Cover not available
Part of
Beyond Markedness in Formal Phonology
Edited by Bridget D. Samuels
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 241] 2017
► pp. 101–120

Chapter 5
On silent markedness

| Meertens Instituut
| Meertens Instituut, Amsterdam
Empty categories – positions in phonological representations that have no direct phonetic counterpart – are (still) controversial in phonological theory. In this paper we give the main arguments for assuming such positions and we furthermore establish a markedness hierarchy for empty positions: some of them are stronger (‘more marked’) than others, and we can derive this from a combination of Element Theory and Turbidity Theory. We illustrate our point with Italian and Dutch dialects, and point out that the phonological hierarchy of empty positions may correspond to a hierarchy of syntactic positions.
Keywords: emptiness, Turbidity Theory, Element Theory, Dutch dialects, Italian dialects, morphosyntax-phonology interface, phonology-phonetics interface
Article outline
  • 1.Empty positions in syntax
    • 1.1How to argue for silent syntactic elements
    • 1.2Taxonomies of empty elements in syntax
  • 2.Empty positions in phonology
    • 2.1Empty nuclei as limited licensers
    • 2.2Schwa as almost empty
    • 2.3The relation between emptiness on different levels
  • 3.Empirical tests
    • 3.1Silent markedness and simplex onsets
    • 3.2Silent markedness, RT and TR
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.241.05van
References (50)
References
Backley, Philip. 2011. An Introduction to Element Theory. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
. 2012. Variation in element theory. Linguistic Variation 12(1): 57–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baltin, Mark. 2012. Deletion versus pro-forms: An overly simple dichotomy? Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30(2): 381–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bendjaballah, Sabrina & Haiden, Martin. 2008. A typology of emptiness in templates. In The Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, Jutta M. Hartmann, Veronica Hegedus & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 21–57. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2015. Amphichronic explanation and the life cycle of phonological processes. In The Oxford Handbook of Historical Phonology, Patrick Honeybone & Joe C. Salmons (eds), 374–399. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cavirani, Eduardo. 2015. Modeling Phonologization. Vowel Reduction and Epenthesis in Lunigiana Dialects. Utrecht: LOT. (PhD dissertation, Leiden University and Pisa University).Google Scholar
Charette, Monik. 1990. Licence to govern. Phonology 7: 233–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Conditions on Phonological Government. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2002. Functional Structure in DP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 1. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi. 2008. The cartography of syntactic structures V. Working Papers on Language and Cognition 2: 43–59.Google Scholar
Cyran, Eugeniusz. 2008. Consonant clusters in strong and weak positions. In Lenition and Fortition, Joaquim Brandão de Carvalho, Tobias Scheer & Philippe Ségéral (eds), 447–481. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fox, Danny & Lasnik, Howard. 2003. Successive cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between Sluicing and VP Ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34:143–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goeman, A. C. M. 1999. T-deletie in nederlandse dialecten. kwantitatieve analyse van structurele, ruimtelijke en temporele variatie. PhD dissertation, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.Google Scholar
2007. De Morfologische Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialecten (MAND); Zero en bewaard gebleven morfologische informatie. Taal en tongval. Themanummer 2006(18): 66–92.Google Scholar
Goldrick, Matthew. 2000. Turbid output representations and the unity of opacity. In NELS 30, Andries Coetzee, Nancy Hall & Ji-yung Kim (eds), 231–245. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Goossens, Jan. 1977. Inleiding tot de Nederlandse dialectologie. Groningen: Wolters Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View From Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, John. 1994. English Sound Structure. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harris, J. 2009. Why final obstruent devoicing is weakening. In Strength Relations in Phonology, Kuniya Nasukawa & Phillip Backley (eds), 9–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van der Hulst, Harry G. 2000 . Features, segments and syllables in Radical CV Phonology. In Phonologica 1996: Syllables!?, John Rennison (ed.), 89–111. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Postal, Paul M. 1964. An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan. 1990. Government in Phonology: The case of Moroccan Arabic. The Linguistic Review 6: 131–159.Google Scholar
Kaye Jonathan, Lowenstamm, Jean & Vergnaud, Jean Roger. 1985. The internal structure of phonological representations: A theory of charm and government. Phonology Yearbook 2: 305–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Constituent structure and government in phonology. Phonology 7: 193–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leu, Thomas. 2008. The Internal Syntax of Determiners. PhD dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
Lohndal, Terje & Samuels, Bridget. 2013. Linearizing empty edges. In Syntax and its Limits, Raffaella Folli, Christina Sevdali & Roberts Truswell (eds), 66–79. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele. 2005–6. I dialetti dell’Appennino tosco-emiliano e il destino delle atone finali nel(l’italo-)romanzo settentrionale. L’Italia Dialettale 66–67, pp. 69–122.Google Scholar
. 2011. Syllable, segment and prosody. In The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages, Vol. I: Structures, Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds), 50–108. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Maffei Bellucci, Patrizia. 1977. Lunigiana. In Profilo dei Dialetti Italiani, Vol. 9(1), Manilo Cortelazzo (ed.). Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 2007. Phases and words. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar, Sook-Hee Choe (ed.), 191–222. Seoul: Dong In.Google Scholar
Merchant, J. 2001. The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
van Oostendorp, Marc. 2005. The first person singular in dialects of Dutch. In Proceedings of NELS, Leah Bateman & Cherlon Ussery (eds), 134–166. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
. 2007. Exceptions to final devoicing. In Voicing in Dutch [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 286], Jeroen van de Weijer & Erik Jan van der Torre (eds), 81–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Phonological and phonetic databases at the Meertens Institute. In The Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology, Jacques Durand, Ulrike Gut & Gjert Kristoffersen (eds), 546–551. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Pöchtrager, Markus A. 2006. The Structure of Length. PhD dissertation, University of Vienna.Google Scholar
Pöchtrager, Markus A. 2015. Binding in phonology. In Representing Structure in Phonology and Syntax, Henk van Riemsdijk & Marc van Oostendorp (eds), 255–275. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pöchtrager, Markus A. & Kaye, Jonathan. 2013. GP 2.0. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 51–64.Google Scholar
Revithiadou, Anthi. 2007. Colored turbid accents and containment: A case study from lexical stress. In: Freedom of Analysis?, Sylvia Blaho, Patrik Bye & Martin Krämer (eds), 149–174. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias. 2004. A Lateral Theory of Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. A Guide to Morphosyntax-Phonology Interface Theories. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur. 2010. The cartographic enterprise in syntax. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(6): 417–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Á. 2004. Meaningful silence, meaningless sounds. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 4: 235–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Á. & Maling, Joan. 2012. Silent heads. In Functional Heads, Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds), 368–378. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Eva. 2017. Morphological Length and Prosodically Defective Morphemes. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: a cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean 1996. CV as the only syllable type. Current trends in Phonology. Models and Methods, edited by Jacques Durand & Bernard Laks, 419-441. Salford, Manchester: ESRI.Google Scholar
. 2008. “On n, nP and ?”. The Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology. Hartmann J., V. Hegedus & H. van Riemsdjik eds. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Cavirani, Edoardo
2022. Silent lateral actors: the role of unpronounced nuclei in morpho-phonological analyses. The Linguistic Review 39:4 ► pp. 615 ff. DOI logo
Köhnlein, Björn
2018. A morpheme-based approach to subtractive pluralisation in German dialects. Phonology 35:4 ► pp. 617 ff. DOI logo
Köhnlein, Björn
2023. Back‐Formations and Subtractive Morphology. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.