Chapter published in:
Contrastive Studies in Verbal Valency
Edited by Lars Hellan, Andrej L. Malchukov and Michela Cennamo
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 237] 2017
► pp. 298–325

Between Passive and Middle

Evidence from Greek and beyond

| Ghent University
| Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
This paper focuses on verbs that can appear with two non-active voice morphologies in Greek. The starting point of the study is a comparison to the Vedic verbs that can also have two different, though formally related, non-active morphologies. In Vedic, these belong to the semantic class of verbs denoting decay and destruction as well as some other spontaneous processes. On the contrary, in Greek, there is a tendency for verbs that participate in causative-anticausative alternations to appear with both middle and passive voice morphology (for instance: ‘unbind sth. – be unbound’; ‘cause to lean – lean’). It will be argued that these verbal classes demonstrate a diachronic tendency for change in their voice marking, which often results in the emergence of lability (that is, the same morphological marking for both transitive and intransitive uses). We will also show that the diachrony of Greek displays a clear decrease in the percentage of such verbs. This decrease is related to the ongoing decline of the middle voice. However, it can also be due to the expansion of the labile type in Greek at the expense of verbs of change-of-state that could appear with middle and passive voice morphologies.
Published online: 30 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.237.10kul
References

References

Abraham, Werner
1995 Diathesis: The middle, particularly in West-Germanic. What does reflexivization have to do with valency reduction? In Discourse Grammar and Typology [Studies in Language Companion Series 27], Werner Abraham, T. Givón & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 3–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Doron, Edit
2012 The syntactic construction of two non-active voices: Passive and middle. Journal of Linguistics 48(1): 1–34. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allan, Rutger J.
2002 The Middle Voice in Ancient Greek. A Study in Polysemy. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
2003 The Middle Voice in Ancient Greek: A Study of Polysemy [Amsterdam Studies in Classical Philology 11]. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Blass, Friedrich, Debrunner, Albert & Rehkopf, Friedrich
1979/1984 Grammatik des neutestamentlichen Griechisch. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Brugmann, Karl & Thumb, Albert
1913 Griechische Grammatik, 4th edn. Munich: von Müller.Google Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre
1958 Grammaire homérique. Phonétique et morphologie, 3rd edn. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Chatzidakis, Georgios
1934 Γλωσσολογικαί έρευναι (Linguistic Investigations), Vol. 1. Athens.Google Scholar
1892/1975 Einleitung in die neugriechische Grammatik. Leipzig: Breitkopf and Härtel.Google Scholar
Dom, Sebastian
2014 The middle marker -ik- in Bantu. Ms, Ghent University.Google Scholar
Drachman, Gaberell, Lavidas, Nikolaos & Malikouti-Drachman, Angeliki
2013 Preverbs in the history of Greek: On predicting and changing idiomatic vs. compositional readings. Paper presented at ICHL 2013, 8 August.
Ernout, Alfred
1908–1909 Recherches sur l’emploi du passif latin. MSL 15: 273–333.Google Scholar
George, Coulter H.
2005 Expressions of Agency in Ancient Greek. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1987 Transitivity Alternations of the Anticausative Type [Arbeitspapier / Institut für Sprachwissenschaft, Universität zu Köln; N.F. 5]. Cologne: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Howard, Harry
2001 Negentropic causation vs. entropic inchoation. In Linguagem e Cognição. A Perspectiva da Linguística Cognitiva, Augusto Soares da Silva (ed.), 401–421. Braga: APL/UCP, Faculdade de Filosofia de Braga.Google Scholar
Humbert, Jean
1986 Syntaxe grecque, 3rd ed. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Jankuhn, Harald
1969 Die passive Bedeutung medialer Formen untersucht an der Sprache Homers. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1927[1954] A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Vol. III: Syntax. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne
1993 The Middle Voice [Typological Studies in Language 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid
1998a Passive, anticausative and classification of verbs: The case of Vedic. In Typology of Verbal Categories. Papers presented to Vladimir Nedjalkov on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday [Linguistische Arbeiten 382], Leonid Kulikov & Heinz Vater (eds), 139–153. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998b Vedic -ya- presents: Semantics and the place of stress. In Sprache und Kultur der Indogermanen. Akten der X. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, 22.-28 September 1996, Innsbruck [Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft 93], Wolfgang Meid (ed.), 341–350. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
2011 Drifting between passive and anticausative. True and alleged accent shifts in the history of Vedic -ya-presents; Reply to replies. Journal of Language Relationship/Voprosy Jazykovogo Rodstva 6: 185–198, 210–215.Google Scholar
