Chapter 6
The phonetic salience of phonological head-dependent structure in a modulated-carrier model of speech
In terms of the roles of heads and dependents, there is a mismatch between phonology and syntax. In phonology, heads are important in both structural and informational terms. In syntax, on the other hand, heads have a different function: syntactic heads, like phonological heads, have an important structural role because they license dependent structure, but unlike phonological heads their informational role is relatively unimportant because they usually bear less linguistic (e.g. lexical) information than dependents. In order to achieve a greater degree of uniformity between phonology and syntax, this chapter proposes a reassessment of the roles of heads and dependents in phonology. Contrary to the widespread view, it is argued that heads in phonology, like those in syntax, are structurally important but lexically unimportant whereas dependents are structurally unimportant but lexically important. This view is supported not only by segmental distribution patterns but also by the size of the modulated carrier signal (rather than by the more standard phonetic measure, the sonority scale).
Article outline
- 1.Segmental and structural markedness
-
2.Syntactic structure and its phonetic realisation
-
3.Defining the notion of prominence
- 3.1The sonority scale
- 3.2The modulated carrier-signal
-
3.3Head-dependent relations between syllable constituents
- 4.Phonological structure
- 4.1Head-dependent structure in phonology
-
4.2Head-dependency relations in the foot
- 4.3Redefining head-dependency relations in the foot
-
4.4Redefining head-dependency relations in the rhyme, the nucleus and the onset
- 5.Phonological structure: melody
- 5.1Head-dependent relations in intra-segmental structure
- 5.2More complex melodic compounds
-
6.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgments
-
Notes
-
References
References (51)
Abney, Steven P.
1987 The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. Cambridge, MA: MIT Department of Linguistics and Philosphy.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, John & Ewen, Colin
1987 Principles of Dependency Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Backley, Phillip
2011 An Introduction to Element Theory. Edinburgh: EUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Backley, Phillip & Nasukawa, Kuniya
2009 Representing labials and velars: A single ‘dark’ element.
Phonological Studies 12: 3‒10.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Backley, Phillip & Nasukawa, Kuniya
2010 Consonant-vowel unity in Element Theory.
Phonological Studies 13: 21‒28.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, Laurie
2004 Adjectives, compounds and words.
Nordic Journal of English Studies 3(1): 7–22.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bauer, Laurie
2008 Exocentric compounds.
Morphology 18: 51–74.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bromberger, Sylvain & Halle, Morris
1989 Why phonology is different.
Linguistic Inquiry 20: 51‒70.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris
1968 The Sound Pattern of English. New York NY: Harper & Row.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, Guglielmo
1993 A null theory of phrase and compound stress.
Linguistic Inquiry 24: 239‒297.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ewen, Colin J. & Botma, Bert
2009 Against rhymal adjuncts: the syllabic affiliation of English postvocalic consonants. In
Strength Relations in Phonology,
Kuniya Nasukawa &
Phillip Backley (eds), 221‒250. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldsmith, John A.
1990 Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, John
1990 Segmental complexity and phonological government.
Phonology 7(2): 255–300.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, John
1994 English Sound Structure. Oxford: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, John
2005 Vowel reduction as information loss. In
Headhood, Elements, Specification and Contrastivity [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 259],
Philip Carr,
Jacques Durand &
Colin J. Ewen (eds), 119–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, John
2006 The phonology of being understood: Further arguments against sonority.
Lingua 116(10): 1483‒1494.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, John
2009 Why final devoicing is weakening. In
Strength Relations in Phonology,
Kuniya Nasukawa &
Phillip Backley (eds), 9‒46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter,
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, John
2012 Lenition [Intensive Lecture Series]. Sendai: The Graduate School of Tohoku Gakuin University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, John & Lindsey, Geoff
1995 The elements of phonological representation. In
Frontiers of Phonology: Atoms, Structures, Derivations,
Jacques Durand &
Francis Katamba (eds), 34‒79. Harlow: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harris, John & Lindsey, Geoff
2000 Vowel patterns in mind and sound. In
Phonological Knowledge: Conceptual and Empirical Issues,
Noel Burton-Roberts,
Philip Carr &
Gerry Docherty (eds), 185–205. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hayes, Bruce
1995 Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hauser, Marc, Chomsky, Noam & Fitch, W. Tecumseh
2002 The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298: 1569–1579.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hogg, Richard & McCully, Christopher B.
