Part of
Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages
Edited by Annika Hübl and Markus Steinbach
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 247] 2018
► pp. 1540
Allen, G. D., Wilbur, R. B. & Schick, B.
1991Aspects of rhythm in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 72: 297–320.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyes Braem, P.
1999Rhythmic temporal patterns in the signing of deaf early and later learners of Swiss German Sign Language. Language & Speech 42: 177–208.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, D.
1998A Prosodic Model of Sign Language Phonology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brentari, D. & Crossley, L.
2002Prosody on the hands and face: Evidence from American Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 5: 105–130.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, D., Nadolske, M. & Wolford, G.
2012Can experience with co-speech gesture influence the prosody of a sign language? Sign language prosodic cues in bimodal bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15(2): 402–412.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentari, D., González, C., Seidl, A. & Wilbur, R. B.
2011Sensitivity to visual prosodic cues in signers and nonsigners. Language & Speech 54: 49–72.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González, C.
2011Perception of Prosody in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Purdue University.Google Scholar
Green, K.
1984Sign boundaries in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 42: 65–91.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosjean, F. & Lane, H.
1977Pauses and syntax in American Sign Language. Cognition 5: 101–117.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosvald, M. A.
2009Long-distance Coarticulation: A Production and Perception Study of English and American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California at Davis.Google Scholar
Kantor, R.
1978Identifying native and second-language signers. In Sign Language Research, R. B. Wilbur (ed), Special issue of Communication and Cognition 11(1): 39–55.Google Scholar
Kröger, B. J., Birkholz, P., Kannampuzha, J., Kaufmann, E. & Mittelberg, I.
2011Movements and holds in fluent sentence production of American Sign Language: The action-based approach. Cognitive Computation 3(3): 449–465.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liddell, S. K.
1977An Investigation into the Syntactic Structure of American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Lupton, L. K.
1998Fluency in American Sign Language. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 3(4): 320–328.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lupton, L. K. & Zelaznik, H.
1990Motor learning in sign language students. Sign Language Studies 67: 153–174.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weast, T.
2008Questions in American Sign Language: A Quantitative Analysis of Raised and Lowered Eyebrows. Phd dissertation, University of Texas, Arlington, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Malaia, E.
2014It still isn’t over: Event boundaries in language and perception. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(3): 89–98.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Current and future methodologies for quantitative analysis of information transfer in sign language and gesture data. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.Google Scholar
Malaia, E., Borneman, J. D. & Wilbur, R. B.
2016Assessment of information content in visual signal: analysis of optical flow fractal complexity. Visual Cognition 24(3): 246–251.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017Information transfer capacity of articulators in American Sign Language. Language and Speech. doi:DOI logo.Google Scholar
Malaia, E., Ranaweera, R., Wilbur R. B. & Talavage, T. M.
2012Neural representation of event structure in American Sign Language: fMRI comparison of cortical activations in deaf signers and hearing non-signers. Neuroimage 59: 4094–4101.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malaia, E. & Wilbur, R. B.
2012aKinematic signatures of telic and atelic events in ASL predicates. Language & Speech 55(3): 407–421.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012bTelicity expression in the visual modality. In Telicity, Change, and State: A Cross-categorial View of Event Structure, V. Demonte & L. McNally (eds), 122–136. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malaia, E., Wilbur, R. B. & Milković, M.
2013Kinematic parameters of signed verbs at the morpho-phonology interface. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 56: 1677–1688.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malaia, E., Wilbur, R. B. & Weber-Fox, C.
2013Event end-point primes the undergoer argument: Neurobiological bases of event structure processing. In Studies in the Composition and Decomposition of Event Predicates, B. Arsenijevic, B. Gehrke & R. Marin (eds), 231–248. Dordrecht: Springer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauk, C. E.
2003Undershoot in Two Modalities: Evidence from Fast Speech and Fast Signing. PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
Mauk, C. E. & Tyrone, M. E.
2008Sign lowering as phonetic reduction in American Sign Language. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Seminar on Speech Production, R. Sock, S. Fuchs & Y. Laprie (eds), 185–188. [URL]Google Scholar
2012Location in ASL: Insights from phonetic variation. Sign Language & Linguistics 15(1): 128–146.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J., Wolfe, R., Wilbur, R. B., Moncrief, R., Malaia, E., Fujimoto, S., Baowidan, S. & Stec, J.
