Part of
Contrastive Studies in Verbal Valency
Edited by Lars Hellan, Andrej L. Malchukov and Michela Cennamo
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 237] 2017
► pp. 327373
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Everaert, Martin
(eds) 2004The Unaccusativity Puzzle. Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Sevdali, Christina
2013Dative-nominative alternations in Germanic languages: A generative perspective. Lingue e Linguaggi 9: 7–20.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
1992A-morphous Morphology. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angster, Marco
2012Le marche di coreferenza contrastiva nella formazione delle parole. Una panoramica delle lingue d’Europa. PhD dissertation, University of Pavia.Google Scholar
Apresjan, Juri D.
1974Regular polysemy. Linguistics 12: 5–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1994Morphology by Itself. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie
2004The function of word-formation and the inflection-derivation distinction. In Words in their Places. A Festschrift for J. Lachlan Mackenzie, Henk Aertsen, Mike Hannay & Rod Lyall (eds), 283–292. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.Google Scholar
Beard, Robert
1995Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology. A General Theory of Inflection and Word Formation Albany NY: New York Press.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert
1992Morphology, semantics and argument structure. In Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar, Iggy Roca (ed.), 47–64. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993Against split morphology. In Yearbook of Morphology 1993, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 27–50. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Yearbook of Morphology 1995, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 1–16. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2013Structuring Sense, Vol. III: Taking Form. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1985Morphology [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cennamo, Michela & Jezek, Elisabetta
2011The anticausative alternation in Italian. In I luoghi della traduzione – Le interfacce. Atti del XLIII Congresso Internazionale di Studi della Società di Linguistica Italiana (SLI), Verona, 24–26 settembre 2009, Giovanna Massariello Merzagora & Serena Dal Maso (eds), 809–823. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Cennamo, Michela
2015Valency patterns in Italian. In Valency Classes in the World’s Languages, Vol. 1, Andrej Malchukov & Bernard Comrie (eds), 417–481. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Corbin, Danielle
1997Locutions, composés, unités polylexématiques: Lexicalisation et mode de construction. In La locution entre langue et usages, Michel Martins-Baltar (ed.), 53–101. Fontenay: ENS.Google Scholar
Croft, William
2003Lexical rules vs. constructions: A false dichotomy. In Motivation in Language. Studies in Honor of Günter Radden, Hubert Cuyckens, Thomas Berg, René Dirven & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds), 49–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Cruse, D. Alan
2004Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diedrichsen, Elke
2013Auxiliary selection in German: Constructional gradience with perfect formation. In Argument Structure in Flux: the Naples/Capri Papers [Studies in Language Companion Series 131], Elly van Gelderen, Michela Cennamo & Jóhanna Barðdal (eds), 405–434. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
2000A typology of causatives: Form, syntax and meaning. In Changing Valency. Case Studies in Transitivity, Robert M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds), 30–83. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dokulil, Milos
1968Zur Theorie der Wortbildung. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Karl-Marx-Universität Leipzig [Gesellschafts- und Sprachwissenschaftsreihe] 17: 203–211.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U.
1989Prototypical differences between inflection and derivation. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42: 3–10.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia
1994Morphopragmatics. Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German and Other Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubinsky, Stanley & Simango, Silvester R.
1996Passive and stative in Chichewa: Evidence for modular distinctions in grammar. Language 72(4): 749–781. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fagan, Sarah
1988The English middle. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 181–204.Google Scholar
Fleischer, Wolfgang & Bars, Irmhild
1995Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Gaeta, Livio
2010aOn the viability of cognitive morphology for explaining language change. In Word Formation from Cognitive Perspectives, Alexander Onysko & Sascha Michel (ed.), 75–95. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010bSynthetic compounds. With special reference to German. In Cross-Disciplinary Issues in Compounding [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 131], Sergio Scalise & Irene Vogel (eds), 219–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Affix ordering and conversion: Looking for the place of zero. Lingue e Linguaggio 12(2): 145–170.Google Scholar
2014Kontrastive Linguistik nach der typologischen Wende. Kommentar zu den Beiträgen. Germanistische Mitteilungen 40(1): 79–82.Google Scholar
2015aAction nouns in Romance. In Müller et al., Vol. 2, 1165–1185.Google Scholar
2015bLexeme formation in a conscious approach to the lexicon. In Semantics of Complex Words, Laurie Bauer, Lívia Körtvélyessy & Pavol Štekauer (eds), 115–141. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
García Velasco, Daniel & Hengeveld, Kees
2002Do we need predicate frames? In New Perspectives on Argument Structure in Functional Grammar, Ricardo Mairal Usón & María Jesús Pérez Quintero (eds), 95–123. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk
2010Cognitive Semantics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Geniušienė, Emma Š.