1987 Metrical Phonology: A Coursebook. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hume, Elizabeth
2008 Markedness and the language user.
Phonological Studies 11: 295–310.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van der Hulst, Harry
1995 Radical CV Phonology: The categorical gesture. In
Frontiers of Phonology: Atoms, Structures, Derivations,
Jacques Durand &
Francis Katamba (eds), 80‒116. Harlow: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van der Hulst, Harry
2011 Dependency-based phonologies. In
The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 2nd edn,
John A. Goldsmith,
Allan C. L. Yu &
Jason Riggle (eds), 533–570. Oxford: Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ito, Junko
1986 Syllable Theory in Prosodic Phonology. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray
1975 Morphological and semantic regularities in the lexicon.
Language 51: 639–671.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaye, Jonathan
1990 ‘Coda’ licensing.
Phonology 7(2): 301–330.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaye, Jonathan
1992 Do you believe in magic? The story of s+C sequences.
SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 2: 293–313.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaye, Jonathan
1995 Derivations and Interfaces. In
Frontiers of Phonology: Atoms, Structures, Derivations,
Jacques Durand &
Francis Katamba (eds), 289‒332. Harlow: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaye, Jonathan, Lowenstamm, Jean & Vergnaud, Jean-Roger
1990 Constituent structure and government in phonology.
Phonology 7: 193–231.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liberman, Mark & Prince, Alan
1977 On stress and linguistic thythm.
Linguistic Inquiry 8: 249‒336.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nasukawa, Kuniya
2012 Recursion in intra-morphemic phonology. Paper presented at Workshop: Language and the Brain. The 9th International Conference on the Evolution of Language (Evolang IX), Kyoto, Japan, 13 March.
Nasukawa, Kuniya
2014 Features and recursive structure.
Special issue on Features,
Martin Krämer,
Sandra-Iulia Ronai &
Peter Svenonius (eds).
Nordlyd 41(1): 1‒19.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nasukawa, Kuniya
2015 Recursion in the lexical structure of morphemes. In
Representing Structure in Phonology and Syntax,
Marc van Oostendorp &
Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 211‒238. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nasukawa, Kuniya
2016 A precedence-free approach to (de-)palatalisation in Japanese.
Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1(1): 9. 1–21.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nasukawa, Kuniya & Backley, Phillip
2008 Affrication as a performance device.
Phonological Studies 11: 35‒46.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nasukawa, Kuniya & Backley, Phillip
2015a Heads and complements in phonology: A case of role reversal? Phonological Studies 18: 67‒74.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nasukawa, Kuniya & Backley, Phillip
2015b Syllables without constituents: Towards melody-prosody integration. Paper presented at the Workshop “Around the syllable: phonetics, phonology and acquisition”, University of Poitiers, France, 13 November.
Nasukawa, Kuniya & Backley, Phillip
2016 Recursion in element-based prosodic structure. Paper presented at Workshop: Recursion in Phonology. Tohoku Gakuin University, Sendai, Japan, 1 September.
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene
1986 Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ohala, John J.
1992 Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints.
CLS 26: Papers from the Parasession on the Syllable,
Michael Ziolkowsky,
Manuela Noske &
Karen Deaton (eds), 319–338. Chicago IL: CLS.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ohala, John J. & Kawasaki-Fukumori, Haruko
1997 Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints. In
Language and its Ecology: Essays in Memory of Einar Haugen [Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 100],
Stig Eliasson &
Ernst Hakon Jahr (eds), 343‒365. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ritter, Nancy
2003 On the logical order of development in acquiring prosodic structure. In
Living on the Edge. 28 Papers in Honour of Jonathan Kaye,
Stefan Ploch (ed.), 29‒54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scheer, Tobias
2004 A Lateral Theory of Phonology: What Is CVCV and Why Should It Be? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, Elizabeth O.
1978 On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. In
Nordic Prosody II,
Thorstein Fretheim (ed.), 111‒140. Trondheim: Tapir.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, Elizabeth O.
1980 The role of prosodic categories in English word stress.
Linguistic Inquiry 11: 563–605.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Takahashi, Toyomi
2009 Identity avoidance in the onset. In
Identity Relations in Grammar,
Kuniya Nasukawa &
Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 101‒120. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traunmüller, Hartmut
1994 Conventional, biological, and environmental factors in speech communication: A modulation theory.
Phonetica 51: 170‒183.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traunmüller, Hartmut
2005 Speech considered as modulated voice. Ms, University of Stockholm.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Nasukawa, Kuniya
2020.
Lexicalising phonological structure in morphemes.
Acta Linguistica Academica 67:1
► pp. 29 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.