A centering theoretic account for the changing usage of anaphoric expressions in the history of German
The Centering status of a referent and the coherence relation of the discourse unit in which the referent is used are potential factors for anaphor resolution. In Old High German, as exemplified with Otfrid’s Evangelienbuch, there is a strong tendency for this generalisation – Backward looking centers in Continue relations tend to be realised by personal pronouns, in Retain and Shift relations, they tend to be realised by demonstrative pronouns – but it is far from categorical. There are even blatant violations of generalizations that hold for Modern German, so the importance of Centering as a factor is higher today than in Old High German. In Early New High German of the 14th century, anaphora resolution was sensitive to Centering. The hierarchical structure of a text played a bigger role, as adjacency was defined not strictly linearly, but with respect to discourse units on the same hierarchical level.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Aims of this paper
- 1.2Centering theory
- 2.Anaphoric expressions in modern German from a centering perspective
- 3.Old High German – does centering play a role for the choice of anaphoric expressions?
- 4.Later periods
- 5.Conclusions
-
Notes
-
References
References (36)
References
Abraham, W. 2002. Pronomina im Diskurs: Deutsche Personal- und Demonstrativpronomina unter Zentrierungsperspektive. Grammatische Überlegungen zu einer Teiltheorie der Textkohärenz. Sprachwissenschaft 27: 447–491.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ahrenholz, B. 2007. Verweise mit Demonstrativa im gesprochenen Deutsch. Grammatik, Zweitspracherwerb und Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Berlin: De Gruyter.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Altmann, H. 1981. Formen der Herausstellung im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ariel, M. 1990. Accessing NP antecedents. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Axel, K. & Weiß, H. 2011. Pro-drop in the history of German. From Old High German to the modern dialects. In Null Pronouns, P. Gallmann & M. Wratil (eds), 21–51. Berlin: De Gruyter.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bethke, I. 1990. Der, die, das als Pronomen. München: Judicium.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bosch, P. 2012. Parameters of anaphoric reference for German personal and demonstrative pronouns. Talk given at 34th DGfS Annual Meeting, Frankfurt, March 8, 2012.
Bosch, P., Rozario, T. & Zhao, Y. 2003. Demonstrative pronouns and personal pronouns. German der vs. er. Proceedings of the EACL 2003, Budapest.
Bosch, P., Katz, G. & Umbach, C. 2007. The non-subject bias of German demonstrative pronouns. In Anaphors in Text: Cognitive, Formal and Applied Approaches to Anaphoric Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series 86], M. Schwarz-Friesel, M. Consten & M. Knees (eds), 145–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bosch, P. & Umbach C. 2007. Reference determination for demonstrative pronouns. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 48: 39–51.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardinaletti, A. & Starke, M. 1996. Deficient pronouns: A view from Germanic. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, Vol. II, H. Thráinsson, S. D. Epstein & S. Peter (eds), 21–65. Dordrecht: Kluwer.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chiarcos, C., Claus, B. & Grabski, M. 2011. Introduction: Salience in linguistics and beyond. In Salience: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on its Functions in Discourse, C. Chiarcos, B. Claus & M. Grabski (eds), 1–28. Berlin: De Gruyter.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Eggenberger, J. 1961. Das Subjektpronomen im Althochdeutschen. Ein syntaktischer Beitrag zur Frühgeschichte des deutschen Schrifttums. Grabs: Selbstverlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ellert, M. 2010. Ambiguous Pronoun Resolution in L1 and L2 German and Dutch. PhD dissertation, MPI Nijmegen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grosz, B. & Sidner, C. 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12: 175–204.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grosz, B., Joshi, A. K. & Weinstein, S. 1995. Centering: A framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 21: 203–225.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N. & Zacharski R. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69: 274–307.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nübling, D. 1992. Klitika im Deutschen. Schriftsprache, Umgangssprache, alemannische Dialekte. Tübingen: Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Petrova, S. & Solf, M. 2010. Pronominale Wiederaufnahme im ältesten Deutsch. In Historische Textgrammatik und historische Syntax des Deutschen, A. Ziegler & C. Braun (eds), 339–363. Berlin: De Gruyter.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Primus, B. 2011. Animacy, generalized semantic roles, and different object marking. In Case, Word Order, and Prominence. Interacting Cues in Language Production and Comprehension, M. Lamers & P. de Swart (eds), 65–90. Dordrecht: Springer.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schlachter, E. 2012. Syntax und Informationsstruktur im Althochdeutschen. Untersuchungen am Beispiel der Isidorgruppe. Heidelberg: Winter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shaer, B. & Frey, W. 2004. ‘Integrated’ and ‘non-integrated’ left-peripheral elements in German and English. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 35: 465–502.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Somers Wicka, K. 2009. From Phonology to Syntax: Pronominal Cliticization in Otfrid’s Evangelienbuch. Tübingen: Niemeyer.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Speyer, A. 2007. Die Bedeutung der Centering Theory für Fragen der Vorfeldbesetzung im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 26: 83–115.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Speyer, A. 2016. Factors determining the choice of anaphora in Old High German – A survey of zero and personal pronoun usage in Otfrid. In Experimental Perspectives on Anaphora Resolution,A. Holler & K. Suckow (eds), 113–141. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Strube, M. & Hahn, U. 1996. Functional centering. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 270–277.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Turan, Ü.D. 1998. Ranking forward-looking centers in Turkish: Universals and language-specific properties. In Centering Theory in Discourse, M. A. Walker, A. K. Joshi & E. F. Prince (eds), 139–160. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Dyke, J. 2012. The role of memory in language and communication. In Cognition and Acquired Language Disorders: A Process-oriented Approach, R. Peach & L. Shapiro (eds), 94–120. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier.![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Walker, M. A., Joshi, A. K. & Prince, E. F. 1998. Centering in naturally occurring discourse: An overview. In Centering Theory in Discourse, M. A. Walker, A. K. Joshi & E. F. Prince (eds), 1–28. Oxford: OUP. ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Winter, Y. 2003. Parameter zur Bestimmung der Referenz von Demonstrativpronomina in Texten. Versuch einer Analyse mit Hilfe der Centering Theory. BA thesis, Osnabrück.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)