Part of
Linguistic Foundations of Narration in Spoken and Sign Languages
Edited by Annika Hübl and Markus Steinbach
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 247] 2018
► pp. 251274
Almor, A.
1999Constraints and mechanisms in theories of anaphor processing. In Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, M. Crocker, M. Pickering & C. Clifton (eds), 341–354. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ariel, M.
1990Accessing Noun-phrase Antecedents. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. E.
2010How speakers refer: The role of accessibility. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(4): 187–203.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benedicto, E. & Brentari, D.
2004Where did all the arguments go? Argument-changing properties of classifiers in ASL. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22(4): 743–810.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chang, J., Su, S. & Tai, J. H.-Y.
2005Classifier predicates reanalysed, with special reference to Taiwan Sign Language. Language and Linguistics 6(2): 247–278.Google Scholar
Charolles, M.
1999Associative anaphora and its interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 311–326.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuxac, C.
2000La Langue des Signes Française (LSF): Les voies de lʼiconicité. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Earis, H. & Cormier, K.
2013Point of view in British Sign Language and spoken English narrative discourse: The example of ‘The Tortoise and the Hare’. Language and Cognition 5(4): 314–343.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, E. & Pedersen, A.
1985Proforms in Danish Sign Language. Their use in figurative meaning. In SLR’83 Proceedings of the III International Symposium on Sign Language Research, W. Stokoe & V. Volterra (eds), 202–210. Silver Spring MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
Friedman, L.
1975Space, time, and person reference in American Sign Language. Language 51(4): 940–961.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garcia, B. & Sallandre M.-A.
2013Reference resolution in French Sign Language (LSF). In Crosslinguistic Studies on Noun Phrase Structure and Reference [Syntax and Semantics 39], P. Cabredo Hofherr & A. Zribi-Hertz (eds), 316–364. Leiden: Brill.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Glück, S. & Pfau, R.
1998On classifying classification as a class of inflection in German Sign Language. In ConSole VI Proceedings, T. Cambier-Langeveld, A. Lipták & M. Redford (eds), 59–74. Leiden: Sole.Google Scholar
Grosz, B., Joshi, A. & Weinstein, S.
1995Centering: A framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 2(21): 203–225.Google Scholar
Gundel, J., Hedberg, N. & Zacharski, R.
1993Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69: 274–307.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, M.
2007Why can German Sign Language (DGS) do without a passive construction? Ways of marking semantic roles in DGS. Dissertation abstract. Sign Language & Linguistics 10(2): 213–222.Google Scholar
Heim, I.
1982The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Herrero, Á.
2004Una aproximación morfológica a las construcciones clasificatorias en la lengua de signos española. ELUA Estudios de lingüística 18: 151–186.Google Scholar
von Heusinger, K.
2007Accessibility and definite noun phrases. In Anaphors in Text: Cognitive, Formal and Applied Approaches to Anaphoric Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series 86], M. Schwarz-Friesel, M. Consten & M. Knees (eds), 123–144. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Janzen, T., O’Dea, B. & Shaffer, B.
2001The construal of events: Passives in American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 1(3): 281–310.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kamp, H. & Reyle, U.
1993From Discourse to Logic. Introduction to Model Theoretic semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kegl, J.
1986Clitics in American Sign Language. In The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics [Syntax and Semantics 19], H. Borer (ed), 285–309. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1990Predicate argument structure and verb-class organization in the American Sign Language lexicon. In Sign Language Research. Theoretical Issues, C. Lucas (ed), 149–176. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Kegl, J. & Wilbur, R.
1976When does structure stop and style begin? Syntax, morphology and phonology vs. stylistic variation in American Sign Language. Papers from the Annual Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society 12: 376–396.Google Scholar
Kibrik, A. A. & Prozorova, E. V.
2007Referential choice in signed and spoken languages. In Proceedings of 6th DAARC, A. Branco, T. McEnery, R. Mitkov & F. Silva (eds), 41–46. Porto: Centro de Linguistica da Universidade do Porto.Google Scholar
Morgan, G.
2006The development of narrative skills in British Sign Language. In Advances in Sign Language Development in Deaf Children, B. Schick, M. Marschark & P. Spencer (eds), 314–343. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. & Woll, B.
2003The development of reference switching enconded through body classifiers in British Sign Language. In Perspectives on Classifier Constructions in Sign Languages, K. Emmorey (ed), 297–310. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Nouwen, R.
2003Plural Pronominal Anaphora in Context: Dynamic Aspects of Quantification. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Perniss, P.
2007Space and Iconicity in German Sign Language (DGS). PhD dissertation, Radboud University.Google Scholar
Prince, E.
1981 Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Radical Pragmatics, P. Cole (ed), 223–256. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Quinto-Pozos, D.
2007Why does constructed action seem obligatory? An analysis of classifiers and the lack of articulator-referent correspondence. Sign Language Studies 7(4): 458–506.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saeed, J. & Leeson, L.
1999Detransitivisation in Irish Sign Language. Paper presented at the European Science Foundation Intersign Meeting on Morphosyntax. Siena, Italy, March.Google Scholar
Schwarz, F.
2013Two kinds of definites cross-linguistically. Language and Linguistics Compass 7(10): 534–559.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Supalla, T.
1986The classifier system in American Sign Language. In Noun Classification and Categorization [Typological Studies in Language 7], C. Craig (ed), 181–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swabey, L.
2002The Cognitive Status, Form and Distribution of Referring Expressions in ASL and English Narratives. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Wilbur, R.
1987American Sign Language: Linguistic and Applied Dimensions. San Diego CA: College-Hill.Google Scholar
Zwitserlood, I.
2003Classifying Hand Configurations in Nederlandse Gebarentaal (Sign Language of the Netherlands). PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
2012Classifiers. In Sign Language. An International Handbook, R. Pfau, M. Steinbach & B. Woll (eds), 158–186. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zwitserlood, I. & van Gijn, I.
2006Agreement phenomena in Sign Language of the Netherlands. In Arguments and Agreement, P. Ackema, P. Brandt, M. Schoorlemmer & F. Weermann (eds), 195–229. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Barberà, Gemma & Josep Quer
2023. Chapter 8. Studying microdiachronic change with the Catalan Sign Language corpus. In Advances in Sign Language Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 108],  pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Ferrara, Lindsay, Benjamin Anible, Gabrielle Hodge, Tommi Jantunen, Lorraine Leeson, Johanna Mesch & Anna-Lena Nilsson
2023. A cross-linguistic comparison of reference across five signed languages. Linguistic Typology 27:3  pp. 591 ff. DOI logo
2019. On the cardinal system in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Journal of Linguistics 55:4  pp. 795 ff. DOI logo
Steinbach, Markus
2023. Angry lions and scared neighbors: Complex demonstrations in sign language role shift at the sign-gesture interface. Linguistics 61:2  pp. 391 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.