2012a The Vedic -ya-presents: Passives and Intransitivity in Old Indo-Aryan [Leiden Studies in Indo-European 19]. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2012b Voice and valency derivations in Old Indo-Aryan in a diachronic typological perspective: The degrammaticalization of the middle and other trends in the Vedic verbal system. In Usare il presente per spiegare il passato. Teorie linguistiche contemporanee e lingue storiche. Atti del XXXIII Convegno della Società Italiana di Glottologia, Lucio Melazzo (ed.), 161–191. Roma: Il Calamo.Google Scholar
2014 The decline of labile syntax in Old Indo-Aryan: A diachronic typological perspective. Linguistics 52(4) Special issue: Typology of Labile Verbs: Focus on Diachrony: 1139–1165.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid & Lavidas, Nikolaos
2013 Reconstructing passive and voice in Proto-Indo-European. Journal of Historical Linguistics 3(1): 98–121. Special issue: Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kühner, Raphael
& Gerth, Bernhard [1898–1904]/1963 Ausführliche Grammatik der Griechischen Sprache, Zweiter Teil: Satzlehre. Munich: Max Hueber.Google Scholar
van de Laar, Henri
2000 Description of the Greek Individual Verbal Systems. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Lavidas, Nikolaos
2009 Transitivity Alternations in Diachrony. Changes in Argument Structure and Voice Morphology. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2013 Passives in the history of Greek: Evidence for the role of the passive suffix. Folia Linguistica Historica 33: 87–122.Google Scholar
Lavidas, Nikolaos & Papangeli, Dimitra
2007 Deponency in the diachrony of Greek. In Deponency and Morphological Mismatches, Matthew Baerman, Greville G. Corbett, Dunstan Brown & Andrew Hippisley (eds), 97–126. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lazzeroni, Romano
2004 Inaccusatività indoeuropea e alternanza causativa vedica. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 89(2): 139–164.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995 Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantic Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
2010 The extension of the transitive construction in Ancient Greek. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 42(1): 60–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Magni, Elisabetta
2004 Doppioni e alternanze nel greco omerico: I presenti in -θω. In Dialetti, dialettismi, generi letterari e funzioni sociali, Giovanna Rocca (ed.), 329–342. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
2008 Contiguità e continuità nelle categorie verbali: Le forme in -θ- del greco. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 93: 171–225.Google Scholar
2010 L’evoluzione semantico-funzionale dell’elemento -θ- nella morfologia verbale del greco. In La morfologia del greco tra tipologia e diacronia, Ignazio Putzu, Giulio Paulis, Gianfranco Nieddu & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 266–285. Milano: Angeli.Google Scholar
Mayser, Edwin
1929[1970] Grammatik der griechischen Papyri aus der Ptolemäerzeit. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Padučeva, Elena V.
2001 Kauzativnyj glagol i dekauzativ v russkom jazyke (Causative verbs and decausative in Russian). Russkij jazyk v naučnom osveščenii 1: 52–79.Google Scholar
Perseus under Philologic
Perseus Project Texts Loaded under PhiloLogic). http://​perseus​.uchicago​.edu/
Prévot, André
1935 L' aoriste grec en -θην [Collection Linguistique publiée par la Société de Linguistique de Paris, XXXIX]. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
PROIEL
Pragmatic Resources in Old Indo-European Languages). http://​foni​.uio​.no:3000/
Schwyzer, Eduard
1943 Zum persönlichen Agens beim Passiv, besonders im Griechische. Berlin: Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S.
1970 Jespersen’s ‘move’ and ‘change’ class and causative verbs. In Linguistic and Literary Studies in Honor of Archibald A. Hill, Vol. 2: Descriptive Linguistics, Mohammad Ali Jazayery, Edgar C. Polomé & Werner Winter (eds), 101–109. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stahl, Johann Matthias
1907 Kritisch-historische Syntax des griechischen Verbums der klassischen Zeit. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Theophanopoulou-Kontou, Dimatra
1999 Τα μέσα αμετάβατα ρήματα της Νέας Ελληνικής και η μεσοπαθητική κατάληξη (Middle intransitive verbs in Modern Greek and the mediopassive ending). In Proceedings of the third International Conference on Greek Linguistics, Amalia Moser (ed.), 114–122. Athens: Ellinika Grammata, 114–122.Google Scholar
Theophanopoulou-Kontou, Dimitra
2004 The structure of VP and the mediopassive morphology. The passives and anticausatives in Modern Greek. Parousia 15–16: 173–206.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi M.
2006 The acquisition of voice and transitivity alternations in Greek as a native and second language. In Paths of Development in L1 and L2 Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 39], Sharon Unsworth, Teresa Parodi, Antonella Sorace & Martha Young-Scholten (eds), 15–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wackernagel, Jakob
1920–24 Vorlesungen über Syntax mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Griechisch, Lateinisch und Deutsch, Vol. 1–2. Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Lavidas, Nikolaos
2018.  In Reorganising Grammatical Variation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 203], ► pp. 175 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.