Introduction published in:
Boundaries, Phases and Interfaces: Case studies in honor of Violeta Demonte
Edited by Olga Fernández-Soriano, Elena Castroviejo Miró and Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 239] 2017
► pp. 224
References

References

Abels, Klaus
2003Successive Cyclicity, Antilocality and Adposition Stranding. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad
2004Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word Formation. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Morphology ≠ syntax. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 325–352. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Adger, David
2007Stress and phasal syntax. Linguistic Analysis 33: 238–266.Google Scholar
Adger, David & Borer, Hagit
2009General preface. In InterPhases: Phase-theoretic Investigations of Linguistic Interfaces, Kleanthes K. Grohmann (ed.), vii. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Anderson, Stephen
1992Amorphous Morphology. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arad, Maya
1998VP-Structure and the Syntax-Lexicon Interface. PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
1988Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, Bocci, Giuliano & Cruschina, Silvio
2015Focus fronting and its implicatures. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013. Selected papers from 'Going Romance' Amsterdam 2013 [Romance Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8], Enoch Aboh, Aafke Hulk, Jeannette Schaeffer & Petra Sleeman (eds), 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biskup, Petr
2009The Phase Model and Adverbials. PhD dissertation, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005aStructuring Sense, Vol. I: In Name Only. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2005bStructuring Sense, Vol. II: The Normal Course of Events. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Structuring Sense, Vol. III: Taking Form. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Željko
2010Phases beyond clauses. Ms, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
2004Scalar implicatures, polarity phenomena, and the syntax/pragmatics interface. In Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 39–103. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2013Logic in Grammar: Polarity, Free Choice, and Intervention [Oxford Studies in Semantics and Pragmatics 2]. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro, Fox, Danny & Spector, Benjamin
2012The grammatical view of scalar implicatures and the relationship between semantics and pragmatics. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK) 3], Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds), 2297–2331. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam 1977On wh-movement. In Formal Syntax, Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds), 71–132. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1986Barriers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language [Current Studies in Linguistics 36], Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 104–131. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2005Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 1–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Approaching UG from below. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Syntax-Semantics, Uli Sauerland & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds), 1–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Foreword. In Phases, Developing the Framework, Angel J. Gallego (ed.), 1–8. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Halle, Morris & Lukoff, Fred
1956On accent and juncture in English. In For Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday, 11 October 1956, Morris Halle, Horace G. Lunt, Hugh McLean & Cornelis H. van Schooneveld (eds), 65–80. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guggielmo
1993A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 239–297.Google Scholar
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Citko Barbara
2014Phase Theory. An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta & van Oostendorp, Marc
To appear. When imperfections are perfect: Prosody, phi-features and deixis in Central and Southern Italian vocatives. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 61–82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dehé, Nicole
2014Parentheticals in Spoken English: The Syntax-Prosody Relation. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida & Uribe-Etxebarria, Myriam
2000The primitives of temporal relations. Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka (eds), 157–186. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta
2006Qué es sintáctico y qué es léxico en la interficie entre sintaxis y léxico-semántica. Signo y Seña 15: 17–42.Google Scholar
2014Parámetros y variación en la interfaz léxico-sintaxis. In Panorama de sintaxis, Angel J. Gallego (ed.), 383–421. Madrid: AKAL.Google Scholar
Diesing, Molly
1990Indefinites. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dobashi, Yoshihiko
2003Phonological Phrasing and Syntactic Derivation. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Drummond, Alex, Hornstein, Norbert & Lasnik, Howard
2010A puzzle about P-stranding and a possible solution. Linguistic Inquiry 41: 689–692. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Elordieta, Gorka 2008An overview of theories of the syntax-phonology interface. Journal of Basque Linguistics and Philology 42: 209–286.Google Scholar
Elordieta, Gorka & Irurtzun, Aritz
2012Movimiento y prosodia. In El movimiento de constituyentes, José María Brucart & Ángel J. Gallego (eds), 213–234. Madrid: Visor Libros.Google Scholar
Embick, David & Noyer, Ralph
2007Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 289–325. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi & Rapoport, Tova R.
