Chapter published in:
Beyond Markedness in Formal Phonology
Edited by Bridget D. Samuels
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 241] 2017
► pp. 153190
References

References

Blevins, Juliette
1995The syllable in phonological theory. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, John A. Goldsmith (ed.), 206–244. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2004Evolutionary Phonology. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul
1999Functional Phonology. The Hague: HAG. (PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam).Google Scholar
Breen, Gavan & Pensalfini, Rob
1999Arrernte: A language with no syllable onsets. Linguistic Inquiry 30:1–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea
1988Towards a Theory of Phonological Alphabets. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
1995A constraint-based theory of phonological markedness and simplification procedures. Linguistic Inquiry. 26: 373–463.Google Scholar
2005Markedness and Economy in a Derivational Model of Phonology. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Charette, Monik
1990License to govern. Phonology. 7: 233–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991Conditions on Phonological Government. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992Polish and Mongolian meet government licensing. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 2: 275–291.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1964Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1986Knowledge of Language. New York NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris
1968The Sound Pattern of English. New York NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clements, George N.
1986Compensatory lengthening in Luganda. In Studies in Compensatory Lengthening, Leo Wetzels & Engin Sezer (eds), 37–76. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Clements, George N. & Keyser, Samuel Jay
1983CV Phonology: A Generative Theory of the Syllable. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Côte, Marie-Hélène
2011Final consonants. In Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds). Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cover, Thomas M., Gács, Peter & Grey, Robert M.
1989Kolmogorov’s contributions to information theory and algorithmic complexity. Annals of Probability Theory 17: 840–865. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cullicover, Peter W.
2013Grammar and Complexity: Language at the Intersection of Competence and Performance. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cyran, Eugeniusz & Gussmann, Edmund
1999Consonant clusters and governing relations. In The Syllable: Views and Facts [Studies in Generative Grammar 45], Harry van der Hulst & Nancy A. Ritter (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Lacy, Paul
2006Markedness: Reduction and Preservation in Phonology. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Demuth, Katherine
1995Markedness and the development of prosodic structure. In Proceedings of NELS 25, Jill N. Beckman (ed.). Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Dresher, B. Elan
2011The Contrastivity Hierarchy in Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fikkert, Paula
1994On the Acquisition of Prosodic Structure. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Fudge, Erik C.
1967The nature of phonological primes. Journal of Linguistics 3: 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallon, Nicola, Harris, John & van der Lely, Heather K.
2007Non-word repetition: An investigation of phonological complexity in children with Grammatical SLI. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 21: 435–455. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gnanadesikan, Amalia E.
1995Markedness and Faithfulness Constraints in Child Phonology. Ms, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Grünwald, Peter
1996A minimum description length approach to grammar inference. In Connectionist, Statistical and Symbolic Approaches to Learning for Natural Language Processing, Stefan Wermter, Ellen Riloff & Gabriele Scheler (eds), 203–216. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gunasinghe, Hemmali
1983Gemination as a Syllable Structure Process in Modern Sinhala. Ms, University of Victoria. www​.mmduvic​.ca​/index​.php​/WPLC​/article​/download​/5491​/2099
Gurevich, Noami
2001A critique of markedness based theories in phonology. Studies in Linguisic Sciences 31(2): 89–114.Google Scholar
Hale, Morris & Reiss, Charles
2000Substance abuse and dysfunctionalism: Current trends in phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 157–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008The Phonological Enterprise. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hall, Daniel Currie
2014On substance in phonology. Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, 1–14.Google Scholar
Harris, John
1990Segmental complexity and phonological government. Phonology 7: 255–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994English Sound Structure. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harris, John & Gussmann, Edmund
2002Word-final onsets. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14: 1–42.Google Scholar
Harris, John, Gallon, Nicola & van der Lely, Heather K.
2007Prosodic complexity and processing complexity: Evidence from language impairment. Revista da Associação Brasileira de Lingüística 6: 1–19.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2006Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42(1): 25–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth
2004Deconstructing markedness: A predictability-based approach. Proceedings of BLS 30: 182–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M.
2008Universals in phonology. The Linguistic Review 25(1–2): 83–137.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan
1990‘Coda’ licensing. Phonology Yearbook 7: 301–330. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan
1992Do you believe in magic? The story of s+C sequences. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics 2: 293–313.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan D.
