Chapter 6
Anaphoric reference in Early Modern English
The case of said and same
Work on the anaphoric NPs the said + N and the same has shown that both were frequent in sixteenth-century English but declined afterwards. We address the question why this happened. After reviewing earlier work on the two constructions, we present data showing that their properties and development are too dissimilar to assume that they declined for the same reason. Instead, we identify for each of the changes two separate causal factors, which involve tension between form and meaning of the anaphor. In exploring these case histories, we also offer some discussion of the general kinds of explanations that have been proposed for the decline of linguistic forms and constructions, which is an aspect of language change that deserves more systematic investigation.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1
Background to the said + N
- 2.2
Background to the same
- 3.Further data: Frequency and distance
- 3.1The frequency of said and same in EModE: Methodology
- 3.2The frequency of said and same in EModE: Results
- 3.3The distance of said and same in EModE
- 4.The decline of said and same
: Causation
- 4.1The decline of said
: Wrong word, wrong place
- 4.2The decline of same
: Too costly, too long
- 5.Conclusion
-
Acknowledgements
-
Notes
-
References
References (112)
Alrenga, Peter
2006 Scalar (non-)identity and similarity. In
Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics,
Donald Baumer,
David Montero &
Michael Scanlon (eds), 49–57. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ariel, Mira
1990 Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ariel, Mira
1994 Interpreting anaphoric expressions: a cognitive versus a pragmatic approach.
Journal of Linguistics 30: 3–42.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ariel, Mira
2004 Accessibility marking: Discourse functions, discourse profiles, and processing cues.
Discourse Processes 37: 91–116.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ariel, Mira
2008 Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beaver, David I. & Clark, Brady Z.
2008,
Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
BNC:
British National Corpus.
Davies, Mark 2004-
BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press).
[URL]
Bolinger, Dwight
1967 Adjectives in English: Attribution and predication.
Lingua 18: 1–34.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Breban, Tine
2010a English Adjectives of Comparison: Lexical and Grammaticalized Uses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Breban, Tine
2010b Reconstructing paths of secondary grammaticalisation of same from emphasising to phoricity and single-referent-marking postdeterminer uses.
Transactions of the Philological Society 108: 68–87.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Breban, Tine
2012 Functional shifts and the development of English determiners. In
Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English,
Anneli Meurman-Solin,
María J. López-Couso &
Bettelou Los (eds), 271–300. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Breban, Tine
2014 What is secondary grammaticalization? Trying to see the wood for the trees in a confusion of interpretations.
Folia Linguistica 48: 469–502.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brie, Friedrich W. D.
1906–1908 The Brut or The Chronicles of England,
Edited from Ms. Rawl. B 171, Bodleian Library, 2 vols [
Early English Text Society, O.S. 131, 136]. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2005 Lexicalization and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Britain, David
2002 Space and spatial diffusion. In
The Handbook of Language Variation and Change,
Jack K. Chambers,
Peter Trudgill &
Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds), 603–637. Oxford: Blackwell.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Büring, Daniel
2005 Binding Theory. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burnley, David
1992 Lexis and semantics. In
The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 2: 1066–1476,
Norman Blake (ed.), 409–499. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan
2015 Language Change. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan & Pagliuca, William
1985 Cross-linguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. In
Historical Semantics – Historical Word-Formation,
Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 59–83. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Campbell, Lyle
2001 What’s wrong with grammaticalization? Language Sciences 23: 113–161.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
1980 On binding.
Linguistic Inquiry 11: 1–46.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christiansen, Morten H. & Chater, Nick
2016 The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Claridge, Claudia
2012 Linguistic levels: Styles, registers, genres, text types. In
English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. 1,
Alexander Bergs &
Laurel Brinton (eds), 237–253. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cornish, Francis
1999 Anaphora, Discourse, and Understanding. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Smet, Hendrik
2014 Does innovation need reanalysis? In
Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change [
Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 69],
Evie Coussé &
Ferdinand von Mengden (eds), 23–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Smet, Hendrik & Fischer, Olga C. M.
2017 The role of analogy in language change: Supporting constructions. In
The Changing English Language: Psycholinguistic Perspectives,
Marianne Hundt,
Sandra Mollin &
Simone E. Pfenninger (eds), 240–268. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Smet, Hendrik & Heyvaert, Liesbet
2010 The meaning of the English present participle.
English Language and Linguistics 15: 473–498.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Durkin, Philip & Allan, Kathryn
EEBO
Early English Books Online.
[URL]
Filipović, Luna & Hawkins, John
2016 English article usage as a window on the meanings of same, identical and similar
.
English Language and Linguistics 20: 295–313.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, Olga C. M.