2004Bare aspect: A theory of syntactic projection. In The Syntax of Time, Jacqueline Guéron & Alexander Lecarme (eds), 217–234. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Feldhausen, Ingo
2016Inter-speaker variation, optimality theory and the prosody of clitic left-dislocations in Spanish. Probus 28(2): 293–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Susann & Gabriel, Christoph
(eds) 2016Manual of Grammatical Interfaces in Romance. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fox, Danny & Pesetsky, David
2005Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31: 1–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara
2000The Syntax-Phonology Interface in Focus and Topic Constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Ángel J.
2012: Introduction: A framework of phases for linguistic theory. In Phases, Developing the Framework, Angel J. Gallego (ed.), 9–44. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geurts, Bart
2010Quantity Implicatures. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes K.
(ed.) 2009InterPhases: Phase-theoretic Investigations of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel J.
2002Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris
1997Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In PF: Papers at the Interface [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30], Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang & Martha McGinnis, 425–449. Cambridge MA: MITWpl.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–76. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1994Some key features of distributed morphology. In Papers on Phonology and Morphology [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 21], Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley & Tony Bures (eds), 275–288. Cambridge MA: Department of Linguistics, MIT.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika
1998Semantics in Generative Grammar [Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistic 13]. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hiraiwa, Ken
2005Dimensions of Symmetry in Syntax: Agreement and Clausal Architecture. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun
1992Aspect and theta theory. In Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar, Iggy M. Roca (ed.), 145–174. Berlin: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Hout, Angeliek
1996Event Semantics of Verb Frame Alternations: A Case Study of Dutch and its Acquisition. PhD dissertation, Tilburg University.Google Scholar
2000Event semantics in the lexicon–syntax interface: Verb frame alternations in Dutch and their acquisition. In Events as Grammatical Objects, Carol L. Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds), 239–282. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Huang, Yan 2006Pragmatics [Oxford Textbooks in Linguistics]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ishihara, Shinichiro
2007Major phrase, focus intonation, multiple spell-out (Map, FI, MSO). The Linguistic Review 24: 2–3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1990Semantic Structures. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Julien, Marit
2002Syntactic Heads and Word Formation. New York NY: OUP.Google Scholar
2007The relation between morphology and syntax. In The The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 209–238. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan
2005Towards a phase-based theory of sentential stress. In Perspectives on Phases [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49], Martha McGinnis & Norvin Richards (eds), 125–46. Cambridge MA: Department of Linguistics, MIT.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard C.
1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cabridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1999Prepositional complementizers as attractors. Probus 11: 39–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Prepositions as probes. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 192–212. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kempson, Ruth
2012The syntax/pragmatics interface. In The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, Keith Allan & Kasia M. Jaszczolt (eds), Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1995A time-relational analysis of Russian aspect. Language 71(4): 669–695. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
2015The notional category of modality. In Words, Worlds, and Content: New Approaches in Word Semantics, Hans-Jürgen Eikmeyer & Hannes Reiser (eds), 38–74. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika & Selkirk, Elisabeth
2007Phase Theory and prosodic spell-out: The case of verbs. The Linguistic Review 24: 93–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lapointe, Steven Guy
1980A Theory of Grammatical Agreement. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard
2011Clauses, propositions and phases. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise. New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty, Anna Maria Di Sciulo & Cedric Boeckx (eds), 366–391. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995Unaccusativity. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2005Argument Realization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López, Luis
2009A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure [Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics 23]. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1997No escape from syntax. Working Papers in Linguistics 4(2): 201–225.Google Scholar
2001Words. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
2007Phases and words. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar, Sook-Hee Choe (ed.), 191–220. Seoul: Dong In.Google Scholar
Mateu, Jaume
2002Argument Structure: Relational Construal at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. http://​hdl​.handle​.net​/10803​/4828 Google Scholar
May, Robert
1978The Grammar of Quantification. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
1985Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation [Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 12]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Milsark, Gary L.
