Cover not available
Part of
Contrastive Studies in Verbal Valency
Edited by Lars Hellan, Andrej L. Malchukov and Michela Cennamo
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 237] 2017
► pp. 297–325

Between Passive and Middle

Evidence from Greek and beyond

| Ghent University
| Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
This paper focuses on verbs that can appear with two non-active voice morphologies in Greek. The starting point of the study is a comparison to the Vedic verbs that can also have two different, though formally related, non-active morphologies. In Vedic, these belong to the semantic class of verbs denoting decay and destruction as well as some other spontaneous processes. On the contrary, in Greek, there is a tendency for verbs that participate in causative-anticausative alternations to appear with both middle and passive voice morphology (for instance: ‘unbind sth. – be unbound’; ‘cause to lean – lean’). It will be argued that these verbal classes demonstrate a diachronic tendency for change in their voice marking, which often results in the emergence of lability (that is, the same morphological marking for both transitive and intransitive uses). We will also show that the diachrony of Greek displays a clear decrease in the percentage of such verbs. This decrease is related to the ongoing decline of the middle voice. However, it can also be due to the expansion of the labile type in Greek at the expense of verbs of change-of-state that could appear with middle and passive voice morphologies.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Verbs with two non-active voice morphologies: Evidence from Vedic in a typological perspective
  • 3.Middle and Passive Voice in Greek
    • 3.1Voice morphology in Ancient Greek: With special focus on the verbs that can appear with two non-active voice morphologies
    • 3.2A corpus study: Homeric and Classical Greek
    • 3.3Koine Greek: Changes in voice and a corpus study
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 April 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.237.10kul
References (49)
References
Abraham, Werner. 1995. Diathesis: The middle, particularly in West-Germanic. What does reflexivization have to do with valency reduction? In Discourse Grammar and Typology [Studies in Language Companion Series 27], Werner Abraham, T. Givón & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 3–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Doron, Edit. 2012. The syntactic construction of two non-active voices: Passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics 48(1): 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allan, Rutger J. 2002. The Middle Voice in Ancient Greek. A Study in Polysemy. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
2003. The Middle Voice in Ancient Greek: A Study of Polysemy [Amsterdam Studies in Classical Philology 11]. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Blass, Friedrich, Debrunner, Albert & Rehkopf, Friedrich. 1979/1984. Grammatik des neutestamentlichen Griechisch. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl & Thumb, Albert. 1913. Griechische Grammatik, 4th edn. Munich: von Müller.Google Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre. 1958. Grammaire homérique. Phonétique et morphologie, 3rd edn. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Chatzidakis, Georgios. 1934. Γλωσσολογικαί έρευναι (Linguistic Investigations), Vol. 1. Athens.Google Scholar
. 1892/1975. Einleitung in die neugriechische Grammatik. Leipzig: Breitkopf and Härtel.Google Scholar
Dom, Sebastian. 2014. The middle marker -ik- in Bantu. Ms, Ghent University.Google Scholar
Drachman, Gaberell, Lavidas, Nikolaos & Malikouti-Drachman, Angeliki. 2013. Preverbs in the history of Greek: On predicting and changing idiomatic vs. compositional readings. Paper presented at ICHL 2013, 8 August.
Ernout, Alfred. 1908–1909. Recherches sur l’emploi du passif latin. MSL 15: 273–333.Google Scholar
George, Coulter H. 2005. Expressions of Agency in Ancient Greek. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1987. Transitivity Alternations of the Anticausative Type [Arbeitspapier / Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität zu Köln; N.F. 5]. Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Howard, Harry. 2001. Negentropic causation vs. entropic inchoation. In Linguagem e Cognição. A Perspectiva da Linguística Cognitiva, Augusto Soares da Silva (ed.), 401–421. Braga: APL/UCP, Faculdade de Filosofia de Braga.Google Scholar
Humbert, Jean. 1986. Syntaxe grecque, 3rd ed. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Jankuhn, Harald. 1969. Die passive Bedeutung medialer Formen untersucht an der Sprache Homers. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1927[1954]. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Vol. III: Syntax. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne. 1993. The Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid. 1998a. Passive, anticausative and classification of verbs: The case of Vedic. In Typology of Verbal Categories. Papers presented to Vladimir Nedjalkov on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday [Linguistische Arbeiten 382], Leonid Kulikov & Heinz Vater (eds), 139–153. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998b. Vedic -ya- presents: Semantics and the place of stress. In Sprache und Kultur der Indogermanen. Akten der X. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, 22.-28 September 1996, Innsbruck [Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 93], Wolfgang Meid (ed.), 341–350. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
. 2011. Drifting between passive and anticausative. True and alleged accent shifts in the history of Vedic -ya-presents; Reply to replies. Journal of Language Relationship/Voprosy Jazykovogo Rodstva 6: 185–198, 210–215.Google Scholar
