Chapter 2
Complex NPs with third-order entity clauses
Towards a grammatical description and semantic typology
This article focuses on complex NP constructions of the form ‘determiner (+ adjective) + noun (+ complementiser) + clause’, which refer to third-order entities, defined by Lyons (1977: 443) as “such abstract entities as propositions, which are outside time and space”. Their functional structure has so far tended to be analysed in terms of one syntagmatic model, either as an appositive structure defined by the criterion that NP and clause have identical reference (e.g. Quirk et al. 1985) or as a complementation structure in which the noun is viewed as licensing the complement clause (e.g. Huddleston & Pullum 2002). I argue that, as unified descriptions, neither of these analyses can be maintained. I propose instead that these NPs divide into two distinct subtypes on the basis of different grammatical behaviour: one in which the third order entity clause is premodified by the noun and one in which it complements the head noun. Starting from this basic functional-structural division, I propose a typology that distinguishes the main semantic classes of nouns patterning with third-order entity clauses. The typology aims to capture the most important semantic distinctions between the subtypes of these complex NPs.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Main analyses in the literature
- 2.1Complex NPs with appositive clauses
- 2.2Complex NPs with noun complement clauses
- 3.Basic outline of a grammatical description
- 3.1Complex NPs with a complementation relation between noun and clause
- 3.2Complex NPs with a modification relation between noun and clause
- 3.3The main feature shared: nominalised third order entity clauses
- 4.A semantic typology of NPs with third-order entity clauses
- 4.1A semantic typology of NPs with a complementation relation between noun and clause
- 4.1.1Nouns taking presupposed complement clauses
- 4.1.2Nouns taking non-presupposed complement clauses
- 4.2A semantic typology of NPs with a modification relation between noun and clause
- 5.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References
Acuña-Fariña, Juan Carlos
1996 The Puzzle of Apposition. Santiago: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.

Acuña-Fariña, Juan Carlos
2009 Aspects of the grammar of close apposition and the structure of the noun phrase.
English Language and Linguistics 13: 453–481.


Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.

Bolinger, Dwight
1968 Entailment and the meaning of structures.
Glossa 2: 119–127.

Breban, Tine, Davidse, Kristin & Ghesquière, Lobke
2011 Types of phoric relations expressed by complex determiners in English.
Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2689–2703.


Burton-Roberts, Noel
1975 Nominal apposition.
Foundations of Language 13: 391–419.

Butler, Chris
2003 Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories [
Studies in Language Companion Series 63–64]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Davidse, Kristin
1994 Fact projection. In
Perspectives on English: Studies in Honour of Professor Emma Vorlat,
Keith Carlon,
Kristin Davidse &
Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds), 259–286. Leuven: Peeters.

Davidse, Kristin
2003 A corpus check of the factive presupposition. In
Configurations of Culture: Essays in Honour of Michael Windross,
Aline Remael &
Katja Pelsmaekers (eds), 115–126. Apeldoorn: Garant.

Declerck, Renaat
1988 Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts and Pseudo-Clefts. Leuven & Dordrecht: Leuven University Press & Foris.


Delacruz, Enrique
1976 Factives and proposition level constructions in Montague Grammar. In
Montague Grammar,
Barbara Partee (ed.), 177–199. New York, NY: Academic Press.


Donellan, Keith
1966 Reference and definite descriptions.
Philosophical Review 60: 281–304.


Francis, Gill
1993 A corpus-driven approach to grammar. In
Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair,
Mona Baker,
Gill Francis &
Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 138–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.


Gentens, Caroline
2016 The Factive-Reported Distinction in English: Representational and InterpersonalSemantics. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.

Halliday, Michael
1985 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.

Halliday, Michael
1994 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Arnold

Halliday, Michael & Hasan, Ruqaiya
1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Huddleston, Rodney
1988 Constituency, multi-functionality and grammaticalisation in Halliday’s Functional Grammar.
Journal of Linguistics 24: 137–174.


Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey
2002 The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.


Kallulli, Dalina
2010 Belief will create fact: On the relation between givenness and presupposition, and other remarks.
Theoretical Linguistics 36: 199–208.


Kiparsky, Paul & Kiparsky, Carol
1971 Fact. In
Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology,
Danny Steinberg &
Leon Jakobovits (eds), 345–369. Cambridge: CUP.

Kuno, Susumo
1970 Some properties of non-referential noun phrases. In
Studies in General and Oriental Linguistics, Presented to Shiro Hattori on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday,
Roman Jakobson &
Shigeo Kawamoto (eds), 348–373. Tokyo: TEC Corporation for Language and Educational Research.

Langacker, Ronald
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1:
Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.

Langacker, Ronald
1999 Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton.


Langacker, Ronald
1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2:
Descriptive Application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.

Lyons, John
1977 Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.

McGregor, William
1992 The place of circumstantials in systemic-functional grammar. In
Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice,
Martin Davies &
Louise Ravelli (eds), 136–149. London: Pinter.

McGregor, William
1997 Semiotic Grammar. London: Clarendon.

Nuyts, Jan
2005 The modal confusion: On terminology and the concepts behind it. In
Modality: Studies in Form and Function,
Alex Klinge &
Henrik Høeg-Müller (eds), 5–38. London: Equinox.

Palmer, Frank
1990 Modality and the English Modals. London: Longman.

Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

Sweetser, Eve
1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP.


Vandelanotte, Lieven & Davidse, Kristin
2009 The emergence and structure of be like and related quotatives: A constructional account.
Cognitive Linguistics 20: 777–807.


Van Langendonck, Willy
1994 Determiners as heads? Cognitive Linguistics 5: 243–259.


Van Langendonck, Willy
2007 Theory and Typology of Proper Names. Berlin: Mouton.


Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2007 Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy: Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton.


WB Collins WordBanks Online.
[URL]
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Gentens, Caroline
2019.
The Diachrony of the Fact That-Clauses.
English Studies 100:2
► pp. 220 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.