2016A new tool to facilitate prosodic analysis of motion capture data and a data-driven technique for the improvement of avatar motion. In Proceedings of the Seventh Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Corpus Mining (LREC-2016), 153–158, Portorož, Slovenia.Google Scholar
Milković, M.
2011Verb Classes in Croatian Sign Language (HZJ): Syntactic and Semantic Properties PhD dissertation, University of Zagreb, Croatia.Google Scholar
Nespor, M. & Sandler, W.
1999Prosody in Israeli Sign Language. Language and Speech 42: 143–176.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ormel, E. & Crasborn, O.
2012Prosodic correlates of sentences in signed languages: A literature review and suggestions for new types of studies. Sign Language Studies 12(2): 279–315.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfeiffer, T.
2013Documentation of gestures with motion capture. In Body – Language – Communication, C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, H. S. Ladewig, D. McNeill & S. Tessendorf (eds), 857–868. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, T., Hofmann, F., Hahn, F., Rieser, H. & Röpke, I.
2013Gesture semantics reconstruction based on motion capturing and complex event processing: A circular shape example. In Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2013 Conference, Maxine Eskenazi, Michael Strube, Barbara Di Eugenio & Jason D. Williams (eds), 270–279. Metz: ACL. [URL]
Russell, K., Wilkinson, E. & Janzen, T.
2011ASL sign lowering as undershoot: A corpus study. Laboratory Phonology 2(2): 403–422.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, W.
2012Visual prosody. In Sign language, R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds), 55–76. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandler, W. & Lillo-Martin, D.
2006Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, G., Brentari, D., González, C., & Sze, F.
2010Crosslinguistic variation in prosodic cues. In Sign languages, D. Brentari (ed), 519–542. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyrone, M. E.
2007Simultaneity in atypical signers – Implications for the structure of signed language. In Simultaneity in Signed Language: Form and Function [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 281], M. Vermeerbergen, L. Leeson & O. Crasborn (eds), 317–335. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyrone, M. E., Nam, H., Saltzman, E., Mathur, G. & Goldstein, L.
2010Prosody and movement in American Sign Language: A task-dynamics approach. In Speech Prosody 2010 Conference Proceedings. [URL]
Tyrone, M. E., Atkinson, J. R., Marshall, J. & Woll, B.
2009The effects of cerebellar ataxia on sign language production: A case study. Neurocase 15(5): 419–426.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tyrone, M. E. & Mauk, C. E.
2010Sign lowering and phonetic reduction in American Sign Language. Journal of Phonetics 38(2): 317–328.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malaia, E., Wilbur, R. B.
2012Kinematic signatures of telic and atelic events in ASL predicates. Language and Speech 55(3): 407–421. Scholar
Wilbur, R. B.
1990An experimental investigation of stressed sign production. International Journal of Sign Linguistics 1(1): 41–59.Google Scholar
1994Eyeblinks and ASL phrase structure. Sign Language Studies 84: 221–240.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997A prosodic/pragmatic explanation for word order variation in ASL with typological implications. In Lexical and Syntactic Constructions and the Construction of Meaning, Vol. 1 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 150], M. Verspoor, K. D. Lee & E. Sweetser (eds) 89–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999Stress in ASL: Empirical evidence and linguistic issues. Language & Speech 42: 229–250.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000Phonological and prosodic layering of non-manuals in American Sign Language. In The Signs of Language Revisited: Festschrift for Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, H. Lane & K. Emmorey (eds), 213–241. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2009Effects of varying rate of signing on ASL manual signs and non-manual markers. Language & Speech 52(2–3): 245–285.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010The semantics-phonology interface. In Sign languages, D. Brentari (ed), 357–382. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011bSign syllables. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, M. van Oostendorp, C. J. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice (eds), 1309–1334. Oxford: Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, R. B. & Patschke, C.
1998Body leans and marking contrast in ASL. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 275–303.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, R. B. & Malaia, E.
2008Contributions of sign language research to gesture understanding: What can multimodal computational systems learn from sign language research. International Journal of Semantic Computing 2(1): 5–19.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, R. B. & Schick, B. S.
1987The effects of linguistic stress on ASL signs. Language & Speech 30: 301–323.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilbur, R. B.
2003Representations of telicity in ASL. Chicago Linguistics Society 39, 354–368.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Catteau, Fanny
2022. Translating sign language poetry into spoken French. Sign Language & Linguistics 25:1  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Krebs, Julia, Evie Malaia, Ronnie B. Wilbur & Dietmar Roehm
2020. Interaction between topic marking and subject preference strategy in sign language processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 35:4  pp. 466 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.