. 2012a. The Vedic -ya-presents: Passives and Intransitivity in Old Indo-Aryan [Leiden Studies in Indo-European 19]. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
. 2012b. Voice and valency derivations in Old Indo-Aryan in a diachronic typological perspective: The degrammaticalization of the middle and other trends in the Vedic verbal system. In Usare il presente per spiegare il passato. Teorie linguistiche contemporanee e lingue storiche. Atti del XXXIII Convegno della Società Italiana di Glottologia, Lucio Melazzo (ed.), 161–191. Roma: Il Calamo.Google Scholar
. 2014. The decline of labile syntax in Old Indo-Aryan: A diachronic typological perspective. Linguistics 52(4) Special issue: Typology of Labile Verbs: Focus on Diachrony: 1139–1165.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid & Lavidas, Nikolaos. 2013. Reconstructing passive and voice in Proto-Indo-European. Journal of Historical Linguistics 3(1): 98–121. Special issue: Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kühner, Raphael & Gerth, Bernhard. [1898–1904]/1963. Ausführliche Grammatik der Griechischen Sprache, Zweiter Teil: Satzlehre. Munich: Max Hueber.Google Scholar
van de Laar, Henri. 2000. Description of the Greek Individual Verbal Systems. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Lavidas, Nikolaos. 2009. Transitivity Alternations in Diachrony. Changes in Argument Structure and Voice Morphology. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
. 2013. Passives in the history of Greek: Evidence for the role of the passive suffix. Folia Linguistica Historica 33: 87–122.Google Scholar
Lavidas, Nikolaos & Papangeli, Dimitra. 2007. Deponency in the diachrony of Greek. In Deponency and Morphological Mismatches, Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley (eds), 97–126. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lazzeroni, Romano. 2004. Inaccusatività indoeuropea e alternanza causativa vedica. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 89(2): 139–164.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantic Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 2010. The extension of the transitive construction in Ancient Greek. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 42(1): 60–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magni, Elisabetta. 2004. Doppioni e alternanze nel greco omerico: I presenti in -θω. In Dialetti, dialettismi, generi letterari e funzioni sociali, Giovanna Rocca (ed.), 329–342. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
. 2008. Contiguità e continuità nelle categorie verbali: Le forme in -θ- del greco. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 93: 171–225.Google Scholar
. 2010. L’evoluzione semantico-funzionale dell’elemento -θ- nella morfologia verbale del greco. In La morfologia del greco tra tipologia e diacronia, Ignazio Putzu, Giulio Paulis, Gianfranco Nieddu & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 266–285. Milano: Angeli.Google Scholar
Mayser, Edwin. 1929[1970]. Grammatik der griechischen Papyri aus der Ptolemäerzeit. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Padučeva, Elena V. 2001. Kauzativnyj glagol i dekauzativ v russkom jazyke (Causative verbs and decausative in Russian). Russkij jazyk v naučnom osveščenii 1: 52–79.Google Scholar
Perseus under Philologic (Perseus Project Texts Loaded under PhiloLogic). <[URL]>
Prévot, André. 1935. L' aoriste grec en -θην [Collection Linguistique publiée par la Société de Linguistique de Paris, XXXIX]. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
PROIEL (Pragmatic Resources in Old Indo-European Languages). <[URL]>
Schwyzer, Eduard. 1943. Zum persönlichen Agens beim Passiv, besonders im Griechische. Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S. 1970. Jespersen’s ‘move’ and ‘change’ class and causative verbs. In Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honor of Archibald A. Hill, Vol. 2: Descriptive Linguistics, Mohammad Ali Jazayery, Edgar C. Polomé & Werner Winter (eds), 101–109. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stahl, Johann Matthias. 1907. Kritisch-historische Syntax des griechischen Verbums der klassischen Zeit. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Theophanopoulou-Kontou, Dimatra. 1999. Τα μέσα αμετάβατα ρήματα της Νέας Ελληνικής και η μεσοπαθητική κατάληξη (Middle intransitive verbs in Modern Greek and the mediopassive ending). In Proceedings of the third International Conference on Greek Linguistics, Amalia Moser (ed.), 114–122. Athens: Ellinika Grammata, 114–122.Google Scholar
Theophanopoulou-Kontou, Dimitra. 2004. The structure of VP and the mediopassive morphology. The passives and anticausatives in Modern Greek. Parousia 15–16: 173–206.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi M. 2006. The acquisition of voice and transitivity alternations in Greek as a native and second language. In Paths of Development in L1 and L2 Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 39], Sharon Unsworth, Teresa Parodi, Antonella Sorace & Martha Young-Scholten (eds), 15–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wackernagel, Jakob. 1920–24. Vorlesungen über Syntax mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Griechisch, Lateinisch und Deutsch, Vol. 1–2. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Dahl, Eystein & Liana Tronci
2023. Voice Markers in Septuagint Greek in the Light of Hebrew Interference: A Corpus‐Based Study on the Aorist System of the Book of Genesis*. Transactions of the Philological Society 121:2 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Rwahwire, Samson & Ivan Ssebagala
2023. Radar Cross‐Section Reducing Metamaterials. In Electromagnetic Metamaterials, ► pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
Lavidas, Nikolaos
2018. Reorganising voice in the history of Greek. In Reorganising Grammatical Variation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 203], ► pp. 175 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.