Part of
Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages
Edited by Annika Hübl and Markus Steinbach
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 247] 2018
► pp. 119142
References (36)
References
Abraham, W. 2002. Pronomina im Diskurs: Deutsche Personal- und Demonstrativpronomina unter Zentrierungsperspektive. Grammatische Überlegungen zu einer Teiltheorie der Textkohärenz. Sprachwissenschaft 27: 447–491.Google Scholar
2007a. Discourse binding. DPs and pronouns in German, Dutch, and English. In Nominal Determination. Typology, Context Constraints, and Historical Emergence [Studies in Language Companion Series 89], E. Stark, E. Leiss & W. Abraham (eds), 21–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007b. The discourse-functional crystallization of the historically original demonstrative. In Nominal Determination. Typology, Context Constraints, and Historical Emergence [Studies in Language Companion Series 89], 241–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ahrenholz, B. 2007. Verweise mit Demonstrativa im gesprochenen Deutsch. Grammatik, Zweitspracherwerb und Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altmann, H. 1981. Formen der Herausstellung im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, M. 1990. Accessing NP antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2001. Accessibility theory: An overview. In Text representation, T. Sanders, J. Schliperoord & W. Spooren (eds), 29–87. Amsterdam: Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Axel, K. 2007. Studies on Old High German Syntax. Left Sentence Periphery, Verb Placement and Verb-second [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 112]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Axel, K. & Weiß, H. 2011. Pro-drop in the history of German. From Old High German to the modern dialects. In Null Pronouns, P. Gallmann & M. Wratil (eds), 21–51. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bethke, I. 1990. Der, die, das als Pronomen. München: Judicium.Google Scholar
Bosch, P. 2012. Parameters of anaphoric reference for German personal and demonstrative pronouns. Talk given at 34th DGfS Annual Meeting, Frankfurt, March 8, 2012.
Bosch, P., Rozario, T. & Zhao, Y. 2003. Demonstrative pronouns and personal pronouns. German der vs. er. Proceedings of the EACL 2003, Budapest.
Bosch, P., Katz, G. & Umbach, C. 2007. The non-subject bias of German demonstrative pronouns. In Anaphors in Text: Cognitive, Formal and Applied Approaches to Anaphoric Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series 86], M. Schwarz-Friesel, M. Consten & M. Knees (eds), 145–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bosch, P. & Umbach C. 2007. Reference determination for demonstrative pronouns. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 48: 39–51.Google Scholar
Bublitz, W., Lenk, U. & Ventola, E. (eds). 1999. Coherence in Spoken and Written Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 63]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, A. & Starke, M. 1996. Deficient pronouns: A view from Germanic. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax, Vol. II, H. Thráinsson, S. D. Epstein & S. Peter (eds), 21–65. Dordrecht: Kluwer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chiarcos, C., Claus, B. & Grabski, M. 2011. Introduction: Salience in linguistics and beyond. In Salience: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on its Functions in Discourse, C. Chiarcos, B. Claus & M. Grabski (eds), 1–28. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eggenberger, J. 1961. Das Subjektpronomen im Althochdeutschen. Ein syntaktischer Beitrag zur Frühgeschichte des deutschen Schrifttums. Grabs: Selbstverlag.Google Scholar
Ellert, M. 2010. Ambiguous Pronoun Resolution in L1 and L2 German and Dutch. PhD dissertation, MPI Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Grosz, B. & Sidner, C. 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12: 175–204.Google Scholar
Grosz, B., Joshi, A. K. & Weinstein, S. 1995. Centering: A framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 21: 203–225.Google Scholar
Gundel, J. K., Hedberg, N. & Zacharski R. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69: 274–307.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nübling, D. 1992. Klitika im Deutschen. Schriftsprache, Umgangssprache, alemannische Dialekte. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Petrova, S. & Solf, M. 2010. Pronominale Wiederaufnahme im ältesten Deutsch. In Historische Textgrammatik und historische Syntax des Deutschen, A. Ziegler & C. Braun (eds), 339–363. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Primus, B. 2011. Animacy, generalized semantic roles, and different object marking. In Case, Word Order, and Prominence. Interacting Cues in Language Production and Comprehension, M. Lamers & P. de Swart (eds), 65–90. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Schlachter, E. 2012. Syntax und Informationsstruktur im Althochdeutschen. Untersuchungen am Beispiel der Isidorgruppe. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Shaer, B. & Frey, W. 2004. ‘Integrated’ and ‘non-integrated’ left-peripheral elements in German and English. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 35: 465–502.Google Scholar
Somers Wicka, K. 2009. From Phonology to Syntax: Pronominal Cliticization in Otfrid’s Evangelienbuch. Tübingen: Niemeyer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speyer, A. 2007. Die Bedeutung der Centering Theory für Fragen der Vorfeldbesetzung im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 26: 83–115.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speyer, A. 2016. Factors determining the choice of anaphora in Old High German – A survey of zero and personal pronoun usage in Otfrid. In Experimental Perspectives on Anaphora Resolution,A. Holler & K. Suckow (eds), 113–141. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Stark, E., Leiss, E. & Abraham, W. (eds) 2007. Nominal Determination. Typology, Context Constraints, and Historical Emergence [Studies in Language Companion Series 89]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strube, M. & Hahn, U. 1996. Functional centering. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 270–277.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turan, Ü.D. 1998. Ranking forward-looking centers in Turkish: Universals and language-specific properties. In Centering Theory in Discourse, M. A. Walker, A. K. Joshi & E. F. Prince (eds), 139–160. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
van Dyke, J. 2012. The role of memory in language and communication. In Cognition and Acquired Language Disorders: A Process-oriented Approach, R. Peach & L. Shapiro (eds), 94–120. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker, M. A., Joshi, A. K. & Prince, E. F. 1998. Centering in naturally occurring discourse: An overview. In Centering Theory in Discourse, M. A. Walker, A. K. Joshi & E. F. Prince (eds), 1–28. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar
Winter, Y. 2003. Parameter zur Bestimmung der Referenz von Demonstrativpronomina in Texten. Versuch einer Analyse mit Hilfe der Centering Theory. BA thesis, Osnabrück.Google Scholar