2006 On the position of adjectives in Middle English.
English Language and Linguistics 10: 253–288.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, Olga C. M., De Smet, Hendrik & van der Wurff, Wim
2017 A Brief History of English Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fitzmaurice, Susan, Alexander, Marc, Pidd, Michael, Robinson, Justyna, Dallachy, Fraser, Hine, Iona, Mehl, Seth, Aitken, Brian, Groves, Matthew & Rogers, Katherine
2016 Linguistic DNA: Modelling concepts and semantic change in English, 1500–1800. Paper presented at Digital Humanities 2016 Conference, Kraków, July 2016. Abstract available online at
[URL]
Fox, Barbara A.
1987 Discourse Structure and Anaphora: Written and Conversational English. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fries, Udo
1994 Text deixis in Early Modern English. In
Studies in Early Modern English,
Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), 111–128. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Garner, Bryan
2011 Garner’s Dictionary of Legal Usage, 3rd edn. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, Talmy
1992 The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions.
Linguistics 30: 5–55.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grossmann, James
2012 Contribution to internet forum, posted on 22 June 2012, 2:58, on the topic ‘Can the word “said” be a determiner in written English?’.
[URL]
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron
1993 Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse.
Language 69: 274–307.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron
Haas, Florian
2009 Reciprocity in English: Historical Development and Synchronic Structure. London: Routledge.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Hasan, Ruqaiya
1976 Cohesion in English. Harlow: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin
2004 Explaining the ditransitive person-role constraint: A usage-based account.
Constructions 2.
[URL].
Haspelmath, Martin
2009 Lexical borrowing: Concepts and issues. In
Loanwords in the World’s Languages: A Comparative Handbook,
Martin Haspelmath &
Uri Tadmor (eds), 35–54. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2002 World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
2005 Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd & Reh, Mechthild
1984 Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd & Song, Kyung-an
2011 On the grammaticalization of personal pronouns.
Journal of Linguistics 47: 587–630.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoekstra, Eric & Slofstra, Bouke
2013 A diachronic study of the negative polarity item syn leven ‘his life > ever’ in West Frisian between 1550 and 1800.
Language 89(4): e39–e55.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, Yan
2000 Anaphora: A Cross-Linguistic Study. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hundt, Marianne
2014 The demise of the being to V construction.
Transactions of the Philological Society 112: 167–187.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Juge, Matthew L.
2007 Metaphor and teleology do not drive grammaticalization. In
Historical Linguistics 2005: Selected papers from the 17th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Madison, Wisconsin, 31 July – 5 August 2005 [
Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 284],
Joseph C. Salmons &
Shannon Dubenion-Smith (eds), 33–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keenan, Edward
2002 Explaining the creation of reflexive pronouns in English. In
Studies in the History of the English Language: A Millennial Perspective,
Donka Minkova &
Robert Stockwell (eds), 325–354. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kibrik, Andrej A.
2011 Reference in Discourse. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kilpiö, Matti
1997 Participial adjectives with anaphoric reference of the type the said, the (a)forementioned from Old to Early Modern English: The evidence of the Helsinki Corpus. In
Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen [
Mémoires de la Société Linguistique de Helsinki 52],
Terttu Nevalainen &
Lena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds), 77–100. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
König, Ekkehard & Siemund, Peter
Komen, Erwin R.
2011 Average referential distance. MS, Radboud University Nijmegen.
[URL].
Koopman, Willem & van der Wurff, Wim
Kroch, Anthony
1989 Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change.
Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kroch, Anthony
1994 Morphosyntactic variation. In
Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society: Parasession on Variation and Linguistic Theory,
Katharine Beals (ed.), 180–201. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kytö, Merja
2010 Data in historical pragmatics. In
Historical Pragmatics [
Handbooks of Pragmatics 8],
Andreas Jucker &
Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 33–67. Berlin: De Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laitinen, Mikko
2008 Sociolinguistic patterns in grammaticalization: He, they, and those in human indefinite reference.
Language Variation and Change 20: 155–185.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W.
2010 A lot of quantifiers. In
Empirical and Experimental Methods in Cognitive/Functional Research,
Sally Rice &
John Newman (eds), 41–57. Stanford CA: CSLI.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Barbara
2008 Asymmetries in participial modification. In
Asymmetric Events [
Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 11],
Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (ed.), 261–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, David
1990 Obsolescence and universal grammar. In
Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics [
Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 65],
Sylvia M. Adamson,
Vivien A. Law,
Nigel Vincent &
Susan Wright (eds), 281–292. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Linguistic DNA
A collaborative research project of the universities of Sheffield, Glasgow and Sussex on semantic-conceptual change in English 1500–1800.
[URL]
Matras, Yaron
2007 The borrowability of grammatical categories. In
Grammatical Borrowing in Cross-Linguistic Perspective,
Yaron Matras &
Jeanette S. Sakel (eds), 31–73. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matthews, Peter H.