2006Passives in Lithuanian (in comparison with Russian). In Passivization and Typology: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 68], Werner Abraham & Larisa Leisiö (eds), 29–61. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
2013Constructionist approaches. In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 15–31. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Studies in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
2015The syntax-morphology interface. In Syntax – Theory and Analysis, Vol. 2, Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 1128–1154. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1996Word-class-changing inflection and morphological theory. In Yearbook of Morphology 1995, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 43–66. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Sims, Andrea D.
2010Understanding Morphology, 2nd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hook, Peter E. & Koul, Omkar N.
2006Valency sets in Kashmiri. In Voice and Grammatical Relations: In Honor of Masayoshi Shibatani [Typological Studies in Language 65], Tasaku Tsunoda & Taro Kageyama (eds), 43–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iacobini, Claudio
2004Verbi parasintetici. In La formazione delle parole in italiano, Maria Grossmann & Franz Rainer (eds), 167–181. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Keller, Frank & Sorace, Antonella
2003Gradient auxiliary selection and impersonal passivization in German: An experimental investigation. Journal of Linguistics 39: 57–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
König, Ekkehard
2011Reflexive nominal compounds. Studies in Language 35(1): 112–127. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012Contrastive linguistics and language comparison. Languages in Contrast 12: 3–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid I.
2001Causatives. In Language Typology and Linguistics Universals, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard Konig, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 886–898. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Volkmar
2015Categories of word-formation. In Müller et al., Vol. 2, 1020–1034.Google Scholar
Lenci, Alessandro
2012Argument alternations in Italian verbs: A computational study. In Linguaggio e cervello – Semantica / Language and the brain – Semantics. Atti del XLII Congresso Internazionale della Società di Linguistica Italiana, Vol. 2 (CD-Rom), Paper II.B.1, Pier Marco Bertinetto, Valentina Bambini & Irene Ricci (eds). Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Letuchiy, Alexander
2009Towards a typology of labile verbs: Lability vs. derivation. In New Challenges in Typology. Transcending the Borders and Refining the Distinctions, Patience Epps & Alexandre Arkhipov (eds), 247–268. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth
1993English Verb Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995Unaccusativity. At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2005Argument Realization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Löbner, Sebastian
2002Understanding Semantics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2013Voice and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 44(1): 77–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A. & Ruppenhofer, Josef
2001Beyond Alternations: A Constructional Account of the Applicative Pattern in German. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Müller, Stefan & Wechsler, Steve
2014Lexical approaches to argument structure. Theoretical Linguistics 40(1–2): 1–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Müller, Peter O., Ohnheiser, Ingeborg, Olsen, Susan & Rainer, Franz
(eds) 2015Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, vol.2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Munaro, Nicola
1994Alcuni casi di alternanza di struttura argomentale in inglese. In Teoria del Linguaggio e Analisi Linguistica: XX Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Gianluigi Borgato (ed.), 341–370. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Mutz, Katrin
2003Le parole complesse in ‘auto’ nell'italiano di oggi. In Italia linguistica anno Mille. Italia linguistica anno Duemila. Atti del XXXIV Congresso Internazionale della SLI, Nicoletta Maraschio & Teresa Poggi Salani (eds), 649–664. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Rainer, Franz
1993Spanische Wortbildungslehre. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
2008The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics 44: 129–167.Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo
2010La realizzazione sintattica della struttura argomentale. In Grammatica dell’italiano antico, Vol. 1, Giampaolo Salvi & Lorenzo Renzi (eds), 123–189. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Sanders, Gerald
1988Zero derivation and the overt analogue criterion. In Theoretical Morphology: Approaches in Modern Linguistics, Michael Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds), 155–175. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Florian
2008The Syntax of (Anti-)Causatives. External Arguments in Change-of-state Contexts [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 126]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siller-Runggaldier, Heidi
2000Fra semantica e formazione delle parole: I cambiamenti di valenza verbale. Italienische Studien 21: 233–268.Google Scholar
2003Changes of valence and their effect on objects. In Romance Objects: Transitivity in Romance Languages, Giuliana Fiorentino (ed.), 187–216. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Cambiamenti di valenza. In La formazione delle parole in italiano, Maria Grossmann & Franz Rainer (eds), 546–549. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Sorace, Antonella
2000Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language 76(4): 859–890. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Štekauer, Pavol
2015The delimitation of derivation and inflection. In Müller et al., Vol. 1, 218–235.Google Scholar
Thornton, Anna M.
2004Conversione. In La formazione delle parole in italiano, Maria Grossmann & Franz Rainer (eds), 501–533. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Valera, Salvador
2015Conversion. In Müller et al., Vol. 1, 322–339.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter
2015Valency-changing word-formation. In Müller et al., Vol. 2, 1424–1466.Google Scholar