications.
Linguistic Discovery 8(1).
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1991 A New Approach to English Grammar, on Semantic Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dryer, Matthew S
1986 Primary objects, secondary objects, and antidative.
Language 62: 808–845.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dryer, Matthew S
2007 Clause types. In
Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. II,
Timothy Shopen (ed.), 224–275. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Essegbey, James
1999 Inherent Complement Verbs Revisited. PhD dissertation, University of Nijmegen.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Estrada Fernández, Zarina, Tubino, Mercedes & Villalpando, Jesús
2015 Valency classes in Yaqui. In
Malchukov &
Comrie (eds), 1359–1391.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fedden, Sebastian
2010 Ditransitives in Mian. In
Malchukov et al. (eds), 456–486.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J.
1970 The Grammar of Hitting and Breaking. In
Readings in English Transformational Grammar,
R.A. Jacobs and
P.S. Rosenbaum (eds.), 120–133. Ginn: Waltham, MA.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fortescue, Michael
1984 West Greenlandic. London: Croom Helm.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Golluscio, Lucia
2010 Ditransitives in Mapudungun. In
Malchukov et al. (eds), 710–757.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E
1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guerrero, Lilián & Van Valin, Robert D. Jr.
2004 Yaqui and the analysis of primary object languages.
International Journal of American Linguistics 70(3): 290–319.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hartmann, Iren, Haspelmath, Martin & Taylor, Bradley
(eds) 2013 Valency Patterns Leipzig. Leipzig: MPI for Evolutionary Anthropology.
[URL]![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2003 The geometry of grammatical meaning: Semantic maps and cross-linguistic comparison. In
The New Psychology of Language, Vol. 2,
Michael Tomasello (ed.), 211–43. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2004 Explaining the ditransitive person-role constraint: A usage based account.
Constructions 2.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2005 Ditransitive constructions: The verb ‘give’. In
The World Atlas of Language Structures,
Martin Haspelmath,
Matthew S. Dryer,
David Gil &
Bernard Comrie (eds), 426–429. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2005a Ditransitive Constructions: The Verb ‘Give’. In
The World Atlas of Language Structures,
M. Haspelmath &
M. S. Dryer &
D. Gil &
B. Comrie (eds.), 426–429. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2005b Argument marking in ditransitive alignment types.
Linguistic Discovery 3.1:1–21 (free online journal,
[URL])
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2015 Ditransitive constructions.
Annual Review of Linguistics 1.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kemmer, Susan & Verhagen, Arie
1994 The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events.
Cognitive Linguistics 5: 115–156.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kingkarn, Thepkanjana
2010 Ditransitive constructions in Thai. In
Malchukov et al. (eds), 409–427.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kittilä, Seppo
2005 Recipient-prominence vs. beneficiary-prominence.
Linguistic Typology 9: 269–297.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kittilä, Seppo
2006 The anomaly of the verb ‘give’ explained by its high (formal and semantic) transitivity.
Linguistics 44(3): 569–612.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krifka, Manfred
2004 Semantic and pragmatic conditions for the Dative Alternation.
Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 4: 1–32.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levin, Beth
1993 English Verb Classes and Alternations. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
2005 Argument Realization. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, Andrej
1995 Even. Munich: Lincom.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, Andrej
2005 Case pattern splits, verb types, and construction competition. In
Competition and Variation in Natural Languages: The Case for Case,
Mengistu Amberber &
Helen de Hoop (eds), 73–117. Oxford: Elsevier.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, Andrej, Haspelmath, Martin & Comrie, Bernard
2010 Ditransitive constructions: A typological overview. In
Malchukov et al. (eds), 1–65.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, Andrej, Haspelmath, Martin, Comrie, Bernard
(eds) 2010 Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, Andrej
2013 Alignment preferences in basic and derived ditransitives. In
Languages across Boundaries. Studies in Memory of Anna Siewierska,
Dik Bakker &
Martin Haspelmath (eds), 263–291. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, Andrej & Comrie, Bernard
(eds) 2015 Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, 2 Vols. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miyaoka, Osahito
2010 Ditransitives in Central Alaskan Yupik. In
Malchukov et al. (eds), 529–563.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miyaoka, Osahito
2012 A Grammar of Central Alaskan Yupik (CAY). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Margetts, Anna & Austin, Peter K
2007 Three participant events in the languages of the world: Towards a crosslinguistic typology.
Linguistics (3): 393–451.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mosel, Ulrike
2010 Ditransitive constructions and their alternations in Teop. In
Malchukov et al. (eds), 486–509.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mukherjee, Joybrato
2005 English Ditransitive Verbs: Aspects of Theory, Description and a Usage-based Model. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newman, John
1996 Give: A Cognitive Linguistic Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nikolaeva, Irina
1999 Ostyak. Munich: Lincom.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pinker, Steven
1989 Learnability and Cognition. The Acquisition of Argument Structure Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plank, Frans
1987 Direkte indirekte Objekte: Was uns lehren lehrt.
Leuvense Bijdragen 76: 37–61.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
2008 The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity.
Journal of Linguistics 44(1): 129–167.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1996 Applicatives and benefactives: A cognitive account. In
Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning,
Masayoshi Shibatani &
Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 157–194. Oxford: Clarendon.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sedlak, Philip
1975 Direct/indirect object word order: A cross-linguistic analysis.
Working Papers on Language Universals 18: 117–164.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siewierska, Anna
2003 Person agreement and the determination of alignment.
Transactions of the Philological Society 101(2): 339–370.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siewierska, Anna
2004 Person. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Siewierska, Anna & van Lier, Eva
2012 Ditransitive constructions with two human nonagentive arguments.
Faits de Langues 39: 140–156.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van Valin, Robert Jr. & Randy Lapolla
1997 Syntax: Structure, Meaning and Function. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wunderlich, Dieter
2006 Towards a structural typology of verb classes. In
Advances in the Theory of the Lexicon,
Dieter Wunderlich (ed.), 57–166. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Fedriani, Chiara & Maria Napoli
2023.
The Missing Dative Alternation in Romance: Explaining Stability and Change in the Argument Structure of Latin Ditransitives.
Transactions of the Philological Society 121:1
► pp. 33 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.