2014 The Positions of Adjectives in English. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Matushansky, Ora
2010
Same problem, different solution. MS, University of Utrecht.
[URL]
MED
Middle English Dictionary.
[URL]
Mellinkoff, David
1963 The Language of the Law. Boston MA: Little, Brown & Co.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miller, George A., Newman, E. B. & Friedman, E. A.
1958 Length-frequency statistics for written English.
Information and Control 1: 370–389.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mind Bending Grammars
Research project at the University of Antwerp on change in the grammars of 17th-century individuals.
[URL]
Mortelmans, Jesse
2006
Ledit vs le démonstratif en moyen français: Quels contextes d’emploi ? Langue française 152(4): 70–81.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevalainen, Terttu
1999 The facts and nothing but: The (non-)grammaticalisation of negative exclusives in English. In
Negation in the History of English,
Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade,
Gunnel Tottie &
Wim van der Wurff (eds), 167–187. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevalainen, Terttu
2014 Norms and usage in seventeenth-century English. In
Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600–1900: A Sociolinguistic and Comparative Perspective [
Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics 3],
Gijsbert Rutten,
Rik Vosters &
Wim Vandenbussche (eds), 103–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena
1994
Its strength and the beauty of it: The standardization of the third person neuter possessive in Early Modern English. In
Towards a Standard English, 1600–1800,
Dieter Stein &
Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds), 171–216. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
OED
Oxford English Dictionary.
[URL]
Österman, Aune
2001 “Where your Treasure is, There is your Heart”: A Corpus-Based Study of There
Compounds and There/Where
Subordinators in the History of English [
Memoires de la Société Néophilologique de Helsinki 59]. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Petré, Peter & Van de Velde, Freek
2015 Differences and similarities between individuals in ongoing grammaticalisation. Paper presented at International Conference on Historical Linguistics 22, Naples, July 2015.
[URL]
Pollard, Carl & Sag, Ivan A.
1992 Anaphors in English and the scope of binding theory.
Linguistic Inquiry 23: 261–303.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Postma, Gertjan
2010 The impact of failed changes. In
Continuity and Change in Grammar [
Linguistik Aktuesll/Linguistics Today 159],
Christopher Lucas,
Sheila Watts,
Anne Breitbarth &
David Willis (eds), 269–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, Ellen
1981 Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In
Radical Pragmatics,
Peter Cole (ed.), 223–255. New York NY: Academic Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Geoffrey, Leech & Svartvik, Jan
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Radden, Günter & Dirven, René
Reinhart, Tanja & Reuland, Eric
1993 Reflexivity.
Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657–720.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rissanen, Matti
1999 Syntax. In
Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. 3: 1476–1776,
Roger Lass (ed.), 187–331. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ritt, Nikolaus
2004 Selfish Sounds and Linguistic Evolution: A Darwinian Approach to Language Change. Cambridge: CUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, Ian
2007 Diachronic Syntax. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rooth, Mats
1992 A theory of focus interpretation.
Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Scotto di Carlo, Giuseppina
2015 Diachronic and Synchronic Aspects of Legal English: Past, Present, and Possible Future of Legal English. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sinar, Beck
2006 A History of English Reflexives: From Old English into Early Modern English. PhD dissertation, University of York.
[URL]
Sleeman, Petra
2011 Verbal and adjectival participles: Position and internal structure.
Lingua 121: 1569–1587.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, Andrew, Trousdale, Graeme & Waltereit, Richard
Tiersma, Peter M.
1999 Legal Language. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2010 Dialogic contexts as motivations for syntactic change. In
Variation and Change in English Grammar and Lexicon,
Robert A. Cloutier,
Anne Marie Hamilton-Brehm &
William Kretzschmar (eds), 11–27. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013 Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vartiainen, Turo
2016 A constructionist approach to category change: Constraining factors in the adjectivization of participles.
Journal of English Linguistics 44: 34–60.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Warner, Anthony
1997 The structure of parametric change, and V-movement in the history of English. In
Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change,
Ans van Kemenade &
Nigel Vincent (eds), 380–393. Cambridge: CUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wichmann, Anne
2011 Grammaticalization and prosody. In
The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization,
Heiko Narrog &
Bernd Heine (eds), 331–341. Oxford: OUP.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zenner, Eline, Speelman, Dirk & Geeraerts, Dirk
Cited by (2)
Cited by 2 other publications
Pinson, Mathilde
2023.
Decompositionalization and Partial Recompositionalization: The Emergence of by the Same Token as a Polyfunctional Discourse Marker.
Journal of English Linguistics 51:3
► pp. 236 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Kranich, Svenja & Tine Breban
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.