1977Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis 3: 1–29.Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara H. 1973Some transformational extensions of Montague grammar. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2(4): 509–534. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1975Montague grammar and transformational grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 6(2): 203–300.Google Scholar
2014aThe history of formal semantics: Changing notions of semantic competence. Paper presented at the 2014 Annual Joshua and Verona Taylor Whatmough Lecture Whatmough Lecture in Linguistics , Harvard University, Cambridge MA: April 28. https://​youtu​.be​/0VV​-1NDKmEc (1 January 2016).
2014bA brief history of the syntax-semantics interface in Western formal linguistics. Semantics-Syntax Interface 1(1): 1–20.Google Scholar
2015aThe Garden of Eden period for deep structure and semantics. In 50 Years Later: Reflections on Chomsky’s Aspects [MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 77], Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott (eds), 187–198. Cambridge MA: Department of Linguistics, MIT.Google Scholar
2015bAsking what a meaning does: David Lewis’s contributions to semantics. In A Companion to David Lewis, Barry Loewer & Jonathan Schaffer (eds), 328–344. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1995Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2005The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2007The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2): 165–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1995The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian
1997Aspect and Predication. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
2008Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gilliam & Reiss, Charles
(eds) 2007The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Randall, Janet H.
2010Linking: The Geometry of Argument Structure [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 74]. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, Malka & Levin, Beth
1998Building verb meanings. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhem Geuder (eds), 97–134. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Richards, Marc D.
2004Object Shift and Scrambling in North and West Germanic: A Case Study in Symmetrical Syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth & Rosen, Sara Thomas
1998Delimiting events. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhem Geuder (eds), 135–164. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2000Event structure and ergativity. In Events as Grammatical Objects, Carol L. Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds), 187–238. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2005Topic or aspect: Functional heads, features and the grammaticalization of events. In Aspectual Inquiries, Paula Marie Kempchinsky & Roumyana Slabakova (eds), 21–40. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Sara Thomas
2007Structured events, structured discourse. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 181–208. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ross, John R. 1970On declarative sentences. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds), 222–272. Waltham MA: Ginn & Co.Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M.
1974Towards a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri
2015The Interaction of Focus, Givenness, and Prosody. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, Bridget
2011A minimalist program for phonology. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed.), 574–594. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
di Sciullo, Ana Maria & Williams, Edwin
1987On the Definition of Word. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elizabeth
1982The Syntax of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2011The syntax-phonology interface. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, Second Edition, John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan C.L. Yu (eds), 435–484. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Stechow, Arnim
2012Syntax and semantics: An overview. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK) 3], Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds), 2173–2223. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2004On the edge. In Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects, David Adger, Cécile De Cat & Geroge Tsoulas (eds), 259–287. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
20071…3-2. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gilliam Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 239–288. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter, Ramchand, Gillian, Starke, Michal & Taraldsen, Knut Tarald
2009Nordlyd: Tromsø Working Papers in Language and Linguistics 36(1). Special issue of Nanosyntax. Tromsø: Universitet i Tromsø.Google Scholar
Szabolcsi, Anna
(ed.) 1997Ways of Scope Taking [Studies in Linguistic and Philosophy 65]. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tenny, Carol L.
1994Aspectual Roles and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Travis, Lisa
2000Event structure in syntax. In Events as Grammatical Objects, Carol L. Tenny & James Pustejovsky (eds), 145–185. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Vanrell, M. Mar, Fernández-Soriano, Olga
2014Dialectal variation at the Prosody-Syntax interface: Evidence from Catalan and Spanish interrogatives. Proceedings of Speech Prosody , 253–282. Trinity College, Dublin.
Williams, Edwin
1981Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1: 81–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2007Dumping lexicalism. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, Gillian Ramchand & Charles Reiss (eds), 353–382. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Portner, Paul
2003Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79(1): 39–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte & Onea, Edgar
2011Focus marking and focus interpretation. Lingua 121(11): 1651–1670. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa
1998Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Bîlbîie, Gabriela
2020. A constraint-based approach to linguistic interfaces. Lingvisticae Investigationes 43:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.