Chapter published in:
The Noun Phrase in English: Past and present
Edited by Alex Ho-Cheong Leung and Wim van der Wurff
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 246] 2018
► pp. 1146
References

References

Acuña-Fariña, Juan Carlos
1996The Puzzle of Apposition. Santiago: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
2009Aspects of the grammar of close apposition and the structure of the noun phrase. English Language and Linguistics 13: 453–481. Crossref link
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Bolinger, Dwight
1968Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa 2: 119–127.
Breban, Tine, Davidse, Kristin & Ghesquière, Lobke
2011Types of phoric relations expressed by complex determiners in English. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2689–2703. Crossref link
Burton-Roberts, Noel
1975Nominal apposition. Foundations of Language 13: 391–419.
Butler, Chris
2003Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories [Studies in Language Companion Series 63–64]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Davidse, Kristin
1994Fact projection. In Perspectives on English: Studies in Honour of Professor Emma Vorlat, Keith Carlon, Kristin Davidse & Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds), 259–286. Leuven: Peeters.
2003A corpus check of the factive presupposition. In Configurations of Culture: Essays in Honour of Michael Windross, Aline Remael & Katja Pelsmaekers (eds), 115–126. Apeldoorn: Garant.
Davies, Eirian
2001Propositional attitudes. Functions of Language 8: 217–251. Crossref link
Declerck, Renaat
1988Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts and Pseudo-Clefts. Leuven & Dordrecht: Leuven University Press & Foris. Crossref link
Delacruz, Enrique
1976Factives and proposition level constructions in Montague Grammar. In Montague Grammar, Barbara Partee (ed.), 177–199. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Donellan, Keith
1966Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 60: 281–304. Crossref link
Francis, Gill
1993A corpus-driven approach to grammar. In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 138–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Gentens, Caroline
2016The Factive-Reported Distinction in English: Representational and InterpersonalSemantics. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.
Halliday, Michael
1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: Arnold
Halliday, Michael & Hasan, Ruqaiya
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Huddleston, Rodney
1988Constituency, multi-functionality and grammaticalisation in Halliday’s Functional Grammar. Journal of Linguistics 24: 137–174. Crossref link
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.
Kallulli, Dalina
2010Belief will create fact: On the relation between givenness and presupposition, and other remarks. Theoretical Linguistics 36: 199–208. Crossref link
Kiparsky, Paul & Kiparsky, Carol
1971Fact. In Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology, Danny Steinberg & Leon Jakobovits (eds), 345–369. Cambridge: CUP.
Kuno, Susumo
1970Some properties of non-referential noun phrases. In Studies in General and Oriental Linguistics, Presented to Shiro Hattori on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday, Roman Jakobson & Shigeo Kawamoto (eds), 348–373. Tokyo: TEC Corporation for Language and Educational Research.
Langacker, Ronald
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
1999Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton.
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.
Martin, James
1992English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
McGregor, William
1992 The place of circumstantials in systemic-functional grammar. In Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice, Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds), 136–149. London: Pinter.
1997Semiotic Grammar. London: Clarendon.
Nuyts, Jan
2005The modal confusion: On terminology and the concepts behind it. In Modality: Studies in Form and Function, Alex Klinge & Henrik Høeg-Müller (eds), 5–38. London: Equinox.
Palmer, Frank
1990Modality and the English Modals. London: Longman.
Prince, Ellen
1992The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information-status. In Discourse Description: Diverse Analyses of a Fund-raising Text [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16], Sandra Thompson & William Mann (eds), 295–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Sweetser, Eve
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
Vandelanotte, Lieven & Davidse, Kristin
2009The emergence and structure of be like and related quotatives: A constructional account. Cognitive Linguistics 20: 777–807. Crossref link
Van Langendonck, Willy
1994Determiners as heads? Cognitive Linguistics 5: 243–259. Crossref link
1999Neurolinguistic and syntactic evidence for basic level meaning in proper names. Functions of Language 6: 95–138. Crossref link
2007Theory and Typology of Proper Names. Berlin: Mouton. Crossref link
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2007Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy: Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton. Crossref link
Wierzbicka, Anna
1988The Semantics of Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Gentens, Caroline
2019. The Diachrony of the Fact That-Clauses. English Studies 100:2  pp. 220 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.