Part of
The Noun Phrase in English: Past and present
Edited by Alex Ho-Cheong Leung and Wim van der Wurff
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 246] 2018
► pp. 1146
Acuña-Fariña, Juan Carlos
1996The Puzzle of Apposition. Santiago: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
2009Aspects of the grammar of close apposition and the structure of the noun phrase. English Language and Linguistics 13: 453–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1968Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa 2: 119–127.Google Scholar
Breban, Tine, Davidse, Kristin & Ghesquière, Lobke
2011Types of phoric relations expressed by complex determiners in English. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2689–2703. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel
1975Nominal apposition. Foundations of Language 13: 391–419.Google Scholar
Butler, Chris
2003Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories [Studies in Language Companion Series 63–64]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin
1994Fact projection. In Perspectives on English: Studies in Honour of Professor Emma Vorlat, Keith Carlon, Kristin Davidse & Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds), 259–286. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
2003A corpus check of the factive presupposition. In Configurations of Culture: Essays in Honour of Michael Windross, Aline Remael & Katja Pelsmaekers (eds), 115–126. Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
Davies, Eirian
2001Propositional attitudes. Functions of Language 8: 217–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
1988Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts and Pseudo-Clefts. Leuven & Dordrecht: Leuven University Press & Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delacruz, Enrique
1976Factives and proposition level constructions in Montague Grammar. In Montague Grammar, Barbara Partee (ed.), 177–199. New York, NY: Academic Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donellan, Keith
1966Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 60: 281–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francis, Gill
1993A corpus-driven approach to grammar. In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 138–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentens, Caroline
2016The Factive-Reported Distinction in English: Representational and InterpersonalSemantics. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael
1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: ArnoldGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael & Hasan, Ruqaiya
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney
1988Constituency, multi-functionality and grammaticalisation in Halliday’s Functional Grammar. Journal of Linguistics 24: 137–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kallulli, Dalina
2010Belief will create fact: On the relation between givenness and presupposition, and other remarks. Theoretical Linguistics 36: 199–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul & Kiparsky, Carol
1971Fact. In Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology, Danny Steinberg & Leon Jakobovits (eds), 345–369. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumo
1970Some properties of non-referential noun phrases. In Studies in General and Oriental Linguistics, Presented to Shiro Hattori on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday, Roman Jakobson & Shigeo Kawamoto (eds), 348–373. Tokyo: TEC Corporation for Language and Educational Research.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1999Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Martin, James
1992English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGregor, William
1992 The place of circumstantials in systemic-functional grammar. In Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice, Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds), 136–149. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1997Semiotic Grammar. London: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2005The modal confusion: On terminology and the concepts behind it. In Modality: Studies in Form and Function, Alex Klinge & Henrik Høeg-Müller (eds), 5–38. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank
1990Modality and the English Modals. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen
1992The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information-status. In Discourse Description: Diverse Analyses of a Fund-raising Text [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16], Sandra Thompson & William Mann (eds), 295–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven & Davidse, Kristin
2009The emergence and structure of be like and related quotatives: A constructional account. Cognitive Linguistics 20: 777–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Langendonck, Willy
1994Determiners as heads? Cognitive Linguistics 5: 243–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Theory and Typology of Proper Names. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2007Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy: Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
WB Collins WordBanks Online. [URL]
Wierzbicka, Anna
1988The Semantics of Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Gentens, Caroline
2019. The Diachrony of the Fact That-Clauses. English Studies 100:2  pp. 220 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.