Part of
The Noun Phrase in English: Past and present
Edited by Alex Ho-Cheong Leung and Wim van der Wurff
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 246] 2018
► pp. 1146
Acuña-Fariña, Juan Carlos
1996The Puzzle of Apposition. Santiago: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
2009Aspects of the grammar of close apposition and the structure of the noun phrase. English Language and Linguistics 13: 453–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1968Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa 2: 119–127.Google Scholar
Breban, Tine, Davidse, Kristin & Ghesquière, Lobke
2011Types of phoric relations expressed by complex determiners in English. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2689–2703. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel
1975Nominal apposition. Foundations of Language 13: 391–419.Google Scholar
Butler, Chris
2003Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories [Studies in Language Companion Series 63–64]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Davidse, Kristin
1994Fact projection. In Perspectives on English: Studies in Honour of Professor Emma Vorlat, Keith Carlon, Kristin Davidse & Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds), 259–286. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
2003A corpus check of the factive presupposition. In Configurations of Culture: Essays in Honour of Michael Windross, Aline Remael & Katja Pelsmaekers (eds), 115–126. Apeldoorn: Garant.Google Scholar
Davies, Eirian
2001Propositional attitudes. Functions of Language 8: 217–251. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
1988Studies on Copular Sentences, Clefts and Pseudo-Clefts. Leuven & Dordrecht: Leuven University Press & Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Delacruz, Enrique
1976Factives and proposition level constructions in Montague Grammar. In Montague Grammar, Barbara Partee (ed.), 177–199. New York, NY: Academic Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Donellan, Keith
1966Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 60: 281–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Francis, Gill
1993A corpus-driven approach to grammar. In Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair, Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds), 138–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gentens, Caroline
2016The Factive-Reported Distinction in English: Representational and InterpersonalSemantics. PhD dissertation, University of Leuven.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael
1985An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1994An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 2nd edn. London: ArnoldGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael & Hasan, Ruqaiya
1976Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney
1988Constituency, multi-functionality and grammaticalisation in Halliday’s Functional Grammar. Journal of Linguistics 24: 137–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kallulli, Dalina
2010Belief will create fact: On the relation between givenness and presupposition, and other remarks. Theoretical Linguistics 36: 199–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul & Kiparsky, Carol
1971Fact. In Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader in Philosophy, Linguistics and Psychology, Danny Steinberg & Leon Jakobovits (eds), 345–369. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumo
1970Some properties of non-referential noun phrases. In Studies in General and Oriental Linguistics, Presented to Shiro Hattori on the Occasion of his Sixtieth Birthday, Roman Jakobson & Shigeo Kawamoto (eds), 348–373. Tokyo: TEC Corporation for Language and Educational Research.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1999Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977Semantics. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Martin, James
1992English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGregor, William
1992 The place of circumstantials in systemic-functional grammar. In Advances in Systemic Linguistics: Recent Theory and Practice, Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds), 136–149. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
1997Semiotic Grammar. London: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Nuyts, Jan
2005The modal confusion: On terminology and the concepts behind it. In Modality: Studies in Form and Function, Alex Klinge & Henrik Høeg-Müller (eds), 5–38. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank
1990Modality and the English Modals. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Prince, Ellen
1992The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information-status. In Discourse Description: Diverse Analyses of a Fund-raising Text [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 16], Sandra Thompson & William Mann (eds), 295–325. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
1990From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven & Davidse, Kristin
2009The emergence and structure of be like and related quotatives: A constructional account. Cognitive Linguistics 20: 777–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Langendonck, Willy
1994Determiners as heads? Cognitive Linguistics 5: 243–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007Theory and Typology of Proper Names. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe
2007Rethinking the Coordinate-Subordinate Dichotomy: Interpersonal Grammar and the Analysis of Adverbial Clauses in English. Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
WB Collins WordBanks Online. [URL]
Wierzbicka, Anna
1988The Semantics of Grammar [Studies in Language Companion Series 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Gentens, Caroline
2019. The Diachrony of the Fact That-Clauses. English Studies 100:2  pp. 220 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.