2005GP: I′ll have to put your flat feet on the ground. In Organizing Grammar: Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, Hans Broekhuis, Corver, Norbert, Huybregts, Riny, Kleinhenz, Ursula & Jan Koster (eds), 283–288. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kaye, Jonathan, Lowenstamm, Jean & Vergnaud, Jean Roger
1990Constituent structure and government in phonology. Phonology Yearbook 7:193–231. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Robert
2002A stress-based approach to Ponapean reduplication. WCCFL 21: 222–235.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
2013On the empirical bases of phonological typology. Paper presented at the Workshop on Phonological Typology, Oxford.
Lee, Ho-Young
1990The Structure of Korean Prosody. PhD dissertation, University College London.Google Scholar
Levelt, Clara C.
1995Unfaithful Kids: Place of Articulation Patterns in Early Vocabularies. Colloquium presented at the University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Levelt, Clara C., Schiller, Niels O. & Levelt, Willem
2000The acquisition of syllable types. Language Acquisition 8(3): 237–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean
1996CV as the only syllable type. In Current Trends in Phonology. Models and Methods, Jacques Durand & Bernard Laks (eds), 419–441. Salford: ESRI.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian
2013Syllable Structure. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Chapter 12, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/12 (9 January 2016).
Marshall, Chloe R., Harris, John & van der Lely, Heather K.
2003The nature of phonological representations in children with Grammatical-Specific Language Impairment (G-SLI). In The University of Cambridge First Postgraduate Conference in Language Research, Damien Hall, Theodore Markopoulos, Angeliki Salamoura & Sophia Skoufaki (eds), 511–517. Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Language Research.Google Scholar
Niang, Mamadou Ousmane
1997Constraints on Pulaar phonology. Lanham MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Reiss, Charles
2017Substance free phonology. In Routledge Handbook of Phonological Theory, S. J. Hannahs & Anna R. K. Bosch (eds). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Holmberg, Anders
2010Introduction: Parameters in minimalist theory. In Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory, Teresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Romani, Cristina & Calabrese, Andrea
1998Syllabic constraints in the phonological errors of an aphasic patient. Brain and Language 64: 83–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salffner, Sophie
2010Tone in the Phonology, Lexicon and Grammar of Ikaan. PhD dissertation, SOAS, University of London.Google Scholar
Samuels, Bridget
2011Phonological Architecture: A Biolinguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sanoudaki, Eirini
2007Consonant Clusters and the Acquisition of Greek. PhD dissertation. UCL – University of London.Google Scholar
Scheer, Tobias
2004A Lateral Theory of Phonology, Vol 1: What is CVCV, and Why Should it Be? Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tamburelli, Marco, Sanoudaki, Eirini, Jones, Gary & Sowinska, Michelle
2015Acceleration in the bilingual acquisition of phonological structure: Evidence from Polish-English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18(4):713–725. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Kevin
2015Naturalistic Speech Misperception. PhD dissertation, UCL – University of London.Google Scholar
Topintzi, Nina
2010Onsets: Suprasegmental and Prosodic Behaviour. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai Sergeyevich
1939Principles of Phonology. The Center for Research in Languages and Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. https://​monoskop​.org​/images​/7​/73​/Trubetzkoy​_NS​_Principles​_of​_Phonology​.pdf
Turnbull, Rory
2015Assessing the Listener-oriented Account of Predictability-based Phonetic Reduction. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Ulfsbjorninn, Shanti
2009The internal structure of compounds: A phase account of aphasia. Iberia 1(1):143–168.Google Scholar
2014A Field Theory of Stress: The Role of Empty Nuclei in Stress Systems. PhD dissertation, SOAS – University of London.Google Scholar
van der Lely, Heather K.
2005Domain-specific cognitive systems: Insight from Grammatical-SLI. Trends in the Cognitive Sciences 9: 53–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Oostendorp, Marc
1995Vowel Quality and Phonological Projection. PhD dissertation, University of Tilburg.Google Scholar
Vaux, Bert
2009The appendix. In Contemporary Views on Architecture and Representations in Phonology, Eric Raimy & Charles E. Cairns (eds), 101–143. Cambridge MA: A Bradford Book, The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar